Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022
Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Translational breast cancer research 2022-04, Vol.3, p.13-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Translational breast cancer research |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Jiang, Zefei Li, Jianbin Chen, Jiayi Liu, Yueping Wang, Kun Nie, Jianyun Wang, Xiaojia Hao, Chunfang Yin, Yongmei Wang, Shusen Yan, Min Wang, Tao Yan, Ying Chen, Xiaoyuan Song, Erwei |
description | Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). In recent years, the availability of medical resources has become a major concern in clinical guidelines, which is particularly important for developing countries or socioeconomically diverse countries and territories. China is the world's largest developing country, with a large territory and uneven economic and academic developments. The CSCO guidelines must take into account the differences in regional development, the availability of medicines and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer treatment. Therefore, for each clinical problem and intervention in the CSCO guidelines, the levels of evidence should be graded according to the currently available evidences and expert consensuses, and the grades of recommendations should be based on the availability and cost-effectiveness of the products. Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO experts, the CSCO guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application. The CSCO Guidance Working Group firmly believes that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice. Again, any comments from our readers are greatly appreciated and will be considered in updates of these guidelines, so as to maintain the accuracy, fairness, and timeliness of the CSCO guidelines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21037/tbcr-22-21 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11093004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3055896384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-7df6d0ae7a4da792e6f8affc2ff2bdadc4a6f56485cc33ff06b3c56030a683c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFPAjEQhRujEYKcvJseMWa17bDdcjK6USQh4YCem263hZpli-2uCf9eECR4mpnMN28m8xC6puSeUQLZQ1PokDCWMHqGuoxRkfAsE-cneQf1Y_wkhABQAE4vUQdEltIUsi6a5EtXm2jw3Gtnmg32FueVq51WFZ7V2ld-scGDfJ7PbvFzMCo2OFe1NgGPW1eaajeNGWHsCl1YVUXTP8Qe-nh9ec_fkulsPMmfpokGypokKy0viTKZGpYqGzHDrVDWamYtK0pV6qHiNuVDkWoNYC3hBeiUEyCKC9AMeuhxr7tui5UptamboCq5Dm6lwkZ65eT_Tu2WcuG_JaVkBIQMtwqDg0LwX62JjVy5qE1Vqdr4NkogaSpGHMQOvdujOvgYg7HHPZTIXwPkzgDJ2Lba0jenpx3Zv3fDD4utgTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055896384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jiang, Zefei ; Li, Jianbin ; Chen, Jiayi ; Liu, Yueping ; Wang, Kun ; Nie, Jianyun ; Wang, Xiaojia ; Hao, Chunfang ; Yin, Yongmei ; Wang, Shusen ; Yan, Min ; Wang, Tao ; Yan, Ying ; Chen, Xiaoyuan ; Song, Erwei</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zefei ; Li, Jianbin ; Chen, Jiayi ; Liu, Yueping ; Wang, Kun ; Nie, Jianyun ; Wang, Xiaojia ; Hao, Chunfang ; Yin, Yongmei ; Wang, Shusen ; Yan, Min ; Wang, Tao ; Yan, Ying ; Chen, Xiaoyuan ; Song, Erwei ; CSCO BC guideline working group ; CSCO BC guideline working group</creatorcontrib><description>Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). In recent years, the availability of medical resources has become a major concern in clinical guidelines, which is particularly important for developing countries or socioeconomically diverse countries and territories. China is the world's largest developing country, with a large territory and uneven economic and academic developments. The CSCO guidelines must take into account the differences in regional development, the availability of medicines and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer treatment. Therefore, for each clinical problem and intervention in the CSCO guidelines, the levels of evidence should be graded according to the currently available evidences and expert consensuses, and the grades of recommendations should be based on the availability and cost-effectiveness of the products. Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO experts, the CSCO guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application. The CSCO Guidance Working Group firmly believes that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice. Again, any comments from our readers are greatly appreciated and will be considered in updates of these guidelines, so as to maintain the accuracy, fairness, and timeliness of the CSCO guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2218-6778</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2218-6778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/tbcr-22-21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38751537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Guideline</subject><ispartof>Translational breast cancer research, 2022-04, Vol.3, p.13-13</ispartof><rights>2022 Translational Breast Cancer Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022 Translational Breast Cancer Research. All rights reserved. 2022 Translational Breast Cancer Research.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-7df6d0ae7a4da792e6f8affc2ff2bdadc4a6f56485cc33ff06b3c56030a683c23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093004/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093004/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38751537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zefei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiayi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yueping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Jianyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaojia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Chunfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Yongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shusen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Erwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CSCO BC guideline working group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CSCO BC guideline working group</creatorcontrib><title>Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022</title><title>Translational breast cancer research</title><addtitle>Transl Breast Cancer Res</addtitle><description>Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). In recent years, the availability of medical resources has become a major concern in clinical guidelines, which is particularly important for developing countries or socioeconomically diverse countries and territories. China is the world's largest developing country, with a large territory and uneven economic and academic developments. The CSCO guidelines must take into account the differences in regional development, the availability of medicines and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer treatment. Therefore, for each clinical problem and intervention in the CSCO guidelines, the levels of evidence should be graded according to the currently available evidences and expert consensuses, and the grades of recommendations should be based on the availability and cost-effectiveness of the products. Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO experts, the CSCO guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application. The CSCO Guidance Working Group firmly believes that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice. Again, any comments from our readers are greatly appreciated and will be considered in updates of these guidelines, so as to maintain the accuracy, fairness, and timeliness of the CSCO guidelines.</description><subject>Guideline</subject><issn>2218-6778</issn><issn>2218-6778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUFPAjEQhRujEYKcvJseMWa17bDdcjK6USQh4YCem263hZpli-2uCf9eECR4mpnMN28m8xC6puSeUQLZQ1PokDCWMHqGuoxRkfAsE-cneQf1Y_wkhABQAE4vUQdEltIUsi6a5EtXm2jw3Gtnmg32FueVq51WFZ7V2ld-scGDfJ7PbvFzMCo2OFe1NgGPW1eaajeNGWHsCl1YVUXTP8Qe-nh9ec_fkulsPMmfpokGypokKy0viTKZGpYqGzHDrVDWamYtK0pV6qHiNuVDkWoNYC3hBeiUEyCKC9AMeuhxr7tui5UptamboCq5Dm6lwkZ65eT_Tu2WcuG_JaVkBIQMtwqDg0LwX62JjVy5qE1Vqdr4NkogaSpGHMQOvdujOvgYg7HHPZTIXwPkzgDJ2Lba0jenpx3Zv3fDD4utgTE</recordid><startdate>20220430</startdate><enddate>20220430</enddate><creator>Jiang, Zefei</creator><creator>Li, Jianbin</creator><creator>Chen, Jiayi</creator><creator>Liu, Yueping</creator><creator>Wang, Kun</creator><creator>Nie, Jianyun</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaojia</creator><creator>Hao, Chunfang</creator><creator>Yin, Yongmei</creator><creator>Wang, Shusen</creator><creator>Yan, Min</creator><creator>Wang, Tao</creator><creator>Yan, Ying</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaoyuan</creator><creator>Song, Erwei</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220430</creationdate><title>Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022</title><author>Jiang, Zefei ; Li, Jianbin ; Chen, Jiayi ; Liu, Yueping ; Wang, Kun ; Nie, Jianyun ; Wang, Xiaojia ; Hao, Chunfang ; Yin, Yongmei ; Wang, Shusen ; Yan, Min ; Wang, Tao ; Yan, Ying ; Chen, Xiaoyuan ; Song, Erwei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-7df6d0ae7a4da792e6f8affc2ff2bdadc4a6f56485cc33ff06b3c56030a683c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Guideline</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zefei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiayi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yueping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Jianyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaojia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Chunfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Yongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shusen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Erwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CSCO BC guideline working group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CSCO BC guideline working group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational breast cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Zefei</au><au>Li, Jianbin</au><au>Chen, Jiayi</au><au>Liu, Yueping</au><au>Wang, Kun</au><au>Nie, Jianyun</au><au>Wang, Xiaojia</au><au>Hao, Chunfang</au><au>Yin, Yongmei</au><au>Wang, Shusen</au><au>Yan, Min</au><au>Wang, Tao</au><au>Yan, Ying</au><au>Chen, Xiaoyuan</au><au>Song, Erwei</au><aucorp>CSCO BC guideline working group</aucorp><aucorp>CSCO BC guideline working group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022</atitle><jtitle>Translational breast cancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Transl Breast Cancer Res</addtitle><date>2022-04-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>3</volume><spage>13</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>13-13</pages><issn>2218-6778</issn><eissn>2218-6778</eissn><abstract>Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). In recent years, the availability of medical resources has become a major concern in clinical guidelines, which is particularly important for developing countries or socioeconomically diverse countries and territories. China is the world's largest developing country, with a large territory and uneven economic and academic developments. The CSCO guidelines must take into account the differences in regional development, the availability of medicines and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer treatment. Therefore, for each clinical problem and intervention in the CSCO guidelines, the levels of evidence should be graded according to the currently available evidences and expert consensuses, and the grades of recommendations should be based on the availability and cost-effectiveness of the products. Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO experts, the CSCO guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application. The CSCO Guidance Working Group firmly believes that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice. Again, any comments from our readers are greatly appreciated and will be considered in updates of these guidelines, so as to maintain the accuracy, fairness, and timeliness of the CSCO guidelines.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>38751537</pmid><doi>10.21037/tbcr-22-21</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2218-6778 |
ispartof | Translational breast cancer research, 2022-04, Vol.3, p.13-13 |
issn | 2218-6778 2218-6778 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11093004 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Guideline |
title | Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A09%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chinese%20Society%20of%20Clinical%20Oncology%20(CSCO)%20Breast%20Cancer%20Guidelines%202022&rft.jtitle=Translational%20breast%20cancer%20research&rft.au=Jiang,%20Zefei&rft.aucorp=CSCO%20BC%20guideline%20working%20group&rft.date=2022-04-30&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=13-13&rft.issn=2218-6778&rft.eissn=2218-6778&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/tbcr-22-21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3055896384%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055896384&rft_id=info:pmid/38751537&rfr_iscdi=true |