Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Studies showed that integrating coating or valve into Peripherally Inserted Central (PICC) can prevent related complications. However, data regarding efficiency were controversial. Therefore, a systematic review was needed to analyse the effect of PICC materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐rela...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International wound journal 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.e14468-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Nannan, Peng, Huizhen, Zhao, Wenli, Yi, Yinping, Ma, Yufeng, Guo, Yaru, Li, Haiyun, Wu, Xue
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page e14468
container_title International wound journal
container_volume 21
creator Ding, Nannan
Peng, Huizhen
Zhao, Wenli
Yi, Yinping
Ma, Yufeng
Guo, Yaru
Li, Haiyun
Wu, Xue
description Studies showed that integrating coating or valve into Peripherally Inserted Central (PICC) can prevent related complications. However, data regarding efficiency were controversial. Therefore, a systematic review was needed to analyse the effect of PICC materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications. We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, EMbase, grey literature and referent literature from inception to 5 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case–control study were included. Two authors extracted data independently, using a predesigned Excel form, and assessed the quality of included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (V5.1.0), case–control study was assessed by the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Data were analysed using Review Manager (v5.3.0). A total of 10 RCTs and one case–control study were included. Meta‐analysis results showed that PICC designs reduce the incidence of obstruction, and at the critical value of PICC‐associated bloodstream infection, but may have no effects on other complications. Based on the literature reviewed, we can only say PICC new materials did not reflect significant reduction on complications, what's more, the result needs more multicentre, large RCTs to support. We suggested clinicians combine descriptive research and cost‐effect analysis to select appropriate PICC materials and designs for patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iwj.14468
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10898378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2898312663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-14f09bee22a8f312da8197ccd02a74ac4ef74401ef077c8dab26e235920e4c513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQgC0EoqVw4AWQJS7tYVvbcRKHC6qiFhZVogcQ3CyvM-565SSL7XSVG4_Qh-DJeBKcpqwACV_8M998ntEg9JKSU5rWmd1tTinnhXiEDmnJ2YIL-vXx_kzoAXoWwoYQVuV5-RQdZILkpMjZIfpxYQzoGHBv8DV4u12DV86N2HYBfIQG19DF9IRrFdcQwePj62Vdn-BWpYtVLmDVNbiBYG-6pOmwh2bQ0abT5Ezsz-93HpyaZLpvt85qNYXDG3yOwxgiJJXVKe_Wwu7e1kJUKUt1yo3BhufoiUkfwYuH_Qh9vrz4VL9fXH18t6zPrxaaEy4WlBtSrQAYU8JklDVK0KrUuiFMlVxpDqbknFAwpCy1aNSKFcCyvGIEuM5pdoTezt7tsGqh0XPncuttq_woe2Xl35HOruVNfyspEZXISpEMxw8G338bIETZ2qDBOdVBPwTJJo6yosgS-vofdNMPPnUcZEYqUpAqz6pEncyU9n0IHsy-GkrkNHyZhi_vh5_YV3-Wvyd_TzsBZzOwsw7G_5vk8suHWfkLMAO97Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090609539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ding, Nannan ; Peng, Huizhen ; Zhao, Wenli ; Yi, Yinping ; Ma, Yufeng ; Guo, Yaru ; Li, Haiyun ; Wu, Xue</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Nannan ; Peng, Huizhen ; Zhao, Wenli ; Yi, Yinping ; Ma, Yufeng ; Guo, Yaru ; Li, Haiyun ; Wu, Xue</creatorcontrib><description>Studies showed that integrating coating or valve into Peripherally Inserted Central (PICC) can prevent related complications. However, data regarding efficiency were controversial. Therefore, a systematic review was needed to analyse the effect of PICC materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications. We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, EMbase, grey literature and referent literature from inception to 5 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case–control study were included. Two authors extracted data independently, using a predesigned Excel form, and assessed the quality of included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (V5.1.0), case–control study was assessed by the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Data were analysed using Review Manager (v5.3.0). A total of 10 RCTs and one case–control study were included. Meta‐analysis results showed that PICC designs reduce the incidence of obstruction, and at the critical value of PICC‐associated bloodstream infection, but may have no effects on other complications. Based on the literature reviewed, we can only say PICC new materials did not reflect significant reduction on complications, what's more, the result needs more multicentre, large RCTs to support. We suggested clinicians combine descriptive research and cost‐effect analysis to select appropriate PICC materials and designs for patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-4801</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14468</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38050652</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Bias ; Blood clots ; Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects ; Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects ; Catheterization, Peripheral - methods ; Catheters ; Central Venous Catheters - adverse effects ; Clinical trials ; complication ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Handbooks ; Humans ; Infections ; Intervention ; Intubation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; new design ; new material ; Original ; Patient safety ; PICC ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Systematic review ; Thrombosis ; valve</subject><ispartof>International wound journal, 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.e14468-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-14f09bee22a8f312da8197ccd02a74ac4ef74401ef077c8dab26e235920e4c513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4523-982X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898378/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898378/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38050652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Nannan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Huizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wenli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Yinping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xue</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>International wound journal</title><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><description>Studies showed that integrating coating or valve into Peripherally Inserted Central (PICC) can prevent related complications. However, data regarding efficiency were controversial. Therefore, a systematic review was needed to analyse the effect of PICC materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications. We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, EMbase, grey literature and referent literature from inception