Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic. We conducted a pilot study implementing the pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2024-02, Vol.228, p.180-184
Hauptverfasser: Mott, Nicole M., Huynh, Victoria, Vemuru, Sudheer, Parris, Hannah J., Colborn, Kathryn, Ahrendt, Gretchen, Christian, Nicole, Kim, Simon, Matlock, Daniel D., Cumbler, Ethan, Tevis, Sarah E.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue
container_start_page 180
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 228
creator Mott, Nicole M.
Huynh, Victoria
Vemuru, Sudheer
Parris, Hannah J.
Colborn, Kathryn
Ahrendt, Gretchen
Christian, Nicole
Kim, Simon
Matlock, Daniel D.
Cumbler, Ethan
Tevis, Sarah E.A.
description Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic. We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively. Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively. We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data. •Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11044988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961023004749</els_id><sourcerecordid>2930471565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e73be96fb962231c5ec9b9cad6936aedcd23cd107734f8018494e83c9b107ea13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EotOBRwBZYsMmwZdcbDZoWrVQqQgJwdpynJOpQ2IH2yniHXhoPOpQLhtWlu3_P-f850PoGSUlJbR5NZZ6HuMa9iUjjJdEloSxB2hDRSsLKgR_iDaEEFbIhpITdBrjmK-UVvwxOuFtW1FB-Ab9ONMhWAgRa9fjQRs72aSTzw_J4xl0bmHdHi86WXAJB1h8SNBjvybjZ4jYumzF2ugeZmtwF7InYaOdgYDNZJ01r_EuK5ZlsiaX8Q77AacbwB8vit3VezwEPcM3H748QY8GPUV4ejy36PPlxafzd8X1h7dX57vrwnDZpgJa3oFshk42jHFqajCyk3mARvJGQ296xk1PSdvyahCEikpWIHgW5TfQlG_Rm7u6y9rNWZ-DBT2pJdhZh-_Ka6v-_nH2Ru39raKUVJXMy92il8cKwX9dISY122hgmrQDv0bFRCMo46I-NHvxj3T0a3A5n2KSk6qldVNnVX2nMsHHGGC4n4YSdQCuRnUErg7AFZEqA8--539GuXf9Ivw7K-SF3mbSKppM0kBvA5ikem__0-InSYrBxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930471565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mott, Nicole M. ; Huynh, Victoria ; Vemuru, Sudheer ; Parris, Hannah J. ; Colborn, Kathryn ; Ahrendt, Gretchen ; Christian, Nicole ; Kim, Simon ; Matlock, Daniel D. ; Cumbler, Ethan ; Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mott, Nicole M. ; Huynh, Victoria ; Vemuru, Sudheer ; Parris, Hannah J. ; Colborn, Kathryn ; Ahrendt, Gretchen ; Christian, Nicole ; Kim, Simon ; Matlock, Daniel D. ; Cumbler, Ethan ; Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic. We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively. Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively. We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data. •Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37741803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Automation ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; BREAST-Q ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Female ; Humans ; Implementation ; Lumpectomy ; Mastectomy ; Nurses ; Oncology ; Participation ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patient reported outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Quality of life ; Radiation ; RE-AIM ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Value-based care ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2024-02, Vol.228, p.180-184</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e73be96fb962231c5ec9b9cad6936aedcd23cd107734f8018494e83c9b107ea13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4834-3400 ; 0000-0001-9597-9642 ; 0000-0001-8498-1819 ; 0000-0001-8399-6330 ; 0000-0003-3680-6623 ; 0000-0001-5672-8226 ; 0009-0008-6815-7908</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961023004749$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mott, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vemuru, Sudheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parris, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colborn, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrendt, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matlock, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumbler, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic. We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively. Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively. We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data. •Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>BREAST-Q</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Lumpectomy</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient reported outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>RE-AIM</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Value-based care</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EotOBRwBZYsMmwZdcbDZoWrVQqQgJwdpynJOpQ2IH2yniHXhoPOpQLhtWlu3_P-f850PoGSUlJbR5NZZ6HuMa9iUjjJdEloSxB2hDRSsLKgR_iDaEEFbIhpITdBrjmK-UVvwxOuFtW1FB-Ab9ONMhWAgRa9fjQRs72aSTzw_J4xl0bmHdHi86WXAJB1h8SNBjvybjZ4jYumzF2ugeZmtwF7InYaOdgYDNZJ01r_EuK5ZlsiaX8Q77AacbwB8vit3VezwEPcM3H748QY8GPUV4ejy36PPlxafzd8X1h7dX57vrwnDZpgJa3oFshk42jHFqajCyk3mARvJGQ296xk1PSdvyahCEikpWIHgW5TfQlG_Rm7u6y9rNWZ-DBT2pJdhZh-_Ka6v-_nH2Ru39raKUVJXMy92il8cKwX9dISY122hgmrQDv0bFRCMo46I-NHvxj3T0a3A5n2KSk6qldVNnVX2nMsHHGGC4n4YSdQCuRnUErg7AFZEqA8--539GuXf9Ivw7K-SF3mbSKppM0kBvA5ikem__0-InSYrBxg</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Mott, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Huynh, Victoria</creator><creator>Vemuru, Sudheer</creator><creator>Parris, Hannah J.