Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends

Background There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies. Methods Google Trends™ was queried for: “En...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.457-461
Hauptverfasser: Das, Sanjay, Friedrich, Nadine A., Daniels, James, Galvan, G. Cecilia, Gong, Jun, Posadas, Edwin, Aronson, William, Freedland, Stephen J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 461
container_issue 3
container_start_page 457
container_title Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases
container_volume 27
creator Das, Sanjay
Friedrich, Nadine A.
Daniels, James
Galvan, G. Cecilia
Gong, Jun
Posadas, Edwin
Aronson, William
Freedland, Stephen J.
description Background There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies. Methods Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined. Results Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3 rd place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid ( p  = 0.012). Across all states with data ( n  = 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income ( r  = 0.385, p  = 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults ( r  = 0.426, p  = 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity. Conclusions Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11019934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2863300571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e44618a1dfbb18ebafedc607227a29d7b0a153a0e4b947bc11a67dd89b8340573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQjhAVLYU_wAFZ4sIldCZ27PiEUAUFqVIlVE4cLMeebFNl7WAnK_Xf42VLeRx68ljfYx5fVb1CeIfAu7MskGusoeE1gEJZ6yfVCQol61ZC97TUXLa16trmuHqe8y0AaNTwrDrmSiotgZ9U37_SZJdxRyyTTe6GzXFeJ5vG5Y7FgQ17xPqdDY48m1PMi12Iuf0_sS350RV1DJmteQwbdhHjZiJ2nSj4_KI6GuyU6eX9e1p9-_Tx-vxzfXl18eX8w2XtRCOXmoSQ2Fn0Q99jR70dyDsJqmmUbbRXPVhsuQUSvRaqd4hWKu873XdcQKv4afX-4DuvfRnJUViSncycxq1Ndyba0fyLhPHGbOLOIAJqzUVxeHvvkOKPlfJitmN2NE02UFyzaTrJOZReWKhv_qPexjWFsp_hoBvkKMTesDmwXDlZTjQ8TINg9uGZQ3imhGd-hWd0Eb3-e48Hye-0CoEfCLlAYUPpT-9HbH8ChHamnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092131444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Das, Sanjay ; Friedrich, Nadine A. ; Daniels, James ; Galvan, G. Cecilia ; Gong, Jun ; Posadas, Edwin ; Aronson, William ; Freedland, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Sanjay ; Friedrich, Nadine A. ; Daniels, James ; Galvan, G. Cecilia ; Gong, Jun ; Posadas, Edwin ; Aronson, William ; Freedland, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies. Methods Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined. Results Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3 rd place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid ( p  = 0.012). Across all states with data ( n  = 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income ( r  = 0.385, p  = 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults ( r  = 0.426, p  = 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity. Conclusions Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-7852</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-5608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5608</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37679603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/308 ; 692/699/2768/589/466 ; Acetic acid ; Adults ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Cancer therapies ; COVID-19 ; Drugs ; Family income ; FDA approval ; Health behavior ; Health economics ; Medicaid ; Prostate cancer ; Public interest ; Reproductive Medicine ; Search engines ; Socioeconomic factors ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.457-461</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e44618a1dfbb18ebafedc607227a29d7b0a153a0e4b947bc11a67dd89b8340573</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8713-1406 ; 0000-0003-2107-5362 ; 0000-0002-8104-6419 ; 0000-0001-8520-5280 ; 0000-0001-5892-3340 ; 0000-0002-6713-0614 ; 0000-0002-2401-2474 ; 0000-0001-8649-1346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Nadine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvan, G. Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posadas, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedland, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</title><title>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases</title><addtitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</addtitle><description>Background There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies. Methods Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined. Results Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3 rd place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid ( p  = 0.012). Across all states with data ( n  = 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income ( r  = 0.385, p  = 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults ( r  = 0.426, p  = 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity. Conclusions Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.