Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial
Background Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMI...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2023-03, Vol.71 (3), p.774-784 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 784 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 774 |
container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Sheehan, Orla C. Gleason, Kathy S. Bayliss, Elizabeth A. Green, Ariel R. Drace, Melanie L. Norton, Jonathan Reeve, Emily Shetterly, Susan M. Weffald, Linda A. Sawyer, Jennifer K. Maciejewski, Matthew L. Kraus, Courtney Maiyani, Mahesh Wolff, Jennifer Boyd, Cynthia M. |
description | Background
Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood.
Methods
We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact.
Results
Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing.
Conclusions
Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jgs.18148 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11163949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2754047996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9uFCEUxonR2G31whcwJN7Yi2mBgflzZZqm1jVrauJeeUNYODNlw8AIM2v2zofwCX0SqVsbNREuIDk_vvMdPoReUHJG8zrf9umMNpQ3j9CCipIVglPxGC0IIaxoKsqP0HFKW0IoI03zFB2VlSBNzcQC7Zd-grgDP9ngsYFke4-txzr03k52B26P7TAqG8HgMYyzU3dk-vHt-wpSyjfsQEWfq10MA55uAd98XC8_LD9fZbkxQtLRbqzv8RhVP-TXGk_RKvcMPemUS_D8_jxB67dX68t3xermenl5sSo057wpSqFLwzphqICqIqXIvluoocnbCFKZTtfcsNZQI7p6U9VMGQqd7mqtBZTlCXpzkB3nzQBG50mjcnKMdlBxL4Oy8u-Kt7eyDzuZP7YqW95mhdf3CjF8mSFNcrBJg3PKQ5iTZLXghNdtW2X01T_oNszR5_EylY2zmnORqdMDpWNIKUL34IaSu7ZU5kDlr0Az-_JP-w_k7wQzcH4AvloH-_8ryffXnw6SPwG_7a7B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787227445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sheehan, Orla C. ; Gleason, Kathy S. ; Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ; Green, Ariel R. ; Drace, Melanie L. ; Norton, Jonathan ; Reeve, Emily ; Shetterly, Susan M. ; Weffald, Linda A. ; Sawyer, Jennifer K. ; Maciejewski, Matthew L. ; Kraus, Courtney ; Maiyani, Mahesh ; Wolff, Jennifer ; Boyd, Cynthia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Orla C. ; Gleason, Kathy S. ; Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ; Green, Ariel R. ; Drace, Melanie L. ; Norton, Jonathan ; Reeve, Emily ; Shetterly, Susan M. ; Weffald, Linda A. ; Sawyer, Jennifer K. ; Maciejewski, Matthew L. ; Kraus, Courtney ; Maiyani, Mahesh ; Wolff, Jennifer ; Boyd, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood.
Methods
We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact.
Results
Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing.
Conclusions
Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36508725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Caregivers ; Chronic illnesses ; Cognitive ability ; cognitive impairment ; deprescribing ; Deprescriptions ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Elder care ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intervention ; intervention delivery ; Older people ; Polypharmacy ; Potentially Inappropriate Medication List ; Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2023-03, Vol.71 (3), p.774-784</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgs.18148$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgs.18148$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Orla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleason, Kathy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Ariel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drace, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weffald, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraus, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiyani, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><title>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Background
Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood.
Methods
We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact.
Results
Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing.
Conclusions
Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>cognitive impairment</subject><subject>deprescribing</subject><subject>Deprescriptions</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>Elder care</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>intervention delivery</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Potentially Inappropriate Medication List</subject><subject>Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9uFCEUxonR2G31whcwJN7Yi2mBgflzZZqm1jVrauJeeUNYODNlw8AIM2v2zofwCX0SqVsbNREuIDk_vvMdPoReUHJG8zrf9umMNpQ3j9CCipIVglPxGC0IIaxoKsqP0HFKW0IoI03zFB2VlSBNzcQC7Zd-grgDP9ngsYFke4-txzr03k52B26P7TAqG8HgMYyzU3dk-vHt-wpSyjfsQEWfq10MA55uAd98XC8_LD9fZbkxQtLRbqzv8RhVP-TXGk_RKvcMPemUS_D8_jxB67dX68t3xermenl5sSo057wpSqFLwzphqICqIqXIvluoocnbCFKZTtfcsNZQI7p6U9VMGQqd7mqtBZTlCXpzkB3nzQBG50mjcnKMdlBxL4Oy8u-Kt7eyDzuZP7YqW95mhdf3CjF8mSFNcrBJg3PKQ5iTZLXghNdtW2X01T_oNszR5_EylY2zmnORqdMDpWNIKUL34IaSu7ZU5kDlr0Az-_JP-w_k7wQzcH4AvloH-_8ryffXnw6SPwG_7a7B</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Sheehan, Orla C.</creator><creator>Gleason, Kathy S.</creator><creator>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Green, Ariel R.</creator><creator>Drace, Melanie L.</creator><creator>Norton, Jonathan</creator><creator>Reeve, Emily</creator><creator>Shetterly, Susan M.</creator><creator>Weffald, Linda A.</creator><creator>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</creator><creator>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creator><creator>Kraus, Courtney</creator><creator>Maiyani, Mahesh</creator><creator>Wolff, Jennifer</creator><creator>Boyd, Cynthia M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</title><author>Sheehan, Orla C. ; Gleason, Kathy S. ; Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ; Green, Ariel R. ; Drace, Melanie L. ; Norton, Jonathan ; Reeve, Emily ; Shetterly, Susan M. ; Weffald, Linda A. ; Sawyer, Jennifer K. ; Maciejewski, Matthew L. ; Kraus, Courtney ; Maiyani, Mahesh ; Wolff, Jennifer ; Boyd, Cynthia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>cognitive impairment</topic><topic>deprescribing</topic><topic>Deprescriptions</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>Elder care</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>intervention delivery</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Potentially Inappropriate Medication List</topic><topic>Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Orla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleason, Kathy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Ariel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drace, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weffald, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraus, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiyani, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheehan, Orla C.</au><au>Gleason, Kathy S.</au><au>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Green, Ariel R.</au><au>Drace, Melanie L.</au><au>Norton, Jonathan</au><au>Reeve, Emily</au><au>Shetterly, Susan M.</au><au>Weffald, Linda A.</au><au>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</au><au>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</au><au>Kraus, Courtney</au><au>Maiyani, Mahesh</au><au>Wolff, Jennifer</au><au>Boyd, Cynthia M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>774</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>774-784</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>Background
Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood.
Methods
We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact.
Results
Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing.
Conclusions
Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36508725</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.18148</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2023-03, Vol.71 (3), p.774-784 |
issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11163949 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Caregivers Chronic illnesses Cognitive ability cognitive impairment deprescribing Deprescriptions Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions Elder care Hospitalization Humans Intervention intervention delivery Older people Polypharmacy Potentially Inappropriate Medication List Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic |
title | Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intervention%20design%20in%20cognitively%20impaired%20populations%E2%80%94Lessons%20learned%20from%20the%20OPTIMIZE%20deprescribing%20pragmatic%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Sheehan,%20Orla%20C.&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=774-784&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.18148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2754047996%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787227445&rft_id=info:pmid/36508725&rfr_iscdi=true |