Cruciate-retaining Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Varus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparative Study

There has been debate regarding the advantages of cruciate-retaining over posterior stabilized (PS) knee arthroplasty and vice versa. Many authors consider any coronal plane deformity > 15° as a contraindication for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. We aimed to compare whether functiona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic case reports 2024-04, Vol.14 (4), p.176-180
Hauptverfasser: George, James C, Chittaranjan, B Samuel, Babu, Subin, Mohan, Bharath
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 4
container_start_page 176
container_title Journal of orthopaedic case reports
container_volume 14
creator George, James C
Chittaranjan, B Samuel
Babu, Subin
Mohan, Bharath
description There has been debate regarding the advantages of cruciate-retaining over posterior stabilized (PS) knee arthroplasty and vice versa. Many authors consider any coronal plane deformity > 15° as a contraindication for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. We aimed to compare whether functional outcome, deformity correction, and survivorship of cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty (CR) for severe varus deformity are equivalent to that ofposterior cruciate ligament substituting (PS) for 6 years. We conducted a retrospective comparative study among patients who underwent Total Knee Replacement in the Orthopedics Department of a tertiary care hospital between 2016 and 2018 August who had a varus deformity of more than 15°. The first author exclusively performed CR operation (Group A) for all complex knees. In contrast, the second author performed PS surgery (Group B) for any coronal plane deformity over 15°. Clinical evaluation included completing a Knee Society Score (KSS) Evaluation Form. Pre-operative scoring was collected from the hospital database. All clinical examinations and radiographs at the final follow-up were done by the third author, who was unbiased and not involved with the initial patient care. here were 39 patients in Group A (CR) and 28 patients in Group B (PS). In Group A, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.05 ± 2.72° and the pre-operative KSS was 32.94 ± 6.79. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 5.48 ± 1.8° and mean KSS of 89.17 ± 5.79. In Group B, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.14±3.82° and pre-operative KSS was 32.82 ± 5.98. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 4.85 ± 2.1° and mean KSS of 90.17 ± 5.13. The mean insert thickness was 11.76 ± 1.75 mm and 11.42 ± 1.75mm among the CRand PS groups, respectively. Concerning deformity correction (P = 0.19) and functional outcome (P = 0.46), both groups showed equal improvement with a 100% survival rate for 6 years. We concluded that CRknee replacements are possible with excellent functional and radiological outcomes in severe varus arthritic knees with a 100 % survival rate.
doi_str_mv 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i04.4402
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11043990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3048493977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2092-d0589d02cfe275d1da54091c0a6d079d4752e34646f19f21111b3b7f0e355acf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtuFDEMhiMEolXbV4BccjODc5hDuEGrLSepUlFbuI2yGU83q5nJkGQW7duTbUsFvrEl279_6yPkLYOSCQbN-523oeTAZblnsnQgSymBvyCnXHBWiJY1L3PNKyigbqsTchHjDgCYkBwUe01ORFu3TLH6lOzWYbHOJCwCJuMmN93TVUjb4OfBxHSgbqLfTXI4pUh_u7Slt7jHgPSnCUukl9j7MLp0-EBX9AZT8HFGm9we6dqPswnmob5NS3c4J696M0S8eMpn5MfnT3frr8XV9Zdv69VVYbM7XnRQtaoDbnvkTdWxzlQyu7Zg6g4a1cmm4ihkLeueqZ6zHBuxaXpAUVXG9uKMfHzUnZfNiJ3N1oMZ9BzcaMJBe-P0_53JbfW932vGQAqlICu8e1II_teCMenRRYvDYCb0S9QCZCuVUE2TR5vHUZtfjwH75zsM9AMtfaSlj7R0pqUzLX2klTff_Gvzee8vG_EHr4OUjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048493977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cruciate-retaining Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Varus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparative Study</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>George, James C ; Chittaranjan, B Samuel ; Babu, Subin ; Mohan, Bharath</creator><creatorcontrib>George, James C ; Chittaranjan, B Samuel ; Babu, Subin ; Mohan, Bharath ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India</creatorcontrib><description>There has been debate regarding the advantages of cruciate-retaining over posterior stabilized (PS) knee arthroplasty and vice versa. Many authors consider any coronal plane deformity &gt; 15° as a contraindication for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. We aimed to compare whether functional outcome, deformity correction, and survivorship of cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty (CR) for severe varus deformity are equivalent to that ofposterior cruciate ligament substituting (PS) for 6 years. We conducted a retrospective comparative study among patients who underwent Total Knee Replacement in the Orthopedics Department of a tertiary care hospital between 2016 and 2018 August who had a varus deformity of more than 15°. The first author exclusively performed CR operation (Group A) for all complex knees. In contrast, the second author performed PS surgery (Group B) for any coronal plane deformity over 15°. Clinical evaluation included completing a Knee Society Score (KSS) Evaluation Form. Pre-operative scoring was collected from the hospital database. All clinical examinations and radiographs at the final follow-up were done by the third author, who was unbiased and not involved with the initial patient care. here were 39 patients in Group A (CR) and 28 patients in Group B (PS). In Group A, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.05 ± 2.72° and the pre-operative KSS was 32.94 ± 6.79. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 5.48 ± 1.8° and mean KSS of 89.17 ± 5.79. In Group B, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.14±3.82° and pre-operative KSS was 32.82 ± 5.98. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 4.85 ± 2.1° and mean KSS of 90.17 ± 5.13. The mean insert thickness was 11.76 ± 1.75 mm and 11.42 ± 1.75mm among the CRand PS groups, respectively. Concerning deformity correction (P = 0.19) and functional outcome (P = 0.46), both groups showed equal improvement with a 100% survival rate for 6 years. We concluded that CRknee replacements are possible with excellent functional and radiological outcomes in severe varus arthritic knees with a 100 % survival rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2250-0685</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2321-3817</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2321-3817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i04.4402</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38681916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Indian Orthopaedic Research Group</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024-04, Vol.14 (4), p.176-180</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.</rights><rights>Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11043990/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11043990/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38681916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>George, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chittaranjan, B Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Subin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Bharath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India</creatorcontrib><title>Cruciate-retaining Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Varus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparative Study</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic case reports</title><addtitle>J Orthop Case Rep</addtitle><description>There has been debate regarding the advantages of cruciate-retaining over posterior stabilized (PS) knee arthroplasty and vice versa. Many authors consider any coronal plane deformity &gt; 15° as a contraindication for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. We aimed to compare whether functional outcome, deformity correction, and survivorship of cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty (CR) for severe varus deformity are equivalent to that ofposterior cruciate ligament substituting (PS) for 6 years. We conducted a retrospective comparative study among patients who underwent Total Knee Replacement in the Orthopedics Department of a tertiary care hospital between 2016 and 2018 August who had a varus deformity of more than 15°. The first author exclusively performed CR operation (Group A) for all complex knees. In contrast, the second author performed PS surgery (Group B) for any coronal plane deformity over 15°. Clinical evaluation included completing a Knee Society Score (KSS) Evaluation Form. Pre-operative scoring was collected from the hospital database. All clinical examinations and radiographs at the final follow-up were done by the third author, who was unbiased and not involved with the initial patient care. here were 39 patients in Group A (CR) and 28 patients in Group B (PS). In Group A, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.05 ± 2.72° and the pre-operative KSS was 32.94 ± 6.79. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 5.48 ± 1.8° and mean KSS of 89.17 ± 5.79. In Group B, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.14±3.82° and pre-operative KSS was 32.82 ± 5.98. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 4.85 ± 2.1° and mean KSS of 90.17 ± 5.13. The mean insert thickness was 11.76 ± 1.75 mm and 11.42 ± 1.75mm among the CRand PS groups, respectively. Concerning deformity correction (P = 0.19) and functional outcome (P = 0.46), both groups showed equal improvement with a 100% survival rate for 6 years. We concluded that CRknee replacements are possible with excellent functional and radiological outcomes in severe varus arthritic knees with a 100 % survival rate.