Voice attractiveness and decision making in third‐party punishment
This study examined the impact of an attractive voice compared to an unattractive voice in an economic game. Results showed that proposers with an attractive voice were perceived as more reasonable in their monetary allocations and were less likely to receive punishment for unfair allocation.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PsyCh journal 2024-02, Vol.13 (1), p.142-144 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 144 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 142 |
| container_title | PsyCh journal |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Shang, Junchen Liu, Zhihui Liu, Chang Hong |
| description | This study examined the impact of an attractive voice compared to an unattractive voice in an economic game. Results showed that proposers with an attractive voice were perceived as more reasonable in their monetary allocations and were less likely to receive punishment for unfair allocation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pchj.690 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10917093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2921784923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4000-2b998d3a344fc207cfe3bff1badef2ff14ab78dea78ba141085ddc1d579b2c1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMottSCTyADbtxMTTK3ZCVSL1UKulC3IZNkOqltZkxmKt35CD6jT2KG1qILszkH8vH9hx-AYwRHCEJ8XotyPkop3AN9DOM0hDiF-7s9wT0wdG4O_SMoJRE5BL0oozChiPbB1UulhQp401guGr1SRjkXcCMDqYR2ujLBkr9qMwu0CZpSW_n18Vlz26yDujXalUtlmiNwUPCFU8PtHIDnm-un8SScPtzejS-noYh9eohzSomMeBTHhcAwE4WK8qJAOZeqwH6JeZ4RqXhGco5iBEkipUAyyWiO_YwG4GLjrdt8qaTw0ZYvWG31kts1q7hmf3-MLtmsWjEEKcogjbzhdGuw1VurXMPmVWuNP5philFGYoo76mxDCVs5Z1Wxi0CQdZ2zrnPmO_foye-TduBPwx4IN8C7Xqj1vyL2OJ7cd8JvVsWOVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2921784923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voice attractiveness and decision making in third‐party punishment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shang, Junchen ; Liu, Zhihui ; Liu, Chang Hong</creator><creatorcontrib>Shang, Junchen ; Liu, Zhihui ; Liu, Chang Hong</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the impact of an attractive voice compared to an unattractive voice in an economic game. Results showed that proposers with an attractive voice were perceived as more reasonable in their monetary allocations and were less likely to receive punishment for unfair allocation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-0252</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pchj.690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37905919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>beauty premium ; Conflicts of interest ; Decision Making ; dictator game ; Humans ; perceived reasonableness ; Punishment ; Review boards ; Short Communication ; Short Communications ; third‐party punishment ; Variables ; voice attractiveness</subject><ispartof>PsyCh journal, 2024-02, Vol.13 (1), p.142-144</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4000-2b998d3a344fc207cfe3bff1badef2ff14ab78dea78ba141085ddc1d579b2c1d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0470-2208</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917093/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917093/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1416,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46475,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37905919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shang, Junchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang Hong</creatorcontrib><title>Voice attractiveness and decision making in third‐party punishment</title><title>PsyCh journal</title><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><description>This study examined the impact of an attractive voice compared to an unattractive voice in an economic game. Results showed that proposers with an attractive voice were perceived as more reasonable in their monetary allocations and were less likely to receive punishment for unfair allocation.</description><subject>beauty premium</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>dictator game</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>perceived reasonableness</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Short Communication</subject><subject>Short Communications</subject><subject>third‐party punishment</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>voice attractiveness</subject><issn>2046-0252</issn><issn>2046-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMottSCTyADbtxMTTK3ZCVSL1UKulC3IZNkOqltZkxmKt35CD6jT2KG1qILszkH8vH9hx-AYwRHCEJ8XotyPkop3AN9DOM0hDiF-7s9wT0wdG4O_SMoJRE5BL0oozChiPbB1UulhQp401guGr1SRjkXcCMDqYR2ujLBkr9qMwu0CZpSW_n18Vlz26yDujXalUtlmiNwUPCFU8PtHIDnm-un8SScPtzejS-noYh9eohzSomMeBTHhcAwE4WK8qJAOZeqwH6JeZ4RqXhGco5iBEkipUAyyWiO_YwG4GLjrdt8qaTw0ZYvWG31kts1q7hmf3-MLtmsWjEEKcogjbzhdGuw1VurXMPmVWuNP5philFGYoo76mxDCVs5Z1Wxi0CQdZ2zrnPmO_foye-TduBPwx4IN8C7Xqj1vyL2OJ7cd8JvVsWOVw</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Shang, Junchen</creator><creator>Liu, Zhihui</creator><creator>Liu, Chang Hong</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-2208</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Voice attractiveness and decision making in third‐party punishment</title><author>Shang, Junchen ; Liu, Zhihui ; Liu, Chang Hong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4000-2b998d3a344fc207cfe3bff1badef2ff14ab78dea78ba141085ddc1d579b2c1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>beauty premium</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>dictator game</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>perceived reasonableness</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Short Communication</topic><topic>Short Communications</topic><topic>third‐party punishment</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>voice attractiveness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shang, Junchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang Hong</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shang, Junchen</au><au>Liu, Zhihui</au><au>Liu, Chang Hong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voice attractiveness and decision making in third‐party punishment</atitle><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>142-144</pages><issn>2046-0252</issn><eissn>2046-0260</eissn><abstract>This study examined the impact of an attractive voice compared to an unattractive voice in an economic game. Results showed that proposers with an attractive voice were perceived as more reasonable in their monetary allocations and were less likely to receive punishment for unfair allocation.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>37905919</pmid><doi>10.1002/pchj.690</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-2208</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2046-0252 |
| ispartof | PsyCh journal, 2024-02, Vol.13 (1), p.142-144 |
| issn | 2046-0252 2046-0260 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10917093 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | beauty premium Conflicts of interest Decision Making dictator game Humans perceived reasonableness Punishment Review boards Short Communication Short Communications third‐party punishment Variables voice attractiveness |
| title | Voice attractiveness and decision making in third‐party punishment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A13%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voice%20attractiveness%20and%20decision%20making%20in%20third%E2%80%90party%20punishment&rft.jtitle=PsyCh%20journal&rft.au=Shang,%20Junchen&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=142-144&rft.issn=2046-0252&rft.eissn=2046-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pchj.690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2921784923%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2921784923&rft_id=info:pmid/37905919&rfr_iscdi=true |