Attention biases the process of risky decision‐making: Evidence from eye‐tracking
Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher‐complexity risky decision‐making and attention as illustrated by eye‐tracking to explain the process of r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PsyCh journal 2024-04, Vol.13 (2), p.157-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | PsyCh journal |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Hu, Mengchen Chang, Ruosong Sui, Xue Gao, Min |
description | Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher‐complexity risky decision‐making and attention as illustrated by eye‐tracking to explain the process of risky decision‐making by the effect of attention. We demonstrate this process from three stages: the pre‐phase guidance of options on attention, the process of attention being biased, and the impact of attention on final risk preference. We conclude that exogenous information can capture attention directly to salient options, thereby altering evidence accumulation. In particular, for multi‐attribute risky decision‐making, attentional advantages increase the weight of specific attributes, thus biasing risk preference in different directions. We highlight the significance of understanding how people use available information to weigh risks from an information‐processing perspective via process data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pchj.724 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10990817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3031404233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-7141185329e64a3e8093b0be8e0f9fcab7ee014eb3095550c7ef2b74a49fda023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMoVqrgE0jAjZvRk8t0ZtyIlHqjoAtdh0x6pk1tJzWZVrrzEXxGn8SU1qILszmB_-M_l5-QYwbnDIBfzMxofJ5xuUMOOMhOArwDu9t_ylvkKIQxxJezTi7yfdISOUtTCfkBebluGqwb62paWh0w0GaEdOadwRCoq6i34XVJB2hsiNDXx-dUv9p6eEl7CzvA2iCtvJtSXGLUGq_NSj0ke5WeBDza1DZ5uek9d--S_uPtffe6nxgJIJOMScbyVPACO1ILzKEQJZSYI1RFZXSZIQKTWAoo0jQFk2HFy0xqWVQDDVy0ydXadzYvpzgwcROvJ2rm7VT7pXLaqr9KbUdq6BaKQVHEc2TR4XTj4N3bHEOjxm7u6zi0EiCYBMmFiNTZmjLeheCx2rZgoFYhqFUIKoYQ0ZPfI23Bn5NHIFkD73aCy3-N1FP37mFl-A1mhZOJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3031404233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attention biases the process of risky decision‐making: Evidence from eye‐tracking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hu, Mengchen ; Chang, Ruosong ; Sui, Xue ; Gao, Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Mengchen ; Chang, Ruosong ; Sui, Xue ; Gao, Min</creatorcontrib><description>Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher‐complexity risky decision‐making and attention as illustrated by eye‐tracking to explain the process of risky decision‐making by the effect of attention. We demonstrate this process from three stages: the pre‐phase guidance of options on attention, the process of attention being biased, and the impact of attention on final risk preference. We conclude that exogenous information can capture attention directly to salient options, thereby altering evidence accumulation. In particular, for multi‐attribute risky decision‐making, attentional advantages increase the weight of specific attributes, thus biasing risk preference in different directions. We highlight the significance of understanding how people use available information to weigh risks from an information‐processing perspective via process data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-0252</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pchj.724</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38155408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>attention ; Bias ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition ; Decision Making ; evidence accumulation ; Eye-Tracking Technology ; eye‐tracking ; Humans ; Review ; risk preference ; risky decision‐making</subject><ispartof>PsyCh journal, 2024-04, Vol.13 (2), p.157-165</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-7141185329e64a3e8093b0be8e0f9fcab7ee014eb3095550c7ef2b74a49fda023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2320-9400 ; 0000-0002-4746-764X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990817/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990817/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38155408$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Mengchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ruosong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sui, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Min</creatorcontrib><title>Attention biases the process of risky decision‐making: Evidence from eye‐tracking</title><title>PsyCh journal</title><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><description>Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher‐complexity risky decision‐making and attention as illustrated by eye‐tracking to explain the process of risky decision‐making by the effect of attention. We demonstrate this process from three stages: the pre‐phase guidance of options on attention, the process of attention being biased, and the impact of attention on final risk preference. We conclude that exogenous information can capture attention directly to salient options, thereby altering evidence accumulation. In particular, for multi‐attribute risky decision‐making, attentional advantages increase the weight of specific attributes, thus biasing risk preference in different directions. We highlight the significance of understanding how people use available information to weigh risks from an information‐processing perspective via process data.