Interactions between commensal Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium

Enterococcus faecium (Efm) is a versatile pathogen, responsible for multidrug-resistant infections, especially in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. Its population structure has been characterized by diverse clades (A1, A2, and B (reclassified as E. lactis (Ela)), adapted to different environm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:FEMS microbes 2024, Vol.5, p.xtae009
Hauptverfasser: Wagner, Theresa Maria, Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina, Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia, Engi, Daniel, Janice, Jessin, Almeida-Santos, Ana C, Tedim, Ana P, Freitas, Ana R, Peixe, Luísa, van Schaik, Willem, Johannessen, Mona, Hegstad, Kristin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page xtae009
container_title FEMS microbes
container_volume 5
creator Wagner, Theresa Maria
Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina
Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia
Engi, Daniel
Janice, Jessin
Almeida-Santos, Ana C
Tedim, Ana P
Freitas, Ana R
Peixe, Luísa
van Schaik, Willem
Johannessen, Mona
Hegstad, Kristin
description Enterococcus faecium (Efm) is a versatile pathogen, responsible for multidrug-resistant infections, especially in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. Its population structure has been characterized by diverse clades (A1, A2, and B (reclassified as E. lactis (Ela)), adapted to different environments, and distinguished by their resistomes and virulomes. These features only partially explain the predominance of clade A1 strains in nosocomial infections. We investigated in vitro interaction of 50 clinical isolates (clade A1 Efm) against 75 commensal faecal isolates from healthy humans (25 clade A2 Efm and 50 Ela). Only 36% of the commensal isolates inhibited clinical isolates, while 76% of the clinical isolates inhibited commensal isolates. The most apparent overall differences in inhibition patterns were presented between clades. The inhibitory activity was mainly mediated by secreted, proteinaceous, heat-stable compounds, likely indicating an involvement of bacteriocins. A custom-made database targeting 76 Bacillota bacteriocins was used to reveal bacteriocins in the genomes. Our systematic screening of the interactions between nosocomial and commensal Efm and Ela on a large scale suggests that, in a clinical setting, nosocomial strains not only have an advantage over commensal strains due to their possession of AMR genes, virulence factors, and resilience but also inhibit the growth of commensal strains.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/femsmc/xtae009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11008740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/femsmc/xtae009</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3038436297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91c3027d94a05aab2aaaa5e6ec1abb8109a5c1087213c5e5c10caa4f185ea6b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMoKrpXj9qjHlaTps22JxHxsbDgRc9hOjvVSJusTerjvzfrPlhBMBAy5PvmlyEfY0eCnwteyouaWt_ixWcA4rzcYvupknKoVJFvb9R7bOD9K-c8zYWMe5ftyUJxJfNsn32NbaAOMBhnfVJR-CCyCbq2JeuhSW7mskOH2PukBkLTtwnY6W-hmQP8zz02xhqMnca7BgL5xNV_Ug7ZTg2Np8HyPGBPtzeP1_fDycPd-PpqMkSpsjAsBUqejqZlBjwHqFKIKydFKKCqivgPkKPgxSgVEnOa1wiQ1aLICVSl5AG7XHBnfdXSFMmGDho960wL3Zd2YPRvxZoX_ezetRA8YjMeCScLAnbGB2O1dR3oqMqRlpn6cZwu3-jcW08-6NZ4pKYBS673WnJZZFKl5Shaz1cw531H9XoSwfU8Vb1IVS9TjQ3Hm_Ov7asMo-FsYXD97D_YN3oLsVo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3038436297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactions between commensal Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wagner, Theresa Maria ; Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina ; Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia ; Engi, Daniel ; Janice, Jessin ; Almeida-Santos, Ana C ; Tedim, Ana P ; Freitas, Ana R ; Peixe, Luísa ; van Schaik, Willem ; Johannessen, Mona ; Hegstad, Kristin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Theresa Maria ; Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina ; Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia ; Engi, Daniel ; Janice, Jessin ; Almeida-Santos, Ana C ; Tedim, Ana P ; Freitas, Ana R ; Peixe, Luísa ; van Schaik, Willem ; Johannessen, Mona ; Hegstad, Kristin</creatorcontrib><description>Enterococcus faecium (Efm) is a versatile pathogen, responsible for multidrug-resistant infections, especially in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. Its population structure has been characterized by diverse clades (A1, A2, and B (reclassified as E. lactis (Ela)), adapted to different environments, and distinguished by their resistomes and virulomes. These features only partially explain the predominance of clade A1 strains in nosocomial infections. We investigated in vitro