Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic. We conducted a pilot study implementing the pati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2024-02, Vol.228, p.180-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 228 |
creator | Mott, Nicole M. Huynh, Victoria Vemuru, Sudheer Parris, Hannah J. Colborn, Kathryn Ahrendt, Gretchen Christian, Nicole Kim, Simon Matlock, Daniel D. Cumbler, Ethan Tevis, Sarah E.A. |
description | Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic.
We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively.
Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively.
We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data.
•Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11044988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961023004749</els_id><sourcerecordid>2930471565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e73be96fb962231c5ec9b9cad6936aedcd23cd107734f8018494e83c9b107ea13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EotOBRwBZYsMmwZdcbDZoWrVQqQgJwdpynJOpQ2IH2yniHXhoPOpQLhtWlu3_P-f850PoGSUlJbR5NZZ6HuMa9iUjjJdEloSxB2hDRSsLKgR_iDaEEFbIhpITdBrjmK-UVvwxOuFtW1FB-Ab9ONMhWAgRa9fjQRs72aSTzw_J4xl0bmHdHi86WXAJB1h8SNBjvybjZ4jYumzF2ugeZmtwF7InYaOdgYDNZJ01r_EuK5ZlsiaX8Q77AacbwB8vit3VezwEPcM3H748QY8GPUV4ejy36PPlxafzd8X1h7dX57vrwnDZpgJa3oFshk42jHFqajCyk3mARvJGQ296xk1PSdvyahCEikpWIHgW5TfQlG_Rm7u6y9rNWZ-DBT2pJdhZh-_Ka6v-_nH2Ru39raKUVJXMy92il8cKwX9dISY122hgmrQDv0bFRCMo46I-NHvxj3T0a3A5n2KSk6qldVNnVX2nMsHHGGC4n4YSdQCuRnUErg7AFZEqA8--539GuXf9Ivw7K-SF3mbSKppM0kBvA5ikem__0-InSYrBxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930471565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mott, Nicole M. ; Huynh, Victoria ; Vemuru, Sudheer ; Parris, Hannah J. ; Colborn, Kathryn ; Ahrendt, Gretchen ; Christian, Nicole ; Kim, Simon ; Matlock, Daniel D. ; Cumbler, Ethan ; Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mott, Nicole M. ; Huynh, Victoria ; Vemuru, Sudheer ; Parris, Hannah J. ; Colborn, Kathryn ; Ahrendt, Gretchen ; Christian, Nicole ; Kim, Simon ; Matlock, Daniel D. ; Cumbler, Ethan ; Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic.
We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively.
Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively.
We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data.
•Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37741803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Automation ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; BREAST-Q ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Female ; Humans ; Implementation ; Lumpectomy ; Mastectomy ; Nurses ; Oncology ; Participation ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patient reported outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Quality of life ; Radiation ; RE-AIM ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Value-based care ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2024-02, Vol.228, p.180-184</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e73be96fb962231c5ec9b9cad6936aedcd23cd107734f8018494e83c9b107ea13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4834-3400 ; 0000-0001-9597-9642 ; 0000-0001-8498-1819 ; 0000-0001-8399-6330 ; 0000-0003-3680-6623 ; 0000-0001-5672-8226 ; 0009-0008-6815-7908</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961023004749$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mott, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vemuru, Sudheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parris, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colborn, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrendt, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matlock, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumbler, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic.
We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively.
Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively.
We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data.
•Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>BREAST-Q</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Lumpectomy</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient reported outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>RE-AIM</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Value-based care</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EotOBRwBZYsMmwZdcbDZoWrVQqQgJwdpynJOpQ2IH2yniHXhoPOpQLhtWlu3_P-f850PoGSUlJbR5NZZ6HuMa9iUjjJdEloSxB2hDRSsLKgR_iDaEEFbIhpITdBrjmK-UVvwxOuFtW1FB-Ab9ONMhWAgRa9fjQRs72aSTzw_J4xl0bmHdHi86WXAJB1h8SNBjvybjZ4jYumzF2ugeZmtwF7InYaOdgYDNZJ01r_EuK5ZlsiaX8Q77AacbwB8vit3VezwEPcM3H748QY8GPUV4ejy36PPlxafzd8X1h7dX57vrwnDZpgJa3oFshk42jHFqajCyk3mARvJGQ296xk1PSdvyahCEikpWIHgW5TfQlG_Rm7u6y9rNWZ-DBT2pJdhZh-_Ka6v-_nH2Ru39raKUVJXMy92il8cKwX9dISY122hgmrQDv0bFRCMo46I-NHvxj3T0a3A5n2KSk6qldVNnVX2nMsHHGGC4n4YSdQCuRnUErg7AFZEqA8--539GuXf9Ivw7K-SF3mbSKppM0kBvA5ikem__0-InSYrBxg</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Mott, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Huynh, Victoria</creator><creator>Vemuru, Sudheer</creator><creator>Parris, Hannah J.</creator><creator>Colborn, Kathryn</creator><creator>Ahrendt, Gretchen</creator><creator>Christian, Nicole</creator><creator>Kim, Simon</creator><creator>Matlock, Daniel D.</creator><creator>Cumbler, Ethan</creator><creator>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-3400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-9642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-1819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-6330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-6623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-8226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6815-7908</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</title><author>Mott, Nicole M. ; Huynh, Victoria ; Vemuru, Sudheer ; Parris, Hannah J. ; Colborn, Kathryn ; Ahrendt, Gretchen ; Christian, Nicole ; Kim, Simon ; Matlock, Daniel D. ; Cumbler, Ethan ; Tevis, Sarah E.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e73be96fb962231c5ec9b9cad6936aedcd23cd107734f8018494e83c9b107ea13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>BREAST-Q</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Lumpectomy</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient reported outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>RE-AIM</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Value-based care</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mott, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vemuru, Sudheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parris, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colborn, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrendt, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matlock, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumbler, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mott, Nicole M.</au><au>Huynh, Victoria</au><au>Vemuru, Sudheer</au><au>Parris, Hannah J.</au><au>Colborn, Kathryn</au><au>Ahrendt, Gretchen</au><au>Christian, Nicole</au><au>Kim, Simon</au><au>Matlock, Daniel D.</au><au>Cumbler, Ethan</au><au>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>228</volume><spage>180</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>180-184</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic.
We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively.
Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively.
We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data.
•Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37741803</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-3400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-9642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-1819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-6330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-6623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-8226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6815-7908</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2024-02, Vol.228, p.180-184 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11044988 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Automation Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - surgery BREAST-Q Cancer therapies Clinical outcomes Clinical trials Electronic health records Electronic medical records Female Humans Implementation Lumpectomy Mastectomy Nurses Oncology Participation Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient reported outcomes Patient satisfaction Patients Pilot Projects Quality of life Radiation RE-AIM Surgeons Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires Value-based care Workflow |
title | Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A42%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20and%20facilitators%20to%20measuring%20patient%20reported%20outcomes%20in%20an%20academic%20breast%20cancer%20clinic:%20An%20application%20of%20the%20RE-AIM%20framework&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Mott,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=228&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=180-184&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2930471565%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930471565&rft_id=info:pmid/37741803&rft_els_id=S0002961023004749&rfr_iscdi=true |