</description><subject>attention</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>evidence accumulation</subject><subject>Eye-Tracking Technology</subject><subject>eye‐tracking</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>risk preference</subject><subject>risky decision‐making</subject><issn>2046-0252</issn><issn>2046-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKAzEUhoMoVqrgE0jAjZvRk8t0ZtyIlHqjoAtdh0x6pk1tJzWZVrrzEXxGn8SU1qILszmB_-M_l5-QYwbnDIBfzMxofJ5xuUMOOMhOArwDu9t_ylvkKIQxxJezTi7yfdISOUtTCfkBebluGqwb62paWh0w0GaEdOadwRCoq6i34XVJB2hsiNDXx-dUv9p6eEl7CzvA2iCtvJtSXGLUGq_NSj0ke5WeBDza1DZ5uek9d--S_uPtffe6nxgJIJOMScbyVPACO1ILzKEQJZSYI1RFZXSZIQKTWAoo0jQFk2HFy0xqWVQDDVy0ydXadzYvpzgwcROvJ2rm7VT7pXLaqr9KbUdq6BaKQVHEc2TR4XTj4N3bHEOjxm7u6zi0EiCYBMmFiNTZmjLeheCx2rZgoFYhqFUIKoYQ0ZPfI23Bn5NHIFkD73aCy3-N1FP37mFl-A1mhZOJ</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Hu, Mengchen</creator><creator>Chang, Ruosong</creator><creator>Sui, Xue</creator><creator>Gao, Min</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2320-9400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-764X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Attention biases the process of risky decision‐making: Evidence from eye‐tracking</title><author>Hu, Mengchen ; Chang, Ruosong ; Sui, Xue ; Gao, Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4004-7141185329e64a3e8093b0be8e0f9fcab7ee014eb3095550c7ef2b74a49fda023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>attention</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>evidence accumulation</topic><topic>Eye-Tracking Technology</topic><topic>eye‐tracking</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>risk preference</topic><topic>risky decision‐making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Mengchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Ruosong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sui, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Min</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Mengchen</au><au>Chang, Ruosong</au><au>Sui, Xue</au><au>Gao, Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attention biases the process of risky decision‐making: Evidence from eye‐tracking</atitle><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>157-165</pages><issn>2046-0252</issn><eissn>2046-0260</eissn><abstract>Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher‐complexity risky decision‐making and attention as illustrated by eye‐tracking to explain the process of risky decision‐making by the effect of attention. We demonstrate this process from three stages: the pre‐phase guidance of options on attention, the process of attention being biased, and the impact of attention on final risk preference. We conclude that exogenous information can capture attention directly to salient options, thereby altering evidence accumulation. In particular, for multi‐attribute risky decision‐making, attentional advantages increase the weight of specific attributes, thus biasing risk preference in different directions. We highlight the significance of understanding how people use available information to weigh risks from an information‐processing perspective via process data.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38155408</pmid><doi>10.1002/pchj.724</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2320-9400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-764X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-0252 |
ispartof | PsyCh journal, 2024-04, Vol.13 (2), p.157-165 |
issn | 2046-0252 2046-0260 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10990817 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | attention Bias Choice Behavior Cognition Decision Making evidence accumulation Eye-Tracking Technology eye‐tracking Humans Review risk preference risky decision‐making |
title | Attention biases the process of risky decision‐making: Evidence from eye‐tracking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A02%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention%20biases%20the%20process%20of%20risky%20decision%E2%80%90making:%20Evidence%20from%20eye%E2%80%90tracking&rft.jtitle=PsyCh%20journal&rft.au=Hu,%20Mengchen&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=157-165&rft.issn=2046-0252&rft.eissn=2046-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pchj.724&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3031404233%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3031404233&rft_id=info:pmid/38155408&rfr_iscdi=true |