GRACE scores or high-sensitivity troponin for timing of coronary angiography in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes

Background The GRACE risk score is generically recommended by guidelines for timing of invasive coronary angiography without stating which score should be used. The aim was to determine the diagnostic performance of different GRACE risk scores in comparison to the ESC 0/1 h-algorithm using high-sens...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical research in cardiology 2024-04, Vol.113 (4), p.533-545
Hauptverfasser: Jobs, Alexander, Boeddinghaus, Jasper, Neumann, Johannes Tobias, Goßling, Alina, Sörensen, Nils A., Twerenbold, Raphael, Nestelberger, Thomas, Lopez-Ayala, Pedro, Gimenez, Maria Rubini, Miro, Oscar, Koechlin, Luca, Buergin, Natacha, Feistritzer, Hans-Josef, Collet, Jean-Philippe, Bhatt, Deepak L., Granger, Christopher B., Blankenberg, Stefan, Desch, Steffen, Mueller, Christian, Westermann, Dirk, Thiele, Holger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The GRACE risk score is generically recommended by guidelines for timing of invasive coronary angiography without stating which score should be used. The aim was to determine the diagnostic performance of different GRACE risk scores in comparison to the ESC 0/1 h-algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn). Methods Prospectively enrolled patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction (MI) in two large studies testing biomarker diagnostic strategies were included. Five GRACE risk scores were calculated. The amount of risk reclassification and the theoretical impact on guideline-recommended timing of invasive coronary angiography was studied. Results Overall, 8,618 patients were eligible for analyses. Comparing different GRACE risk scores, up to 63.8% of participants were reclassified into a different risk category. The proportion of MIs identified (i.e., sensitivity) dramatically differed between GRACE risk scores (range 23.8–66.5%) and was lower for any score than for the ESC 0/1 h-algorithm (78.1%). Supplementing the ESC 0/1 h-algorithm with a GRACE risk score slightly increased sensitivity ( P  
ISSN:1861-0684
1861-0692
DOI:10.1007/s00392-023-02258-5