A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients

Staging laparoscopy (SL) has become commonplace in the preoperative staging pathway for oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. SL is often performed before curative treatment to examine for macroscopic peritoneal metastases (PM) or positive peritoneal cytology (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop an o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2024-04, Vol.106 (4), p.369-376
Hauptverfasser: Halle-Smith, J M, Bage, T, Kamarajah, S K, Siddaiah-Subramanya, M, Pande, R, Whiting, J L, Griffiths, E A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 4
container_start_page 369
container_title Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
container_volume 106
creator Halle-Smith, J M
Bage, T
Kamarajah, S K
Siddaiah-Subramanya, M
Pande, R
Whiting, J L
Griffiths, E A
description Staging laparoscopy (SL) has become commonplace in the preoperative staging pathway for oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. SL is often performed before curative treatment to examine for macroscopic peritoneal metastases (PM) or positive peritoneal cytology (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop an objective risk scoring system to predict both PM and PPC at SL. A prospectively collected and maintained database of all OG cancer patients treated between 2006 and 2020 was reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both PM and PPC at SL. A risk score was produced for both PM and PPC, and then validated internally. Among 968 patients who underwent SL, 96 (9.9%) had PM and 81 (8.4%) had PPC at SL. Tumour site ( < 0.001), computed tomography (CT) T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( = 0.029) were significantly associated with PM at SL ( < 0.001). Tumour site ( < 0.001), biopsy histology ( = 0.041), CT T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( < 0.001) were significantly associated with PPC. The risk scoring model for PM included cancer site and CT T stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.730). The risk scoring model for PPC included cancer site, CT T and N stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (AUROC = 0.773). The current risk scores are valid tools with which to predict the risk PM and PPC in patients undergoing SL for OG cancer and may help to avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary SL.
doi_str_mv 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0140
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10981985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3089535166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-91e9f9b72544eeb4f299f363dd300b3ac306e2abc3eacfd0691a75f83d9ecbdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzglZ4sIlyzjOh31CVcWXVIkLnK2JM866ytrBzlbqv8dhSwVcxjPyO-94_DD2WsBeSFDvk80Ywr6Gut6DaOAJ24mmV1UPSj5lOwDZVko18oK9yPkWQOheiefsQvZdU4uu2bHjFV8SxYUSrv6OtmL09ne6xjiXwDFnypmvB-KBaOQuJp5XnHyY-IwLpphtXO65DzxSjssBpzhhXpO33GKwlPhSzCms-SV75nDO9OrhvGQ_Pn38fv2luvn2-ev11U1lZa_WSgvSTg993TYN0dC4WmsnOzmOEmCQaCV0VONgJaF1I3RaYN86JUdNdhidvGQfzr7LaTjSaMvshLNZkj9iujcRvfn3JviDmeKdEaCV0KotDu8eHFL8eaK8mqPPluYZA8VTNrVqlVa9kpv07X_S23hKoexnCiPdylZ0XVHBWWXLf-VE7vE1AswG05xhmg2m2WCWljd_b_HY8Iee_AX3AJ_y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3089535166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Halle-Smith, J M ; Bage, T ; Kamarajah, S K ; Siddaiah-Subramanya, M ; Pande, R ; Whiting, J L ; Griffiths, E A</creator><creatorcontrib>Halle-Smith, J M ; Bage, T ; Kamarajah, S K ; Siddaiah-Subramanya, M ; Pande, R ; Whiting, J L ; Griffiths, E A</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Staging laparoscopy (SL) has become commonplace in the preoperative staging pathway for oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. SL is often performed before curative treatment to examine for macroscopic peritoneal metastases (PM) or positive peritoneal cytology (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop an objective risk scoring system to predict both PM and PPC at SL. A prospectively collected and maintained database of all OG cancer patients treated between 2006 and 2020 was reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both PM and PPC at SL. A risk score was produced for both PM and PPC, and then validated internally. Among 968 patients who underwent SL, 96 (9.9%) had PM and 81 (8.4%) had PPC at SL. Tumour site ( < 0.001), computed tomography (CT) T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( = 0.029) were significantly associated with PM at SL ( < 0.001). Tumour site ( < 0.001), biopsy histology ( = 0.041), CT T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( < 0.001) were significantly associated with PPC. The risk scoring model for PM included cancer site and CT T stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.730). The risk scoring model for PPC included cancer site, CT T and N stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (AUROC = 0.773). The current risk scores are valid tools with which to predict the risk PM and PPC in patients undergoing SL for OG cancer and may help to avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary SL.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37642164</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biopsy ; Cancer therapies ; Cardiothoracic ; Cellular biology ; Chemotherapy ; COVID-19 ; Gastric cancer ; Histology ; Laparoscopy ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Statistical analysis ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2024-04, Vol.106 (4), p.369-376</ispartof><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD 2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, The Authors 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-91e9f9b72544eeb4f299f363dd300b3ac306e2abc3eacfd0691a75f83d9ecbdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981985/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981985/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37642164$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halle-Smith, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bage, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamarajah, S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddaiah-Subramanya, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pande, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiting, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, E