Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Is it time to reach an Agreement?
In this editorial, we proceed to comment on the article by Chua , addressing the management of metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (mLLN) in stage II/III rectal cancer patients below the peritoneal reflection. The treatment of this nodal area sparks significant controversy due to the strategic dif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of clinical oncology 2024-04, Vol.15 (4), p.472-477 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 477 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 472 |
container_title | World journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E López-Campos, Fernando Couñago, Felipe |
description | In this editorial, we proceed to comment on the article by Chua
, addressing the management of metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (mLLN) in stage II/III rectal cancer patients below the peritoneal reflection. The treatment of this nodal area sparks significant controversy due to the strategic differences followed by Eastern and Western physicians, albeit with a higher degree of convergence in recent years. The dissection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes without neoadjuvant therapy is a standard practice in Eastern countries. In contrast, in the West, preference leans towards opting for neoadjuvant therapy with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, that would cover the treatment of this area without the need to add the dissection of these nodes to the total mesorectal excision. In the presence of high-risk nodal characteristics for mLLN related to radiological imaging and lack of response to neoadjuvant therapy, the risk of lateral local recurrence increases, suggesting the appropriate selection of strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence in each patient profile. Despite the heterogeneous and retrospective nature of studies addressing this area, an international consensus is necessary to approach this clinical scenario uniformly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5306/wjco.v15.i4.472 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11056856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3049721371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-a350d997822b34f95973e06b6bfa926a5b2e2d8003ad632198c3e7148c5ad4573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUlLBDEQhYMoKurZm-ToZcbsSXsRETdQvOhNCOl09UykuzMmPSPz740rmktCvZdXVXwIHVIylZyok7cXH6crKqdBTIVmG2iXMWomgnO--ee9gw5yfiHlCKkUN9tohxtlKsX0Lnq-d4ObQQ_DiGOLOzdCch1eQLcKHnfrfjHHQ2wg4zDgBH4soneDh3SKb0txxGPoAY-xiM7PsRvw-SzBZ-DZPtpqXZfh4PveQ09Xl48XN5O7h-vbi_O7iWfajBPHJWmqShvGai7aSlaaA1G1qltXMeVkzYA1hhDuGsUZrYznoKkwXrpGSM330NlX7mJZ99D40rssYRcp9C6tbXTB_leGMLezuLKUEqmMVCXh-Dshxdcl5NH2IXvoOjdAXGbLiag0o1zTYj35svoUc07Q_vahxH5wsR9cbOFig7CFS_lx9He8X_8PBf4OOX2KaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049721371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Is it time to reach an Agreement?</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E ; López-Campos, Fernando ; Couñago, Felipe</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E ; López-Campos, Fernando ; Couñago, Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>In this editorial, we proceed to comment on the article by Chua
, addressing the management of metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (mLLN) in stage II/III rectal cancer patients below the peritoneal reflection. The treatment of this nodal area sparks significant controversy due to the strategic differences followed by Eastern and Western physicians, albeit with a higher degree of convergence in recent years. The dissection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes without neoadjuvant therapy is a standard practice in Eastern countries. In contrast, in the West, preference leans towards opting for neoadjuvant therapy with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, that would cover the treatment of this area without the need to add the dissection of these nodes to the total mesorectal excision. In the presence of high-risk nodal characteristics for mLLN related to radiological imaging and lack of response to neoadjuvant therapy, the risk of lateral local recurrence increases, suggesting the appropriate selection of strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence in each patient profile. Despite the heterogeneous and retrospective nature of studies addressing this area, an international consensus is necessary to approach this clinical scenario uniformly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2218-4333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2218-4333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i4.472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38689627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><ispartof>World journal of clinical oncology, 2024-04, Vol.15 (4), p.472-477</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-a350d997822b34f95973e06b6bfa926a5b2e2d8003ad632198c3e7148c5ad4573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11056856/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11056856/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38689627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Campos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couñago, Felipe</creatorcontrib><title>Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Is it time to reach an Agreement?</title><title>World journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>World J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>In this editorial, we proceed to comment on the article by Chua
