Consensus‐based ethical best practices for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography in the emergency department

Objectives There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient‐centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus‐b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AEM education and training 2024-04, Vol.8 (2), p.e10963-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Chao, Samantha K., Liu, Yiju T., Kropf, Charles W., Huang, Robert D., Theyyunni, Nik, Taylor, Lindsay A., Firn, Janice I., Kessler, Ross, Micheller, Daniel R., Battles, Alethia J., Rosculet, Natalja P., Ager, Emily E., Valentyne, Alyssa A., Schellack, Christine J., Hennessy, John P., White, Cameron, Tucker, Ryan V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page e10963
container_title AEM education and training
container_volume 8
creator Chao, Samantha K.
Liu, Yiju T.
Kropf, Charles W.
Huang, Robert D.
Theyyunni, Nik
Taylor, Lindsay A.
Firn, Janice I.
Kessler, Ross
Micheller, Daniel R.
Battles, Alethia J.
Rosculet, Natalja P.
Ager, Emily E.
Valentyne, Alyssa A.
Schellack, Christine J.
Hennessy, John P.
White, Cameron
Tucker, Ryan V.
description Objectives There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient‐centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus‐based best practice guidance. Methods A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus. Results Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application. Conclusions Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aet2.10963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10955606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2985796151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3803-d2ba40bd1a5d8522464603855b609b37134db5abdf8f7f0e1de993a963c617d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhVsIRKKQDQdAXiKkAf-03d0rFI3CjxSJTVhbZbt6xqjbbmw3aHbhBpyRk-AwIQobNq6S_PlV-b2mec7oa0YpfwNYeO0GJR41p7zt-EaKgT5-0J805zl_oZSyvpWM8qfNiegll0LJ0-bHNoaMIa_5181PAxkdwbL3FiZiMBeyJLDFW8xkjIksmGqZfdgRdKuF4mOo5BJ9KPV9HOthISFZp5IgxxB3CZb9gfhAyh4Jzph2GOyBOFwglRlDedY8GWHKeH5Xz5rP7y6vtx82V5_ef9xeXG2s6KnYOG6gpcYxkK5uz1vVKlr_IY2igxEdE60zEowb-7EbKTKHwyCg-mIV65wUZ83bo-6ymhmdraMTTHpJfoZ00BG8_vcm-L3exW-6miuloqoqvLxTSPHrWt3Rs88WpwkCxjVrPvSyGxSTrKKvjqhNMeeE4_0cRvVtbvo2N_0ntwq_eLjZPfo3pQqwI_DdT3j4j5S-uLzmR9HfvpupOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2985796151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consensus‐based ethical best practices for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography in the emergency department</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chao, Samantha K. ; Liu, Yiju T. ; Kropf, Charles W. ; Huang, Robert D. ; Theyyunni, Nik ; Taylor, Lindsay A. ; Firn, Janice I. ; Kessler, Ross ; Micheller, Daniel R. ; Battles, Alethia J. ; Rosculet, Natalja P. ; Ager, Emily E. ; Valentyne, Alyssa A. ; Schellack, Christine J. ; Hennessy, John P. ; White, Cameron ; Tucker, Ryan V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chao, Samantha K. ; Liu, Yiju T. ; Kropf, Charles W. ; Huang, Robert D. ; Theyyunni, Nik ; Taylor, Lindsay A. ; Firn, Janice I. ; Kessler, Ross ; Micheller, Daniel R. ; Battles, Alethia J. ; Rosculet, Natalja P. ; Ager, Emily E. ; Valentyne, Alyssa A. ; Schellack, Christine J. ; Hennessy, John P. ; White, Cameron ; Tucker, Ryan V.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient‐centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus‐based best practice guidance. Methods A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus. Results Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application. Conclusions Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38525365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Original Contribution</subject><ispartof>AEM education and training, 2024-04, Vol.8 (2), p.e10963-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3803-d2ba40bd1a5d8522464603855b609b37134db5abdf8f7f0e1de993a963c617d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8380-6664 ; 0000-0002-9476-3003 ; 0000-0001-9969-7693 ; 0000-0001-8928-473X ; 0000-0001-8263-1276</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faet2.10963$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faet2.10963$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38525365$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chao, Samantha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yiju T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropf, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theyyunni, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Lindsay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firn, Janice I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheller, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battles, Alethia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosculet, Natalja P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ager, Emily E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentyne, Alyssa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellack, Christine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennessy, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Cameron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Ryan V.</creatorcontrib><title>Consensus‐based ethical best practices for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography in the emergency department</title><title>AEM education and training</title><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><description>Objectives There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient‐centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus‐based best practice guidance. Methods A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus. Results Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application. Conclusions Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.