Safety of surgery: quality assessment of meta-analyses on the WHO checklist

Safety of surgery: quality assessment of meta-analyses on the WHO checklist

To assess the quality of the meta-analyses that review the WHO surgical safety checklist. A systematic review of meta-analysis studies was undertaken using the search terms "World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist" in PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. The selected meta-anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of medicine and surgery 2024-05, Vol.86 (5), p.2684-2687
1. Verfasser: González Mariño, Mario Arturo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Original Research
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2687
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2684
container_title Annals of medicine and surgery
container_volume 86
creator González Mariño, Mario Arturo
description To assess the quality of the meta-analyses that review the WHO surgical safety checklist. A systematic review of meta-analysis studies was undertaken using the search terms "World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist" in PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. The selected meta-analyses were rated using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool. In the three meta-analyses evaluated, the checklist was associated with a decrease in the rates of complications and mortality. Overall confidence in the results of the evaluated meta-analysis was critically low. The meta-analysis coincides with obtaining lower complications and mortality rates with the WHO surgical safety checklist. However, the studies included in the meta-analyses were mostly observational, with potential biases, and according to the AMSTAR 2 tool, the overall confidence in the results of the evaluated studies was critically low.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11060208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3050174194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-4e62482c781557c456ca99b8fae0f354aa4df89983b87b15f162ba2b867a371f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1PwzAMjRCITWP_AKEeuXQkTZqmXBCagCGGdhiIY-RmyVbox5a0SP33ZNqYBr7YerafrfcQuiR4RHCa3LzO0xE-ighjfoL6EWZpiAUmp0d1Dw2d-_RDBMeUc3GOelTwlFFO--hlDkY3XVCbwLV2qW13G2xaKHKPgXPauVJXzbZd6gZCqKDoPBrUVdCsdPAxmQVqpdVXkbvmAp0ZKJwe7vMAvT8-vI0n4XT29Dy-n4YqEqIJmeYRE5FKBInjRLGYK0jTTBjQ2NCYAbCFEWkqaCaSjMSG8CiDKBM8AZoQQwfobse7brNSL5R_0EIh1zYvwXayhlz-7VT5Si7rb0kI5l4q4Rmu9wy23rTaNbLMndJFAZWuWycpjjFJGPEiDRDbjSpbO2e1OdwhWG69kN4L-d8Lv3Z1_ONh6Vd5-gNLh4SL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050174194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of surgery: quality assessment of meta-analyses on the WHO checklist</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>González Mariño, Mario Arturo</creator><creatorcontrib>González Mariño, Mario Arturo</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the quality of the meta-analyses that review the WHO surgical safety checklist. A systematic review of meta-analysis studies was undertaken using the search terms "World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist" in PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. The selected meta-analyses were rated using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool. In the three meta-analyses evaluated, the checklist was associated with a decrease in the rates of complications and mortality. Overall confidence in the results of the evaluated meta-analysis was critically low. The meta-analysis coincides with obtaining lower complications and mortality rates with the WHO surgical safety checklist. However, the studies included in the meta-analyses were mostly observational, with potential biases, and according to the AMSTAR 2 tool, the overall confidence in the results of the evaluated studies was critically low.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-0801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-0801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38694363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>Annals of medicine and surgery, 2024-05, Vol.86 (5), p.2684-2687</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-4e62482c781557c456ca99b8fae0f354aa4df89983b87b15f162ba2b867a371f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11060208/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11060208/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38694363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>González Mariño, Mario Arturo</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of surgery: quality assessment of meta-analyses on the WHO checklist</title><title>Annals of medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Med Surg (Lond)</addtitle><description>To assess the quality of the meta-analyses that review the WHO surgical safety checklist. A systematic review of meta-analysis studies was undertaken using the search terms "World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist" in PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. The selected meta-analyses were rated using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool. In the three meta-analyses evaluated, the checklist was associated with a decrease in the rates of complications and mortality. Overall confidence in the results of the evaluated meta-analysis was critically low. The meta-analysis coincides with obtaining lower complications and mortality rates with the WHO surgical safety checklist. However, the studies included in the meta-analyses were mostly observational, with potential biases, and according to the AMSTAR 2 tool, the overall confidence in the results of the evaluated studies was critically low.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>2049-0801</issn><issn>2049-0801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUU1PwzAMjRCITWP_AKEeuXQkTZqmXBCagCGGdhiIY-RmyVbox5a0SP33ZNqYBr7YerafrfcQuiR4RHCa3LzO0xE-ighjfoL6EWZpiAUmp0d1Dw2d-_RDBMeUc3GOelTwlFFO--hlDkY3XVCbwLV2qW13G2xaKHKPgXPauVJXzbZd6gZCqKDoPBrUVdCsdPAxmQVqpdVXkbvmAp0ZKJwe7vMAvT8-vI0n4XT29Dy-n4YqEqIJmeYRE5FKBInjRLGYK0jTTBjQ2NCYAbCFEWkqaCaSjMSG8CiDKBM8AZoQQwfobse7brNSL5R_0EIh1zYvwXayhlz-7VT5Si7rb0kI5l4q4Rmu9wy23rTaNbLMndJFAZWuWycpjjFJGPEiDRDbjSpbO2e1OdwhWG69kN4L-d8Lv3Z1_ONh6Vd5-gNLh4SL</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>González Mariño, Mario Arturo</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Safety of surgery: quality assessment of meta-analyses on the WHO checklist</title><author>González Mariño, Mario Arturo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-4e62482c781557c456ca99b8fae0f354aa4df89983b87b15f162ba2b867a371f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González Mariño, Mario Arturo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González Mariño, Mario Arturo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of surgery: quality assessment of meta-analyses on the WHO checklist</atitle><jtitle>Annals of medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Med Surg (Lond)</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2684</spage><epage>2687</epage><pages>2684-2687</pages><issn>2049-0801</issn><eissn>2049-0801</eissn><abstract>To assess the quality of the meta-analyses that review the WHO surgical safety checklist. A systematic review of meta-analysis studies was undertaken using the search terms "World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist" in PubMed, Embase, and Lilacs databases. The selected meta-analyses were rated using the AMSTAR 2 assessment tool. In the three meta-analyses evaluated, the checklist was associated with a decrease in the rates of complications and mortality. Overall confidence in the results of the evaluated meta-analysis was critically low. The meta-analysis coincides with obtaining lower complications and mortality rates with the WHO surgical safety checklist. However, the studies included in the meta-analyses were mostly observational, with potential biases, and according to the AMSTAR 2 tool, the overall confidence in the results of the evaluated studies was critically low.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>38694363</pmid><doi>10.1097/MS9.0000000000002006</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-0801
ispartof Annals of medicine and surgery, 2024-05, Vol.86 (5), p.2684-2687
issn 2049-0801
2049-0801
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11060208
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original Research
title Safety of surgery: quality assessment of meta-analyses on the WHO checklist
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T17%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20surgery:%20quality%20assessment%20of%20meta-analyses%20on%20the%20WHO%20checklist&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez%20Mari%C3%B1o,%20Mario%20Arturo&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2684&rft.epage=2687&rft.pages=2684-2687&rft.issn=2049-0801&rft.eissn=2049-0801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3050174194%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050174194&rft_id=info:pmid/38694363&rfr_iscdi=true