Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people with Mycoplasma pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The escalating resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to macrolides has become a significant global health concern, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although tetracyclines and quinolones have been proposed as alternative therapeutic options, concerns regarding age-specifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EClinicalMedicine 2024-05, Vol.71, p.102589-102589, Article 102589
Hauptverfasser: Cai, Fangqing, Li, Jinglin, Liang, Weijie, Wang, Ling, Ruan, Junshan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102589
container_issue
container_start_page 102589
container_title EClinicalMedicine
container_volume 71
creator Cai, Fangqing
Li, Jinglin
Liang, Weijie
Wang, Ling
Ruan, Junshan
description The escalating resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to macrolides has become a significant global health concern, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although tetracyclines and quinolones have been proposed as alternative therapeutic options, concerns regarding age-specific safety issues and the lack of consensus in recommendations across various national guidelines prevail. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to ascertain the most efficacious interventions for second-line treatment of M. pneumoniae infection while considering the age-specific safety issues associated with these interventions. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we searched PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Data, from inception up to November 11th, 2023. Studies of quinolones or tetracyclines for the treatment of people with M. pneumoniae infection were collected and screened by reading published reports, with any type of study included, and no individual patient-level data requested. A systematic review and direct meta-analysis compared the efficacy of tetracyclines and quinolones regarding time to defervescence (TTD) and the rates of fever disappearance within 24 h and 48 h of antibiotic administration, for managing M. pneumoniae infection. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was employed to indirectly assess the relative effectiveness of different interventions in people with M. pneumoniae infection and the safety profile of medication in paediatric patients. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023478383. The systematic review and direct meta-analysis included a total of 4 articles involving 246 patients, while the NMA encompassed 85 articles involving a substantial cohort of 7095 patients. The NMA measured the effectiveness across all ages and included 7043 patients, with a mean age of 37.80 ± 3.91 years. Of the 85 included studies, 14 (16.5%) were at low risk of bias, 71 (83.5%) were at moderate risk, and no studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. In the direct meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences were found between tetracyclines and quinolones concerning TTD (mean difference: −0.40, 95% CI: −1.43 to 0.63; I2 = 0%), fever disappearance rate within 24 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.08–1.79; I2 = 58%), and fever disappearance rate within 48 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.30–3.98; I2 = 59%). However, the comprehensive NMA analysis of clinical response (in 7
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102589
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11001646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2589537024001688</els_id><sourcerecordid>3035541048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-e2958bc2cacbe621c16a852401d0e70f4144f706d39a509379a03c70671fa3bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQjRCIVqV_gJCXbHKxYzsPFiBUtVCpiA2srYkzob4kdmo79yrf0J_GIaUqG1bjmTlzZnxOlr1mdMcoK9_td6gHY8ddQQuRSoWsm2fZ6RpyySv6_Mn7JDsPYU8pLaiom5K-zE54LZuyZPI0u7_se9TRHNBiCARsRwL0GBfiehIxetDLugm33t1srBvcmhpLJnTTgORo4i35uuiUQBiBTBbn0VkD7wmQsISII0SjiceDweMfHovx6PwvMmKEHCwMSzDhVfaihyHg-UM8y35cXX6_-JLffPt8ffHpJteC8Zhj0ci61YUG3WJZMM1KqGUhKOsoVrQXTIi-omXHG5C04VUDlOtUqFgPvG35WfZx453mdsROo03fHNTkzQh-UQ6M-rdjza366Q6KMZrEF2ViePvA4N3djCGq0QSNwwAW3RwUp1xKwZLeCSo2qPYuBI_94x5G1eql2qvNS7V6qTYv09ibpzc-Dv11LgE-bABMSiVdvQraoNXYGZ8MVZ0z_9_wG6T5tbI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3035541048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people with Mycoplasma pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cai, Fangqing ; Li, Jinglin ; Liang, Weijie ; Wang, Ling ; Ruan, Junshan</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Fangqing ; Li, Jinglin ; Liang, Weijie ; Wang, Ling ; Ruan, Junshan</creatorcontrib><description>The escalating resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to macrolides has become a significant global health concern, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although tetracyclines and quinolones have been proposed as alternative therapeutic options, concerns regarding age-specific safety issues and the lack of consensus in recommendations across various national guidelines prevail. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to ascertain the most efficacious interventions for second-line treatment of M. pneumoniae infection while considering the age-specific safety issues associated with these interventions. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we searched PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Data, from inception up to November 11th, 2023. Studies of quinolones or tetracyclines for the treatment of people with M. pneumoniae infection were collected and screened by reading published reports, with any type of study included, and no individual patient-level data requested. A systematic review and direct meta-analysis compared the efficacy of tetracyclines and quinolones regarding time to defervescence (TTD) and the rates of fever disappearance within 24 h and 48 h of antibiotic administration, for managing M. pneumoniae infection. