Can Cyprus Afford Luspatercept? A Budget Impact Analysis of the Reimbursement of Luspatercept for the Management of Thalassaemia in Cyprus
Objective This study aims to estimate the budget impact of luspatercept reimbursement as an adjuvant to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus, from a societal perspective, and assess the financial feasibility of its inclusion in the β-thalassaemia armamentarium. Methods A 5-year...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PharmacoEconomics - Open 2024-05, Vol.8 (3), p.471-480 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 480 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | PharmacoEconomics - Open |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Pitsillidou, Olga Petrou, Panagiotis Postma, M. J. |
description | Objective
This study aims to estimate the budget impact of luspatercept reimbursement as an adjuvant to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus, from a societal perspective, and assess the financial feasibility of its inclusion in the β-thalassaemia armamentarium.
Methods
A 5-year horizon budget impact model was developed to determine the budget impact of reimbursing luspatercept for the management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus. Two treatment discontinuation scenarios were elaborated. In the first scenario, luspatercept is reimbursed complementary to best supportive care, and a dropout rate of 40% is assumed based on published real-world data, while for the second scenario a dropout rate of 25%, is assumed as per the clinical trial data. Input parameters were retrieved from the phase III clinical trial of luspatercept, literature, and expert opinion consensus. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted for both scenarios.
Results
The addition of luspatercept to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus imparted an incremental budget impact ranging from €21,300,643 to €25,834,368, depending on the drop-out rate scenario assumed. Results were sensitive to the number of eligible patients and dose per patient.
Conclusion
The potential reimbursement of luspatercept will wield a substantial impact on Cyprus total pharmaceutical expenditure and it is therefore imperative to affix a reimbursement framework that will allow the payer to mitigate uncertainty stemming out of the scarce clinical data and the inherently complex therapeutic landscape of β-thalassemia management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41669-024-00482-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11058738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A792093151</galeid><sourcerecordid>A792093151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-51454a01f7712b8f28d8a83ae09f2cc5e34d687fdb1da646a0f5cdb864daf5b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1DAUhiMEolXpC7BAltiwSfE1cVZVGHGpNAgJlbV14ksmVRIHO6k6r8BT42naobBAXtiyv_8_x_afZa8JviAYl-8jJ0VR5ZjyHGMuaX73LDulAlc5p4I_P64LepKdx3iDMSZSkrIkL7MTJkUpyqo8zX5tYESb_RSWiGrnfDBou8QJZhu0neZLVKMPi2ntjK6GCfSM6hH6fewi8g7NO4u-225olhDtYMf5sPlUjpLhPfUVRmiPyPUOeogR7NAB6h7rv8peOOijPX-Yz7Ifnz5eb77k22-frzb1NteC0zkXhAsOmLh0FdpIR6WRIBlYXDmqtbCMm0KWzjTEQMELwE5o08iCG3Cikewsu1x9p6UZrNGpqQC9mkI3QNgrD536-2Tsdqr1t4oQLGTJDg7vHhyC_7nYOKuhi9r2PYzWL1ExzDjlnLEqoW__QW_8EtIbHqj0bYUkFU_UxUq10FvVjc6nwjoNk55I-9G6Lu3XZUVxxYggSUBXgQ4-xmDdsX2C1SEfas2HSvlQ9_lQd0n05unFj5LHNCSArUBMR2Nrw59m_2P7G0k2yHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048268194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Cyprus Afford Luspatercept? A Budget Impact Analysis of the Reimbursement of Luspatercept for the Management of Thalassaemia in Cyprus</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pitsillidou, Olga ; Petrou, Panagiotis ; Postma, M. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitsillidou, Olga ; Petrou, Panagiotis ; Postma, M. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This study aims to estimate the budget impact of luspatercept reimbursement as an adjuvant to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus, from a societal perspective, and assess the financial feasibility of its inclusion in the β-thalassaemia armamentarium.
Methods
A 5-year horizon budget impact model was developed to determine the budget impact of reimbursing luspatercept for the management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus. Two treatment discontinuation scenarios were elaborated. In the first scenario, luspatercept is reimbursed complementary to best supportive care, and a dropout rate of 40% is assumed based on published real-world data, while for the second scenario a dropout rate of 25%, is assumed as per the clinical trial data. Input parameters were retrieved from the phase III clinical trial of luspatercept, literature, and expert opinion consensus. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted for both scenarios.
