Quantifying differences in femoral head and neck asphericity in CAM type femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia versus controls using radial 3DCT imaging and volumetric segmentation

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia are the most common causes of groin pain originating from the hip joint. To date, there is controversy over cut-off values for the evaluation of abnormal femoral head-neck anatomy with significant overlap between the normal and abnormal hips. Our...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2020-06, Vol.93 (1110), p.20190039-20190039
Hauptverfasser: Schauwecker, Natalie, Xi, Yin, Slepicka, Chenelle, Dessouky, Riham, Fey, Nicholas, Chatzinoff, Yonatan, Chopra, Rajiv, Wells, Joel, Chhabra, Avneesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20190039
container_issue 1110
container_start_page 20190039
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 93
creator Schauwecker, Natalie
Xi, Yin
Slepicka, Chenelle
Dessouky, Riham
Fey, Nicholas
Chatzinoff, Yonatan
Chopra, Rajiv
Wells, Joel
Chhabra, Avneesh
description Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia are the most common causes of groin pain originating from the hip joint. To date, there is controversy over cut-off values for the evaluation of abnormal femoral head-neck anatomy with significant overlap between the normal and abnormal hips. Our aim was to perform three-dimensional CT analysis of femoral head and bump anatomy to quantify common hip pathologies (FAI and hip dysplasia) controls. Consecutive patients who underwent three-dimensional CT imaging for hip dysplasia or CAM type FAI were compared to asymptomatic controls. α angles on radial CT and 3D volumetric femoral head and bump segmentations were performed by two readers. Inter- and intrapatient comparisons were performed including interreader and receiver operating characteristic analyses. 25 FAI patients, 16 hip dysplasia patients and 38 controls were included. FAI and dysplasia patients exhibited higher α angles and higher bump-head volume ratios than the controls ( < 0.05). Larger bump volumes were found among FAI than dysplasia patients and contralateral hips of FAI patients were also different than the controls. α angle at 2 o'clock and bump to head ratio showed the highest area under the curve for patients controls. The interreader reliability was better for volumetric segmentation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.35-0.84) as compared to the α angles (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.11-0.44). Patients with FAI and dysplasia exhibit different femoral head anatomy than asymptomatic controls. Volumetric segmentation of femoral head and bump is more reliable and better demonstrates the bilateral femoral head anatomy differences in hip patients controls. Utilizing information from 3D volumetric bump assessment in patients with FAI and dysplasia, the physicians may be able to more objectively and reliably evaluate the altered anatomy for better pre-surgical evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20190039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10993221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2374318763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fd73ad8b67b9300d3a9ed4ae994273f3c8e4ddd4de308bf9165b2247f495b1023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1DAUhSMEokNhxxp5yYIUvzKJV6ia8pKKEFKR2FmOfT3jktjBdkbKj-O_4TBtBSvLvt8958inql4SfEFoI972t_GCYiIwZuJRtSEt7-quwz8eVxuMcVsT2jVn1bOUbtdrI_DT6oxRwinbsk31-9usfHZ2cX6PjLMWIngNCTmPLIwhqgEdQBmkvEEe9E-k0nSA6LTLywrtLr-gvExwooPSkFU_DyoiN05FFEbw-e_2wU3ILGkaVHIKHSGmOSEdfI5hSGhOa4KojCuO7Gp3U_bVfn1bd49hmEfIxRYl2K-SKrvgn1dPrBoSvLg7z6vvH97f7D7V118_ft5dXteaNyTX1rRMma7ftr1gGBumBBiuQAhOW2aZ7oAbY7gBhrveCrJtekp5a7loeoIpO6_enXSnuR_B6OJfPkZOsWSMiwzKyf8n3h3kPhwlwUIwSklReH2nEMOvGVKWo0sahkF5CHOSlLWcka7dsoK-OaE6hpQi2AcfguVauSyVy_vKC_7q32wP8H3H7A8XEa3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2374318763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying differences in femoral head and neck asphericity in CAM type femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia versus controls using radial 3DCT imaging and volumetric segmentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Schauwecker, Natalie ; Xi, Yin ; Slepicka, Chenelle ; Dessouky, Riham ; Fey, Nicholas ; Chatzinoff, Yonatan ; Chopra, Rajiv ; Wells, Joel ; Chhabra, Avneesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Schauwecker, Natalie ; Xi, Yin ; Slepicka, Chenelle ; Dessouky, Riham ; Fey, Nicholas ; Chatzinoff, Yonatan ; Chopra, Rajiv ; Wells, Joel ; Chhabra, Avneesh</creatorcontrib><description>Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia are the most common causes of groin pain originating from the hip joint. To date, there is controversy over cut-off values for the evaluation of abnormal femoral head-neck anatomy with significant overlap between the normal and abnormal hips. Our aim was to perform three-dimensional CT analysis of femoral head and bump anatomy to quantify common hip pathologies (FAI and hip dysplasia) controls. Consecutive patients who underwent three-dimensional CT imaging for hip dysplasia or CAM type FAI were compared to asymptomatic controls. α angles on radial CT and 3D volumetric femoral head and bump segmentations were performed by two readers. Inter- and intrapatient comparisons were performed including interreader and receiver operating characteristic analyses. 