Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland

Objectives Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European journal of health economics 2024-06, Vol.25 (4), p.689-699
Hauptverfasser: Paulissen, Jeroen H. J., Seddik, Ahmed H., Dunton, Kyle J., Livings, Christopher J., van Hulst, Marinus, Postma, Maarten J., de Jong, Lisa A., Freriks, Roel D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 699
container_issue 4
container_start_page 689
container_title The European journal of health economics
container_volume 25
creator Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.
Seddik, Ahmed H.
Dunton, Kyle J.
Livings, Christopher J.
van Hulst, Marinus
Postma, Maarten J.
de Jong, Lisa A.
Freriks, Roel D.
description Objectives Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland. Methods A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model. Results Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case. Conclusions T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11136791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3061502463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFjEUhQdRbK3-ARcScOMmNh-TSWYl8tJaoSCIrkMmc1NTZpLXJFPU39Ef3IzTD3XhKhfuc07u4TTNS0reUkLkcaaE9goTxjGhHZWYP2oO66Cw7Ah9fDeLXh00z3K-JIQxyfjT5oDLVnVCyMPmehdzweAc2OKvIEDOaI4jTCg6VJLJZfm1zGZAI6TlRwFrAjIZZbAxjHjyASoFpswQCvIBnZ18Zngfs1_d0BISVLSYYQJkwngcE5qhVFdTvEVDVeaCqqeFtKpPfZgq9rx54syU4cXte9R8PT35sjvD558-fNy9P8dWdKJgRgaljGulGNSgRm7dwJRytLWjA0Z7RoBJSZgFMG1PKPTKUj5wQqgRlDt-1LzbfPfLMMNoa4ZkJr1Pfjbpp47G6783wX_TF_FKU0p5J3taHd7cOqT4fYFc9OyzhammgLhkzVRLW9LWsyr6-h_0Mi4p1Hyak44KwtqOV4ptlE0x5wTu_hpK9Nq63lrXtXX9u3W9il79meNecldzBdAGrLX5_OCpei462XJREb4huS7DBaSH8_7z8w0QFcW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3061502463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J. ; Seddik, Ahmed H. ; Dunton, Kyle J. ; Livings, Christopher J. ; van Hulst, Marinus ; Postma, Maarten J. ; de Jong, Lisa A. ; Freriks, Roel D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J. ; Seddik, Ahmed H. ; Dunton, Kyle J. ; Livings, Christopher J. ; van Hulst, Marinus ; Postma, Maarten J. ; de Jong, Lisa A. ; Freriks, Roel D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland. Methods A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model. Results Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case. Conclusions T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7598</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37486557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics ; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Camptothecin - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Camptothecin - economics ; Camptothecin - therapeutic use ; Cost analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Economic Policy ; Female ; Finland ; Health care expenditures ; Health Care Management ; Health Economics ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Original Paper ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Public Finance ; Public Health ; Quality of life ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Sensitivity analysis ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Trastuzumab - economics ; Trastuzumab - therapeutic use ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>The European journal of health economics, 2024-06, Vol.25 (4), p.689-699</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2742-9870 ; 0000-0003-3216-7246 ; 0000-0001-8814-0670 ; 0000-0001-5783-2914 ; 0000-0002-9458-1832 ; 0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37486557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddik, Ahmed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunton, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livings, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hulst, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postma, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Roel D.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</title><title>The European journal of health economics</title><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><description>Objectives Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland. Methods A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model. Results Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case. Conclusions T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.</description><subject>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics</subject><subject>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Camptothecin - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Camptothecin - economics</subject><subject>Camptothecin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Care Management</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoconjugates</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Trastuzumab - economics</subject><subject>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFjEUhQdRbK3-ARcScOMmNh-TSWYl8tJaoSCIrkMmc1NTZpLXJFPU39Ef3IzTD3XhKhfuc07u4TTNS0reUkLkcaaE9goTxjGhHZWYP2oO66Cw7Ah9fDeLXh00z3K-JIQxyfjT5oDLVnVCyMPmehdzweAc2OKvIEDOaI4jTCg6VJLJZfm1zGZAI6TlRwFrAjIZZbAxjHjyASoFpswQCvIBnZ18Zngfs1_d0BISVLSYYQJkwngcE5qhVFdTvEVDVeaCqqeFtKpPfZgq9rx54syU4cXte9R8PT35sjvD558-fNy9P8dWdKJgRgaljGulGNSgRm7dwJRytLWjA0Z7RoBJSZgFMG1PKPTKUj5wQqgRlDt-1LzbfPfLMMNoa4ZkJr1Pfjbpp47G6783wX_TF_FKU0p5J3taHd7cOqT4fYFc9OyzhammgLhkzVRLW9LWsyr6-h_0Mi4p1Hyak44KwtqOV4ptlE0x5wTu_hpK9Nq63lrXtXX9u3W9il79meNecldzBdAGrLX5_OCpei462XJREb4huS7DBaSH8_7z8w0QFcW0</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</creator><creator>Seddik, Ahmed H.</creator><creator>Dunton, Kyle J.</creator><creator>Livings, Christopher J.</creator><creator>van Hulst, Marinus</creator><creator>Postma, Maarten J.</creator><creator>de Jong, Lisa A.</creator><creator>Freriks, Roel D.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-9870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-7246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-0670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-2914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-1832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</title><author>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J. ; Seddik, Ahmed H. ; Dunton, Kyle J. ; Livings, Christopher J. ; van Hulst, Marinus ; Postma, Maarten J. ; de Jong, Lisa A. ; Freriks, Roel D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-20b88af475b8b8d3cfb288f14cdfe21920e27702ceea4901e98c13b3001a513f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics</topic><topic>Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Camptothecin - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Camptothecin - economics</topic><topic>Camptothecin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Care Management</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoconjugates</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Trastuzumab - economics</topic><topic>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddik, Ahmed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunton, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livings, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hulst, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postma, Maarten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Roel D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paulissen, Jeroen H. J.</au><au>Seddik, Ahmed H.</au><au>Dunton, Kyle J.</au><au>Livings, Christopher J.</au><au>van Hulst, Marinus</au><au>Postma, Maarten J.</au><au>de Jong, Lisa A.</au><au>Freriks, Roel D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Health Econ</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>689</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>689-699</pages><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><eissn>1618-7601</eissn><abstract>Objectives Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland. Methods A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model. Results Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case. Conclusions T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37486557</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-9870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-7246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-0670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-2914</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-1832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1618-7598
ispartof The European journal of health economics, 2024-06, Vol.25 (4), p.689-699
issn 1618-7598
1618-7601
1618-7601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11136791
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - economics
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine - therapeutic use
Adult
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - economics
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Camptothecin - analogs & derivatives
Camptothecin - economics
Camptothecin - therapeutic use
Cost analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Economic Policy
Female
Finland
Health care expenditures
Health Care Management
Health Economics
Humans
Immunoconjugates
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
Middle Aged
Monoclonal antibodies
Original Paper
Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
Public Finance
Public Health
Quality of life
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism
Sensitivity analysis
Survival
Survival Analysis
Targeted cancer therapy
Trastuzumab - economics
Trastuzumab - therapeutic use
Willingness to pay
title Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A00%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20model%20of%20trastuzumab%20deruxtecan%20as%20second-line%20treatment%20in%20HER2-positive%20unresectable%20and/or%20metastatic%20breast%20cancer%20in%20Finland&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Paulissen,%20Jeroen%20H.%20J.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=689&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=689-699&rft.issn=1618-7598&rft.eissn=1618-7601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3061502463%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3061502463&rft_id=info:pmid/37486557&rfr_iscdi=true