A comparative evaluation of internal and marginal fits of custom post and core fabricated using conventional and two digital techniques: An in vitro study
The purpose of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the marginal and internal fits of cobalt-chromium metal custom post and core fabricated using a conventional technique with two digital techniques. The study was designed in an in-vitro study setting. Five sets of custom post and core...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.95-102 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 102 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 95 |
| container_title | The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu Gharat, Nikita Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan Gill, Shruti Shah, Naisargi P |
| description | The purpose of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the marginal and internal fits of cobalt-chromium metal custom post and core fabricated using a conventional technique with two digital techniques.
The study was designed in an in-vitro study setting.
Five sets of custom post and core restorations were fabricated using the conventional (Group 1) and two semi digital methods (digital scanning of the resin pattern and computer aided additive manufacturing, and digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent computer aided designing [CAD] computer aided manufacturing fabrication) (Group 2 and 3). Marginal and internal fits of the posts were evaluated using a micro computed tomography scan at various points.
A one way ANOVA test of the scores was made to evaluate the effect of different methods of custom post and core fabrication on marginal and internal fits. Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests were conducted for intergroup comparison.
Least marginal gap was reported in Group 3 (82.5 ± 14.36 μm) followed by Group 1 (110 ± 25.19 μm) and Group 2 (112.5 ± 26.75 μm). Least internal gap at cervical, middle and apical as well as overall values were observed in Group 3 (78 ± 9.25 μm, 72 ± 7.79 μm, 160 ± 15.81 μm, 103.3 ± 4.43 μm) followed by Group 1 (113.5 ± 25.35 μm, 132.5 ± 19.92 μm, 502 ± 74.63 μm, 249.3 ± 25.44 μm) and Group 2 (114.5 ± 21.68 μm, 133.5 ± 19.57 μm, 598 ± 87.86 μm, 282 ± 28.91 μm) respectively. The results of one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests for marginal gap did not show any statistically significant difference between the three groups (P > 0.05) but revealed statistically significant difference (P = 0.02) in internal gap values at the cervical, middle, and apical regions as well as overall internal gap region between the three groups.
Better marginal and internal fits were observed in custom post and core fabricated by digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent CAD as compared to those fabricated by the other two groups. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jips.jips_275_23 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10896309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A788422587</galeid><sourcerecordid>A788422587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3cfd1ec26f3fb96c0bc7b732da3d73932778b995bac732ea64451441e0fced5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhhtR3HH17kkCgniZMV_d6XiRYfELFrzoOaTTlZkM3cmYpEf2r_hrTe-O64yIBJJK5ak3SVVV1XOCV5xg9mbn9mk1T4qKWlH2oFoQKdslx7V4WC2wFHS26UX1JKUdxnWLW_64umAtbVjd8EX1c41MGPc66uwOgOCgh6mYwaNgkfMZotcD0r5Ho44bN2-sy2k-NVPKYUT7kPItYEIEZHUXndEZejQl5zfF6w_gZ8WjTv4RUO82Lpd9BrP17vsE6S1a-3IfOrgcA0p56m-eVo-sHhI8O66X1bcP779efVpef_n4-Wp9vTS8oXnJjO0JGNpYZjvZGNwZ0QlGe816wSSjQrSdlHWnTfGCbjivCecEsDXQ14ZdVu_udPdTN0JvymujHtQ-uvLlGxW0U-cn3m3VJhwUwa1sGJZF4fVRIYb5M1mNLhkYBu0hTKU4krSlLkSSgr78C92Fac5xUowQwhvGZP1fCjOJGyZq_Ifa6AGU8zaU55n5arUWbcsprVtRqNU_qDJ6GF2pDlhX_GcBr04CtqCHvE1hmOYapnMQ34EmhpQi2PucEazm_lS3rXnSnyXkxWmu7wN-NyT7BTpV5NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039063750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of internal and marginal fits of custom post and core fabricated using conventional and two digital techniques: An in vitro study</title><source>Medknow Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu ; Gharat, Nikita ; Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan ; Gill, Shruti ; Shah, Naisargi P</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu ; Gharat, Nikita ; Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan ; Gill, Shruti ; Shah, Naisargi P</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the marginal and internal fits of cobalt-chromium metal custom post and core fabricated using a conventional technique with two digital techniques.
The study was designed in an in-vitro study setting.
Five sets of custom post and core restorations were fabricated using the conventional (Group 1) and two semi digital methods (digital scanning of the resin pattern and computer aided additive manufacturing, and digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent computer aided designing [CAD] computer aided manufacturing fabrication) (Group 2 and 3). Marginal and internal fits of the posts were evaluated using a micro computed tomography scan at various points.
