Evaluation of risk stratification for acute kidney injury: a comparative analysis of EKFC, 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration estimating equations

Background The adoption of the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation provided a race-free eGFR calculation. However, the discriminative performance for AKI risk has been rarely validated. We aimed to evaluate the differences in acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nephrology 2024-04, Vol.37 (3), p.681-693
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Jeong Min, Koh, Jung Hun, Kim, Minsang, Jung, Sehyun, Cho, Semin, Lee, Soojin, Kim, Yaerim, Kim, Yong Chul, Lee, Hajeong, Han, Seung Seok, Oh, Kook-Hwan, Joo, Kwon Wook, Kim, Yon Su, Kim, Dong Ki, Park, Sehoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 693
container_issue 3
container_start_page 681
container_title Journal of nephrology
container_volume 37
creator Cho, Jeong Min
Koh, Jung Hun
Kim, Minsang
Jung, Sehyun
Cho, Semin
Lee, Soojin
Kim, Yaerim
Kim, Yong Chul
Lee, Hajeong
Han, Seung Seok
Oh, Kook-Hwan
Joo, Kwon Wook
Kim, Yon Su
Kim, Dong Ki
Park, Sehoon
description Background The adoption of the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation provided a race-free eGFR calculation. However, the discriminative performance for AKI risk has been rarely validated. We aimed to evaluate the differences in acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction or reclassification power according to the three eGFR equations. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study within a tertiary hospital from 2011 to 2021. Acute kidney injury was defined according to KDIGO serum creatinine criteria. Glomerular filtration rate estimates were calculated by three GFR estimating equations: 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPIcr, and EKFC. In three equations, AKI prediction performance was evaluated with area under receiver operator curves (AUROC) and reclassification power was evaluated with net reclassification improvement analysis. Results A total of 187,139 individuals, including 27,447 (14.7%) AKI and 159,692 (85.3%) controls, were enrolled. In the multivariable regression prediction model, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model (continuous eGFR model 2, 0.7583 [0.755–0.7617]) showed superior performance in AKI prediction to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr (0.7564 [0.7531–0.7597], 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40620-023-01883-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11150313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2926076855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f3d0b7ecbcc779b4d8b222fbe83f4e23570977ffea167b6431a215afbed55fe93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCIlsIf4IB85EDAn3HCBVXLFqpWggOcLcd5Xrx14q2drLS_hT-LtylVuXDy6L15M2MNQq8peU8JUR-yIDUjFWG8IrRpeKWeoFOqmKhqItunj_AJepHzlhAmJRPP0QlvuJB1U5-i3-u9CbOZfBxxdDj5fIPzlMrAebuMXUzY2HkCfOP7EQ7Yj9s5HT5ig20cduZI3gM2owmH7PNRZn11sXqHGSFtGfcFMIpXV5-r9fdLvAlxgDQHk7Dz4c6qmECe_FDguMFwu-TJL9EzZ0KGV_fvGfp5sf6x-lpdf_tyuTq_rqwQaqoc70mnwHbWKtV2om86xpjroOFOAONSkVYp58DQWnW14NQwKk0h9FI6aPkZ-rTo7uZugN7CWFIFvUslUTroaLz-dzP6X3oT95pSKgmnvCi8vVdI8XYuf9GDzxZCMCPEOWvWspqoupGyUNlCtSnmnMA9-FCij7XqpVZdatV3tWpVjt48Tvhw8rfHQuALIZfVuIGkt3FOpZH8P9k_jICwsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2926076855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of risk stratification for acute kidney injury: a comparative analysis of EKFC, 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration estimating equations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Cho, Jeong Min ; Koh, Jung Hun ; Kim, Minsang ; Jung, Sehyun ; Cho, Semin ; Lee, Soojin ; Kim, Yaerim ; Kim, Yong Chul ; Lee, Hajeong ; Han, Seung Seok ; Oh, Kook-Hwan ; Joo, Kwon Wook ; Kim, Yon Su ; Kim, Dong Ki ; Park, Sehoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong Min ; Koh, Jung Hun ; Kim, Minsang ; Jung, Sehyun ; Cho, Semin ; Lee, Soojin ; Kim, Yaerim ; Kim, Yong Chul ; Lee, Hajeong ; Han, Seung Seok ; Oh, Kook-Hwan ; Joo, Kwon Wook ; Kim, Yon Su ; Kim, Dong Ki ; Park, Sehoon</creatorcontrib><description>Background The adoption of the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation provided a race-free eGFR calculation. However, the discriminative performance for AKI risk has been rarely validated. We aimed to evaluate the differences in acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction or reclassification power according to the three eGFR equations. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study within a tertiary hospital from 2011 to 2021. Acute kidney injury was defined according to KDIGO serum creatinine criteria. Glomerular filtration rate estimates were calculated by three GFR estimating equations: 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPIcr, and EKFC. In three equations, AKI prediction performance was evaluated with area under receiver operator curves (AUROC) and reclassification power was evaluated with net reclassification improvement analysis. Results A total of 187,139 individuals, including 27,447 (14.7%) AKI and 159,692 (85.3%) controls, were enrolled. In the multivariable regression prediction model, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model (continuous eGFR model 2, 0.7583 [0.755–0.7617]) showed superior performance in AKI prediction to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr (0.7564 [0.7531–0.7597], &lt; 0.001) or EKFC model in AUROC (0.7577 [0.7543–0.761], &lt; 0.001). Moreover, in reclassification of AKI, the 2021 CKD-EPIcr and EKFC models showed a worse classification performance than the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model. (− 7.24 [− 8.21–− 6.21], − 2.38 [− 2.72–− 1.97]). Conclusion Regarding AKI risk stratification, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr equation showed better discriminative performance compared to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation in the study population. Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1724-6059</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1121-8428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01883-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38345686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acute Kidney Injury - diagnosis ; Acute Kidney Injury - physiopathology ; Adult ; Aged ; Creatinine - blood ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Original ; Original Article ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - diagnosis ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of nephrology, 2024-04, Vol.37 (3), p.681-693</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f3d0b7ecbcc779b4d8b222fbe83f4e23570977ffea167b6431a215afbed55fe93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f3d0b7ecbcc779b4d8b222fbe83f4e23570977ffea167b6431a215afbed55fe93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40620-023-01883-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40620-023-01883-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38345686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Jung Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minsang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Semin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soojin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yaerim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hajeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Seung Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Kook-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Kwon Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yon Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sehoon</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of risk stratification for acute kidney injury: a comparative analysis of EKFC, 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration estimating equations</title><title>Journal of nephrology</title><addtitle>J Nephrol</addtitle><addtitle>J Nephrol</addtitle><description>Background The adoption of the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation provided a race-free eGFR calculation. However, the discriminative performance for AKI risk has been rarely validated. We aimed to evaluate the differences in acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction or reclassification power according to the three eGFR equations. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study within a tertiary hospital from 2011 to 2021. Acute kidney injury was defined according to KDIGO serum creatinine criteria. Glomerular filtration rate estimates were calculated by three GFR estimating equations: 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPIcr, and EKFC. In three equations, AKI prediction performance was evaluated with area under receiver operator curves (AUROC) and reclassification power was evaluated with net reclassification improvement analysis. Results A total of 187,139 individuals, including 27,447 (14.7%) AKI and 159,692 (85.3%) controls, were enrolled. In the multivariable regression prediction model, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model (continuous eGFR model 2, 0.7583 [0.755–0.7617]) showed superior performance in AKI prediction to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr (0.7564 [0.7531–0.7597], &lt; 0.001) or EKFC model in AUROC (0.7577 [0.7543–0.761], &lt; 0.001). Moreover, in reclassification of AKI, the 2021 CKD-EPIcr and EKFC models showed a worse classification performance than the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model. (− 7.24 [− 8.21–− 6.21], − 2.38 [− 2.72–− 1.97]). Conclusion Regarding AKI risk stratification, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr equation showed better discriminative performance compared to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation in the study population. Graphical abstract</description><subject>Acute Kidney Injury - diagnosis</subject><subject>Acute Kidney Injury - physiopathology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Creatinine - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1724-6059</issn><issn>1121-8428</issn><issn>1724-6059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCIlsIf4IB85EDAn3HCBVXLFqpWggOcLcd5Xrx14q2drLS_hT-LtylVuXDy6L15M2MNQq8peU8JUR-yIDUjFWG8IrRpeKWeoFOqmKhqItunj_AJepHzlhAmJRPP0QlvuJB1U5-i3-u9CbOZfBxxdDj5fIPzlMrAebuMXUzY2HkCfOP7EQ7Yj9s5HT5ig20cduZI3gM2owmH7PNRZn11sXqHGSFtGfcFMIpXV5-r9fdLvAlxgDQHk7Dz4c6qmECe_FDguMFwu-TJL9EzZ0KGV_fvGfp5sf6x-lpdf_tyuTq_rqwQaqoc70mnwHbWKtV2om86xpjroOFOAONSkVYp58DQWnW14NQwKk0h9FI6aPkZ-rTo7uZugN7CWFIFvUslUTroaLz-dzP6X3oT95pSKgmnvCi8vVdI8XYuf9GDzxZCMCPEOWvWspqoupGyUNlCtSnmnMA9-FCij7XqpVZdatV3tWpVjt48Tvhw8rfHQuALIZfVuIGkt3FOpZH8P9k_jICwsg</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Cho, Jeong Min</creator><creator>Koh, Jung Hun</creator><creator>Kim, Minsang</creator><creator>Jung, Sehyun</creator><creator>Cho, Semin</creator><creator>Lee, Soojin</creator><creator>Kim, Yaerim</creator><creator>Kim, Yong Chul</creator><creator>Lee, Hajeong</creator><creator>Han, Seung Seok</creator><creator>Oh, Kook-Hwan</creator><creator>Joo, Kwon Wook</creator><creator>Kim, Yon Su</creator><creator>Kim, Dong Ki</creator><creator>Park, Sehoon</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of