Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials
The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2024-07, Vol.119 (3), p.737-749 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 749 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 737 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Li, Heng Mayr, Nina A. Griffin, Robert J. Zhang, Hualin Pokhrel, Damodar Grams, Michael Penagaricano, Jose Chang, Sha Spraker, Matthew B. Kavanaugh, James Lin, Liyong Sheikh, Khadija Mossahebi, Sina Simone, Charles B. Roberge, David Snider, James W. Sabouri, Pouya Molineu, Andrea Xiao, Ying Benedict, Stanley H. |
description | The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials.
Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials.
Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy.
Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11162930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301623082469</els_id><sourcerecordid>2903858906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c2939ffec31ecbbbad42278a8ae96087d3f4841316bdffbecf683e216faf9f8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0DIRy4J_sh6nQsIrShFKmoFi8TNcuwx9SqJg-0s2n-Pt9tW5dLTSPYz74zmQegNJTUlVLzf1n4bQzfVjDBeU1YTyp-hBZWrtuLL5a_naEG4IBUv8Ak6TWlLCKF01bxEJ1zSkkGaBdpf7SDuPPzFerT4O5gwDDBanX0YE3Yh4usY0gQm-x3gb3OffeXHlH2eD4ju8Y-pwLrv9_g8anP7mKFEaetvU_DmBqKe9njd-9Gb0rGJhU-v0AtXCry-q2fo5_nnzfqiurz68nX96bIyjWhyZVjLW-fAcAqm6zptG8ZWUksNrSByZblrZEM5FZ11rgPjhOTAqHDatU52_Ax9POZOczeANTDmqHs1RT_ouFdBe_X_z-hv1O-wU5RSUYaTkvDuLiGGPzOkrAafDPS9HiHMSbGWcLmULREFbY6oKVdLEdzDHErUQZvaqqM2ddCmKFNFW2l7-3jHh6Z7TwX4cASgXKroiioZD6MB62Nxo2zwT0_4B1s8sJE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2903858906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Li, Heng ; Mayr, Nina A. ; Griffin, Robert J. ; Zhang, Hualin ; Pokhrel, Damodar ; Grams, Michael ; Penagaricano, Jose ; Chang, Sha ; Spraker, Matthew B. ; Kavanaugh, James ; Lin, Liyong ; Sheikh, Khadija ; Mossahebi, Sina ; Simone, Charles B. ; Roberge, David ; Snider, James W. ; Sabouri, Pouya ; Molineu, Andrea ; Xiao, Ying ; Benedict, Stanley H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Heng ; Mayr, Nina A. ; Griffin, Robert J. ; Zhang, Hualin ; Pokhrel, Damodar ; Grams, Michael ; Penagaricano, Jose ; Chang, Sha ; Spraker, Matthew B. ; Kavanaugh, James ; Lin, Liyong ; Sheikh, Khadija ; Mossahebi, Sina ; Simone, Charles B. ; Roberge, David ; Snider, James W. ; Sabouri, Pouya ; Molineu, Andrea ; Xiao, Ying ; Benedict, Stanley H.</creatorcontrib><description>The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials.
Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials.
Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy.
Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38110104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic ; Consensus ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Humans ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Prospective Studies ; Radiation Oncology - standards ; Radiobiology ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024-07, Vol.119 (3), p.737-749</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c2939ffec31ecbbbad42278a8ae96087d3f4841316bdffbecf683e216faf9f8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c2939ffec31ecbbbad42278a8ae96087d3f4841316bdffbecf683e216faf9f8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4815-0537</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301623082469$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38110104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Nina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hualin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokhrel, Damodar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grams, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penagaricano, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spraker, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanaugh, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Liyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheikh, Khadija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossahebi, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simone, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberge, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snider, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabouri, Pouya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molineu, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Stanley H.</creatorcontrib><title>Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials.
Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials.
Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy.
Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.</description><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology - standards</subject><subject>Radiobiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0DIRy4J_sh6nQsIrShFKmoFi8TNcuwx9SqJg-0s2n-Pt9tW5dLTSPYz74zmQegNJTUlVLzf1n4bQzfVjDBeU1YTyp-hBZWrtuLL5a_naEG4IBUv8Ak6TWlLCKF01bxEJ1zSkkGaBdpf7SDuPPzFerT4O5gwDDBanX0YE3Yh4usY0gQm-x3gb3OffeXHlH2eD4ju8Y-pwLrv9_g8anP7mKFEaetvU_DmBqKe9njd-9Gb0rGJhU-v0AtXCry-q2fo5_nnzfqiurz68nX96bIyjWhyZVjLW-fAcAqm6zptG8ZWUksNrSByZblrZEM5FZ11rgPjhOTAqHDatU52_Ax9POZOczeANTDmqHs1RT_ouFdBe_X_z-hv1O-wU5RSUYaTkvDuLiGGPzOkrAafDPS9HiHMSbGWcLmULREFbY6oKVdLEdzDHErUQZvaqqM2ddCmKFNFW2l7-3jHh6Z7TwX4cASgXKroiioZD6MB62Nxo2zwT0_4B1s8sJE</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Li, Heng</creator><creator>Mayr, Nina A.</creator><creator>Griffin, Robert J.</creator><creator>Zhang, Hualin</creator><creator>Pokhrel, Damodar</creator><creator>Grams, Michael</creator><creator>Penagaricano, Jose</creator><creator>Chang, Sha</creator><creator>Spraker, Matthew B.</creator><creator>Kavanaugh, James</creator><creator>Lin, Liyong</creator><creator>Sheikh, Khadija</creator><creator>Mossahebi, Sina</creator><creator>Simone, Charles B.</creator><creator>Roberge, David</creator><creator>Snider, James W.</creator><creator>Sabouri, Pouya</creator><creator>Molineu, Andrea</creator><creator>Xiao, Ying</creator><creator>Benedict, Stanley H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-0537</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials</title><author>Li, Heng ; Mayr, Nina A. ; Griffin, Robert J. ; Zhang, Hualin ; Pokhrel, Damodar ; Grams, Michael ; Penagaricano, Jose ; Chang, Sha ; Spraker, Matthew B. ; Kavanaugh, James ; Lin, Liyong ; Sheikh, Khadija ; Mossahebi, Sina ; Simone, Charles B. ; Roberge, David ; Snider, James W. ; Sabouri, Pouya ; Molineu, Andrea ; Xiao, Ying ; Benedict, Stanley H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-c2939ffec31ecbbbad42278a8ae96087d3f4841316bdffbecf683e216faf9f8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology - standards</topic><topic>Radiobiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Nina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hualin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokhrel, Damodar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grams, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penagaricano, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spraker, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanaugh, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Liyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheikh, Khadija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossahebi, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simone, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberge, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snider, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabouri, Pouya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molineu, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Stanley H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Heng</au><au>Mayr, Nina A.</au><au>Griffin, Robert J.</au><au>Zhang, Hualin</au><au>Pokhrel, Damodar</au><au>Grams, Michael</au><au>Penagaricano, Jose</au><au>Chang, Sha</au><au>Spraker, Matthew B.</au><au>Kavanaugh, James</au><au>Lin, Liyong</au><au>Sheikh, Khadija</au><au>Mossahebi, Sina</au><au>Simone, Charles B.</au><au>Roberge, David</au><au>Snider, James W.</au><au>Sabouri, Pouya</au><au>Molineu, Andrea</au><au>Xiao, Ying</au><au>Benedict, Stanley H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>737</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>737-749</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials.
Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials.
Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy.
Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38110104</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.013</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-0537</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024-07, Vol.119 (3), p.737-749 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11162930 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Clinical Trials as Topic Consensus Dose Fractionation, Radiation Humans Multicenter Studies as Topic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Prospective Studies Radiation Oncology - standards Radiobiology Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards |
title | Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overview%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Prospective%20Multi-institutional%20Spatially%20Fractionated%20Radiation%20Therapy%20Clinical%20Trials&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Li,%20Heng&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=737&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=737-749&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2903858906%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2903858906&rft_id=info:pmid/38110104&rft_els_id=S0360301623082469&rfr_iscdi=true |