Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract Deficits in social and occupational function are widely reported in psychosis, yet no one measure of function is currently agreed upon as a gold standard in psychosis research. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of functioning measures to determine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia bulletin 2024-03, Vol.50 (2), p.266-285
Hauptverfasser: Cowman, Megan, Godfrey, Emmet, Walsh, Talissa, Frawley, Emma, Fowler, David, Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario, O’Connor, Karen, Wykes, Til, Birchwood, Max, Donohoe, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue 2
container_start_page 266
container_title Schizophrenia bulletin
container_volume 50
creator Cowman, Megan
Godfrey, Emmet
Walsh, Talissa
Frawley, Emma
Fowler, David
Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario
O’Connor, Karen
Wykes, Til
Birchwood, Max
Donohoe, Gary
description Abstract Deficits in social and occupational function are widely reported in psychosis, yet no one measure of function is currently agreed upon as a gold standard in psychosis research. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of functioning measures to determine what measures were associated with largest effect sizes when measuring between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Literature searches were conducted based on PsycINFO and PubMed to identify studies for inclusion. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational and intervention studies of early psychosis (≤5 years since diagnosis) that included social and occupational functioning as an outcome measure were considered. A series of meta-analyses were conducted to determine effect size differences for between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were carried out to account for variability in study and participant characteristics. One hundred and sixteen studies were included, 46 studies provided data (N = 13 261) relevant to our meta-analysis. Smallest effect sizes for changes in function over time and in response to treatment were observed for global measures, while more specific measures of social and occupational function showed the largest effect sizes. Differences in effect sizes between functioning measures remained significant after variability in study and participant characteristics were accounted for. Findings suggest that more specific measures of social function are better able to detect changes in function over time and in response to treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/schbul/sbad062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10919778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/schbul/sbad062</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2813561953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-41b9f865c30f59423178adff19949b2458d37fb16cdaf179bdd7203b350e95b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFP2zAUhy20CUrHlSPycRxC_eI4jrlMVVW2SaCisZ0t27GpURp3cQLKf4-7dmg7cfKT_b3vWe-H0DmQKyCCzqJZ66GZRa1qUuZHaAK8YBlwAh_QhLCqzHgJxQk6jfGJEChEmR-jE8qB05zzCXJ3VsWhsxEHhx-C8arBqq3xyphhq3of2nRxM7RmV2Lf4qXqmhHfx9GsQ_TxGs_xwxh7u0mwwT_ss7cvfwx3tleZSu1jwj6hj0410Z4dzin6dbP8ufiW3a6-fl_MbzNT5KzPCtDCVSUzlDgmipwCr1TtHAhRCJ0XrKopdxpKUysHXOi65jmhmjJiBdNAp-jL3rsd9MbWxrZ9pxq57fxGdaMMysv_X1q_lo_hWaZlguC8SobPB0MXfg829nLjo7FNo1obhijzCigrQTCa0Ks9aroQY2fd2xwgOyGV-3TkIZ3UcPHv797wv3Ek4HIPhGH7nuwVpn-dQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2813561953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Cowman, Megan ; Godfrey, Emmet ; Walsh, Talissa ; Frawley, Emma ; Fowler, David ; Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario ; O’Connor, Karen ; Wykes, Til ; Birchwood, Max ; Donohoe, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Cowman, Megan ; Godfrey, Emmet ; Walsh, Talissa ; Frawley, Emma ; Fowler, David ; Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario ; O’Connor, Karen ; Wykes, Til ; Birchwood, Max ; Donohoe, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Deficits in social and occupational function are widely reported in psychosis, yet no one measure of function is currently agreed upon as a gold standard in psychosis research. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of functioning measures to determine what measures were associated with largest effect sizes when measuring between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Literature searches were conducted based on PsycINFO and PubMed to identify studies for inclusion. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational and intervention studies of early psychosis (≤5 years since diagnosis) that included social and occupational functioning as an outcome measure were considered. A series of meta-analyses were conducted to determine effect size differences for between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were carried out to account for variability in study and participant characteristics. One hundred and sixteen studies were included, 46 studies provided data (N = 13 261) relevant to our meta-analysis. Smallest effect sizes for changes in function over time and in response to treatment were observed for global measures, while more specific measures of social and occupational function showed the largest effect sizes. Differences in effect sizes between functioning measures remained significant after variability in study and participant characteristics were accounted for. Findings suggest that more specific measures of social function are better able to detect changes in function over time and in response to treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0586-7614</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37173277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Psychotic Disorders ; Regular</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin, 2024-03, Vol.50 (2), p.266-285</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-41b9f865c30f59423178adff19949b2458d37fb16cdaf179bdd7203b350e95b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-41b9f865c30f59423178adff19949b2458d37fb16cdaf179bdd7203b350e95b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3037-7426 ; 0000-0002-5881-8003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37173277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cowman, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfrey, Emmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Talissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frawley, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wykes, Til</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birchwood, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><description>Abstract Deficits in social and occupational function are widely reported in psychosis, yet no one measure of function is currently agreed upon as a gold standard in psychosis research. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of functioning measures to determine what measures were associated with largest effect sizes when measuring between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Literature searches were conducted based on PsycINFO and PubMed to identify studies for inclusion. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational and intervention studies of early psychosis (≤5 years since diagnosis) that included social and occupational functioning as an outcome measure were considered. A series of meta-analyses were conducted to determine effect size differences for between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were carried out to account for variability in study and participant characteristics. One hundred and sixteen studies were included, 46 studies provided data (N = 13 261) relevant to our meta-analysis. Smallest effect sizes for changes in function over time and in response to treatment were observed for global measures, while more specific measures of social and occupational function showed the largest effect sizes. Differences in effect sizes between functioning measures remained significant after variability in study and participant characteristics were accounted for. Findings suggest that more specific measures of social function are better able to detect changes in function over time and in response to treatment.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders</subject><subject>Regular</subject><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFP2zAUhy20CUrHlSPycRxC_eI4jrlMVVW2SaCisZ0t27GpURp3cQLKf4-7dmg7cfKT_b3vWe-H0DmQKyCCzqJZ66GZRa1qUuZHaAK8YBlwAh_QhLCqzHgJxQk6jfGJEChEmR-jE8qB05zzCXJ3VsWhsxEHhx-C8arBqq3xyphhq3of2nRxM7RmV2Lf4qXqmhHfx9GsQ_TxGs_xwxh7u0mwwT_ss7cvfwx3tleZSu1jwj6hj0410Z4dzin6dbP8ufiW3a6-fl_MbzNT5KzPCtDCVSUzlDgmipwCr1TtHAhRCJ0XrKopdxpKUysHXOi65jmhmjJiBdNAp-jL3rsd9MbWxrZ9pxq57fxGdaMMysv_X1q_lo_hWaZlguC8SobPB0MXfg829nLjo7FNo1obhijzCigrQTCa0Ks9aroQY2fd2xwgOyGV-3TkIZ3UcPHv797wv3Ek4HIPhGH7nuwVpn-dQQ</recordid><startdate>20240307</startdate><enddate>20240307</enddate><creator>Cowman, Megan</creator><creator>Godfrey, Emmet</creator><creator>Walsh, Talissa</creator><creator>Frawley, Emma</creator><creator>Fowler, David</creator><creator>Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario</creator><creator>O’Connor, Karen</creator><creator>Wykes, Til</creator><creator>Birchwood, Max</creator><creator>Donohoe, Gary</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-7426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5881-8003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240307</creationdate><title>Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Cowman, Megan ; Godfrey, Emmet ; Walsh, Talissa ; Frawley, Emma ; Fowler, David ; Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario ; O’Connor, Karen ; Wykes, Til ; Birchwood, Max ; Donohoe, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-41b9f865c30f59423178adff19949b2458d37fb16cdaf179bdd7203b350e95b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders</topic><topic>Regular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cowman, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfrey, Emmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Talissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frawley, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wykes, Til</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birchwood, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cowman, Megan</au><au>Godfrey, Emmet</au><au>Walsh, Talissa</au><au>Frawley, Emma</au><au>Fowler, David</au><au>Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario</au><au>O’Connor, Karen</au><au>Wykes, Til</au><au>Birchwood, Max</au><au>Donohoe, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><date>2024-03-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>266-285</pages><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><eissn>1745-1701</eissn><abstract>Abstract Deficits in social and occupational function are widely reported in psychosis, yet no one measure of function is currently agreed upon as a gold standard in psychosis research. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of functioning measures to determine what measures were associated with largest effect sizes when measuring between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Literature searches were conducted based on PsycINFO and PubMed to identify studies for inclusion. Cross-sectional and longitudinal observational and intervention studies of early psychosis (≤5 years since diagnosis) that included social and occupational functioning as an outcome measure were considered. A series of meta-analyses were conducted to determine effect size differences for between-group differences, changes over time, or response to treatment. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were carried out to account for variability in study and participant characteristics. One hundred and sixteen studies were included, 46 studies provided data (N = 13 261) relevant to our meta-analysis. Smallest effect sizes for changes in function over time and in response to treatment were observed for global measures, while more specific measures of social and occupational function showed the largest effect sizes. Differences in effect sizes between functioning measures remained significant after variability in study and participant characteristics were accounted for. Findings suggest that more specific measures of social function are better able to detect changes in function over time and in response to treatment.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37173277</pmid><doi>10.1093/schbul/sbad062</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-7426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5881-8003</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0586-7614
ispartof Schizophrenia bulletin, 2024-03, Vol.50 (2), p.266-285
issn 0586-7614
1745-1701
1745-1701
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10919778
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Psychotic Disorders
Regular
title Measures of Social and Occupational Function in Early Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T07%3A22%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measures%20of%20Social%20and%20Occupational%20Function%20in%20Early%20Psychosis:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin&rft.au=Cowman,%20Megan&rft.date=2024-03-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=266-285&rft.issn=0586-7614&rft.eissn=1745-1701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/schbul/sbad062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2813561953%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2813561953&rft_id=info:pmid/37173277&rft_oup_id=10.1093/schbul/sbad062&rfr_iscdi=true