Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends
Background There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies. Methods Google Trends™ was queried for: “En...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.457-461 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 461 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 457 |
container_title | Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Das, Sanjay Friedrich, Nadine A. Daniels, James Galvan, G. Cecilia Gong, Jun Posadas, Edwin Aronson, William Freedland, Stephen J. |
description | Background
There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies.
Methods
Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined.
Results
Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3
rd
place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid (
p
= 0.012). Across all states with data (
n
= 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income (
r
= 0.385,
p
= 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults (
r
= 0.426,
p
= 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity.
Conclusions
Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11019934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2863300571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e44618a1dfbb18ebafedc607227a29d7b0a153a0e4b947bc11a67dd89b8340573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQjhAVLYU_wAFZ4sIldCZ27PiEUAUFqVIlVE4cLMeebFNl7WAnK_Xf42VLeRx68ljfYx5fVb1CeIfAu7MskGusoeE1gEJZ6yfVCQol61ZC97TUXLa16trmuHqe8y0AaNTwrDrmSiotgZ9U37_SZJdxRyyTTe6GzXFeJ5vG5Y7FgQ17xPqdDY48m1PMi12Iuf0_sS350RV1DJmteQwbdhHjZiJ2nSj4_KI6GuyU6eX9e1p9-_Tx-vxzfXl18eX8w2XtRCOXmoSQ2Fn0Q99jR70dyDsJqmmUbbRXPVhsuQUSvRaqd4hWKu873XdcQKv4afX-4DuvfRnJUViSncycxq1Ndyba0fyLhPHGbOLOIAJqzUVxeHvvkOKPlfJitmN2NE02UFyzaTrJOZReWKhv_qPexjWFsp_hoBvkKMTesDmwXDlZTjQ8TINg9uGZQ3imhGd-hWd0Eb3-e48Hye-0CoEfCLlAYUPpT-9HbH8ChHamnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092131444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Das, Sanjay ; Friedrich, Nadine A. ; Daniels, James ; Galvan, G. Cecilia ; Gong, Jun ; Posadas, Edwin ; Aronson, William ; Freedland, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Sanjay ; Friedrich, Nadine A. ; Daniels, James ; Galvan, G. Cecilia ; Gong, Jun ; Posadas, Edwin ; Aronson, William ; Freedland, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies.
Methods
Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined.
Results
Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3
rd
place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid (
p
= 0.012). Across all states with data (
n
= 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income (
r
= 0.385,
p
= 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults (
r
= 0.426,
p
= 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity.
Conclusions
Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-7852</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-5608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37679603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/308 ; 692/699/2768/589/466 ; Acetic acid ; Adults ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Cancer therapies ; COVID-19 ; Drugs ; Family income ; FDA approval ; Health behavior ; Health economics ; Medicaid ; Prostate cancer ; Public interest ; Reproductive Medicine ; Search engines ; Socioeconomic factors ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.457-461</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e44618a1dfbb18ebafedc607227a29d7b0a153a0e4b947bc11a67dd89b8340573</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8713-1406 ; 0000-0003-2107-5362 ; 0000-0002-8104-6419 ; 0000-0001-8520-5280 ; 0000-0001-5892-3340 ; 0000-0002-6713-0614 ; 0000-0002-2401-2474 ; 0000-0001-8649-1346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Nadine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvan, G. Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posadas, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedland, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</title><title>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases</title><addtitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</addtitle><description>Background
There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies.
Methods
Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined.
Results
Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3
rd
place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid (
p
= 0.012). Across all states with data (
n
= 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income (
r
= 0.385,
p
= 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults (
r
= 0.426,
p
= 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity.
Conclusions
Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.</description><subject>692/308</subject><subject>692/699/2768/589/466</subject><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1365-7852</issn><issn>1476-5608</issn><issn>1476-5608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQjhAVLYU_wAFZ4sIldCZ27PiEUAUFqVIlVE4cLMeebFNl7WAnK_Xf42VLeRx68ljfYx5fVb1CeIfAu7MskGusoeE1gEJZ6yfVCQol61ZC97TUXLa16trmuHqe8y0AaNTwrDrmSiotgZ9U37_SZJdxRyyTTe6GzXFeJ5vG5Y7FgQ17xPqdDY48m1PMi12Iuf0_sS350RV1DJmteQwbdhHjZiJ2nSj4_KI6GuyU6eX9e1p9-_Tx-vxzfXl18eX8w2XtRCOXmoSQ2Fn0Q99jR70dyDsJqmmUbbRXPVhsuQUSvRaqd4hWKu873XdcQKv4afX-4DuvfRnJUViSncycxq1Ndyba0fyLhPHGbOLOIAJqzUVxeHvvkOKPlfJitmN2NE02UFyzaTrJOZReWKhv_qPexjWFsp_hoBvkKMTesDmwXDlZTjQ8TINg9uGZQ3imhGd-hWd0Eb3-e48Hye-0CoEfCLlAYUPpT-9HbH8ChHamnw</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Das, Sanjay</creator><creator>Friedrich, Nadine A.</creator><creator>Daniels, James</creator><creator>Galvan, G. Cecilia</creator><creator>Gong, Jun</creator><creator>Posadas, Edwin</creator><creator>Aronson, William</creator><creator>Freedland, Stephen J.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-1406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-5280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-3340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-0614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-1346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</title><author>Das, Sanjay ; Friedrich, Nadine A. ; Daniels, James ; Galvan, G. Cecilia ; Gong, Jun ; Posadas, Edwin ; Aronson, William ; Freedland, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e44618a1dfbb18ebafedc607227a29d7b0a153a0e4b947bc11a67dd89b8340573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>692/308</topic><topic>692/699/2768/589/466</topic><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Nadine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvan, G. Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posadas, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedland, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Sanjay</au><au>Friedrich, Nadine A.</au><au>Daniels, James</au><au>Galvan, G. Cecilia</au><au>Gong, Jun</au><au>Posadas, Edwin</au><au>Aronson, William</au><au>Freedland, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</atitle><jtitle>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases</jtitle><stitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</stitle><addtitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>457-461</pages><issn>1365-7852</issn><issn>1476-5608</issn><eissn>1476-5608</eissn><abstract>Background
There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies.
Methods
Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined.
Results
Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3
rd
place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid (
p
= 0.012). Across all states with data (
n
= 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income (
r
= 0.385,
p
= 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults (
r
= 0.426,
p
= 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity.
Conclusions
Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37679603</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-1406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-5280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-3340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-0614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-1346</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1365-7852 |
ispartof | Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.457-461 |
issn | 1365-7852 1476-5608 1476-5608 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11019934 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | 692/308 692/699/2768/589/466 Acetic acid Adults Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Research Cancer therapies COVID-19 Drugs Family income FDA approval Health behavior Health economics Medicaid Prostate cancer Public interest Reproductive Medicine Search engines Socioeconomic factors Trends |
title | Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A24%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20search%20popularity%20of%20five%20advanced%20prostate%20cancer%20medications%20using%20Google%20Trends&rft.jtitle=Prostate%20cancer%20and%20prostatic%20diseases&rft.au=Das,%20Sanjay&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=457-461&rft.issn=1365-7852&rft.eissn=1476-5608&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2863300571%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092131444&rft_id=info:pmid/37679603&rfr_iscdi=true |