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was employed to indirectly assess the relative effectiveness of different interventions in people with M. pneumoniae infection and the safety profile of medication in paediatric patients. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023478383. The systematic review and direct meta-analysis included a total of 4 articles involving 246 patients, while the NMA encompassed 85 articles involving a substantial cohort of 7095 patients. The NMA measured the effectiveness across all ages and included 7043 patients, with a mean age of 37.80 ± 3.91 years. Of the 85 included studies, 14 (16.5%) were at low risk of bias, 71 (83.5%) were at moderate risk, and no studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. In the direct meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences were found between tetracyclines and quinolones concerning TTD (mean difference: −0.40, 95% CI: −1.43 to 0.63; I2 = 0%), fever disappearance rate within 24 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.08–1.79; I2 = 58%), and fever disappearance rate within 48 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.30–3.98; I2 = 59%). However, the comprehensive NMA analysis of clinical response (in 70 studies; n = 6143 patients), shortening of TTD (in 52 studies; n = 4363 patients), shortening length of cough relief or disappearance (in 39 studies; n = 3235 patients), fever disappearance rate at 48 h (in four studies; n = 418 patients) revealed that minocycline exhibited the most favourable outcomes across these various parameters, and the analysis of fever disappearance rate at 24 h (in three studies; n = 145 patients) revealed that levofloxacin may be the most effective, as indicated by the rank probabilities and surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) value. Moxifloxacin ranked second in clinical response and in shortening the length of cough relief or disappearance, and third in shortening TTD. Notably, when evaluating the occurrence of adverse reactions in paediatric patients (in four studies; n = 239 children), levofloxacin was associated with the highest SUCRA value rankings for the rate of adverse events. Our findings suggest that tetracyclines and quinolones may be equally effective. Based on the age of participants in the included studies, minocycline may be the most effective intervention for children over eight years of age when all preventive measures are considered, whereas moxifloxacin may benefit people under eight years of age. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, given the limited number of studies and patients included, and the heterogeneity between included studies. Based on a limited number of studies in children, levofloxacin is likely to have one of the highest rates of adverse reactions. The majority of the studies included in the NMA were from the Asian region, and more randomised controlled trials comparing different therapeutic strategies in patients with M. pneumoniae are warranted. This comparative study provides clinical pharmacists and clinicians with important information to enable them to make informed decisions about treatment options, considering drug efficacy and safety. The Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2589-5370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-5370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102589</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38596615</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Mycoplasma pneumoniae ; Network meta-analysis ; Paediatric ; Quinolones ; Tetracyclines</subject><ispartof>EClinicalMedicine, 2024-05, Vol.71, p.102589-102589, Article 102589</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-e2958bc2cacbe621c16a852401d0e70f4144f706d39a509379a03c70671fa3bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6462-2357</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001646/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001646/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38596615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Fangqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Weijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Junshan</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people with Mycoplasma pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><title>EClinicalMedicine</title><addtitle>EClinicalMedicine</addtitle><description>The escalating resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to macrolides has become a significant global health concern, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although tetracyclines and quinolones have been proposed as alternative therapeutic options, concerns regarding age-specific safety issues and the lack of consensus in recommendations across various national guidelines prevail. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to ascertain the most efficacious interventions for second-line treatment of M. pneumoniae infection while considering the age-specific safety issues associated with these interventions. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we searched PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Data, from inception up to November 11th, 2023. Studies of quinolones or tetracyclines for the treatment of people with M. pneumoniae infection were collected and screened by reading published reports, with any type of study included, and no individual patient-level data requested. A systematic review and direct meta-analysis compared the efficacy of tetracyclines and quinolones regarding time to defervescence (TTD) and the rates of fever disappearance within 24 h and 48 h of antibiotic administration, for managing M. pneumoniae infection. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was employed to indirectly assess the relative effectiveness of different interventions in people with M. pneumoniae infection and the safety profile of medication in paediatric patients. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023478383. The systematic review and direct meta-analysis included a total of 4 articles involving 246 patients, while the NMA encompassed 85 articles involving a substantial cohort of 7095 patients. The NMA measured the effectiveness across all ages and included 7043 patients, with a mean age of 37.80 ± 3.91 years. Of the 85 included studies, 14 (16.5%) were at low risk of bias, 71 (83.5%) were at moderate risk, and no studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. In the direct meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences were found between tetracyclines and quinolones concerning TTD (mean difference: −0.40, 95% CI: −1.43 to 0.63; I2 = 0%), fever disappearance rate within 24 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.08–1.79; I2 = 58%), and fever disappearance rate within 48 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.30–3.98; I2 = 59%). However, the comprehensive NMA analysis of clinical response (in 70 studies; n = 6143 patients), shortening of TTD (in 52 studies; n = 4363 patients), shortening length of cough relief or disappearance (in 39 studies; n = 3235 patients), fever disappearance rate at 48 h (in four studies; n = 418 patients) revealed that minocycline exhibited the most favourable outcomes across these various parameters, and the analysis of fever disappearance rate at 24 h (in three studies; n = 145 patients) revealed that levofloxacin may be the most effective, as indicated by the rank probabilities and surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) value. Moxifloxacin ranked second in clinical response and in shortening the length of cough relief or disappearance, and third in shortening TTD. Notably, when evaluating the occurrence of adverse reactions in paediatric patients (in four studies; n = 239 children), levofloxacin was associated with the highest SUCRA value rankings for the rate of adverse events. Our findings suggest that tetracyclines and quinolones may be equally effective. Based on the age of participants in the included studies, minocycline may be the most effective intervention for children over eight years of age when all preventive measures are considered, whereas moxifloxacin may benefit people under eight years of age. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, given the limited number of studies and patients included, and the heterogeneity between included studies. Based on a limited number of studies in children, levofloxacin is likely to have one of the highest rates of adverse reactions. The majority of the studies included in the NMA were from the Asian region, and more randomised controlled trials comparing different therapeutic strategies in patients with M. pneumoniae are warranted. This comparative study provides clinical pharmacists and clinicians with important information to enable them to make informed decisions about treatment options, considering drug efficacy and safety. The Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China.</description><subject>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</subject><subject>Network meta-analysis</subject><subject>Paediatric</subject><subject>Quinolones</subject><subject>Tetracyclines</subject><issn>2589-5370</issn><issn>2589-5370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQjRCIVqV_gJCXbHKxYzsPFiBUtVCpiA2srYkzob4kdmo79yrf0J_GIaUqG1bjmTlzZnxOlr1mdMcoK9_td6gHY8ddQQuRSoWsm2fZ6RpyySv6_Mn7JDsPYU8pLaiom5K-zE54LZuyZPI0u7_se9TRHNBiCARsRwL0GBfiehIxetDLugm33t1srBvcmhpLJnTTgORo4i35uuiUQBiBTBbn0VkD7wmQsISII0SjiceDweMfHovx6PwvMmKEHCwMSzDhVfaihyHg-UM8y35cXX6_-JLffPt8ffHpJteC8Zhj0ci61YUG3WJZMM1KqGUhKOsoVrQXTIi-omXHG5C04VUDlOtUqFgPvG35WfZx453mdsROo03fHNTkzQh-UQ6M-rdjza366Q6KMZrEF2ViePvA4N3djCGq0QSNwwAW3RwUp1xKwZLeCSo2qPYuBI_94x5G1eql2qvNS7V6qTYv09ibpzc-Dv11LgE-bABMSiVdvQraoNXYGZ8MVZ0z_9_wG6T5tbI</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Cai, Fangqing</creator><creator>Li, Jinglin</creator><creator>Liang, Weijie</creator><creator>Wang, Ling</creator><creator>Ruan, Junshan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-2357</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people with Mycoplasma pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><author>Cai, Fangqing ; Li, Jinglin ; Liang, Weijie ; Wang, Ling ; Ruan, Junshan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-e2958bc2cacbe621c16a852401d0e70f4144f706d39a509379a03c70671fa3bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</topic><topic>Network meta-analysis</topic><topic>Paediatric</topic><topic>Quinolones</topic><topic>Tetracyclines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Fangqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Weijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Junshan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>EClinicalMedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Fangqing</au><au>Li, Jinglin</au><au>Liang, Weijie</au><au>Wang, Ling</au><au>Ruan, Junshan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people with Mycoplasma pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>EClinicalMedicine</jtitle><addtitle>EClinicalMedicine</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>102589</spage><epage>102589</epage><pages>102589-102589</pages><artnum>102589</artnum><issn>2589-5370</issn><eissn>2589-5370</eissn><abstract>The escalating resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to macrolides has become a significant global health concern, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although tetracyclines and quinolones have been proposed as alternative therapeutic options, concerns regarding age-specific safety issues and the lack of consensus in recommendations across various national guidelines prevail. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to ascertain the most efficacious interventions for second-line treatment of M. pneumoniae infection while considering the age-specific safety issues associated with these interventions. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we searched PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Data, from inception up to November 11th, 2023. Studies of quinolones or tetracyclines for the treatment of people with M. pneumoniae infection were collected and screened by reading published reports, with any type of study included, and no individual patient-level data requested. A systematic review and direct meta-analysis compared the efficacy of tetracyclines and quinolones regarding time to defervescence (TTD) and the rates of fever disappearance within 24 h and 48 h of antibiotic administration, for managing M. pneumoniae infection. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was employed to indirectly assess the relative effectiveness of different interventions in people with M. pneumoniae infection and the safety profile of medication in paediatric patients. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023478383. The systematic review and direct meta-analysis included a total of 4 articles involving 246 patients, while the NMA encompassed 85 articles involving a substantial cohort of 7095 patients. The NMA measured the effectiveness across all ages and included 7043 patients, with a mean age of 37.80 ± 3.91 years. Of the 85 included studies, 14 (16.5%) were at low risk of bias, 71 (83.5%) were at moderate risk, and no studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. In the direct meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences were found between tetracyclines and quinolones concerning TTD (mean difference: −0.40, 95% CI: −1.43 to 0.63; I2 = 0%), fever disappearance rate within 24 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.08–1.79; I2 = 58%), and fever disappearance rate within 48 h of antibiotic administration (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.30–3.98; I2 = 59%). However, the comprehensive NMA analysis of clinical response (in 70 studies; n = 6143 patients), shortening of TTD (in 52 studies; n = 4363 patients), shortening length of cough relief or disappearance (in 39 studies; n = 3235 patients), fever disappearance rate at 48 h (in four studies; n = 418 patients) revealed that minocycline exhibited the most favourable outcomes across these various parameters, and the analysis of fever disappearance rate at 24 h (in three studies; n = 145 patients) revealed that levofloxacin may be the most effective, as indicated by the rank probabilities and surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) value. Moxifloxacin ranked second in clinical response and in shortening the length of cough relief or disappearance, and third in shortening TTD. Notably, when evaluating the occurrence of adverse reactions in paediatric patients (in four studies; n = 239 children), levofloxacin was associated with the highest SUCRA value rankings for the rate of adverse events. Our findings suggest that tetracyclines and quinolones may be equally effective. Based on the age of participants in the included studies, minocycline may be the most effective intervention for children over eight years of age when all preventive measures are considered, whereas moxifloxacin may benefit people under eight years of age. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, given the limited number of studies and patients included, and the heterogeneity between included studies. Based on a limited number of studies in children, levofloxacin is likely to have one of the highest rates of adverse reactions. The majority of the studies included in the NMA were from the Asian region, and more randomised controlled trials comparing different therapeutic strategies in patients with M. pneumoniae are warranted. This comparative study provides clinical pharmacists and clinicians with important information to enable them to make informed decisions about treatment options, considering drug efficacy and safety. The Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38596615</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102589</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-2357</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2589-5370
ispartof EClinicalMedicine, 2024-05, Vol.71, p.102589-102589, Article 102589
issn 2589-5370
2589-5370
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11001646
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Network meta-analysis
Paediatric
Quinolones
Tetracyclines
title Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people with Mycoplasma pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T14%3A37%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20safety%20of%20tetracyclines%20and%20quinolones%20in%20people%20with%20Mycoplasma%20pneumonia:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20network%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=EClinicalMedicine&rft.au=Cai,%20Fangqing&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=102589&rft.epage=102589&rft.pages=102589-102589&rft.artnum=102589&rft.issn=2589-5370&rft.eissn=2589-5370&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3035541048%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3035541048&rft_id=info:pmid/38596615&rft_els_id=S2589537024001688&rfr_iscdi=true