One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer

Background and purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with rectal spacer for localized prostate cancer (PC) and report 1-year clinical outcomes. Materials and methods Thirty-four consecutive patients w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2024-02, Vol.42 (1), p.97, Article 97
Hauptverfasser: Poon, Darren M. C., Yuan, Jing, Wong, Oi Lei, Yang, Bin, Tse, Mei Yan, Lau, Ka Ki, Chiu, Sin Ting, Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung, Ng, Chi Fai, Chui, Ka Lun, Kwong, Yiu Ming, Ma, Wai Kit, Cheung, Kin Yin, Chiu, George, Yu, Siu Ki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
container_title World journal of urology
container_volume 42
creator Poon, Darren M. C.
Yuan, Jing
Wong, Oi Lei
Yang, Bin
Tse, Mei Yan
Lau, Ka Ki
Chiu, Sin Ting
Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung
Ng, Chi Fai
Chui, Ka Lun
Kwong, Yiu Ming
Ma, Wai Kit
Cheung, Kin Yin
Chiu, George
Yu, Siu Ki
description Background and purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with rectal spacer for localized prostate cancer (PC) and report 1-year clinical outcomes. Materials and methods Thirty-four consecutive patients with low- to high-risk localized PC that underwent 5-fraction adaptive MRgSBRT with rectal spacer were enrolled. The dosimetric comparison was performed on a risk- and age-matched cohort treated with MRgSBRT but without a spacer at a similar timepoint. Clinician-reported outcomes were based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Patient-reported outcomes were based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline, acute (1–3 months), subacute (4–12 months), and late (> 12 months) phases. Results The median follow-up was 390 days (range 28–823) and the median age was 70 years (range 58–82). One patient experienced rectal bleeding soon after spacer insertion that subsided before MRgSBRT. The median distance between the midline of the prostate midgland and the rectum after spacer insertion measured 7.8 mm (range 2.6–15.3), and the median length of the spacer was 45.9 mm (range 16.8–62.9) based on T2-weighted MR imaging. The use of spacer resulted in significant improvements in target coverage (V100% > 95% = 98.6% [range 93.4–99.8] for spacer vs. 97.8% [range 69.6–99.7] for non-spacer) and rectal sparing (V95% 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10891188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2930998610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-591d0e0efdd5a61678e15c747ddd8d27b5a3f0c504e742a4e12183375578e8cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZsDMeXxM4KoYqbVFQJwdry2CczrjJxsB3o8Ag8NS4ppbBgZUv_d_5z-ZvmMYPnDEC9yABCthS4pCCVlvTyTnPMpBBUK97dvfU_ah7kfAHAVAft_eZIaNELyeRx8-N8QnpAm4gbwxScHUlciot7zCQO5MNHul2CR09ywYSxWFeCI5voDyRZH2wJcSJlh8nOB_ItlB1J6Ep1ybN1mMgQE5krhVPJqz7G2iR8r5ZzirnYgsTZqbIPm3uDHTM-un5Pms9vXn86fUfPzt--P311Rp3kXaFtzzwg4OB9azvWKY2sdUoq7732XG1aKwZwLUhUkluJjDMthGrbSmrnxUnzcvWdl80evaujJTuaOYW9TQcTbTB_K1PYmW38ahjonjGtq8Oza4cUvyyYi9mH7HAc7YRxyYb3ggPnIHhFn_6DXsQlTXW_Kwr6XncMKsVXytWT5ITDzTQMzFXWZs3a1KzNr6zNZS16cnuPm5Lf4VZArECu0rTF9Kf3f2x_AvbtuJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930998610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Poon, Darren M. C. ; Yuan, Jing ; Wong, Oi Lei ; Yang, Bin ; Tse, Mei Yan ; Lau, Ka Ki ; Chiu, Sin Ting ; Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung ; Ng, Chi Fai ; Chui, Ka Lun ; Kwong, Yiu Ming ; Ma, Wai Kit ; Cheung, Kin Yin ; Chiu, George ; Yu, Siu Ki</creator><creatorcontrib>Poon, Darren M. C. ; Yuan, Jing ; Wong, Oi Lei ; Yang, Bin ; Tse, Mei Yan ; Lau, Ka Ki ; Chiu, Sin Ting ; Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung ; Ng, Chi Fai ; Chui, Ka Lun ; Kwong, Yiu Ming ; Ma, Wai Kit ; Cheung, Kin Yin ; Chiu, George ; Yu, Siu Ki</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with rectal spacer for localized prostate cancer (PC) and report 1-year clinical outcomes. Materials and methods Thirty-four consecutive patients with low- to high-risk localized PC that underwent 5-fraction adaptive MRgSBRT with rectal spacer were enrolled. The dosimetric comparison was performed on a risk- and age-matched cohort treated with MRgSBRT but without a spacer at a similar timepoint. Clinician-reported outcomes were based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Patient-reported outcomes were based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline, acute (1–3 months), subacute (4–12 months), and late (&gt; 12 months) phases. Results The median follow-up was 390 days (range 28–823) and the median age was 70 years (range 58–82). One patient experienced rectal bleeding soon after spacer insertion that subsided before MRgSBRT. The median distance