Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review

PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible syst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2019-06, Vol.51 (6), p.1340-1353
Hauptverfasser: KING, ABBY C, WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C, MARQUEZ, DAVID X, BUMAN, MATTHEW P, NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A, JAKICIC, JOHN, FULTON, JANET E, TENNANT, BETHANY L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1353
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1340
container_title Medicine and science in sports and exercise
container_volume 51
creator KING, ABBY C
WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C
MARQUEZ, DAVID X
BUMAN, MATTHEW P
NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A
JAKICIC, JOHN
FULTON, JANET E
TENNANT, BETHANY L
description PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions). RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace. CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.
doi_str_mv 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11002995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232017843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUdtu1DAUtBAV3bb8AUJ-5CWtL_Em5gWtVtBWKmrFlmfLcU4agxMX29lV_r4uvVDA0pF1jmfGYw9C7yg5pqyUJ183m2PyYlFZildoQQUnBeFUvEaLPBOFpJzuo4MYf2RQxTl9g_Y5JVIQSRZod9XP0Rrt8Moku7VpxlfBDz5ZP37EZ_amd7lSxF2e4tQDZoTW-H_W6WRbcHaEiFft1kYfZrz2w2BTAsCbOSYYdLIGf4Othd0R2uu0i_D2cT9E3798vl6fFReXp-fr1UVhBBF10UEtKpFtG6l1CaJqO8lZxZZ1nV8CrGWwbDrdsKqFBhhICR3XMs8MMAkNP0SfHnRvp2aA1sCYgnbqNthBh1l5bdXfJ6Pt1Y3fKkoJYVKKrPDhUSH4XxPEpAYbDTinR_BTVIzx_CVVXfIMLR-gJvgYA3TP91Ci7kNTOTT1b2iZ9v6lx2fSU0p_dHfeJQjxp5t2EFQP2qX-t56olnWRbUiyzF2Ri9X8Dg-GpR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232017843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>KING, ABBY C ; WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C ; MARQUEZ, DAVID X ; BUMAN, MATTHEW P ; NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A ; JAKICIC, JOHN ; FULTON, JANET E ; TENNANT, BETHANY L</creator><creatorcontrib>KING, ABBY C ; WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C ; MARQUEZ, DAVID X ; BUMAN, MATTHEW P ; NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A ; JAKICIC, JOHN ; FULTON, JANET E ; TENNANT, BETHANY L ; 2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions). RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace. CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31095090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American College of Sports Medicine</publisher><subject>Advisory Committees ; Environment Design ; Exercise ; Fitness Trackers ; Health Policy ; Health Promotion - methods ; Humans ; Mobile Applications ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Risk Reduction Behavior ; Sedentary Behavior ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2019-06, Vol.51 (6), p.1340-1353</ispartof><rights>2019 American College of Sports Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00005768-201906000-00028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4595,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31095090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KING, ABBY C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKICIC, JOHN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FULTON, JANET E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TENNANT, BETHANY L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><title>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions). RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace. CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.</description><subject>Advisory Committees</subject><subject>Environment Design</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Fitness Trackers</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Risk Reduction Behavior</subject><subject>Sedentary Behavior</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplUdtu1DAUtBAV3bb8AUJ-5CWtL_Em5gWtVtBWKmrFlmfLcU4agxMX29lV_r4uvVDA0pF1jmfGYw9C7yg5pqyUJ183m2PyYlFZildoQQUnBeFUvEaLPBOFpJzuo4MYf2RQxTl9g_Y5JVIQSRZod9XP0Rrt8Moku7VpxlfBDz5ZP37EZ_amd7lSxF2e4tQDZoTW-H_W6WRbcHaEiFft1kYfZrz2w2BTAsCbOSYYdLIGf4Othd0R2uu0i_D2cT9E3798vl6fFReXp-fr1UVhBBF10UEtKpFtG6l1CaJqO8lZxZZ1nV8CrGWwbDrdsKqFBhhICR3XMs8MMAkNP0SfHnRvp2aA1sCYgnbqNthBh1l5bdXfJ6Pt1Y3fKkoJYVKKrPDhUSH4XxPEpAYbDTinR_BTVIzx_CVVXfIMLR-gJvgYA3TP91Ci7kNTOTT1b2iZ9v6lx2fSU0p_dHfeJQjxp5t2EFQP2qX-t56olnWRbUiyzF2Ri9X8Dg-GpR0</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>KING, ABBY C</creator><creator>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</creator><creator>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</creator><creator>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</creator><creator>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</creator><creator>JAKICIC, JOHN</creator><creator>FULTON, JANET E</creator><creator>TENNANT, BETHANY L</creator><general>American College of Sports Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</title><author>KING, ABBY C ; WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C ; MARQUEZ, DAVID X ; BUMAN, MATTHEW P ; NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A ; JAKICIC, JOHN ; FULTON, JANET E ; TENNANT, BETHANY L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe8575073c9aa4e57df93272688331e2d2e6bfab27debe2e99ef3a96bfce29eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Advisory Committees</topic><topic>Environment Design</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Fitness Trackers</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Risk Reduction Behavior</topic><topic>Sedentary Behavior</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KING, ABBY C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAKICIC, JOHN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FULTON, JANET E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TENNANT, BETHANY L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KING, ABBY C</au><au>WHITT-GLOVER, MELICIA C</au><au>MARQUEZ, DAVID X</au><au>BUMAN, MATTHEW P</au><au>NAPOLITANO, MELISSA A</au><au>JAKICIC, JOHN</au><au>FULTON, JANET E</au><au>TENNANT, BETHANY L</au><aucorp>2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1340</spage><epage>1353</epage><pages>1340-1353</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><abstract>PURPOSEThis article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. METHODSA comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions). RESULTSEffective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace. CONCLUSIONSA promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American College of Sports Medicine</pub><pmid>31095090</pmid><doi>10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9131
ispartof Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2019-06, Vol.51 (6), p.1340-1353
issn 0195-9131
1530-0315
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11002995
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Advisory Committees
Environment Design
Exercise
Fitness Trackers
Health Policy
Health Promotion - methods
Humans
Mobile Applications
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Risk Reduction Behavior
Sedentary Behavior
Socioeconomic Factors
Systematic Reviews as Topic
title Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A58%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20Activity%20Promotion:%20Highlights%20from%20the%202018%20Physical%20Activity%20Guidelines%20Advisory%20Committee%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=KING,%20ABBY%20C&rft.aucorp=2018%20PHYSICAL%20ACTIVITY%20GUIDELINES%20ADVISORY%20COMMITTEE&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1340&rft.epage=1353&rft.pages=1340-1353&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2232017843%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232017843&rft_id=info:pmid/31095090&rfr_iscdi=true