Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland
Objectives Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European journal of health economics 2024-06, Vol.25 (4), p.689-699 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 699 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 689 |
container_title | The European journal of health economics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Paulissen, Jeroen H. J. Seddik, Ahmed H. Dunton, Kyle J. Livings, Christopher J. van Hulst, Marinus Postma, Maarten J. de Jong, Lisa A. Freriks, Roel D. |
description | Objectives
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland.
Methods
A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model.
Results
Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case.
Conclusions
T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11136791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3061502463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFjEUhQdRbK3-ARcScOMmNh-TSWYl8tJaoSCIrkMmc1NTZpLXJFPU39Ef3IzTD3XhKhfuc07u4TTNS0reUkLkcaaE9goTxjGhHZWYP2oO66Cw7Ah9fDeLXh00z3K-JIQxyfjT5oDLVnVCyMPmehdzweAc2OKvIEDOaI4jTCg6VJLJZfm1zGZAI6TlRwFrAjIZZbAxjHjyASoFpswQCvIBnZ18Zngfs1_d0BISVLSYYQJkwngcE5qhVFdTvEVDVeaCqqeFtKpPfZgq9rx54syU4cXte9R8PT35sjvD558-fNy9P8dWdKJgRgaljGulGNSgRm7dwJRytLWjA0Z7RoBJSZgFMG1PKPTKUj5wQqgRlDt-1LzbfPfLMMNoa4ZkJr1Pfjbpp47G6783wX_TF_FKU0p5J3taHd7cOqT4fYFc9OyzhammgLhkzVRLW9LWsyr6-h_0Mi4p1Hyak44KwtqOV4ptlE0x5wTu_hpK9Nq63lrXtXX9u3W9il79meNecldzBdAGrLX5_OCpei462XJREb4huS7DBaSH8_7z8w0QFcW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3061502463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J. ; Seddik, Ahmed H. ; Dunton, Kyle J. ; Livings, Christopher J. ; van Hulst, Marinus ; Postma, Maarten J. ; de Jong, Lisa A. ; Freriks, Roel D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J. ; Seddik, Ahmed H. ; Dunton, Kyle J. ; Livings, Christopher J. ; van Hulst, Marinus ; Postma, Maarten J. ; de Jong, Lisa A. ; Freriks, Roel D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland.
Methods
A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model.
Results
Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case.
Conclusions
T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7598</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37486557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics ; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Camptothecin - analogs & derivatives ; Camptothecin - economics ; Camptothecin - therapeutic use ; Cost analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Economic Policy ; Female ; Finland ; Health care expenditures ; Health Care Management ; Health Economics ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Original Paper ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Public Finance ; Public Health ; Quality of life ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Sensitivity analysis ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Trastuzumab - economics ; Trastuzumab - therapeutic use ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>The European journal of health economics, 2024-06, Vol.25 (4), p.689-699</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2742-9870 ; 0000-0003-3216-7246 ; 0000-0001-8814-0670 ; 0000-0001-5783-2914 ; 0000-0002-9458-1832 ; 0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37486557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddik, Ahmed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunton, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livings, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hulst, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postma, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Roel D.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</title><title>The European journal of health economics</title><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><description>Objectives
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland.
Methods
A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model.
Results
Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case.
Conclusions
T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.</description><subject>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics</subject><subject>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Camptothecin - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Camptothecin - economics</subject><subject>Camptothecin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Care Management</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoconjugates</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Trastuzumab - economics</subject><subject>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFjEUhQdRbK3-ARcScOMmNh-TSWYl8tJaoSCIrkMmc1NTZpLXJFPU39Ef3IzTD3XhKhfuc07u4TTNS0reUkLkcaaE9goTxjGhHZWYP2oO66Cw7Ah9fDeLXh00z3K-JIQxyfjT5oDLVnVCyMPmehdzweAc2OKvIEDOaI4jTCg6VJLJZfm1zGZAI6TlRwFrAjIZZbAxjHjyASoFpswQCvIBnZ18Zngfs1_d0BISVLSYYQJkwngcE5qhVFdTvEVDVeaCqqeFtKpPfZgq9rx54syU4cXte9R8PT35sjvD558-fNy9P8dWdKJgRgaljGulGNSgRm7dwJRytLWjA0Z7RoBJSZgFMG1PKPTKUj5wQqgRlDt-1LzbfPfLMMNoa4ZkJr1Pfjbpp47G6783wX_TF_FKU0p5J3taHd7cOqT4fYFc9OyzhammgLhkzVRLW9LWsyr6-h_0Mi4p1Hyak44KwtqOV4ptlE0x5wTu_hpK9Nq63lrXtXX9u3W9il79meNecldzBdAGrLX5_OCpei462XJREb4huS7DBaSH8_7z8w0QFcW0</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</creator><creator>Seddik, Ahmed H.</creator><creator>Dunton, Kyle J.</creator><creator>Livings, Christopher J.</creator><creator>van Hulst, Marinus</creator><creator>Postma, Maarten J.</creator><creator>de Jong, Lisa A.</creator><creator>Freriks, Roel D.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-9870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-7246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-0670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-2914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-1832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</title><author>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J. ; Seddik, Ahmed H. ; Dunton, Kyle J. ; Livings, Christopher J. ; van Hulst, Marinus ; Postma, Maarten J. ; de Jong, Lisa A. ; Freriks, Roel D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics</topic><topic>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Camptothecin - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Camptothecin - economics</topic><topic>Camptothecin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Care Management</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoconjugates</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Trastuzumab - economics</topic><topic>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddik, Ahmed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunton, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livings, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hulst, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postma, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Roel D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</au><au>Seddik, Ahmed H.</au><au>Dunton, Kyle J.</au><au>Livings, Christopher J.</au><au>van Hulst, Marinus</au><au>Postma, Maarten J.</au><au>de Jong, Lisa A.</au><au>Freriks, Roel D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Health Econ</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>689</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>689-699</pages><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><eissn>1618-7601</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland.
Methods
A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model.
Results
Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case.
Conclusions
T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37486557</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-9870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-7246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-0670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-2914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-1832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-7598 |
ispartof | The European journal of health economics, 2024-06, Vol.25 (4), p.689-699 |
issn | 1618-7598 1618-7601 1618-7601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11136791 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use Adult Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy Breast Neoplasms - pathology Camptothecin - analogs & derivatives Camptothecin - economics Camptothecin - therapeutic use Cost analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis Economic Policy Female Finland Health care expenditures Health Care Management Health Economics Humans Immunoconjugates Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastasis Middle Aged Monoclonal antibodies Original Paper Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Public Finance Public Health Quality of life Quality-Adjusted Life Years Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism Sensitivity analysis Survival Survival Analysis Targeted cancer therapy Trastuzumab - economics Trastuzumab - therapeutic use Willingness to pay |
title | Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A00%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20model%20of%20trastuzumab%20deruxtecan%20as%20second-line%20treatment%20in%20HER2-positive%20unresectable%20and/or%20metastatic%20breast%20cancer%20in%20Finland&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Paulissen,%20Jeroen%20H.%20J.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=689&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=689-699&rft.issn=1618-7598&rft.eissn=1618-7601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3061502463%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3061502463&rft_id=info:pmid/37486557&rfr_iscdi=true |