between the midline of the prostate midgland and the rectum after spacer insertion measured 7.8 mm (range 2.6–15.3), and the median length of the spacer was 45.9 mm (range 16.8–62.9) based on T2-weighted MR imaging. The use of spacer resulted in significant improvements in target coverage (V100% &gt; 95% = 98.6% [range 93.4–99.8] for spacer vs. 97.8% [range 69.6–99.7] for non-spacer) and rectal sparing (V95% &lt; 3 cc = 0.7 cc [range 0–4.6] for spacer vs. 4.9 cc [range 0–12.5] for non-spacer). Nine patients (26.5%) experienced grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicities, and no grade ≥ 2 toxicities were observed. During the 1-year follow-up period, EPIC scores for the bowel domain remained stable and were the highest among all other domains. Conclusions MRgSBRT with rectal spacer for localized PC showed exceptional tolerability with minimal gastrointestinal toxicities and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes. Improvements in dosimetry, rectal sparing, and target coverage were achieved with a rectal spacer. Randomized trials are warranted for further validation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38393414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Dosimetry ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Rectum ; Terminology ; Topic Paper ; Urology</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2024-02, Vol.42 (1), p.97, Article 97</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-591d0e0efdd5a61678e15c747ddd8d27b5a3f0c504e742a4e12183375578e8cd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6226-0743</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38393414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poon, Darren M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Oi Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Mei Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Ka Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Sin Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Chi Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Ka Lun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Yiu Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wai Kit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Kin Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Siu Ki</creatorcontrib><title>One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Background and purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with rectal spacer for localized prostate cancer (PC) and report 1-year clinical outcomes. Materials and methods Thirty-four consecutive patients with low- to high-risk localized PC that underwent 5-fraction adaptive MRgSBRT with rectal spacer were enrolled. The dosimetric comparison was performed on a risk- and age-matched cohort treated with MRgSBRT but without a spacer at a similar timepoint. Clinician-reported outcomes were based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Patient-reported outcomes were based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline, acute (1–3 months), subacute (4–12 months), and late (&gt; 12 months) phases. Results The median follow-up was 390 days (range 28–823) and the median age was 70 years (range 58–82). One patient experienced rectal bleeding soon after spacer insertion that subsided before MRgSBRT. The median distance between the midline of the prostate midgland and the rectum after spacer insertion measured 7.8 mm (range 2.6–15.3), and the median length of the spacer was 45.9 mm (range 16.8–62.9) based on T2-weighted MR imaging. The use of spacer resulted in significant improvements in target coverage (V100% &gt; 95% = 98.6% [range 93.4–99.8] for spacer vs. 97.8% [range 69.6–99.7] for non-spacer) and rectal sparing (V95% &lt; 3 cc = 0.7 cc [range 0–4.6] for spacer vs. 4.9 cc [range 0–12.5] for non-spacer). Nine patients (26.5%) experienced grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicities, and no grade ≥ 2 toxicities were observed. During the 1-year follow-up period, EPIC scores for the bowel domain remained stable and were the highest among all other domains. Conclusions MRgSBRT with rectal spacer for localized PC showed exceptional tolerability with minimal gastrointestinal toxicities and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes. Improvements in dosimetry, rectal sparing, and target coverage were achieved with a rectal spacer. Randomized trials are warranted for further validation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Topic Paper</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZsDMeXxM4KoYqbVFQJwdry2CczrjJxsB3o8Ag8NS4ppbBgZUv_d_5z-ZvmMYPnDEC9yABCthS4pCCVlvTyTnPMpBBUK97dvfU_ah7kfAHAVAft_eZIaNELyeRx8-N8QnpAm4gbwxScHUlciot7zCQO5MNHul2CR09ywYSxWFeCI5voDyRZH2wJcSJlh8nOB_ItlB1J6Ep1ybN1mMgQE5krhVPJqz7G2iR8r5ZzirnYgsTZqbIPm3uDHTM-un5Pms9vXn86fUfPzt--P311Rp3kXaFtzzwg4OB9azvWKY2sdUoq7732XG1aKwZwLUhUkluJjDMthGrbSmrnxUnzcvWdl80evaujJTuaOYW9TQcTbTB_K1PYmW38ahjonjGtq8Oza4cUvyyYi9mH7HAc7YRxyYb3ggPnIHhFn_6DXsQlTXW_Kwr6XncMKsVXytWT5ITDzTQMzFXWZs3a1KzNr6zNZS16cnuPm5Lf4VZArECu0rTF9Kf3f2x_AvbtuJQ</recordid><startdate>20240223</startdate><enddate>20240223</enddate><creator>Poon, Darren M. C.