25 FAI patients, 16 hip dysplasia patients and 38 controls were included. FAI and dysplasia patients exhibited higher α angles and higher bump-head volume ratios than the controls ( &lt; 0.05). Larger bump volumes were found among FAI than dysplasia patients and contralateral hips of FAI patients were also different than the controls. α angle at 2 o'clock and bump to head ratio showed the highest area under the curve for patients controls. The interreader reliability was better for volumetric segmentation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.35-0.84) as compared to the α angles (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.11-0.44). Patients with FAI and dysplasia exhibit different femoral head anatomy than asymptomatic controls. Volumetric segmentation of femoral head and bump is more reliable and better demonstrates the bilateral femoral head anatomy differences in hip patients controls. Utilizing information from 3D volumetric bump assessment in patients with FAI and dysplasia, the physicians may be able to more objectively and reliably evaluate the altered anatomy for better pre-surgical evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32142363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Head - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Dislocation - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2020-06, Vol.93 (1110), p.20190039-20190039</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fd73ad8b67b9300d3a9ed4ae994273f3c8e4ddd4de308bf9165b2247f495b1023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fd73ad8b67b9300d3a9ed4ae994273f3c8e4ddd4de308bf9165b2247f495b1023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3345-1599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schauwecker, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slepicka, Chenelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dessouky, Riham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzinoff, Yonatan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhabra, Avneesh</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying differences in femoral head and neck asphericity in CAM type femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia versus controls using radial 3DCT imaging and volumetric segmentation</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia are the most common causes of groin pain originating from the hip joint. To date, there is controversy over cut-off values for the evaluation of abnormal femoral head-neck anatomy with significant overlap between the normal and abnormal hips. Our aim was to perform three-dimensional CT analysis of femoral head and bump anatomy to quantify common hip pathologies (FAI and hip dysplasia) controls. Consecutive patients who underwent three-dimensional CT imaging for hip dysplasia or CAM type FAI were compared to asymptomatic controls. α angles on radial CT and 3D volumetric femoral head and bump segmentations were performed by two readers. Inter- and intrapatient comparisons were performed including interreader and receiver operating characteristic analyses. 25 FAI patients, 16 hip dysplasia patients and 38 controls were included. FAI and dysplasia patients exhibited higher α angles and higher bump-head volume ratios than the controls ( &lt; 0.05). Larger bump volumes were found among FAI than dysplasia patients and contralateral hips of FAI patients were also different than the controls. α angle at 2 o'clock and bump to head ratio showed the highest area under the curve for patients controls. The interreader reliability was better for volumetric segmentation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.35-0.84) as compared to the α angles (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.11-0.44). Patients with FAI and dysplasia exhibit different femoral head anatomy than asymptomatic controls. Volumetric segmentation of femoral head and bump is more reliable and better demonstrates the bilateral femoral head anatomy differences in hip patients controls. Utilizing information from 3D volumetric bump assessment in patients with FAI and dysplasia, the physicians may be able to more objectively and reliably evaluate the altered anatomy for better pre-surgical evaluation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Dislocation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtv1DAUhSMEokNhxxp5yYIUvzKJV6ia8pKKEFKR2FmOfT3jktjBdkbKj-O_4TBtBSvLvt8958inql4SfEFoI972t_GCYiIwZuJRtSEt7-quwz8eVxuMcVsT2jVn1bOUbtdrI_DT6oxRwinbsk31-9usfHZ2cX6PjLMWIngNCTmPLIwhqgEdQBmkvEEe9E-k0nSA6LTLywrtLr-gvExwooPSkFU_DyoiN05FFEbw-e_2wU3ILGkaVHIKHSGmOSEdfI5hSGhOa4KojCuO7Gp3U_bVfn1bd49hmEfIxRYl2K-SKrvgn1dPrBoSvLg7z6vvH97f7D7V118_ft5dXteaNyTX1rRMma7ftr1gGBumBBiuQAhOW2aZ7oAbY7gBhrveCrJtekp5a7loeoIpO6_enXSnuR_B6OJfPkZOsWSMiwzKyf8n3h3kPhwlwUIwSklReH2nEMOvGVKWo0sahkF5CHOSlLWcka7dsoK-OaE6hpQi2AcfguVauSyVy_vKC_7q32wP8H3H7A8XEa3I</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Schauwecker, Natalie</creator><creator>Xi, Yin</creator><creator>Slepicka, Chenelle</creator><creator>Dessouky, Riham</creator><creator>Fey, Nicholas</creator><creator>Chatzinoff, Yonatan</creator><creator>Chopra, Rajiv</creator><creator>Wells, Joel</creator><creator>Chhabra, Avneesh</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-1599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Quantifying