interaction of 50 clinical isolates (clade A1 Efm) against 75 commensal faecal isolates from healthy humans (25 clade A2 Efm and 50 Ela). Only 36% of the commensal isolates inhibited clinical isolates, while 76% of the clinical isolates inhibited commensal isolates. The most apparent overall differences in inhibition patterns were presented between clades. The inhibitory activity was mainly mediated by secreted, proteinaceous, heat-stable compounds, likely indicating an involvement of bacteriocins. A custom-made database targeting 76 Bacillota bacteriocins was used to reveal bacteriocins in the genomes. Our systematic screening of the interactions between nosocomial and commensal Efm and Ela on a large scale suggests that, in a clinical setting, nosocomial strains not only have an advantage over commensal strains due to their possession of AMR genes, virulence factors, and resilience but also inhibit the growth of commensal strains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2633-6685</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2633-6685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/femsmc/xtae009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38606354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>FEMS microbes, 2024, Vol.5, p.xtae009</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91c3027d94a05aab2aaaa5e6ec1abb8109a5c1087213c5e5c10caa4f185ea6b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5810-8215 ; 0000-0002-8605-6296 ; 0000-0002-1314-0497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008740/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008740/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1603,4022,26566,27922,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38606354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Theresa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engi, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janice, Jessin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida-Santos, Ana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tedim, Ana P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Ana R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peixe, Luísa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannessen, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegstad, Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>Interactions between commensal Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium</title><title>FEMS microbes</title><addtitle>FEMS Microbes</addtitle><description>Enterococcus faecium (Efm) is a versatile pathogen, responsible for multidrug-resistant infections, especially in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. Its population structure has been characterized by diverse clades (A1, A2, and B (reclassified as E. lactis (Ela)), adapted to different environments, and distinguished by their resistomes and virulomes. These features only partially explain the predominance of clade A1 strains in nosocomial infections. We investigated in vitro interaction of 50 clinical isolates (clade A1 Efm) against 75 commensal faecal isolates from healthy humans (25 clade A2 Efm and 50 Ela). Only 36% of the commensal isolates inhibited clinical isolates, while 76% of the clinical isolates inhibited commensal isolates. The most apparent overall differences in inhibition patterns were presented between clades. The inhibitory activity was mainly mediated by secreted, proteinaceous, heat-stable compounds, likely indicating an involvement of bacteriocins. A custom-made database targeting 76 Bacillota bacteriocins was used to reveal bacteriocins in the genomes. Our systematic screening of the interactions between nosocomial and commensal Efm and Ela on a large scale suggests that, in a clinical setting, nosocomial strains not only have an advantage over commensal strains due to their possession of AMR genes, virulence factors, and resilience but also inhibit the growth of commensal strains.</description><issn>2633-6685</issn><issn>2633-6685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMoKrpXj9qjHlaTps22JxHxsbDgRc9hOjvVSJusTerjvzfrPlhBMBAy5PvmlyEfY0eCnwteyouaWt_ixWcA4rzcYvupknKoVJFvb9R7bOD9K-c8zYWMe5ftyUJxJfNsn32NbaAOMBhnfVJR-CCyCbq2JeuhSW7mskOH2PukBkLTtwnY6W-hmQP8zz02xhqMnca7BgL5xNV_Ug7ZTg2Np8HyPGBPtzeP1_fDycPd-PpqMkSpsjAsBUqejqZlBjwHqFKIKydFKKCqivgPkKPgxSgVEnOa1wiQ1aLICVSl5AG7XHBnfdXSFMmGDho960wL3Zd2YPRvxZoX_ezetRA8YjMeCScLAnbGB2O1dR3oqMqRlpn6cZwu3-jcW08-6NZ4pKYBS673WnJZZFKl5Shaz1cw531H9XoSwfU8Vb1IVS9TjQ3Hm_Ov7asMo-FsYXD97D_YN3oLsVo</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Wagner, Theresa Maria</creator><creator>Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina</creator><creator>Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia</creator><creator>Engi, Daniel</creator><creator>Janice, Jessin</creator><creator>Almeida-Santos, Ana C</creator><creator>Tedim, Ana