A one way ANOVA test of the scores was made to evaluate the effect of different methods of custom post and core fabrication on marginal and internal fits. Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests were conducted for intergroup comparison.
Least marginal gap was reported in Group 3 (82.5 ± 14.36 μm) followed by Group 1 (110 ± 25.19 μm) and Group 2 (112.5 ± 26.75 μm). Least internal gap at cervical, middle and apical as well as overall values were observed in Group 3 (78 ± 9.25 μm, 72 ± 7.79 μm, 160 ± 15.81 μm, 103.3 ± 4.43 μm) followed by Group 1 (113.5 ± 25.35 μm, 132.5 ± 19.92 μm, 502 ± 74.63 μm, 249.3 ± 25.44 μm) and Group 2 (114.5 ± 21.68 μm, 133.5 ± 19.57 μm, 598 ± 87.86 μm, 282 ± 28.91 μm) respectively. The results of one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests for marginal gap did not show any statistically significant difference between the three groups (P > 0.05) but revealed statistically significant difference (P = 0.02) in internal gap values at the cervical, middle, and apical regions as well as overall internal gap region between the three groups.
Better marginal and internal fits were observed in custom post and core fabricated by digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent CAD as compared to those fabricated by the other two groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-4052</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1998-4057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_275_23</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38263564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Analysis of Variance ; Chromium ; Cobalt ; Computed tomography ; Computer industry ; Methods ; Research Design ; Scanning ; Silicones ; Statistical analysis ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.95-102</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2024 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3cfd1ec26f3fb96c0bc7b732da3d73932778b995bac732ea64451441e0fced5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896309/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896309/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38263564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharat, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Naisargi P</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of internal and marginal fits of custom post and core fabricated using conventional and two digital techniques: An in vitro study</title><title>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><description>The purpose of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the marginal and internal fits of cobalt-chromium metal custom post and core fabricated using a conventional technique with two digital techniques.
The study was designed in an in-vitro study setting.
Five sets of custom post and core restorations were fabricated using the conventional (Group 1) and two semi digital methods (digital scanning of the resin pattern and computer aided additive manufacturing, and digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent computer aided designing [CAD] computer aided manufacturing fabrication) (Group 2 and 3). Marginal and internal fits of the posts were evaluated using a micro computed tomography scan at various points.
A one way ANOVA test of the scores was made to evaluate the effect of different methods of custom post and core fabrication on marginal and internal fits. Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests were conducted for intergroup comparison.
Least marginal gap was reported in Group 3 (82.5 ± 14.36 μm) followed by Group 1 (110 ± 25.19 μm) and Group 2 (112.5 ± 26.75 μm). Least internal gap at cervical, middle and apical as well as overall values were observed in Group 3 (78 ± 9.25 μm, 72 ± 7.79 μm, 160 ± 15.81 μm, 103.3 ± 4.43 μm) followed by Group 1 (113.5 ± 25.35 μm, 132.5 ± 19.92 μm, 502 ± 74.63 μm, 249.3 ± 25.44 μm) and Group 2 (114.5 ± 21.68 μm, 133.5 ± 19.57 μm, 598 ± 87.86 μm, 282 ± 28.91 μm) respectively. The results of one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests for marginal gap did not show any statistically significant difference between the three groups (P > 0.05) but revealed statistically significant difference (P = 0.02) in internal gap values at the cervical, middle, and apical regions as well as overall internal gap region between the three groups.