</creator><creator>Colborn, Kathryn</creator><creator>Ahrendt, Gretchen</creator><creator>Christian, Nicole</creator><creator>Kim, Simon</creator><creator>Matlock, Daniel D.</creator><creator>Cumbler, Ethan</creator><creator>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-3400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-9642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-1819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-6330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-6623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-8226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6815-7908</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</title><author>Mott, Nicole M. ; Huynh, Victoria ; Vemuru, Sudheer ; Parris, Hannah J. ; Colborn, Kathryn ; Ahrendt, Gretchen ; Christian, Nicole ; Kim, Simon ; Matlock, Daniel D. ; Cumbler, Ethan ; Tevis, Sarah E.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e73be96fb962231c5ec9b9cad6936aedcd23cd107734f8018494e83c9b107ea13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>BREAST-Q</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Lumpectomy</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient reported outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>RE-AIM</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Value-based care</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mott, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vemuru, Sudheer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parris, Hannah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colborn, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrendt, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matlock, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumbler, Ethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mott, Nicole M.</au><au>Huynh, Victoria</au><au>Vemuru, Sudheer</au><au>Parris, Hannah J.</au><au>Colborn, Kathryn</au><au>Ahrendt, Gretchen</au><au>Christian, Nicole</au><au>Kim, Simon</au><au>Matlock, Daniel D.</au><au>Cumbler, Ethan</au><au>Tevis, Sarah E.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>228</volume><spage>180</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>180-184</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patient-centered, value-based care; however, implementation into surgical practice remains limited. We aimed to demonstrate feasibility of measuring PROMs in an academic breast cancer clinic. We conducted a pilot study implementing the patient-reported outcome measure BREAST-Q among patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer at a single institution from 06/2019-03/2023 using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Barriers and facilitators were characterized. Survey completion was assessed pre-operatively and up to 12 months post-operatively. Barriers included limited time and lack of incorporation into the electronic medical record. Facilitators included utilizing trained team members and an automated workflow. Among eligible patients, 74% completed BREAST-Q at 2-weeks post-operatively and 55% at 12 months post-operatively. We describe the implementation of a PROM using the RE-AIM framework, highlighting facilitators and barriers that may assist others in collecting patient-reported outcome data. •Patient-reported outcome data were collected in a breast cancer clinic.•A number of facilitators and barriers impacted implementation.•Work remains to incorporate patient-reported outcome data into clinical care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37741803</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-3400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-9642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-1819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-6330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-6623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-8226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6815-7908</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2024-02, Vol.228, p.180-184
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11044988
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Automation
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
BREAST-Q
Cancer therapies
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
Electronic health records
Electronic medical records
Female
Humans
Implementation
Lumpectomy
Mastectomy
Nurses
Oncology
Participation
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient reported outcomes
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Pilot Projects
Quality of life
Radiation
RE-AIM
Surgeons
Surgery
Surveys and Questionnaires
Value-based care
Workflow
title Barriers and facilitators to measuring patient reported outcomes in an academic breast cancer clinic: An application of the RE-AIM framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A42%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20and%20facilitators%20to%20measuring%20patient%20reported%20outcomes%20in%20an%20academic%20breast%20cancer%20clinic:%20An%20application%20of%20the%20RE-AIM%20framework&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Mott,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=228&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=180-184&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2930471565%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930471565&rft_id=info:pmid/37741803&rft_els_id=S0002961023004749&rfr_iscdi=true