Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D‐MRI data using an automatic tumor‐based signal reduces stitching artifacts
Purpose To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D‐magnetic resonance (4D‐MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes. Methods (4D‐MRI) scans were collected for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2024-04, Vol.25 (4), p.e14262-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e14262 |
container_title | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Warren, Mark Barrett, Alexander Bhalla, Neeraj Brada, Michael Chuter, Robert Cobben, David Eccles, Cynthia L. Hart, Clare Ibrahim, Ehab McClelland, Jamie Rea, Marc Turtle, Louise Fenwick, John D. |
description | Purpose
To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D‐magnetic resonance (4D‐MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes.
Methods
(4D‐MRI) scans were collected for 10 lung cancer patients using a 2D T2‐weighted single‐shot turbo spin echo sequence, obtaining 25 repeat frames per image slice. For each slice, a tumor‐motion signal was generated using the first principal component of movement in the tumor neighborhood (TumorPC1). Signals were also generated from displacements of the diaphragm (DIA) and upper and lower chest wall (UCW/LCW) and from slice body area changes (BA). Pearson r coefficients of correlations between observed tumor movement and respiratory signals were determined. TumorPC1, DIA, and UCW signals were used to compile image stacks showing each patient's tumor volume in a respiratory phase. Unsorted image stacks were also built for comparison.
For each image stack, the presence of stitching artifacts was assessed by measuring the roughness of the compiled tumor surface according to a roughness metric (Rg). Statistical differences in weighted means of Rg between any two signals were determined using an exact permutation test.
Results
The TumorPC1 signal was most strongly correlated with superior‐inferior tumor motion, and had significantly higher Pearson r values (median 0.86) than those determined for correlations of UCW, LCW, and BA with superior‐inferior tumor motion (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.14262 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11005973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A797086676</galeid><sourcerecordid>A797086676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-2ff6b6df34d288d34f37c46c686bbf51b05a66b535fd8bdb9b4b90cf5b9c12163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdtqFTEYhYMotlZvfADJpQh7m9NkZq5ksz0VWgQP1yHH3chk0uZQ6V0foc_ok5jdqaXeSCAJybfW_ycLgJcYrTFC5K3UgawxI5w8Aoe4I3w1jpg9frA_AM9y_okQxgMdnoIDOhDKMOaH4OJbTMXPOzjVNpUaYoKXcarBZuhSDJC9_319c_r1GBpZJKx5z8oZylpikMXrRdMYJbM1MPvdLCeYrKm6WeTiiz671bQyTuqSn4MnTk7Zvrhbj8CPjx--bz-vTr58Ot5uTlaasZ6siHNcceMoM2QYDGWO9ppxzQeulOuwQp3kXHW0c2ZQRo2KqRFp16lRY4I5PQLvFt_zqoI12s4lyUmcJx9kuhJRevHvzezPxC5eCtw-tRt72hxe3zmkeFFtLiL4rO00ydnGmgUZMWeooyNp6HpBd3Kyws8uNkvdhrHB6zhb59v5ph97NHDe77t7swh0ijkn6-4bw0jsUxX7VMVtqg1-9fAp9-jfGBuAF-BXK3P1Hyux2Z6SxfQPdcmwmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2916405392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D‐MRI data using an automatic tumor‐based signal reduces stitching artifacts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Warren, Mark ; Barrett, Alexander ; Bhalla, Neeraj ; Brada, Michael ; Chuter, Robert ; Cobben, David ; Eccles, Cynthia L. ; Hart, Clare ; Ibrahim, Ehab ; McClelland, Jamie ; Rea, Marc ; Turtle, Louise ; Fenwick, John D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mark ; Barrett, Alexander ; Bhalla, Neeraj ; Brada, Michael ; Chuter, Robert ; Cobben, David ; Eccles, Cynthia L. ; Hart, Clare ; Ibrahim, Ehab ; McClelland, Jamie ; Rea, Marc ; Turtle, Louise ; Fenwick, John D.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D‐magnetic resonance (4D‐MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes.
Methods
(4D‐MRI) scans were collected for 10 lung cancer patients using a 2D T2‐weighted single‐shot turbo spin echo sequence, obtaining 25 repeat frames per image slice. For each slice, a tumor‐motion signal was generated using the first principal component of movement in the tumor neighborhood (TumorPC1). Signals were also generated from displacements of the diaphragm (DIA) and upper and lower chest wall (UCW/LCW) and from slice body area changes (BA). Pearson r coefficients of correlations between observed tumor movement and respiratory signals were determined. TumorPC1, DIA, and UCW signals were used to compile image stacks showing each patient's tumor volume in a respiratory phase. Unsorted image stacks were also built for comparison.