P</creator><creator>Freitas, Ana R</creator><creator>Peixe, Luísa</creator><creator>van Schaik, Willem</creator><creator>Johannessen, Mona</creator><creator>Hegstad, Kristin</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5810-8215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8605-6296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-0497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Interactions between commensal Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium</title><author>Wagner, Theresa Maria ; Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina ; Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia ; Engi, Daniel ; Janice, Jessin ; Almeida-Santos, Ana C ; Tedim, Ana P ; Freitas, Ana R ; Peixe, Luísa ; van Schaik, Willem ; Johannessen, Mona ; Hegstad, Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-91c3027d94a05aab2aaaa5e6ec1abb8109a5c1087213c5e5c10caa4f185ea6b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Theresa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engi, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janice, Jessin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida-Santos, Ana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tedim, Ana P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Ana R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peixe, Luísa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannessen, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegstad, Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>FEMS microbes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wagner, Theresa Maria</au><au>Pöntinen, Anna Kaarina</au><au>Fenzel, Carolin Kornelia</au><au>Engi, Daniel</au><au>Janice, Jessin</au><au>Almeida-Santos, Ana C</au><au>Tedim, Ana P</au><au>Freitas, Ana R</au><au>Peixe, Luísa</au><au>van Schaik, Willem</au><au>Johannessen, Mona</au><au>Hegstad, Kristin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactions between commensal Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium</atitle><jtitle>FEMS microbes</jtitle><addtitle>FEMS Microbes</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>xtae009</spage><pages>xtae009-</pages><issn>2633-6685</issn><eissn>2633-6685</eissn><abstract>Enterococcus faecium (Efm) is a versatile pathogen, responsible for multidrug-resistant infections, especially in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. Its population structure has been characterized by diverse clades (A1, A2, and B (reclassified as E. lactis (Ela)), adapted to different environments, and distinguished by their resistomes and virulomes. These features only partially explain the predominance of clade A1 strains in nosocomial infections. We investigated in vitro interaction of 50 clinical isolates (clade A1 Efm) against 75 commensal faecal isolates from healthy humans (25 clade A2 Efm and 50 Ela). Only 36% of the commensal isolates inhibited clinical isolates, while 76% of the clinical isolates inhibited commensal isolates. The most apparent overall differences in inhibition patterns were presented between clades. The inhibitory activity was mainly mediated by secreted, proteinaceous, heat-stable compounds, likely indicating an involvement of bacteriocins. A custom-made database targeting 76 Bacillota bacteriocins was used to reveal bacteriocins in the genomes. Our systematic screening of the interactions between nosocomial and commensal Efm and Ela on a large scale suggests that, in a clinical setting, nosocomial strains not only have an advantage over commensal strains due to their possession of AMR genes, virulence factors, and resilience but also inhibit the growth of commensal strains.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38606354</pmid><doi>10.1093/femsmc/xtae009</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5810-8215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8605-6296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-0497</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2633-6685
ispartof FEMS microbes, 2024, Vol.5, p.xtae009
issn 2633-6685
2633-6685
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11008740
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
title Interactions between commensal Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactions%20between%20commensal%20Enterococcus%20faecium%20and%20Enterococcus%20lactis%20and%20clinical%20isolates%20of%20Enterococcus%20faecium&rft.jtitle=FEMS%20microbes&rft.au=Wagner,%20Theresa%20Maria&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=xtae009&rft.pages=xtae009-&rft.issn=2633-6685&rft.eissn=2633-6685&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/femsmc/xtae009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3038436297%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3038436297&rft_id=info:pmid/38606354&rft_oup_id=10.1093/femsmc/xtae009&rfr_iscdi=true