</description><subject>Original Contribution</subject><issn>2472-5390</issn><issn>2472-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhVsIRKKQDQdAXiKkAf-03d0rFI3CjxSJTVhbZbt6xqjbbmw3aHbhBpyRk-AwIQobNq6S_PlV-b2mec7oa0YpfwNYeO0GJR41p7zt-EaKgT5-0J805zl_oZSyvpWM8qfNiegll0LJ0-bHNoaMIa_5181PAxkdwbL3FiZiMBeyJLDFW8xkjIksmGqZfdgRdKuF4mOo5BJ9KPV9HOthISFZp5IgxxB3CZb9gfhAyh4Jzph2GOyBOFwglRlDedY8GWHKeH5Xz5rP7y6vtx82V5_ef9xeXG2s6KnYOG6gpcYxkK5uz1vVKlr_IY2igxEdE60zEowb-7EbKTKHwyCg-mIV65wUZ83bo-6ymhmdraMTTHpJfoZ00BG8_vcm-L3exW-6miuloqoqvLxTSPHrWt3Rs88WpwkCxjVrPvSyGxSTrKKvjqhNMeeE4_0cRvVtbvo2N_0ntwq_eLjZPfo3pQqwI_DdT3j4j5S-uLzmR9HfvpupOQ</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Chao, Samantha K.</creator><creator>Liu, Yiju T.</creator><creator>Kropf, Charles W.</creator><creator>Huang, Robert D.</creator><creator>Theyyunni, Nik</creator><creator>Taylor, Lindsay A.</creator><creator>Firn, Janice I.</creator><creator>Kessler, Ross</creator><creator>Micheller, Daniel R.</creator><creator>Battles, Alethia J.</creator><creator>Rosculet, Natalja P.</creator><creator>Ager, Emily E.</creator><creator>Valentyne, Alyssa A.</creator><creator>Schellack, Christine J.</creator><creator>Hennessy, John P.</creator><creator>White, Cameron</creator><creator>Tucker, Ryan V.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-6664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-3003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-7693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-473X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-1276</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Consensus‐based ethical best practices for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography in the emergency department</title><author>Chao, Samantha K. ; Liu, Yiju T. ; Kropf, Charles W. ; Huang, Robert D. ; Theyyunni, Nik ; Taylor, Lindsay A. ; Firn, Janice I. ; Kessler, Ross ; Micheller, Daniel R. ; Battles, Alethia J. ; Rosculet, Natalja P. ; Ager, Emily E. ; Valentyne, Alyssa A. ; Schellack, Christine J. ; Hennessy, John P. ; White, Cameron ; Tucker, Ryan V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3803-d2ba40bd1a5d8522464603855b609b37134db5abdf8f7f0e1de993a963c617d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Contribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chao, Samantha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yiju T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kropf, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theyyunni, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Lindsay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firn, Janice I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micheller, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battles, Alethia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosculet, Natalja P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ager, Emily E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentyne, Alyssa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellack, Christine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennessy, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Cameron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Ryan V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chao, Samantha K.</au><au>Liu, Yiju T.</au><au>Kropf, Charles W.</au><au>Huang, Robert D.</au><au>Theyyunni, Nik</au><au>Taylor, Lindsay A.</au><au>Firn, Janice I.</au><au>Kessler, Ross</au><au>Micheller, Daniel R.</au><au>Battles, Alethia J.</au><au>Rosculet, Natalja P.</au><au>Ager, Emily E.</au><au>Valentyne, Alyssa A.</au><au>Schellack, Christine J.</au><au>Hennessy, John P.</au><au>White, Cameron</au><au>Tucker, Ryan V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consensus‐based ethical best practices for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography in the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e10963</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10963-n/a</pages><issn>2472-5390</issn><eissn>2472-5390</eissn><abstract>Objectives There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient‐centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus‐based best practice guidance. Methods A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus. Results Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application. Conclusions Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>38525365</pmid><doi>10.1002/aet2.10963</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-6664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-3003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-7693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-473X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-1276</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2472-5390
ispartof AEM education and training, 2024-04, Vol.8 (2), p.e10963-n/a
issn 2472-5390
2472-5390
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10955606
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Original Contribution
title Consensus‐based ethical best practices for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography in the emergency department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A31%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consensus%E2%80%90based%20ethical%20best%20practices%20for%20performing%20educational%20point%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90care%20ultrasonography%20in%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=AEM%20education%20and%20training&rft.au=Chao,%20Samantha%20K.&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e10963&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10963-n/a&rft.issn=2472-5390&rft.eissn=2472-5390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aet2.10963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2985796151%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2985796151&rft_id=info:pmid/38525365&rfr_iscdi=true