Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial

Background Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2023-03, Vol.71 (3), p.774-784
Hauptverfasser: Sheehan, Orla C., Gleason, Kathy S., Bayliss, Elizabeth A., Green, Ariel R., Drace, Melanie L., Norton, Jonathan, Reeve, Emily, Shetterly, Susan M., Weffald, Linda A., Sawyer, Jennifer K., Maciejewski, Matthew L., Kraus, Courtney, Maiyani, Mahesh, Wolff, Jennifer, Boyd, Cynthia M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 784
container_issue 3
container_start_page 774
container_title Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)
container_volume 71
creator Sheehan, Orla C.
Gleason, Kathy S.
Bayliss, Elizabeth A.
Green, Ariel R.
Drace, Melanie L.
Norton, Jonathan
Reeve, Emily
Shetterly, Susan M.
Weffald, Linda A.
Sawyer, Jennifer K.
Maciejewski, Matthew L.
Kraus, Courtney
Maiyani, Mahesh
Wolff, Jennifer
Boyd, Cynthia M.
description Background Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood. Methods We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact. Results Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing. Conclusions Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgs.18148
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11163949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2754047996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9uFCEUxonR2G31whcwJN7Yi2mBgflzZZqm1jVrauJeeUNYODNlw8AIM2v2zofwCX0SqVsbNREuIDk_vvMdPoReUHJG8zrf9umMNpQ3j9CCipIVglPxGC0IIaxoKsqP0HFKW0IoI03zFB2VlSBNzcQC7Zd-grgDP9ngsYFke4-txzr03k52B26P7TAqG8HgMYyzU3dk-vHt-wpSyjfsQEWfq10MA55uAd98XC8_LD9fZbkxQtLRbqzv8RhVP-TXGk_RKvcMPemUS_D8_jxB67dX68t3xermenl5sSo057wpSqFLwzphqICqIqXIvluoocnbCFKZTtfcsNZQI7p6U9VMGQqd7mqtBZTlCXpzkB3nzQBG50mjcnKMdlBxL4Oy8u-Kt7eyDzuZP7YqW95mhdf3CjF8mSFNcrBJg3PKQ5iTZLXghNdtW2X01T_oNszR5_EylY2zmnORqdMDpWNIKUL34IaSu7ZU5kDlr0Az-_JP-w_k7wQzcH4AvloH-_8ryffXnw6SPwG_7a7B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787227445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sheehan, Orla C. ; Gleason, Kathy S. ; Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ; Green, Ariel R. ; Drace, Melanie L. ; Norton, Jonathan ; Reeve, Emily ; Shetterly, Susan M. ; Weffald, Linda A. ; Sawyer, Jennifer K. ; Maciejewski, Matthew L. ; Kraus, Courtney ; Maiyani, Mahesh ; Wolff, Jennifer ; Boyd, Cynthia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Orla C. ; Gleason, Kathy S. ; Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ; Green, Ariel R. ; Drace, Melanie L. ; Norton, Jonathan ; Reeve, Emily ; Shetterly, Susan M. ; Weffald, Linda A. ; Sawyer, Jennifer K. ; Maciejewski, Matthew L. ; Kraus, Courtney ; Maiyani, Mahesh ; Wolff, Jennifer ; Boyd, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood. Methods We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact. Results Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing. Conclusions Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36508725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Caregivers ; Chronic illnesses ; Cognitive ability ; cognitive impairment ; deprescribing ; Deprescriptions ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Elder care ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intervention ; intervention delivery ; Older people ; Polypharmacy ; Potentially Inappropriate Medication List ; Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2023-03, Vol.71 (3), p.774-784</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgs.18148$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgs.18148$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Orla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleason, Kathy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Ariel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drace, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weffald, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraus, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiyani, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><title>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Background Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood. Methods We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact. Results Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing. Conclusions Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>cognitive impairment</subject><subject>deprescribing</subject><subject>Deprescriptions</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>Elder care</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>intervention delivery</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Polypharmacy</subject><subject>Potentially Inappropriate Medication List</subject><subject>Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9uFCEUxonR2G31whcwJN7Yi2mBgflzZZqm1jVrauJeeUNYODNlw8AIM2v2zofwCX0SqVsbNREuIDk_vvMdPoReUHJG8zrf9umMNpQ3j9CCipIVglPxGC0IIaxoKsqP0HFKW0IoI03zFB2VlSBNzcQC7Zd-grgDP9ngsYFke4-txzr03k52B26P7TAqG8HgMYyzU3dk-vHt-wpSyjfsQEWfq10MA55uAd98XC8_LD9fZbkxQtLRbqzv8RhVP-TXGk_RKvcMPemUS_D8_jxB67dX68t3xermenl5sSo057wpSqFLwzphqICqIqXIvluoocnbCFKZTtfcsNZQI7p6U9VMGQqd7mqtBZTlCXpzkB3nzQBG50mjcnKMdlBxL4Oy8u-Kt7eyDzuZP7YqW95mhdf3CjF8mSFNcrBJg3PKQ5iTZLXghNdtW2X01T_oNszR5_EylY2zmnORqdMDpWNIKUL34IaSu7ZU5kDlr0Az-_JP-w_k7wQzcH4AvloH-_8ryffXnw6SPwG_7a7B</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Sheehan, Orla C.