, addressing the management of metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (mLLN) in stage II/III rectal cancer patients below the peritoneal reflection. The treatment of this nodal area sparks significant controversy due to the strategic differences followed by Eastern and Western physicians, albeit with a higher degree of convergence in recent years. The dissection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes without neoadjuvant therapy is a standard practice in Eastern countries. In contrast, in the West, preference leans towards opting for neoadjuvant therapy with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, that would cover the treatment of this area without the need to add the dissection of these nodes to the total mesorectal excision. In the presence of high-risk nodal characteristics for mLLN related to radiological imaging and lack of response to neoadjuvant therapy, the risk of lateral local recurrence increases, suggesting the appropriate selection of strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence in each patient profile. Despite the heterogeneous and retrospective nature of studies addressing this area, an international consensus is necessary to approach this clinical scenario uniformly.</description><issn>2218-4333</issn><issn>2218-4333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUlLBDEQhYMoKurZm-ToZcbsSXsRETdQvOhNCOl09UykuzMmPSPz740rmktCvZdXVXwIHVIylZyok7cXH6crKqdBTIVmG2iXMWomgnO--ee9gw5yfiHlCKkUN9tohxtlKsX0Lnq-d4ObQQ_DiGOLOzdCch1eQLcKHnfrfjHHQ2wg4zDgBH4soneDh3SKb0txxGPoAY-xiM7PsRvw-SzBZ-DZPtpqXZfh4PveQ09Xl48XN5O7h-vbi_O7iWfajBPHJWmqShvGai7aSlaaA1G1qltXMeVkzYA1hhDuGsUZrYznoKkwXrpGSM330NlX7mJZ99D40rssYRcp9C6tbXTB_leGMLezuLKUEqmMVCXh-Dshxdcl5NH2IXvoOjdAXGbLiag0o1zTYj35svoUc07Q_vahxH5wsR9cbOFig7CFS_lx9He8X_8PBf4OOX2KaQ</recordid><startdate>20240424</startdate><enddate>20240424</enddate><creator>Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E</creator><creator>López-Campos, Fernando</creator><creator>Couñago, Felipe</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240424</creationdate><title>Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Is it time to reach an Agreement?</title><author>Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E ; López-Campos, Fernando ; Couñago, Felipe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-a350d997822b34f95973e06b6bfa926a5b2e2d8003ad632198c3e7148c5ad4573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Campos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Couñago, Felipe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero-Zoghbi, Sigfredo E</au><au>López-Campos, Fernando</au><au>Couñago, Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Is it time to reach an Agreement?</atitle><jtitle>World journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>World J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-04-24</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>472-477</pages><issn>2218-4333</issn><eissn>2218-4333</eissn><abstract>In this editorial, we proceed to comment on the article by Chua
, addressing the management of metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (mLLN) in stage II/III rectal cancer patients below the peritoneal reflection. The treatment of this nodal area sparks significant controversy due to the strategic differences followed by Eastern and Western physicians, albeit with a higher degree of convergence in recent years. The dissection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes without neoadjuvant therapy is a standard practice in Eastern countries. In contrast, in the West, preference leans towards opting for neoadjuvant therapy with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, that would cover the treatment of this area without the need to add the dissection of these nodes to the total mesorectal excision. In the presence of high-risk nodal characteristics for mLLN related to radiological imaging and lack of response to neoadjuvant therapy, the risk of lateral local recurrence increases, suggesting the appropriate selection of strategies to reduce the risk of recurrence in each patient profile. Despite the heterogeneous and retrospective nature of studies addressing this area, an international consensus is necessary to approach this clinical scenario uniformly.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>38689627</pmid><doi>10.5306/wjco.v15.i4.472</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2218-4333 |
ispartof | World journal of clinical oncology, 2024-04, Vol.15 (4), p.472-477 |
issn | 2218-4333 2218-4333 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11056856 |
source | PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
title | Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Is it time to reach an Agreement? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A24%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20lateral%20pelvic%20lymph%20nodes%20in%20rectal%20cancer:%20Is%20it%20time%20to%20reach%20an%20Agreement?&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Romero-Zoghbi,%20Sigfredo%20E&rft.date=2024-04-24&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=472-477&rft.issn=2218-4333&rft.eissn=2218-4333&rft_id=info:doi/10.5306/wjco.v15.i4.472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3049721371%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049721371&rft_id=info:pmid/38689627&rfr_iscdi=true |