Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study

Since weaning failure is multifactorial, comprehensive weaning scores encompassing not only the respiratory component but also nonrespiratory aspects are quintessential for successful weaning prediction. This was a single-center prospective observational study on 128 intensive care unit (ICU) patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of critical care medicine 2024-03, Vol.28 (3), p.273-279
Hauptverfasser: Nayak, Gautham, Chaudhuri, Souvik, Ravindranath, Sunil, Todur, Pratibha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 279
container_issue 3
container_start_page 273
container_title Indian journal of critical care medicine
container_volume 28
creator Nayak, Gautham
Chaudhuri, Souvik
Ravindranath, Sunil
Todur, Pratibha
description Since weaning failure is multifactorial, comprehensive weaning scores encompassing not only the respiratory component but also nonrespiratory aspects are quintessential for successful weaning prediction. This was a single-center prospective observational study on 128 intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing spontaneous breathing trials (SBT). The extubation prediction score (ExPreS), heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, respiratory rate (HACOR), and weaning parameters, endotracheal tube size, arterial blood gas analysis, nutrition, secretions, neuromuscular affecting agents, obstructive airway problems and wakefulness (WEANSNOW) scores were compared for their diagnostic accuracy for successful weaning prediction. Out of 128 patients, 49 (38.3%) patients had weaning failure, and 79 (61.7%) had weaning success. The patients in the weaning failure group had significantly higher APACHE II scores, WEANSNOW scores, HACOR scores, MV days, and significantly lower ExPreS scores as compared to the successful weaning group. Multivariable regression analysis showed that ExPreS score = 0.015, adjusted OR 0.960, 95% CI (0.929-0.992) and HACOR score < 0.001, adjusted OR 1.357, 95% CI (1.176-1.567) were independent predictors of weaning failure. The HACOR score had an AUC of 0.830, cut-off ≥5, < 0.001, sensitivity 76%, specificity 68%, diagnostic accuracy 70% to predict weaning failure. The ExPreS score had an AUC of 0.735, cut-off ≥69, < 0.001, sensitivity of 70.9%, specificity of 69.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 70.3% to predict weaning success. Both the HACOR and ExPreS scores were good models for predicting weaning outcomes (model quality 0.76 and 0.64 respectively). The parsimonious HACOR score is comparable to the ExPreS score for the prediction of weaning outcomes in critically ill patients. Nayak G, Chaudhuri S, Ravindranath S, Todur P. Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):273-279.
doi_str_mv 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24663
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10926042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956681019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8bbe05125b31a96ee056eb7467ec925ad7cdf126de642ee07427c7efb8cbc5fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUdFu0zAUtRCIlcEvgB95IGA7iR3zgkpVGNK0TitQ3izHudlcpXFmOxX9LP4Qt10neLKu7rnn-JyD0BtK3peElB_WQ7Z2o-91FzJKiKAZKzjPn6AJlbLK8lL-eoomRAqWlYzJM_QihDUhjEtGn6OzvCqEIIRO0J-Z2wza2-B67Foc7wDfgIE-4vnvaw9LvDTOwzu8mk-vlleL1WnWfXMAX2sf7Mb11o0BX0xni5sjAutw2H-GEHEiaqyJzu8lVqB7299-xNM-aUTYm-h2-KfubKMjNAntwgAm2i3gRR3Ab3W0LqHwMo7N7iV61ibb8OrhPUc_vsy_zy6yy8XXb7PpZWYKWsWsqmsgJWVlnVMtOaSBQy0KLsBIVupGmKaljDfAC5a2omDCCGjrytSmbHV-jj4deYex3kCzz8TrTg3ebrTfKaet-n_T2zt167aKEsk4KVhiePvA4N39mIJQGxsMdJ3uIcWlmCw5ryihMkHFEWqS-eChfdShRO0bV-tBnRpXh8bVofF0-frfbz7enSrO_wL9rq6_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956681019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nayak, Gautham ; Chaudhuri, Souvik ; Ravindranath, Sunil ; Todur, Pratibha</creator><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Gautham ; Chaudhuri, Souvik ; Ravindranath, Sunil ; Todur, Pratibha</creatorcontrib><description>Since weaning failure is multifactorial, comprehensive weaning scores encompassing not only the respiratory component but also nonrespiratory aspects are quintessential for successful weaning prediction. This was a single-center prospective observational study on 128 intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing spontaneous breathing trials (SBT). The extubation prediction score (ExPreS), heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, respiratory rate (HACOR), and weaning parameters, endotracheal tube size, arterial blood gas analysis, nutrition, secretions, neuromuscular affecting agents, obstructive airway problems and wakefulness (WEANSNOW) scores were compared for their diagnostic accuracy for successful weaning prediction. Out of 128 patients, 49 (38.3%) patients