differences in femoral head and neck asphericity in CAM type femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia versus controls using radial 3DCT imaging and volumetric segmentation</title><author>Schauwecker, Natalie ; Xi, Yin ; Slepicka, Chenelle ; Dessouky, Riham ; Fey, Nicholas ; Chatzinoff, Yonatan ; Chopra, Rajiv ; Wells, Joel ; Chhabra, Avneesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fd73ad8b67b9300d3a9ed4ae994273f3c8e4ddd4de308bf9165b2247f495b1023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Dislocation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schauwecker, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xi, Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slepicka, Chenelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dessouky, Riham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzinoff, Yonatan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chhabra, Avneesh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schauwecker, Natalie</au><au>Xi, Yin</au><au>Slepicka, Chenelle</au><au>Dessouky, Riham</au><au>Fey, Nicholas</au><au>Chatzinoff, Yonatan</au><au>Chopra, Rajiv</au><au>Wells, Joel</au><au>Chhabra, Avneesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying differences in femoral head and neck asphericity in CAM type femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia versus controls using radial 3DCT imaging and volumetric segmentation</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1110</issue><spage>20190039</spage><epage>20190039</epage><pages>20190039-20190039</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia are the most common causes of groin pain originating from the hip joint. To date, there is controversy over cut-off values for the evaluation of abnormal femoral head-neck anatomy with significant overlap between the normal and abnormal hips. Our aim was to perform three-dimensional CT analysis of femoral head and bump anatomy to quantify common hip pathologies (FAI and hip dysplasia) controls. Consecutive patients who underwent three-dimensional CT imaging for hip dysplasia or CAM type FAI were compared to asymptomatic controls. α angles on radial CT and 3D volumetric femoral head and bump segmentations were performed by two readers. Inter- and intrapatient comparisons were performed including interreader and receiver operating characteristic analyses. 25 FAI patients, 16 hip dysplasia patients and 38 controls were included. FAI and dysplasia patients exhibited higher α angles and higher bump-head volume ratios than the controls ( &lt; 0.05). Larger bump volumes were found among FAI than dysplasia patients and contralateral hips of FAI patients were also different than the controls. α angle at 2 o'clock and bump to head ratio showed the highest area under the curve for patients controls. The interreader reliability was better for volumetric segmentation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.35-0.84) as compared to the α angles (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.11-0.44). Patients with FAI and dysplasia exhibit different femoral head anatomy than asymptomatic controls. Volumetric segmentation of femoral head and bump is more reliable and better demonstrates the bilateral femoral head anatomy differences in hip patients controls. Utilizing information from 3D volumetric bump assessment in patients with FAI and dysplasia, the physicians may be able to more objectively and reliably evaluate the altered anatomy for better pre-surgical evaluation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>32142363</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20190039</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3345-1599</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2020-06, Vol.93 (1110), p.20190039-20190039
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10993221
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Case-Control Studies
Female
Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging
Femur Head - diagnostic imaging
Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging
Hip Dislocation - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Young Adult
title Quantifying differences in femoral head and neck asphericity in CAM type femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia versus controls using radial 3DCT imaging and volumetric segmentation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20differences%20in%20femoral%20head%20and%20neck%20asphericity%20in%20CAM%20type%20femoroacetabular%20impingement%20and%20hip%20dysplasia%20versus%20controls%20using%20radial%203DCT%20imaging%20and%20volumetric%20segmentation&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Schauwecker,%20Natalie&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1110&rft.spage=20190039&rft.epage=20190039&rft.pages=20190039-20190039&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20190039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2374318763%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2374318763&rft_id=info:pmid/32142363&rfr_iscdi=true