Results
The addition of luspatercept to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus imparted an incremental budget impact ranging from €21,300,643 to €25,834,368, depending on the drop-out rate scenario assumed. Results were sensitive to the number of eligible patients and dose per patient.
Conclusion
The potential reimbursement of luspatercept will wield a substantial impact on Cyprus total pharmaceutical expenditure and it is therefore imperative to affix a reimbursement framework that will allow the payer to mitigate uncertainty stemming out of the scarce clinical data and the inherently complex therapeutic landscape of β-thalassemia management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2509-4262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2509-4254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00482-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38575797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Blood & organ donations ; Blood diseases ; Blood transfusions ; Budget ; Chelation therapy ; Disease management ; Impact analysis ; Iron ; Market shares ; Medical prognosis ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Original ; Original Research Article ; Patients ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Public health ; Reimbursement</subject><ispartof>PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2024-05, Vol.8 (3), p.471-480</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-51454a01f7712b8f28d8a83ae09f2cc5e34d687fdb1da646a0f5cdb864daf5b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-51454a01f7712b8f28d8a83ae09f2cc5e34d687fdb1da646a0f5cdb864daf5b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2463-3131 ; 0000-0002-4881-720X ; 0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058738/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058738/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38575797$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitsillidou, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrou, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postma, M. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Can Cyprus Afford Luspatercept? A Budget Impact Analysis of the Reimbursement of Luspatercept for the Management of Thalassaemia in Cyprus</title><title>PharmacoEconomics - Open</title><addtitle>PharmacoEconomics Open</addtitle><addtitle>Pharmacoecon Open</addtitle><description>Objective
This study aims to estimate the budget impact of luspatercept reimbursement as an adjuvant to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus, from a societal perspective, and assess the financial feasibility of its inclusion in the β-thalassaemia armamentarium.
Methods
A 5-year horizon budget impact model was developed to determine the budget impact of reimbursing luspatercept for the management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus. Two treatment discontinuation scenarios were elaborated. In the first scenario, luspatercept is reimbursed complementary to best supportive care, and a dropout rate of 40% is assumed based on published real-world data, while for the second scenario a dropout rate of 25%, is assumed as per the clinical trial data. Input parameters were retrieved from the phase III clinical trial of luspatercept, literature, and expert opinion consensus. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted for both scenarios.
Results
The addition of luspatercept to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus imparted an incremental budget impact ranging from €21,300,643 to €25,834,368, depending on the drop-out rate scenario assumed. Results were sensitive to the number of eligible patients and dose per patient.
Conclusion
The potential reimbursement of luspatercept will wield a substantial impact on Cyprus total pharmaceutical expenditure and it is therefore imperative to affix a reimbursement framework that will allow the payer to mitigate uncertainty stemming out of the scarce clinical data and the inherently complex therapeutic landscape of β-thalassemia management.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Blood & organ donations</subject><subject>Blood diseases</subject><subject>Blood transfusions</subject><subject>Budget</subject><subject>Chelation therapy</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Market shares</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><issn>2509-4262</issn><issn>2509-4254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1DAUhiMEolXpC7BAltiwSfE1cVZVGHGpNAgJlbV14ksmVRIHO6k6r8BT42naobBAXtiyv_8_x_afZa8JviAYl-8jJ0VR5ZjyHGMuaX73LDulAlc5p4I_P64LepKdx3iDMSZSkrIkL7MTJkUpyqo8zX5tYESb_RSWiGrnfDBou8QJZhu0neZLVKMPi2ntjK6GCfSM6hH6fewi8g7NO4u-225olhDtYMf5sPlUjpLhPfUVRmiPyPUOeogR7NAB6h7rv8peOOijPX-Yz7Ifnz5eb77k22-frzb1NteC0zkXhAsOmLh0FdpIR6WRIBlYXDmqtbCMm0KWzjTEQMELwE5o08iCG3Cikewsu1x9p6UZrNGpqQC9mkI3QNgrD536-2Tsdqr1t4oQLGTJDg7vHhyC_7nYOKuhi9r2PYzWL1ExzDjlnLEqoW__QW_8EtIbHqj0bYUkFU_UxUq10FvVjc6nwjoNk55I-9G6Lu3XZUVxxYggSUBXgQ4-xmDdsX2C1SEfas2HSvlQ9_lQd0n05unFj5LHNCSArUBMR2Nrw59m_2P7G0k2yHU</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Pitsillidou, Olga</creator><creator>Petrou, Panagiotis</creator><creator>Postma, M. J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2463-3131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-720X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Can Cyprus Afford Luspatercept? A Budget Impact Analysis of the Reimbursement of Luspatercept for the Management of Thalassaemia in Cyprus</title><author>Pitsillidou, Olga ; Petrou, Panagiotis ; Postma, M. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-51454a01f7712b8f28d8a83ae09f2cc5e34d687fdb1da646a0f5cdb864daf5b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Blood & organ donations</topic><topic>Blood diseases</topic><topic>Blood transfusions</topic><topic>Budget</topic><topic>Chelation therapy</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Market shares</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitsillidou, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrou, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postma, M. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PharmacoEconomics - Open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitsillidou, Olga</au><au>Petrou, Panagiotis</au><au>Postma, M. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Cyprus Afford Luspatercept? A Budget Impact Analysis of the Reimbursement of Luspatercept for the Management of Thalassaemia in Cyprus</atitle><jtitle>PharmacoEconomics - Open</jtitle><stitle>PharmacoEconomics Open</stitle><addtitle>Pharmacoecon Open</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>471-480</pages><issn>2509-4262</issn><eissn>2509-4254</eissn><abstract>Objective
This study aims to estimate the budget impact of luspatercept reimbursement as an adjuvant to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus, from a societal perspective, and assess the financial feasibility of its inclusion in the β-thalassaemia armamentarium.
Methods
A 5-year horizon budget impact model was developed to determine the budget impact of reimbursing luspatercept for the management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus. Two treatment discontinuation scenarios were elaborated. In the first scenario, luspatercept is reimbursed complementary to best supportive care, and a dropout rate of 40% is assumed based on published real-world data, while for the second scenario a dropout rate of 25%, is assumed as per the clinical trial data. Input parameters were retrieved from the phase III clinical trial of luspatercept, literature, and expert opinion consensus. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted for both scenarios.
Results
The addition of luspatercept to the standard management of β-thalassaemia major in Cyprus imparted an incremental budget impact ranging from €21,300,643 to €25,834,368, depending on the drop-out rate scenario assumed. Results were sensitive to the number of eligible patients and dose per patient.
Conclusion
The potential reimbursement of luspatercept will wield a substantial impact on Cyprus total pharmaceutical expenditure and it is therefore imperative to affix a reimbursement framework that will allow the payer to mitigate uncertainty stemming out of the scarce clinical data and the inherently complex therapeutic landscape of β-thalassemia management.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38575797</pmid><doi>10.1007/s41669-024-00482-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2463-3131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-720X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-3653</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2509-4262 |
ispartof | PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2024-05, Vol.8 (3), p.471-480 |
issn | 2509-4262 2509-4254 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11058738 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Blood & organ donations Blood diseases Blood transfusions Budget Chelation therapy Disease management Impact analysis Iron Market shares Medical prognosis Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Original Original Research Article Patients Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Public health Reimbursement |
title | Can Cyprus Afford Luspatercept? A Budget Impact Analysis of the Reimbursement of Luspatercept for the Management of Thalassaemia in Cyprus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A40%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Cyprus%20Afford%20Luspatercept?%20A%20Budget%20Impact%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Reimbursement%20of%20Luspatercept%20for%20the%20Management%20of%20Thalassaemia%20in%20Cyprus&rft.jtitle=PharmacoEconomics%20-%20Open&rft.au=Pitsillidou,%20Olga&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=471-480&rft.issn=2509-4262&rft.eissn=2509-4254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41669-024-00482-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA792093151%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048268194&rft_id=info:pmid/38575797&rft_galeid=A792093151&rfr_iscdi=true |