For each image stack, the presence of stitching artifacts was assessed by measuring the roughness of the compiled tumor surface according to a roughness metric (Rg). Statistical differences in weighted means of Rg between any two signals were determined using an exact permutation test.
Results
The TumorPC1 signal was most strongly correlated with superior‐inferior tumor motion, and had significantly higher Pearson r values (median 0.86) than those determined for correlations of UCW, LCW, and BA with superior‐inferior tumor motion (p < 0.05).
Weighted means of ratios of Rg values in TumorPC1 image stacks to those in unsorted, UCW, and DIA stacks were 0.67, 0.69, and 0.71, all significantly favoring TumorPC1 (p = 0.02–0.05). For other pairs of signals, weighted mean ratios did not differ significantly from one.
Conclusion
Tumor volumes were smoother in 3D image stacks compiled using the first principal component of tumor motion than in stacks compiled with signals based on normal anatomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14262</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38234116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>4D‐MRI ; Humans ; Lung ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; NSCLC ; principal components ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Respiration ; respiratory sorting ; stitching artifacts ; Tumor Burden ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2024-04, Vol.25 (4), p.e14262-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-2ff6b6df34d288d34f37c46c686bbf51b05a66b535fd8bdb9b4b90cf5b9c12163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11005973/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11005973/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38234116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhalla, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brada, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuter, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobben, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccles, Cynthia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Ehab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClelland, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turtle, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenwick, John D.</creatorcontrib><title>Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D‐MRI data using an automatic tumor‐based signal reduces stitching artifacts</title><title>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose
To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D‐magnetic resonance (4D‐MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes.
Methods
(4D‐MRI) scans were collected for 10 lung cancer patients using a 2D T2‐weighted single‐shot turbo spin echo sequence, obtaining 25 repeat frames per image slice. For each slice, a tumor‐motion signal was generated using the first principal component of movement in the tumor neighborhood (TumorPC1). Signals were also generated from displacements of the diaphragm (DIA) and upper and lower chest wall (UCW/LCW) and from slice body area changes (BA). Pearson r coefficients of correlations between observed tumor movement and respiratory signals were determined. TumorPC1, DIA, and UCW signals were used to compile image stacks showing each patient's tumor volume in a respiratory phase. Unsorted image stacks were also built for comparison.
For each image stack, the presence of stitching artifacts was assessed by measuring the roughness of the compiled tumor surface according to a roughness metric (Rg). Statistical differences in weighted means of Rg between any two signals were determined using an exact permutation test.
Results
The TumorPC1 signal was most strongly correlated with superior‐inferior tumor motion, and had significantly higher Pearson r values (median 0.86) than those determined for correlations of UCW, LCW, and BA with superior‐inferior tumor motion (p < 0.05).
Weighted means of ratios of Rg values in TumorPC1 image stacks to those in unsorted, UCW, and DIA stacks were 0.67, 0.69, and 0.71, all significantly favoring TumorPC1 (p = 0.02–0.05). For other pairs of signals, weighted mean ratios did not differ significantly from one.
Conclusion
Tumor volumes were smoother in 3D image stacks compiled using the first principal component of tumor motion than in stacks compiled with signals based on normal anatomy.</description><subject>4D‐MRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>NSCLC</subject><subject>principal components</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>respiratory sorting</subject><subject>stitching artifacts</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdtqFTEYhYMotlZvfADJpQh7m9NkZq5ksz0VWgQP1yHH3chk0uZQ6V0foc_ok5jdqaXeSCAJybfW_ycLgJcYrTFC5K3UgawxI5w8Aoe4I3w1jpg9frA_AM9y_okQxgMdnoIDOhDKMOaH4OJbTMXPOzjVNpUaYoKXcarBZuhSDJC9_319c_r1GBpZJKx5z8oZylpikMXrRdMYJbM1MPvdLCeYrKm6WeTiiz671bQyTuqSn4MnTk7Zvrhbj8CPjx--bz-vTr58Ot5uTlaasZ6siHNcceMoM2QYDGWO9ppxzQeulOuwQp3kXHW0c2ZQRo2KqRFp16lRY4I5PQLvFt_zqoI12s4lyUmcJx9kuhJRevHvzezPxC5eCtw-tRt72hxe3zmkeFFtLiL4rO00ydnGmgUZMWeooyNp6HpBd3Kyws8uNkvdhrHB6zhb59v5ph97NHDe77t7swh0ijkn6-4bw0jsUxX7VMVtqg1-9fAp9-jfGBuAF-BXK3P1Hyux2Z6SxfQPdcmwmA</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Warren, Mark</creator><creator>Barrett, Alexander</creator><creator>Bhalla, Neeraj</creator><creator>Brada, Michael</creator><creator>Chuter, Robert</creator><creator>Cobben, David</creator><creator>Eccles, Cynthia L.