A scoping review to identify barriers and facilitators of research participation among chiropractic faculty

To describe peer-reviewed literature on chiropractic faculty participation in research and identify important barriers and facilitators. We conducted a scoping review using comprehensive searches of relevant databases from inception through November 2022. English language publications of any design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of chiropractic education 2024-03, Vol.38 (1), p.50-59
Hauptverfasser: Anderson, Brian, Shannon, Kara, Baca, Kira, Crouse, John, Ferguson, Amberly, Margrave, Alex, Meyers, Meredith, Percuoco, Kevin, Schneider, Patrik, Smith, Jennifer, VanNatta, Michael, Wells, Breanne, Nightingale, Lia, Salsbury, Stacie A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To describe peer-reviewed literature on chiropractic faculty participation in research and identify important barriers and facilitators. We conducted a scoping review using comprehensive searches of relevant databases from inception through November 2022. English language publications of any design were included, with search terms consisting of subject headings specific to each database and free text words related to chiropractic, faculty, and research. Primary and secondary reviewer teams performed article screening and data abstraction using Covidence software, with primary reviewers responsible for consensus. Data were entered into evidence tables and analyzed descriptively. A total of 330 articles were screened, with 14 deemed eligible including 8 cross-sectional/correlational studies and 6 narrative reviews/editorials. Article publication dates ranged from 1987 to 2017. No intervention studies were identified. Facilitators of chiropractic faculty research included research assignment as primary role, institutional culture promoting research, and dedicated release time. Barriers included teaching/clinic assignments, lack of incentives and mentorship, and teaching load. Qualitative results identified 5 domains impacting faculty research: demographics/professional roles; personal empowerment; research culture; institutional setting/policies; and research training. Our scoping review found a paucity of recently published articles on chiropractic faculty participation in research. Educational institutions building research capacity among chiropractic faculty must establish cultural environments where scholarship is expected, rewarded, and valued. Tangible support, such as research policies, resources, and space, advanced training, funding, and release time, must be available. Faculty are encouraged to build upon key facilitators, evaluate interventions to address barriers to chiropractic faculty research, and publish their results.
ISSN:1042-5055
2374-250X
DOI:10.7899/JCE-23-7