</creator><creator>Gleason, Kathy S.</creator><creator>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Green, Ariel R.</creator><creator>Drace, Melanie L.</creator><creator>Norton, Jonathan</creator><creator>Reeve, Emily</creator><creator>Shetterly, Susan M.</creator><creator>Weffald, Linda A.</creator><creator>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</creator><creator>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creator><creator>Kraus, Courtney</creator><creator>Maiyani, Mahesh</creator><creator>Wolff, Jennifer</creator><creator>Boyd, Cynthia M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</title><author>Sheehan, Orla C. ; Gleason, Kathy S. ; Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ; Green, Ariel R. ; Drace, Melanie L. ; Norton, Jonathan ; Reeve, Emily ; Shetterly, Susan M. ; Weffald, Linda A. ; Sawyer, Jennifer K. ; Maciejewski, Matthew L. ; Kraus, Courtney ; Maiyani, Mahesh ; Wolff, Jennifer ; Boyd, Cynthia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-35c3d2f5d15e660358729e7e8e8ed506dfc74d29d1d5f7b672ad1efcf7cc5e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>cognitive impairment</topic><topic>deprescribing</topic><topic>Deprescriptions</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>Elder care</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>intervention delivery</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Polypharmacy</topic><topic>Potentially Inappropriate Medication List</topic><topic>Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Orla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleason, Kathy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Ariel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drace, Melanie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weffald, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraus, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiyani, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheehan, Orla C.</au><au>Gleason, Kathy S.</au><au>Bayliss, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Green, Ariel R.</au><au>Drace, Melanie L.</au><au>Norton, Jonathan</au><au>Reeve, Emily</au><au>Shetterly, Susan M.</au><au>Weffald, Linda A.</au><au>Sawyer, Jennifer K.</au><au>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</au><au>Kraus, Courtney</au><au>Maiyani, Mahesh</au><au>Wolff, Jennifer</au><au>Boyd, Cynthia M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>774</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>774-784</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>Background Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood. Methods We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact. Results Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing. Conclusions Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36508725</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.18148</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8614
ispartof Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2023-03, Vol.71 (3), p.774-784
issn 0002-8614
1532-5415
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11163949
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Caregivers
Chronic illnesses
Cognitive ability
cognitive impairment
deprescribing
Deprescriptions
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Elder care
Hospitalization
Humans
Intervention
intervention delivery
Older people
Polypharmacy
Potentially Inappropriate Medication List
Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
title Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations—Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intervention%20design%20in%20cognitively%20impaired%20populations%E2%80%94Lessons%20learned%20from%20the%20OPTIMIZE%20deprescribing%20pragmatic%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Sheehan,%20Orla%20C.&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=774-784&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.18148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2754047996%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787227445&rft_id=info:pmid/36508725&rfr_iscdi=true