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2250-0685</issn><issn>2321-3817</issn><issn>2321-3817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkdtuFDEMhiMEolXbV4BccjODc5hDuEGrLSepUlFbuI2yGU83q5nJkGQW7duTbUsFvrEl279_6yPkLYOSCQbN-523oeTAZblnsnQgSymBvyCnXHBWiJY1L3PNKyigbqsTchHjDgCYkBwUe01ORFu3TLH6lOzWYbHOJCwCJuMmN93TVUjb4OfBxHSgbqLfTXI4pUh_u7Slt7jHgPSnCUukl9j7MLp0-EBX9AZT8HFGm9we6dqPswnmob5NS3c4J696M0S8eMpn5MfnT3frr8XV9Zdv69VVYbM7XnRQtaoDbnvkTdWxzlQyu7Zg6g4a1cmm4ihkLeueqZ6zHBuxaXpAUVXG9uKMfHzUnZfNiJ3N1oMZ9BzcaMJBe-P0_53JbfW932vGQAqlICu8e1II_teCMenRRYvDYCb0S9QCZCuVUE2TR5vHUZtfjwH75zsM9AMtfaSlj7R0pqUzLX2klTff_Gvzee8vG_EHr4OUjA</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>George, James C</creator><creator>Chittaranjan, B Samuel</creator><creator>Babu, Subin</creator><creator>Mohan, Bharath</creator><general>Indian Orthopaedic Research Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Cruciate-retaining Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Varus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparative Study</title><author>George, James C ; Chittaranjan, B Samuel ; Babu, Subin ; Mohan, Bharath</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2092-d0589d02cfe275d1da54091c0a6d079d4752e34646f19f21111b3b7f0e355acf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>George, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chittaranjan, B Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Subin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Bharath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic case reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>George, James C</au><au>Chittaranjan, B Samuel</au><au>Babu, Subin</au><au>Mohan, Bharath</au><aucorp>Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cruciate-retaining Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Varus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparative Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic case reports</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Case Rep</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>176-180</pages><issn>2250-0685</issn><issn>2321-3817</issn><eissn>2321-3817</eissn><abstract>There has been debate regarding the advantages of cruciate-retaining over posterior stabilized (PS) knee arthroplasty and vice versa. Many authors consider any coronal plane deformity &gt; 15° as a contraindication for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. We aimed to compare whether functional outcome, deformity correction, and survivorship of cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty (CR) for severe varus deformity are equivalent to that ofposterior cruciate ligament substituting (PS) for 6 years. We conducted a retrospective comparative study among patients who underwent Total Knee Replacement in the Orthopedics Department of a tertiary care hospital between 2016 and 2018 August who had a varus deformity of more than 15°. The first author exclusively performed CR operation (Group A) for all complex knees. In contrast, the second author performed PS surgery (Group B) for any coronal plane deformity over 15°. Clinical evaluation included completing a Knee Society Score (KSS) Evaluation Form. Pre-operative scoring was collected from the hospital database. All clinical examinations and radiographs at the final follow-up were done by the third author, who was unbiased and not involved with the initial patient care. here were 39 patients in Group A (CR) and 28 patients in Group B (PS). In Group A, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.05 ± 2.72° and the pre-operative KSS was 32.94 ± 6.79. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 5.48 ± 1.8° and mean KSS of 89.17 ± 5.79. In Group B, the mean pre-operative varus was 22.14±3.82° and pre-operative KSS was 32.82 ± 5.98. Postoperatively, the deformity corrected to a mean valgus of 4.85 ± 2.1° and mean KSS of 90.17 ± 5.13. The mean insert thickness was 11.76 ± 1.75 mm and 11.42 ± 1.75mm among the CRand PS groups, respectively. Concerning deformity correction (P = 0.19) and functional outcome (P = 0.46), both groups showed equal improvement with a 100% survival rate for 6 years. We concluded that CRknee replacements are possible with excellent functional and radiological outcomes in severe varus arthritic knees with a 100 % survival rate.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Indian Orthopaedic Research Group</pub><pmid>38681916</pmid><doi>10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i04.4402</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2250-0685
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024-04, Vol.14 (4), p.176-180
issn 2250-0685
2321-3817
2321-3817
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11043990
source PubMed Central Free; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Original
title Cruciate-retaining Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Varus Deformity: A Retrospective Comparative Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T13%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cruciate-retaining%20Arthroplasty%20in%20Patients%20with%20Severe%20Varus%20Deformity:%20A%20Retrospective%20Comparative%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20case%20reports&rft.au=George,%20James%20C&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Orthopaedic%20Surgery,%20Believers%20Church%20Medical%20College%20Hospital,%20Thiruvalla,%20Pathanamthitta,%20Kerala,%20India&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=176-180&rft.issn=2250-0685&rft.eissn=2321-3817&rft_id=info:doi/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i04.4402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3048493977%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048493977&rft_id=info:pmid/38681916&rfr_iscdi=true