</creator><creator>Hart, Clare</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Ehab</creator><creator>McClelland, Jamie</creator><creator>Rea, Marc</creator><creator>Turtle, Louise</creator><creator>Fenwick, John D.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D‐MRI data using an automatic tumor‐based signal reduces stitching artifacts</title><author>Warren, Mark ; Barrett, Alexander ; Bhalla, Neeraj ; Brada, Michael ; Chuter, Robert ; Cobben, David ; Eccles, Cynthia L. ; Hart, Clare ; Ibrahim, Ehab ; McClelland, Jamie ; Rea, Marc ; Turtle, Louise ; Fenwick, John D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-2ff6b6df34d288d34f37c46c686bbf51b05a66b535fd8bdb9b4b90cf5b9c12163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>4D‐MRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>NSCLC</topic><topic>principal components</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>respiratory sorting</topic><topic>stitching artifacts</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhalla, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brada, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuter, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobben, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccles, Cynthia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Ehab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClelland, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turtle, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenwick, John D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warren, Mark</au><au>Barrett, Alexander</au><au>Bhalla, Neeraj</au><au>Brada, Michael</au><au>Chuter, Robert</au><au>Cobben, David</au><au>Eccles, Cynthia L.</au><au>Hart, Clare</au><au>Ibrahim, Ehab</au><au>McClelland, Jamie</au><au>Rea, Marc</au><au>Turtle, Louise</au><au>Fenwick, John D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D‐MRI data using an automatic tumor‐based signal reduces stitching artifacts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e14262</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14262-n/a</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To investigate whether a novel signal derived from tumor motion allows more precise sorting of 4D‐magnetic resonance (4D‐MR) image data than do signals based on normal anatomy, reducing levels of stitching artifacts within sorted lung tumor volumes.
Methods
(4D‐MRI) scans were collected for 10 lung cancer patients using a 2D T2‐weighted single‐shot turbo spin echo sequence, obtaining 25 repeat frames per image slice. For each slice, a tumor‐motion signal was generated using the first principal component of movement in the tumor neighborhood (TumorPC1). Signals were also generated from displacements of the diaphragm (DIA) and upper and lower chest wall (UCW/LCW) and from slice body area changes (BA). Pearson r coefficients of correlations between observed tumor movement and respiratory signals were determined. TumorPC1, DIA, and UCW signals were used to compile image stacks showing each patient's tumor volume in a respiratory phase. Unsorted image stacks were also built for comparison.
For each image stack, the presence of stitching artifacts was assessed by measuring the roughness of the compiled tumor surface according to a roughness metric (Rg). Statistical differences in weighted means of Rg between any two signals were determined using an exact permutation test.
Results
The TumorPC1 signal was most strongly correlated with superior‐inferior tumor motion, and had significantly higher Pearson r values (median 0.86) than those determined for correlations of UCW, LCW, and BA with superior‐inferior tumor motion (p < 0.05).
Weighted means of ratios of Rg values in TumorPC1 image stacks to those in unsorted, UCW, and DIA stacks were 0.67, 0.69, and 0.71, all significantly favoring TumorPC1 (p = 0.02–0.05). For other pairs of signals, weighted mean ratios did not differ significantly from one.
Conclusion
Tumor volumes were smoother in 3D image stacks compiled using the first principal component of tumor motion than in stacks compiled with signals based on normal anatomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38234116</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.14262</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
ispartof | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2024-04, Vol.25 (4), p.e14262-n/a |
issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11005973 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | 4D‐MRI Humans Lung Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods NSCLC principal components Radiation Oncology Physics Respiration respiratory sorting stitching artifacts Tumor Burden Tumors |
title | Sorting lung tumor volumes from 4D‐MRI data using an automatic tumor‐based signal reduces stitching artifacts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A49%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sorting%20lung%20tumor%20volumes%20from%204D%E2%80%90MRI%20data%20using%20an%20automatic%20tumor%E2%80%90based%20signal%20reduces%20stitching%20artifacts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Clinical%20Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Warren,%20Mark&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e14262&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14262-n/a&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.14262&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA797086676%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2916405392&rft_id=info:pmid/38234116&rft_galeid=A797086676&rfr_iscdi=true |