Sternal resection and reconstruction: a review

Sternal resection and reconstruction is a rare but sometimes challenging procedure due to its profound anatomical and functional implications. For these reasons, an adequate preoperative evaluation is crucial in each patient, especially when we are faced with malignant lesions that sometimes require...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic disease 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.708-721
Hauptverfasser: Aranda, Jose L, Gomez, María T, Fuentes, Marta, Rivas, Cristina, Forcada, Clara, Jimenez, Marcelo F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 721
container_issue 1
container_start_page 708
container_title Journal of thoracic disease
container_volume 16
creator Aranda, Jose L
Gomez, María T
Fuentes, Marta
Rivas, Cristina
Forcada, Clara
Jimenez, Marcelo F
description Sternal resection and reconstruction is a rare but sometimes challenging procedure due to its profound anatomical and functional implications. For these reasons, an adequate preoperative evaluation is crucial in each patient, especially when we are faced with malignant lesions that sometimes require extensive radical resections, thus demanding an integrated reconstructive strategy that allows stabilizing the chest wall, protecting the underlying mediastinum and minimize resulting deformity. The large number of available reconstruction techniques and the lack of quality studies for their analysis mean that sternal reconstruction depends to a great extent on the consensus of experts or, more frequently, on the simple preference of each surgical team. This article aims to provide an overview of sternal resection and reconstruction. Indications for partial versus total or subtotal sternectomy are suggested and their surgical and oncological outcomes are presented. The use of rigid or semi-rigid prostheses is an ongoing debate, although recent functional data advise reserving rigid reconstructions for extensive defects. Sternectomy for primary tumors or local tumor involvement has a good prognosis with an overall survival of 5 and 10 years: 67% and 58%, respectively, provided that a radical resection with free surgical margins is performed. Breast cancer is the most common secondary sternal tumor, and surgery can offer 5-year overall survival ranging from 20% to 50% provided an R0 resection is achieved, although radical surgery does not appear to decrease rates. of recurrence. Metastases of origin other than the breast give the worst results (less than 40% at 36 months and 0% at 5 years) and although the data available on these cases are limited, the radicality of the resection does not seem to modify the survival or recurrence rates, so a conservative approach is probably more appropriate.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jtd-23-450
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10894421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2932433659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-dd093f73817d08af94d043427693c5665cbdd710ace5950a5ecc8c67abcc3b873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtLAzEQxoMottSevEuPgmxNMnlsvIgUX1DwoJ5DNsnqlu1uTXZb_O8NbS06l3n9-Gb4EDoneEoJBnm96FxGIWMcH6EhxVJmQlB2vK1pRhioARrHuMApBKZUylM0gJwRzDkM0fS186Ex9ST46G1Xtc3ENC51tm1iF_rt6GZi0mRd-c0ZOilNHf14n0fo_eH-bfaUzV8en2d388wCw13mHFZQSsiJdDg3pWIOM2BUCgWWC8Ft4Zwk2FjPFceGe2tzK6QprIUilzBCtzvdVV8svbO-6YKp9SpUSxO-dWsq_X_TVJ_6o11rgnPFGCVJ4XKvENqv3sdOL6tofV2bxrd91FQBZQCCq4Re7VAb2hiDLw93CNZbl3VyWVPQyeVEX_x97cD-ego_9294NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2932433659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sternal resection and reconstruction: a review</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Aranda, Jose L ; Gomez, María T ; Fuentes, Marta ; Rivas, Cristina ; Forcada, Clara ; Jimenez, Marcelo F</creator><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Jose L ; Gomez, María T ; Fuentes, Marta ; Rivas, Cristina ; Forcada, Clara ; Jimenez, Marcelo F</creatorcontrib><description>Sternal resection and reconstruction is a rare but sometimes challenging procedure due to its profound anatomical and functional implications. For these reasons, an adequate preoperative evaluation is crucial in each patient, especially when we are faced with malignant lesions that sometimes require extensive radical resections, thus demanding an integrated reconstructive strategy that allows stabilizing the chest wall, protecting the underlying mediastinum and minimize resulting deformity. The large number of available reconstruction techniques and the lack of quality studies for their analysis mean that sternal reconstruction depends to a great extent on the consensus of experts or, more frequently, on the simple preference of each surgical team. This article aims to provide an overview of sternal resection and reconstruction. Indications for partial versus total or subtotal sternectomy are suggested and their surgical and oncological outcomes are presented. The use of rigid or semi-rigid prostheses is an ongoing debate, although recent functional data advise reserving rigid reconstructions for extensive defects. Sternectomy for primary tumors or local tumor involvement has a good prognosis with an overall survival of 5 and 10 years: 67% and 58%, respectively, provided that a radical resection with free surgical margins is performed. Breast cancer is the most common secondary sternal tumor, and surgery can offer 5-year overall survival ranging from 20% to 50% provided an R0 resection is achieved, although radical surgery does not appear to decrease rates. of recurrence. Metastases of origin other than the breast give the worst results (less than 40% at 36 months and 0% at 5 years) and although the data available on these cases are limited, the radicality of the resection does not seem to modify the survival or recurrence rates, so a conservative approach is probably more appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-6624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-450</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38410553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Review</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic disease, 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.708-721</ispartof><rights>2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. 