risk stratification for acute kidney injury: a comparative analysis of EKFC, 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration estimating equations</title><author>Cho, Jeong Min ; Koh, Jung Hun ; Kim, Minsang ; Jung, Sehyun ; Cho, Semin ; Lee, Soojin ; Kim, Yaerim ; Kim, Yong Chul ; Lee, Hajeong ; Han, Seung Seok ; Oh, Kook-Hwan ; Joo, Kwon Wook ; Kim, Yon Su ; Kim, Dong Ki ; Park, Sehoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-f3d0b7ecbcc779b4d8b222fbe83f4e23570977ffea167b6431a215afbed55fe93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acute Kidney Injury - diagnosis</topic><topic>Acute Kidney Injury - physiopathology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Creatinine - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cho, Jeong Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Jung Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minsang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Semin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soojin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yaerim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hajeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Seung Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Kook-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joo, Kwon Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yon Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sehoon</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cho, Jeong Min</au><au>Koh, Jung Hun</au><au>Kim, Minsang</au><au>Jung, Sehyun</au><au>Cho, Semin</au><au>Lee, Soojin</au><au>Kim, Yaerim</au><au>Kim, Yong Chul</au><au>Lee, Hajeong</au><au>Han, Seung Seok</au><au>Oh, Kook-Hwan</au><au>Joo, Kwon Wook</au><au>Kim, Yon Su</au><au>Kim, Dong Ki</au><au>Park, Sehoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of risk stratification for acute kidney injury: a comparative analysis of EKFC, 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration estimating equations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nephrology</jtitle><stitle>J Nephrol</stitle><addtitle>J Nephrol</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>681-693</pages><issn>1724-6059</issn><issn>1121-8428</issn><eissn>1724-6059</eissn><abstract>Background The adoption of the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation provided a race-free eGFR calculation. However, the discriminative performance for AKI risk has been rarely validated. We aimed to evaluate the differences in acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction or reclassification power according to the three eGFR equations. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study within a tertiary hospital from 2011 to 2021. Acute kidney injury was defined according to KDIGO serum creatinine criteria. Glomerular filtration rate estimates were calculated by three GFR estimating equations: 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPIcr, and EKFC. In three equations, AKI prediction performance was evaluated with area under receiver operator curves (AUROC) and reclassification power was evaluated with net reclassification improvement analysis. Results A total of 187,139 individuals, including 27,447 (14.7%) AKI and 159,692 (85.3%) controls, were enrolled. In the multivariable regression prediction model, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model (continuous eGFR model 2, 0.7583 [0.755–0.7617]) showed superior performance in AKI prediction to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr (0.7564 [0.7531–0.7597], &lt; 0.001) or EKFC model in AUROC (0.7577 [0.7543–0.761], &lt; 0.001). Moreover, in reclassification of AKI, the 2021 CKD-EPIcr and EKFC models showed a worse classification performance than the 2009 CKD-EPIcr model. (− 7.24 [− 8.21–− 6.21], − 2.38 [− 2.72–− 1.97]). Conclusion Regarding AKI risk stratification, the 2009 CKD-EPIcr equation showed better discriminative performance compared to the 2021 CKD-EPIcr equation in the study population. Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38345686</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40620-023-01883-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1724-6059
ispartof Journal of nephrology, 2024-04, Vol.37 (3), p.681-693
issn 1724-6059
1121-8428
1724-6059
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11150313
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects Acute Kidney Injury - diagnosis
Acute Kidney Injury - physiopathology
Adult
Aged
Creatinine - blood
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Original
Original Article
Predictive Value of Tests
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - diagnosis
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Urology
title Evaluation of risk stratification for acute kidney injury: a comparative analysis of EKFC, 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration estimating equations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T08%3A36%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20risk%20stratification%20for%20acute%20kidney%20injury:%20a%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20EKFC,%202009%20and%202021%20CKD-EPI%20glomerular%20filtration%20estimating%20equations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nephrology&rft.au=Cho,%20Jeong%20Min&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=681-693&rft.issn=1724-6059&rft.eissn=1724-6059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40620-023-01883-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2926076855%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2926076855&rft_id=info:pmid/38345686&rfr_iscdi=true