A</creatorcontrib><title>A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Staging laparoscopy (SL) has become commonplace in the preoperative staging pathway for oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. SL is often performed before curative treatment to examine for macroscopic peritoneal metastases (PM) or positive peritoneal cytology (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop an objective risk scoring system to predict both PM and PPC at SL. A prospectively collected and maintained database of all OG cancer patients treated between 2006 and 2020 was reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both PM and PPC at SL. A risk score was produced for both PM and PPC, and then validated internally. Among 968 patients who underwent SL, 96 (9.9%) had PM and 81 (8.4%) had PPC at SL. Tumour site ( < 0.001), computed tomography (CT) T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( = 0.029) were significantly associated with PM at SL ( < 0.001). Tumour site ( < 0.001), biopsy histology ( = 0.041), CT T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( < 0.001) were significantly associated with PPC. The risk scoring model for PM included cancer site and CT T stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.730). The risk scoring model for PPC included cancer site, CT T and N stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (AUROC = 0.773). The current risk scores are valid tools with which to predict the risk PM and PPC in patients undergoing SL for OG cancer and may help to avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary SL.]]></description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhzglZ4sIlyzjOh31CVcWXVIkLnK2JM866ytrBzlbqv8dhSwVcxjPyO-94_DD2WsBeSFDvk80Ywr6Gut6DaOAJ24mmV1UPSj5lOwDZVko18oK9yPkWQOheiefsQvZdU4uu2bHjFV8SxYUSrv6OtmL09ne6xjiXwDFnypmvB-KBaOQuJp5XnHyY-IwLpphtXO65DzxSjssBpzhhXpO33GKwlPhSzCms-SV75nDO9OrhvGQ_Pn38fv2luvn2-ev11U1lZa_WSgvSTg993TYN0dC4WmsnOzmOEmCQaCV0VONgJaF1I3RaYN86JUdNdhidvGQfzr7LaTjSaMvshLNZkj9iujcRvfn3JviDmeKdEaCV0KotDu8eHFL8eaK8mqPPluYZA8VTNrVqlVa9kpv07X_S23hKoexnCiPdylZ0XVHBWWXLf-VE7vE1AswG05xhmg2m2WCWljd_b_HY8Iee_AX3AJ_y</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Halle-Smith, J M</creator><creator>Bage, T</creator><creator>Kamarajah, S K</creator><creator>Siddaiah-Subramanya, M</creator><creator>Pande, R</creator><creator>Whiting, J L</creator><creator>Griffiths, E A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Royal College of Surgeons</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients</title><author>Halle-Smith, J M ; Bage, T ; Kamarajah, S K ; Siddaiah-Subramanya, M ; Pande, R ; Whiting, J L ; Griffiths, E A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-91e9f9b72544eeb4f299f363dd300b3ac306e2abc3eacfd0691a75f83d9ecbdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halle-Smith, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bage, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamarajah, S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddaiah-Subramanya, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pande, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiting, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, E A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halle-Smith, J M</au><au>Bage, T</au><au>Kamarajah, S K</au><au>Siddaiah-Subramanya, M</au><au>Pande, R</au><au>Whiting, J L</au><au>Griffiths, E A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>369-376</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Staging laparoscopy (SL) has become commonplace in the preoperative staging pathway for oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. SL is often performed before curative treatment to examine for macroscopic peritoneal metastases (PM) or positive peritoneal cytology (PPC). The aim of this study was to develop an objective risk scoring system to predict both PM and PPC at SL. A prospectively collected and maintained database of all OG cancer patients treated between 2006 and 2020 was reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both PM and PPC at SL. A risk score was produced for both PM and PPC, and then validated internally. Among 968 patients who underwent SL, 96 (9.9%) had PM and 81 (8.4%) had PPC at SL. Tumour site ( < 0.001), computed tomography (CT) T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( = 0.029) were significantly associated with PM at SL ( < 0.001). Tumour site ( < 0.001), biopsy histology ( = 0.041), CT T stage ( < 0.001) and N stage ( < 0.001) were significantly associated with PPC. The risk scoring model for PM included cancer site and CT T stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.730). The risk scoring model for PPC included cancer site, CT T and N stage. This was successfully tested on the validation set (AUROC = 0.773). The current risk scores are valid tools with which to predict the risk PM and PPC in patients undergoing SL for OG cancer and may help to avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary SL.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>37642164</pmid><doi>10.1308/rcsann.2022.0140</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8843
ispartof Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2024-04, Vol.106 (4), p.369-376
issn 0035-8843
1478-7083
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10981985
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Biopsy
Cancer therapies
Cardiothoracic
Cellular biology
Chemotherapy
COVID-19
Gastric cancer
Histology
Laparoscopy
Medical prognosis
Metastasis
Pandemics
Patients
Squamous cell carcinoma
Statistical analysis
Tomography
Tumors
title A preoperative predictive tool to assess the need for staging laparoscopy in oesophagogastric cancer patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A28%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20preoperative%20predictive%20tool%20to%20assess%20the%20need%20for%20staging%20laparoscopy%20in%20oesophagogastric%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Halle-Smith,%20J%20M&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=369-376&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/rcsann.2022.0140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3089535166%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3089535166&rft_id=info:pmid/37642164&rfr_iscdi=true