2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894421/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894421/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38410553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Jose L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, María T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forcada, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Marcelo F</creatorcontrib><title>Sternal resection and reconstruction: a review</title><title>Journal of thoracic disease</title><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><description>Sternal resection and reconstruction is a rare but sometimes challenging procedure due to its profound anatomical and functional implications. For these reasons, an adequate preoperative evaluation is crucial in each patient, especially when we are faced with malignant lesions that sometimes require extensive radical resections, thus demanding an integrated reconstructive strategy that allows stabilizing the chest wall, protecting the underlying mediastinum and minimize resulting deformity. The large number of available reconstruction techniques and the lack of quality studies for their analysis mean that sternal reconstruction depends to a great extent on the consensus of experts or, more frequently, on the simple preference of each surgical team. This article aims to provide an overview of sternal resection and reconstruction. Indications for partial versus total or subtotal sternectomy are suggested and their surgical and oncological outcomes are presented. The use of rigid or semi-rigid prostheses is an ongoing debate, although recent functional data advise reserving rigid reconstructions for extensive defects. Sternectomy for primary tumors or local tumor involvement has a good prognosis with an overall survival of 5 and 10 years: 67% and 58%, respectively, provided that a radical resection with free surgical margins is performed. Breast cancer is the most common secondary sternal tumor, and surgery can offer 5-year overall survival ranging from 20% to 50% provided an R0 resection is achieved, although radical surgery does not appear to decrease rates. of recurrence. Metastases of origin other than the breast give the worst results (less than 40% at 36 months and 0% at 5 years) and although the data available on these cases are limited, the radicality of the resection does not seem to modify the survival or recurrence rates, so a conservative approach is probably more appropriate.</description><subject>Review</subject><issn>2072-1439</issn><issn>2077-6624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMtLAzEQxoMottSevEuPgmxNMnlsvIgUX1DwoJ5DNsnqlu1uTXZb_O8NbS06l3n9-Gb4EDoneEoJBnm96FxGIWMcH6EhxVJmQlB2vK1pRhioARrHuMApBKZUylM0gJwRzDkM0fS186Ex9ST46G1Xtc3ENC51tm1iF_rt6GZi0mRd-c0ZOilNHf14n0fo_eH-bfaUzV8en2d388wCw13mHFZQSsiJdDg3pWIOM2BUCgWWC8Ft4Zwk2FjPFceGe2tzK6QprIUilzBCtzvdVV8svbO-6YKp9SpUSxO-dWsq_X_TVJ_6o11rgnPFGCVJ4XKvENqv3sdOL6tofV2bxrd91FQBZQCCq4Re7VAb2hiDLw93CNZbl3VyWVPQyeVEX_x97cD-ego_9294NQ</recordid><startdate>20240130</startdate><enddate>20240130</enddate><creator>Aranda, Jose L</creator><creator>Gomez, María T</creator><creator>Fuentes, Marta</creator><creator>Rivas, Cristina</creator><creator>Forcada, Clara</creator><creator>Jimenez, Marcelo F</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240130</creationdate><title>Sternal resection and reconstruction: a review</title><author>Aranda, Jose L ; Gomez, María T ; Fuentes, Marta ; Rivas, Cristina ; Forcada, Clara ; Jimenez, Marcelo F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-dd093f73817d08af94d043427693c5665cbdd710ace5950a5ecc8c67abcc3b873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Jose L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, María T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forcada, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Marcelo F</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aranda, Jose L</au><au>Gomez, María T</au><au>Fuentes, Marta</au><au>Rivas, Cristina</au><au>Forcada, Clara</au><au>Jimenez, Marcelo F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sternal resection and reconstruction: a review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><date>2024-01-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>708</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>708-721</pages><issn>2072-1439</issn><eissn>2077-6624</eissn><abstract>Sternal resection and reconstruction is a rare but sometimes challenging procedure due to its profound anatomical and functional implications. For these reasons, an adequate preoperative evaluation is crucial in each patient, especially when we are faced with malignant lesions that sometimes require extensive radical resections, thus demanding an integrated reconstructive strategy that allows stabilizing the chest wall, protecting the underlying mediastinum and minimize resulting deformity. The large number of available reconstruction techniques and the lack of quality studies for their analysis mean that sternal reconstruction depends to a great extent on the consensus of experts or, more frequently, on the simple preference of each surgical team. This article aims to provide an overview of sternal resection and reconstruction. Indications for partial versus total or subtotal sternectomy are suggested and their surgical and oncological outcomes are presented. The use of rigid or semi-rigid prostheses is an ongoing debate, although recent functional data advise reserving rigid reconstructions for extensive defects. Sternectomy for primary tumors or local tumor involvement has a good prognosis with an overall survival of 5 and 10 years: 67% and 58%, respectively, provided that a radical resection with free surgical margins is performed. Breast cancer is the most common secondary sternal tumor, and surgery can offer 5-year overall survival ranging from 20% to 50% provided an R0 resection is achieved, although radical surgery does not appear to decrease rates. of recurrence. Metastases of origin other than the breast give the worst results (less than 40% at 36 months and 0% at 5 years) and although the data available on these cases are limited, the radicality of the resection does not seem to modify the survival or recurrence rates, so a conservative approach is probably more appropriate.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>38410553</pmid><doi>10.21037/jtd-23-450</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-1439
ispartof Journal of thoracic disease, 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.708-721
issn 2072-1439
2077-6624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10894421
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Review
title Sternal resection and reconstruction: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T17%3A08%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sternal%20resection%20and%20reconstruction:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20disease&rft.au=Aranda,%20Jose%20L&rft.date=2024-01-30&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=708&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=708-721&rft.issn=2072-1439&rft.eissn=2077-6624&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jtd-23-450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2932433659%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2932433659&rft_id=info:pmid/38410553&rfr_iscdi=true