Better marginal and internal fits were observed in custom post and core fabricated by digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent CAD as compared to those fabricated by the other two groups.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer industry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>0972-4052</issn><issn>1998-4057</issn><issn>1998-4057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhhtR3HH17kkCgniZMV_d6XiRYfELFrzoOaTTlZkM3cmYpEf2r_hrTe-O64yIBJJK5ak3SVVV1XOCV5xg9mbn9mk1T4qKWlH2oFoQKdslx7V4WC2wFHS26UX1JKUdxnWLW_64umAtbVjd8EX1c41MGPc66uwOgOCgh6mYwaNgkfMZotcD0r5Ho44bN2-sy2k-NVPKYUT7kPItYEIEZHUXndEZejQl5zfF6w_gZ8WjTv4RUO82Lpd9BrP17vsE6S1a-3IfOrgcA0p56m-eVo-sHhI8O66X1bcP779efVpef_n4-Wp9vTS8oXnJjO0JGNpYZjvZGNwZ0QlGe816wSSjQrSdlHWnTfGCbjivCecEsDXQ14ZdVu_udPdTN0JvymujHtQ-uvLlGxW0U-cn3m3VJhwUwa1sGJZF4fVRIYb5M1mNLhkYBu0hTKU4krSlLkSSgr78C92Fac5xUowQwhvGZP1fCjOJGyZq_Ifa6AGU8zaU55n5arUWbcsprVtRqNU_qDJ6GF2pDlhX_GcBr04CtqCHvE1hmOYapnMQ34EmhpQi2PucEazm_lS3rXnSnyXkxWmu7wN-NyT7BTpV5NQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu</creator><creator>Gharat, Nikita</creator><creator>Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan</creator><creator>Gill, Shruti</creator><creator>Shah, Naisargi P</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of internal and marginal fits of custom post and core fabricated using conventional and two digital techniques: An in vitro study</title><author>Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu ; Gharat, Nikita ; Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan ; Gill, Shruti ; Shah, Naisargi P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3cfd1ec26f3fb96c0bc7b732da3d73932778b995bac732ea64451441e0fced5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer industry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharat, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Shruti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Naisargi P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Health and Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheth, Vidhi Himanshu</au><au>Gharat, Nikita</au><au>Bhatnagar, Vishrut Mohan</au><au>Gill, Shruti</au><au>Shah, Naisargi P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of internal and marginal fits of custom post and core fabricated using conventional and two digital techniques: An in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>95-102</pages><issn>0972-4052</issn><issn>1998-4057</issn><eissn>1998-4057</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the marginal and internal fits of cobalt-chromium metal custom post and core fabricated using a conventional technique with two digital techniques.
The study was designed in an in-vitro study setting.
Five sets of custom post and core restorations were fabricated using the conventional (Group 1) and two semi digital methods (digital scanning of the resin pattern and computer aided additive manufacturing, and digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent computer aided designing [CAD] computer aided manufacturing fabrication) (Group 2 and 3). Marginal and internal fits of the posts were evaluated using a micro computed tomography scan at various points.
A one way ANOVA test of the scores was made to evaluate the effect of different methods of custom post and core fabrication on marginal and internal fits. Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests were conducted for intergroup comparison.
Least marginal gap was reported in Group 3 (82.5 ± 14.36 μm) followed by Group 1 (110 ± 25.19 μm) and Group 2 (112.5 ± 26.75 μm). Least internal gap at cervical, middle and apical as well as overall values were observed in Group 3 (78 ± 9.25 μm, 72 ± 7.79 μm, 160 ± 15.81 μm, 103.3 ± 4.43 μm) followed by Group 1 (113.5 ± 25.35 μm, 132.5 ± 19.92 μm, 502 ± 74.63 μm, 249.3 ± 25.44 μm) and Group 2 (114.5 ± 21.68 μm, 133.5 ± 19.57 μm, 598 ± 87.86 μm, 282 ± 28.91 μm) respectively. The results of one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni adjusted post hoc tests for marginal gap did not show any statistically significant difference between the three groups (P > 0.05) but revealed statistically significant difference (P = 0.02) in internal gap values at the cervical, middle, and apical regions as well as overall internal gap region between the three groups.
Better marginal and internal fits were observed in custom post and core fabricated by digital scanning of the silicone impression and subsequent CAD as compared to those fabricated by the other two groups.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>38263564</pmid><doi>10.4103/jips.jips_275_23</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0972-4052 |
| ispartof | The journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.95-102 |
| issn | 0972-4052 1998-4057 1998-4057 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10896309 |
| source | Medknow Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek; PubMed Central |
| subjects | 3D printing Analysis of Variance Chromium Cobalt Computed tomography Computer industry Methods Research Design Scanning Silicones Statistical analysis X-Ray Microtomography |
| title | A comparative evaluation of internal and marginal fits of custom post and core fabricated using conventional and two digital techniques: An in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A37%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20internal%20and%20marginal%20fits%20of%20custom%20post%20and%20core%20fabricated%20using%20conventional%20and%20two%20digital%20techniques:%20An%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20Indian%20Prosthodontic%20Society&rft.au=Sheth,%20Vidhi%20Himanshu&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=95-102&rft.issn=0972-4052&rft.eissn=1998-4057&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jips.jips_275_23&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA788422587%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039063750&rft_id=info:pmid/38263564&rft_galeid=A788422587&rfr_iscdi=true |