had weaning failure, and 79 (61.7%) had weaning success. The patients in the weaning failure group had significantly higher APACHE II scores, WEANSNOW scores, HACOR scores, MV days, and significantly lower ExPreS scores as compared to the successful weaning group. Multivariable regression analysis showed that ExPreS score = 0.015, adjusted OR 0.960, 95% CI (0.929-0.992) and HACOR score &lt; 0.001, adjusted OR 1.357, 95% CI (1.176-1.567) were independent predictors of weaning failure. The HACOR score had an AUC of 0.830, cut-off ≥5, &lt; 0.001, sensitivity 76%, specificity 68%, diagnostic accuracy 70% to predict weaning failure. The ExPreS score had an AUC of 0.735, cut-off ≥69, &lt; 0.001, sensitivity of 70.9%, specificity of 69.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 70.3% to predict weaning success. Both the HACOR and ExPreS scores were good models for predicting weaning outcomes (model quality 0.76 and 0.64 respectively). The parsimonious HACOR score is comparable to the ExPreS score for the prediction of weaning outcomes in critically ill patients. Nayak G, Chaudhuri S, Ravindranath S, Todur P. Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):273-279.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-5229</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-359X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24663</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38477001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of critical care medicine, 2024-03, Vol.28 (3), p.273-279</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024; The Author(s). 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8bbe05125b31a96ee056eb7467ec925ad7cdf126de642ee07427c7efb8cbc5fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8bbe05125b31a96ee056eb7467ec925ad7cdf126de642ee07427c7efb8cbc5fa3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-9580-4187 ; 0000-0003-4022-1492 ; 0000-0003-0967-2252 ; 0000-0001-8392-2366</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926042/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926042/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38477001$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Gautham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Souvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todur, Pratibha</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study</title><title>Indian journal of critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Indian J Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>Since weaning failure is multifactorial, comprehensive weaning scores encompassing not only the respiratory component but also nonrespiratory aspects are quintessential for successful weaning prediction. This was a single-center prospective observational study on 128 intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing spontaneous breathing trials (SBT). The extubation prediction score (ExPreS), heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, respiratory rate (HACOR), and weaning parameters, endotracheal tube size, arterial blood gas analysis, nutrition, secretions, neuromuscular affecting agents, obstructive airway problems and wakefulness (WEANSNOW) scores were compared for their diagnostic accuracy for successful weaning prediction. Out of 128 patients, 49 (38.3%) patients had weaning failure, and 79 (61.7%) had weaning success. The patients in the weaning failure group had significantly higher APACHE II scores, WEANSNOW scores, HACOR scores, MV days, and significantly lower ExPreS scores as compared to the successful weaning group. Multivariable regression analysis showed that ExPreS score = 0.015, adjusted OR 0.960, 95% CI (0.929-0.992) and HACOR score &lt; 0.001, adjusted OR 1.357, 95% CI (1.176-1.567) were independent predictors of weaning failure. The HACOR score had an AUC of 0.830, cut-off ≥5, &lt; 0.001, sensitivity 76%, specificity 68%, diagnostic accuracy 70% to predict weaning failure. The ExPreS score had an AUC of 0.735, cut-off ≥69, &lt; 0.001, sensitivity of 70.9%, specificity of 69.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 70.3% to predict weaning success. Both the HACOR and ExPreS scores were good models for predicting weaning outcomes (model quality 0.76 and 0.64 respectively). The parsimonious HACOR score is comparable to the ExPreS score for the prediction of weaning outcomes in critically ill patients. Nayak G, Chaudhuri S, Ravindranath S, Todur P. Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):273-279.