to 5 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case–control study were included. Two authors extracted data independently, using a predesigned Excel form, and assessed the quality of included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (V5.1.0), case–control study was assessed by the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Data were analysed using Review Manager (v5.3.0). A total of 10 RCTs and one case–control study were included. Meta‐analysis results showed that PICC designs reduce the incidence of obstruction, and at the critical value of PICC‐associated bloodstream infection, but may have no effects on other complications. Based on the literature reviewed, we can only say PICC new materials did not reflect significant reduction on complications, what's more, the result needs more multicentre, large RCTs to support. We suggested clinicians combine descriptive research and cost‐effect analysis to select appropriate PICC materials and designs for patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Blood clots</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Central Venous Catheters - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>complication</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Handbooks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>new design</subject><subject>new material</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>PICC</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>valve</subject><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQgC0EoqVw4AWQJS7tYVvbcRKHC6qiFhZVogcQ3CyvM-565SSL7XSVG4_Qh-DJeBKcpqwACV_8M998ntEg9JKSU5rWmd1tTinnhXiEDmnJ2YIL-vXx_kzoAXoWwoYQVuV5-RQdZILkpMjZIfpxYQzoGHBv8DV4u12DV86N2HYBfIQG19DF9IRrFdcQwePj62Vdn-BWpYtVLmDVNbiBYG-6pOmwh2bQ0abT5Ezsz-93HpyaZLpvt85qNYXDG3yOwxgiJJXVKe_Wwu7e1kJUKUt1yo3BhufoiUkfwYuH_Qh9vrz4VL9fXH18t6zPrxaaEy4WlBtSrQAYU8JklDVK0KrUuiFMlVxpDqbknFAwpCy1aNSKFcCyvGIEuM5pdoTezt7tsGqh0XPncuttq_woe2Xl35HOruVNfyspEZXISpEMxw8G338bIETZ2qDBOdVBPwTJJo6yosgS-vofdNMPPnUcZEYqUpAqz6pEncyU9n0IHsy-GkrkNHyZhi_vh5_YV3-Wvyd_TzsBZzOwsw7G_5vk8suHWfkLMAO97Q</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Ding, Nannan</creator><creator>Peng, Huizhen</creator><creator>Zhao, Wenli</creator><creator>Yi, Yinping</creator><creator>Ma, Yufeng</creator><creator>Guo, Yaru</creator><creator>Li, Haiyun</creator><creator>Wu, Xue</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-982X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Ding, Nannan ; Peng, Huizhen ; Zhao, Wenli ; Yi, Yinping ; Ma, Yufeng ; Guo, Yaru ; Li, Haiyun ; Wu, Xue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4048-14f09bee22a8f312da8197ccd02a74ac4ef74401ef077c8dab26e235920e4c513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Blood clots</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Central Venous Catheters - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>complication</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Handbooks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>new design</topic><topic>new material</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>PICC</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>valve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Nannan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Huizhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wenli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Yinping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xue</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Nannan</au><au>Peng, Huizhen</au><au>Zhao, Wenli</au><au>Yi, Yinping</au><au>Ma, Yufeng</au><au>Guo, Yaru</au><au>Li, Haiyun</au><au>Wu, Xue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e14468</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14468-n/a</pages><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><eissn>1742-481X</eissn><abstract>Studies showed that integrating coating or valve into Peripherally Inserted Central (PICC) can prevent related complications. However, data regarding efficiency were controversial. Therefore, a systematic review was needed to analyse the effect of PICC materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications. We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, EMbase, grey literature and referent literature from inception to 5 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case–control study were included. Two authors extracted data independently, using a predesigned Excel form, and assessed the quality of included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (V5.1.0), case–control study was assessed by the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Data were analysed using Review Manager (v5.3.0). A total of 10 RCTs and one case–control study were included. Meta‐analysis results showed that PICC designs reduce the incidence of obstruction, and at the critical value of PICC‐associated bloodstream infection, but may have no effects on other complications. Based on the literature reviewed, we can only say PICC new materials did not reflect significant reduction on complications, what's more, the result needs more multicentre, large RCTs to support. We suggested clinicians combine descriptive research and cost‐effect analysis to select appropriate PICC materials and designs for patients.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38050652</pmid><doi>10.1111/iwj.14468</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-982X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-4801
ispartof International wound journal, 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.e14468-n/a
issn 1742-4801
1742-481X
1742-481X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10898378
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Antibiotics
Bias
Blood clots
Catheter-Related Infections - prevention & control
Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects
Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation
Catheterization, Central Venous - methods
Catheterization, Peripheral - adverse effects
Catheterization, Peripheral - methods
Catheters
Central Venous Catheters - adverse effects
Clinical trials
complication
Equipment Design
Female
Handbooks
Humans
Infections
Intervention
Intubation
Male
Middle Aged
new design
new material
Original
Patient safety
PICC
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Systematic review
Thrombosis
valve
title Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC‐related complications: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A01%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Peripherally%20inserted%20Central%20Catheter%20(PICC)%20materials%20and%20designs%20on%20reduction%20of%20PICC%E2%80%90related%20complications:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20wound%20journal&rft.au=Ding,%20Nannan&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e14468&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14468-n/a&rft.issn=1742-4801&rft.eissn=1742-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iwj.14468&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2898312663%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090609539&rft_id=info:pmid/38050652&rfr_iscdi=true