Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a major breakthrough for cancer treatment. However, evidence regarding the use of ICIs in pancreatic cancer (PC) remained scarce. To assess the efficacy and safety of ICIs plus chemotherapy, patients with advanced PC were retrospectively recruited and we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY 2020-03, Vol.69 (3), p.365-372
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Junxun, Sun, Danyang, Wang, Jinliang, Han, Chun, Qian, Yuanyu, Chen, Guangying, Li, Xiaoyan, Zhang, Juan, Cui, Pengfei, Du, Wushuang, Wu, Zhaozhen, Chen, Shixue, Zheng, Xuan, Yue, Zhichao, Song, Jia, Gao, Chan, Cai, Shangli, Hu, Yi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a major breakthrough for cancer treatment. However, evidence regarding the use of ICIs in pancreatic cancer (PC) remained scarce. To assess the efficacy and safety of ICIs plus chemotherapy, patients with advanced PC were retrospectively recruited and were treated with either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus ICIs. Patients previously treated with any agents targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. In total, 58 patients were included (combination, n  = 22; chemotherapy, n  = 36). The combination group showed a significantly longer OS than the chemotherapy group [median, 18.1 vs 6.1 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.46 (0.23–0.90), P  = 0.021]. The median PFSs were 3.2 months in the combination group and 2.0 months in the chemotherapy group [HR 0.57 (0.32–0.99), P  = 0.041]. The combination group and the chemotherapy group had similar ORRs (18.2% vs 19.4%, P  = 0.906). All patients who achieved a partial response received a doublet chemotherapy regimen regardless of co-treatment with ICIs. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 31.8% of the patients in the combination group and in 16.9% of those receiving chemotherapy. Although the incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events was higher in the combination group than in the chemotherapy group, the difference was not significant ( P  = 0.183). Our findings suggest that the combination of ICIs with chemotherapy is both effective and tolerable for advanced PC. ICIs combined with a doublet chemotherapy regimen might be a preferable choice.
ISSN:0340-7004
1432-0851
DOI:10.1007/s00262-019-02452-3