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>0972-5229</issn><issn>1998-359X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUdFu0zAUtRCIlcEvgB95IGA7iR3zgkpVGNK0TitQ3izHudlcpXFmOxX9LP4Qt10neLKu7rnn-JyD0BtK3peElB_WQ7Z2o-91FzJKiKAZKzjPn6AJlbLK8lL-eoomRAqWlYzJM_QihDUhjEtGn6OzvCqEIIRO0J-Z2wza2-B67Foc7wDfgIE-4vnvaw9LvDTOwzu8mk-vlleL1WnWfXMAX2sf7Mb11o0BX0xni5sjAutw2H-GEHEiaqyJzu8lVqB7299-xNM-aUTYm-h2-KfubKMjNAntwgAm2i3gRR3Ab3W0LqHwMo7N7iV61ibb8OrhPUc_vsy_zy6yy8XXb7PpZWYKWsWsqmsgJWVlnVMtOaSBQy0KLsBIVupGmKaljDfAC5a2omDCCGjrytSmbHV-jj4deYex3kCzz8TrTg3ebrTfKaet-n_T2zt167aKEsk4KVhiePvA4N39mIJQGxsMdJ3uIcWlmCw5ryihMkHFEWqS-eChfdShRO0bV-tBnRpXh8bVofF0-frfbz7enSrO_wL9rq6_</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Nayak, Gautham</creator><creator>Chaudhuri, Souvik</creator><creator>Ravindranath, Sunil</creator><creator>Todur, Pratibha</creator><general>Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9580-4187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-1492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-2252</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-2366</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study</title><author>Nayak, Gautham ; Chaudhuri, Souvik ; Ravindranath, Sunil ; Todur, Pratibha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8bbe05125b31a96ee056eb7467ec925ad7cdf126de642ee07427c7efb8cbc5fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Gautham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Souvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindranath, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todur, Pratibha</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nayak, Gautham</au><au>Chaudhuri, Souvik</au><au>Ravindranath, Sunil</au><au>Todur, Pratibha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>273-279</pages><issn>0972-5229</issn><eissn>1998-359X</eissn><abstract>Since weaning failure is multifactorial, comprehensive weaning scores encompassing not only the respiratory component but also nonrespiratory aspects are quintessential for successful weaning prediction. This was a single-center prospective observational study on 128 intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing spontaneous breathing trials (SBT). The extubation prediction score (ExPreS), heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, respiratory rate (HACOR), and weaning parameters, endotracheal tube size, arterial blood gas analysis, nutrition, secretions, neuromuscular affecting agents, obstructive airway problems and wakefulness (WEANSNOW) scores were compared for their diagnostic accuracy for successful weaning prediction. Out of 128 patients, 49 (38.3%) patients had weaning failure, and 79 (61.7%) had weaning success. The patients in the weaning failure group had significantly higher APACHE II scores, WEANSNOW scores, HACOR scores, MV days, and significantly lower ExPreS scores as compared to the successful weaning group. Multivariable regression analysis showed that ExPreS score = 0.015, adjusted OR 0.960, 95% CI (0.929-0.992) and HACOR score &lt; 0.001, adjusted OR 1.357, 95% CI (1.176-1.567) were independent predictors of weaning failure. The HACOR score had an AUC of 0.830, cut-off ≥5, &lt; 0.001, sensitivity 76%, specificity 68%, diagnostic accuracy 70% to predict weaning failure. The ExPreS score had an AUC of 0.735, cut-off ≥69, &lt; 0.001, sensitivity of 70.9%, specificity of 69.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 70.3% to predict weaning success. Both the HACOR and ExPreS scores were good models for predicting weaning outcomes (model quality 0.76 and 0.64 respectively). The parsimonious HACOR score is comparable to the ExPreS score for the prediction of weaning outcomes in critically ill patients. Nayak G, Chaudhuri S, Ravindranath S, Todur P. Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):273-279.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers</pub><pmid>38477001</pmid><doi>10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24663</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9580-4187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-1492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-2252</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-2366</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-5229
ispartof Indian journal of critical care medicine, 2024-03, Vol.28 (3), p.273-279
issn 0972-5229
1998-359X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10926042
source EZB Free E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A11%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Recent%20ExPreS%20Score,%20WEANSNOW%20Score,%20and%20the%20Parsimonious%20HACOR%20Score%20as%20the%20Best%20Predictor%20of%20Weaning:%20An%20Externally%20Validated%20Prospective%20Observational%20Study&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Nayak,%20Gautham&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=273-279&rft.issn=0972-5229&rft.eissn=1998-359X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2956681019%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956681019&rft_id=info:pmid/38477001&rfr_iscdi=true