Terracotta: A tool for conducting experimental research on student learning

For researchers seeking to improve education, a common goal is to identify teaching practices that have causal benefits in classroom settings. To test whether an instructional practice exerts a causal influence on an outcome measure, the most straightforward and compelling method is to conduct an ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavior research methods 2024-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2519-2536
Hauptverfasser: Motz, Benjamin A., Üner, Öykü, Jankowski, Harmony E., Christie, Marcus A., Burgas, Kim, del Blanco Orobitg, Diego, McDaniel, Mark A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2536
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2519
container_title Behavior research methods
container_volume 56
creator Motz, Benjamin A.
Üner, Öykü
Jankowski, Harmony E.
Christie, Marcus A.
Burgas, Kim
del Blanco Orobitg, Diego
McDaniel, Mark A.
description For researchers seeking to improve education, a common goal is to identify teaching practices that have causal benefits in classroom settings. To test whether an instructional practice exerts a causal influence on an outcome measure, the most straightforward and compelling method is to conduct an experiment. While experimentation is common in laboratory studies of learning, experimentation is increasingly rare in classroom settings, and to date, researchers have argued it is prohibitively expensive and difficult to conduct experiments on education in situ. To address this challenge, we present Terracotta (Tool for Education Research with RAndomized COnTrolled TriAls), an open-source web application that integrates with a learning management system to provide a comprehensive experimental research platform within an online class site. Terracotta automates randomization, informed consent, experimental manipulation of different versions of learning activities, and export of de-identified research data. Here we describe these features, and the results of a live classroom demonstration study using Terracotta, a preregistered replication of McDaniel et al. ( Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1 (1), 18–26,  2012 ). Using Terracotta, we experimentally manipulated online review assignments so that consenting students alternated, on a weekly basis, between taking multiple-choice quizzes (retrieval practice) and reading answers to these quizzes (restudy). Students' performance on subsequent exams was significantly improved for items that had been in retrieval practice review assignments. This successful replication demonstrates that Terracotta can be used to experimentally manipulate consequential aspects of students’ experiences in education settings.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13428-023-02164-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10991034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3031733156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-de7dfe2aaea04d9f508e6fda3f2fc71850e5a15980aeec89547d12df71d2a23f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUlPBCEQhYnRuP8BD4bEi5dW1m7aizHGLZp40TNBKMY2PTBCt9F_LzruBw8EUvXV41UeQluU7PFGqv1MuWCqIoyXQ2tRqQW0SqUUFZdMLf54r6C1nB8I4YpRsYxWeCNY26p6FV3eQErGxmEwB_gIDzH22MeEbQxutEMXJhieZ5C6KYTB9DhBBpPsPY4B52F0pYr7UgmF3EBL3vQZNj_udXR7enJzfF5dXZ9dHB9dVVaweqgcNM4DMwYMEa71kiiovTPcM28bqiQBaahsFTEAVrVSNI4y5xvqmGHc83V0ONedjXdTcLZ4SKbXs2LSpBcdTad_d0J3ryfxSVPStpRwURR2PxRSfBwhD3raZQt9bwLEMWumpBBM1LQu6M4f9CGOKZT9NCecNpxT-UaxOWVTzDmB_3JDiX4LS8_D0iUs_R6WVmVo--ceXyOf6RSAz4FcWmEC6fvvf2RfAWOjoX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3031733156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Terracotta: A tool for conducting experimental research on student learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Journals</source><creator>Motz, Benjamin A. ; Üner, Öykü ; Jankowski, Harmony E. ; Christie, Marcus A. ; Burgas, Kim ; del Blanco Orobitg, Diego ; McDaniel, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Motz, Benjamin A. ; Üner, Öykü ; Jankowski, Harmony E. ; Christie, Marcus A. ; Burgas, Kim ; del Blanco Orobitg, Diego ; McDaniel, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>For researchers seeking to improve education, a common goal is to identify teaching practices that have causal benefits in classroom settings. To test whether an instructional practice exerts a causal influence on an outcome measure, the most straightforward and compelling method is to conduct an experiment. While experimentation is common in laboratory studies of learning, experimentation is increasingly rare in classroom settings, and to date, researchers have argued it is prohibitively expensive and difficult to conduct experiments on education in situ. To address this challenge, we present Terracotta (Tool for Education Research with RAndomized COnTrolled TriAls), an open-source web application that integrates with a learning management system to provide a comprehensive experimental research platform within an online class site. Terracotta automates randomization, informed consent, experimental manipulation of different versions of learning activities, and export of de-identified research data. Here we describe these features, and the results of a live classroom demonstration study using Terracotta, a preregistered replication