Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review
PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible syst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2019-06, Vol.51 (6), p.1340-1353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1340 |
container_title | Medicine and science in sports and exercise |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | KING, ABBY C WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C MARQUEZ, DAVID X BUMAN, MATTHEW P NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A JAKICIC, JOHN FULTON, JANET E TENNANT, BETHANY L |
description | PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report.
METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions).
RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace.
CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11002995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232017843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUdtu1DAUtBAV3bb8AUJ-5CWtL_Em5gWtVtBWKmrFlmfLcU4agxMX29lV_r4uvVDA0pF1jmfGYw9C7yg5pqyUJ183m2PyYlFZildoQQUnBeFUvEaLPBOFpJzuo4MYf2RQxTl9g_Y5JVIQSRZod9XP0Rrt8Moku7VpxlfBDz5ZP37EZ_amd7lSxF2e4tQDZoTW-H_W6WRbcHaEiFft1kYfZrz2w2BTAsCbOSYYdLIGf4Othd0R2uu0i_D2cT9E3798vl6fFReXp-fr1UVhBBF10UEtKpFtG6l1CaJqO8lZxZZ1nV8CrGWwbDrdsKqFBhhICR3XMs8MMAkNP0SfHnRvp2aA1sCYgnbqNthBh1l5bdXfJ6Pt1Y3fKkoJYVKKrPDhUSH4XxPEpAYbDTinR_BTVIzx_CVVXfIMLR-gJvgYA3TP91Ci7kNTOTT1b2iZ9v6lx2fSU0p_dHfeJQjxp5t2EFQP2qX-t56olnWRbUiyzF2Ri9X8Dg-GpR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232017843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>KING, ABBY C ; WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C ; MARQUEZ, DAVID X ; BUMAN, MATTHEW P ; NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A ; JAKICIC, JOHN ; FULTON, JANET E ; TENNANT, BETHANY L</creator><creatorcontrib>KING, ABBY C ; WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C ; MARQUEZ, DAVID X ; BUMAN, MATTHEW P ; NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A ; JAKICIC, JOHN ; FULTON, JANET E ; TENNANT, BETHANY L ; 2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report.
METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions).
RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace.
CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31095090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American College of Sports Medicine</publisher><subject>Advisory Committees ; Environment Design ; Exercise ; Fitness Trackers ; Health Policy ; Health Promotion - methods ; Humans ; Mobile Applications ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Sedentary Behavior ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2019-06, Vol.51 (6), p.1340-1353</ispartof><rights>2019 American College of Sports Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00005768-201906000-00028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4595,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31095090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KING, ABBY C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKICIC, JOHN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FULTON, JANET E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TENNANT, BETHANY L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><title>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report.
METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions).
RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace.
CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.</description><subject>Advisory Committees</subject><subject>Environment Design</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Fitness Trackers</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Risk Reduction Behavior</subject><subject>Sedentary Behavior</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplUdtu1DAUtBAV3bb8AUJ-5CWtL_Em5gWtVtBWKmrFlmfLcU4agxMX29lV_r4uvVDA0pF1jmfGYw9C7yg5pqyUJ183m2PyYlFZildoQQUnBeFUvEaLPBOFpJzuo4MYf2RQxTl9g_Y5JVIQSRZod9XP0Rrt8Moku7VpxlfBDz5ZP37EZ_amd7lSxF2e4tQDZoTW-H_W6WRbcHaEiFft1kYfZrz2w2BTAsCbOSYYdLIGf4Othd0R2uu0i_D2cT9E3798vl6fFReXp-fr1UVhBBF10UEtKpFtG6l1CaJqO8lZxZZ1nV8CrGWwbDrdsKqFBhhICR3XMs8MMAkNP0SfHnRvp2aA1sCYgnbqNthBh1l5bdXfJ6Pt1Y3fKkoJYVKKrPDhUSH4XxPEpAYbDTinR_BTVIzx_CVVXfIMLR-gJvgYA3TP91Ci7kNTOTT1b2iZ9v6lx2fSU0p_dHfeJQjxp5t2EFQP2qX-t56olnWRbUiyzF2Ri9X8Dg-GpR0</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>KING, ABBY C</creator><creator>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</creator><creator>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</creator><creator>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</creator><creator>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</creator><creator>JAKICIC, JOHN</creator><creator>FULTON, JANET E</creator><creator>TENNANT, BETHANY L</creator><general>American College of Sports Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</title><author>KING, ABBY C ; WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C ; MARQUEZ, DAVID X ; BUMAN, MATTHEW P ; NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A ; JAKICIC, JOHN ; FULTON, JANET E ; TENNANT, BETHANY L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Advisory Committees</topic><topic>Environment Design</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Fitness Trackers</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Risk Reduction Behavior</topic><topic>Sedentary Behavior</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KING, ABBY C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKICIC, JOHN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FULTON, JANET E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TENNANT, BETHANY L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KING, ABBY C</au><au>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</au><au>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</au><au>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</au><au>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</au><au>JAKICIC, JOHN</au><au>FULTON, JANET E</au><au>TENNANT, BETHANY L</au><aucorp>2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1340</spage><epage>1353</epage><pages>1340-1353</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><abstract>PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report.
METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions).
RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace.
CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American College of Sports Medicine</pub><pmid>31095090</pmid><doi>10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-9131 |
ispartof | Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2019-06, Vol.51 (6), p.1340-1353 |
issn | 0195-9131 1530-0315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11002995 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Advisory Committees Environment Design Exercise Fitness Trackers Health Policy Health Promotion - methods Humans Mobile Applications Practice Guidelines as Topic Risk Reduction Behavior Sedentary Behavior Socioeconomic Factors Systematic Reviews as Topic |
title | Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A58%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20Activity%20Promotion:%20Highlights%20from%20the%202018%20Physical%20Activity%20Guidelines%20Advisory%20Committee%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=KING,%20ABBY%20C&rft.aucorp=2018%20PHYSICAL%20ACTIVITY%20GUIDELINES%20ADVISORY%20COMMITTEE&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1340&rft.epage=1353&rft.pages=1340-1353&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2232017843%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232017843&rft_id=info:pmid/31095090&rfr_iscdi=true |