</description><subject>692/308</subject><subject>692/699/2768/589/466</subject><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1365-7852</issn><issn>1476-5608</issn><issn>1476-5608</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQjhAVLYU_wAFZ4sIldCZ27PiEUAUFqVIlVE4cLMeebFNl7WAnK_Xf42VLeRx68ljfYx5fVb1CeIfAu7MskGusoeE1gEJZ6yfVCQol61ZC97TUXLa16trmuHqe8y0AaNTwrDrmSiotgZ9U37_SZJdxRyyTTe6GzXFeJ5vG5Y7FgQ17xPqdDY48m1PMi12Iuf0_sS350RV1DJmteQwbdhHjZiJ2nSj4_KI6GuyU6eX9e1p9-_Tx-vxzfXl18eX8w2XtRCOXmoSQ2Fn0Q99jR70dyDsJqmmUbbRXPVhsuQUSvRaqd4hWKu873XdcQKv4afX-4DuvfRnJUViSncycxq1Ndyba0fyLhPHGbOLOIAJqzUVxeHvvkOKPlfJitmN2NE02UFyzaTrJOZReWKhv_qPexjWFsp_hoBvkKMTesDmwXDlZTjQ8TINg9uGZQ3imhGd-hWd0Eb3-e48Hye-0CoEfCLlAYUPpT-9HbH8ChHamnw</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Das, Sanjay</creator><creator>Friedrich, Nadine A.</creator><creator>Daniels, James</creator><creator>Galvan, G. Cecilia</creator><creator>Gong, Jun</creator><creator>Posadas, Edwin</creator><creator>Aronson, William</creator><creator>Freedland, Stephen J.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-1406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-5280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-3340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-0614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-1346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</title><author>Das, Sanjay ; Friedrich, Nadine A. ; Daniels, James ; Galvan, G. Cecilia ; Gong, Jun ; Posadas, Edwin ; Aronson, William ; Freedland, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e44618a1dfbb18ebafedc607227a29d7b0a153a0e4b947bc11a67dd89b8340573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>692/308</topic><topic>692/699/2768/589/466</topic><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Nadine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvan, G. Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posadas, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedland, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Sanjay</au><au>Friedrich, Nadine A.</au><au>Daniels, James</au><au>Galvan, G. Cecilia</au><au>Gong, Jun</au><au>Posadas, Edwin</au><au>Aronson, William</au><au>Freedland, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends</atitle><jtitle>Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases</jtitle><stitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</stitle><addtitle>Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>457-461</pages><issn>1365-7852</issn><issn>1476-5608</issn><eissn>1476-5608</eissn><abstract>Background There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies. Methods Google Trends™ was queried for: “Enzalutamide”, “Abiraterone Acetate”, “Bicalutamide”, “Apalutamide”, and “Darolutamide” in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined. Results Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3 rd place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid ( p  = 0.012). Across all states with data ( n  = 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income ( r  = 0.385, p  = 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults ( r  = 0.426, p  = 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity. Conclusions Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37679603</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-1406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-5280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-3340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-0614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-1346</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1365-7852
ispartof Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.457-461
issn 1365-7852
1476-5608
1476-5608
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11019934
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects 692/308
692/699/2768/589/466
Acetic acid
Adults
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cancer Research
Cancer therapies
COVID-19
Drugs
Family income
FDA approval
Health behavior
Health economics
Medicaid
Prostate cancer
Public interest
Reproductive Medicine
Search engines
Socioeconomic factors
Trends
title Relative search popularity of five advanced prostate cancer medications using Google Trends
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A24%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20search%20popularity%20of%20five%20advanced%20prostate%20cancer%20medications%20using%20Google%20Trends&rft.jtitle=Prostate%20cancer%20and%20prostatic%20diseases&rft.au=Das,%20Sanjay&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=457-461&rft.issn=1365-7852&rft.eissn=1476-5608&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41391-023-00716-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2863300571%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092131444&rft_id=info:pmid/37679603&rfr_iscdi=true