of McDaniel et al. ( Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1 (1), 18–26,  2012 ). Using Terracotta, we experimentally manipulated online review assignments so that consenting students alternated, on a weekly basis, between taking multiple-choice quizzes (retrieval practice) and reading answers to these quizzes (restudy). Students' performance on subsequent exams was significantly improved for items that had been in retrieval practice review assignments. This successful replication demonstrates that Terracotta can be used to experimentally manipulate consequential aspects of students’ experiences in education settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1554-351X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02164-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37429986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Classrooms ; Cognition ; Cognitive Psychology ; Curriculum ; Education ; Empirical Research ; Experimental research ; Humans ; Learning ; Multiple choice ; Psychology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Replication ; Students</subject><ispartof>Behavior research methods, 2024-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2519-2536</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-de7dfe2aaea04d9f508e6fda3f2fc71850e5a15980aeec89547d12df71d2a23f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4999-5531 ; 0000-0003-0735-2562 ; 0000-0002-7774-1435 ; 0000-0001-5458-9947 ; 0000-0002-0379-2184 ; 0000-0002-1689-9095 ; 0000-0002-8886-2267</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13428-023-02164-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-023-02164-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37429986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motz, Benjamin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üner, Öykü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankowski, Harmony E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Marcus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgas, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Blanco Orobitg, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Terracotta: A tool for conducting experimental research on student learning</title><title>Behavior research methods</title><addtitle>Behav Res</addtitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><description>For researchers seeking to improve education, a common goal is to identify teaching practices that have causal benefits in classroom settings. To test whether an instructional practice exerts a causal influence on an outcome measure, the most straightforward and compelling method is to conduct an experiment. While experimentation is common in laboratory studies of learning, experimentation is increasingly rare in classroom settings, and to date, researchers have argued it is prohibitively expensive and difficult to conduct experiments on education in situ. To address this challenge, we present Terracotta (Tool for Education Research with RAndomized COnTrolled TriAls), an open-source web application that integrates with a learning management system to provide a comprehensive experimental research platform within an online class site. Terracotta automates randomization, informed consent, experimental manipulation of different versions of learning activities, and export of de-identified research data. Here we describe these features, and the results of a live classroom demonstration study using Terracotta, a preregistered replication of McDaniel et al. ( Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1 (1), 18–26,  2012 ). Using Terracotta, we experimentally manipulated online review assignments so that consenting students alternated, on a weekly basis, between taking multiple-choice quizzes (retrieval practice) and reading answers to these quizzes (restudy). Students' performance on subsequent exams was significantly improved for items that had been in retrieval practice review assignments. This successful replication demonstrates that Terracotta can be used to experimentally manipulate consequential aspects of students’ experiences in education settings.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Empirical Research</subject><subject>Experimental research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1554-3528</issn><issn>1554-351X</issn><issn>1554-3528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUlPBCEQhYnRuP8BD4bEi5dW1m7aizHGLZp40TNBKMY2PTBCt9F_LzruBw8EUvXV41UeQluU7PFGqv1MuWCqIoyXQ2tRqQW0SqUUFZdMLf54r6C1nB8I4YpRsYxWeCNY26p6FV3eQErGxmEwB_gIDzH22MeEbQxutEMXJhieZ5C6KYTB9DhBBpPsPY4B52F0pYr7UgmF3EBL3vQZNj_udXR7enJzfF5dXZ9dHB9dVVaweqgcNM4DMwYMEa71kiiovTPcM28bqiQBaahsFTEAVrVSNI4y5xvqmGHc83V0ONedjXdTcLZ4SKbXs2LSpBcdTad_d0J3ryfxSVPStpRwURR2PxRSfBwhD3raZQt9bwLEMWumpBBM1LQu6M4f9CGOKZT9NCecNpxT-UaxOWVTzDmB_3JDiX4LS8_D0iUs_R6WVmVo--ceXyOf6RSAz4FcWmEC6fvvf2RfAWOjoX4</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Motz, Benjamin A.</creator><creator>Üner, Öykü</creator><creator>Jankowski, Harmony E.</creator><creator>Christie, Marcus A.</creator><creator>Burgas, Kim</creator><creator>del Blanco Orobitg, Diego</creator><creator>McDaniel, Mark A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-5531</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0735-2562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-1435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5458-9947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-2184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-9095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8886-2267</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Terracotta: A tool for conducting experimental research on student learning</title><author>Motz, Benjamin A. ; Üner, Öykü ; Jankowski, Harmony E. ; Christie, Marcus A. ; Burgas, Kim ; del Blanco Orobitg, Diego ; McDaniel, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-de7dfe2aaea04d9f508e6fda3f2fc71850e5a15980aeec89547d12df71d2a23f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Empirical Research</topic><topic>Experimental research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motz, Benjamin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üner, Öykü</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankowski, Harmony E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, Marcus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgas, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Blanco Orobitg, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Behavior research methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motz, Benjamin A.</au><au>Üner, Öykü</au><au>Jankowski, Harmony E.</au><au>Christie, Marcus A.</au><au>Burgas, Kim</au><au>del Blanco Orobitg, Diego</au><au>McDaniel, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Terracotta: A tool for conducting experimental research on student learning</atitle><jtitle>Behavior research methods</jtitle><stitle>Behav Res</stitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2519</spage><epage>2536</epage><pages>2519-2536</pages><issn>1554-3528</issn><issn>1554-351X</issn><eissn>1554-3528</eissn><abstract>For researchers seeking to improve education, a common goal is to identify teaching practices that have causal benefits in classroom settings. To test whether an instructional practice exerts a causal influence on an outcome measure, the most straightforward and compelling method is to conduct an experiment. While experimentation is common in laboratory studies of learning, experimentation is increasingly rare in classroom settings, and to date, researchers have argued it is prohibitively expensive and difficult to conduct experiments on education in situ. To address this challenge, we present Terracotta (Tool for Education Research with RAndomized COnTrolled TriAls), an open-source web application that integrates with a learning management system to provide a comprehensive experimental research platform within an online class site. Terracotta automates randomization, informed consent, experimental manipulation of different versions of learning activities, and export of de-identified research data. Here we describe these features, and the results of a live classroom demonstration study using Terracotta, a preregistered replication of McDaniel et al. ( Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1 (1), 18–26,  2012 ). Using Terracotta, we experimentally manipulated online review assignments so that consenting students alternated, on a weekly basis, between taking multiple-choice quizzes (retrieval practice) and reading answers to these quizzes (restudy). Students' performance on subsequent exams was significantly improved for items that had been in retrieval practice review assignments. This successful replication demonstrates that Terracotta can be used to experimentally manipulate consequential aspects of students’ experiences in education settings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37429986</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13428-023-02164-8</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-5531</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0735-2562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-1435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5458-9947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-2184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-9095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8886-2267</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1554-3528
ispartof Behavior research methods, 2024-03, Vol.56 (3), p.2519-2536
issn 1554-3528
1554-351X
1554-3528
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10991034
source MEDLINE; Springer Journals
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Classrooms
Cognition
Cognitive Psychology
Curriculum
Education
Empirical Research
Experimental research
Humans
Learning
Multiple choice
Psychology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Replication
Students
title Terracotta: A tool for conducting experimental research on student learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Terracotta:%20A%20tool%20for%20conducting%20experimental%20research%20on%20student%20learning&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20research%20methods&rft.au=Motz,%20Benjamin%20A.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2519&rft.epage=2536&rft.pages=2519-2536&rft.issn=1554-3528&rft.eissn=1554-3528&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13428-023-02164-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3031733156%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3031733156&rft_id=info:pmid/37429986&rfr_iscdi=true