</creator><creator>Yuan, Jing</creator><creator>Wong, Oi Lei</creator><creator>Yang, Bin</creator><creator>Tse, Mei Yan</creator><creator>Lau, Ka Ki</creator><creator>Chiu, Sin Ting</creator><creator>Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung</creator><creator>Ng, Chi Fai</creator><creator>Chui, Ka Lun</creator><creator>Kwong, Yiu Ming</creator><creator>Ma, Wai Kit</creator><creator>Cheung, Kin Yin</creator><creator>Chiu, George</creator><creator>Yu, Siu Ki</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6226-0743</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240223</creationdate><title>One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer</title><author>Poon, Darren M. C. ; Yuan, Jing ; Wong, Oi Lei ; Yang, Bin ; Tse, Mei Yan ; Lau, Ka Ki ; Chiu, Sin Ting ; Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung ; Ng, Chi Fai ; Chui, Ka Lun ; Kwong, Yiu Ming ; Ma, Wai Kit ; Cheung, Kin Yin ; Chiu, George ; Yu, Siu Ki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-591d0e0efdd5a61678e15c747ddd8d27b5a3f0c504e742a4e12183375578e8cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Topic Paper</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poon, Darren M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Oi Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Mei Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Ka Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Sin Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Chi Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Ka Lun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, Yiu Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Wai Kit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Kin Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Siu Ki</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poon, Darren M. C.</au><au>Yuan, Jing</au><au>Wong, Oi Lei</au><au>Yang, Bin</au><au>Tse, Mei Yan</au><au>Lau, Ka Ki</au><au>Chiu, Sin Ting</au><au>Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung</au><au>Ng, Chi Fai</au><au>Chui, Ka Lun</au><au>Kwong, Yiu Ming</au><au>Ma, Wai Kit</au><au>Cheung, Kin Yin</au><au>Chiu, George</au><au>Yu, Siu Ki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2024-02-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><pages>97-</pages><artnum>97</artnum><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><abstract>Background and purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with rectal spacer for localized prostate cancer (PC) and report 1-year clinical outcomes. Materials and methods Thirty-four consecutive patients with low- to high-risk localized PC that underwent 5-fraction adaptive MRgSBRT with rectal spacer were enrolled. The dosimetric comparison was performed on a risk- and age-matched cohort treated with MRgSBRT but without a spacer at a similar timepoint. Clinician-reported outcomes were based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Patient-reported outcomes were based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline, acute (1–3 months), subacute (4–12 months), and late (&gt; 12 months) phases. Results The median follow-up was 390 days (range 28–823) and the median age was 70 years (range 58–82). One patient experienced rectal bleeding soon after spacer insertion that subsided before MRgSBRT. The median distance between the midline of the prostate midgland and the rectum after spacer insertion measured 7.8 mm (range 2.6–15.3), and the median length of the spacer was 45.9 mm (range 16.8–62.9) based on T2-weighted MR imaging. The use of spacer resulted in significant improvements in target coverage (V100% &gt; 95% = 98.6% [range 93.4–99.8] for spacer vs. 97.8% [range 69.6–99.7] for non-spacer) and rectal sparing (V95% &lt; 3 cc = 0.7 cc [range 0–4.6] for spacer vs. 4.9 cc [range 0–12.5] for non-spacer). Nine patients (26.5%) experienced grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicities, and no grade ≥ 2 toxicities were observed. During the 1-year follow-up period, EPIC scores for the bowel domain remained stable and were the highest among all other domains. Conclusions MRgSBRT with rectal spacer for localized PC showed exceptional tolerability with minimal gastrointestinal toxicities and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes. Improvements in dosimetry, rectal sparing, and target coverage were achieved with a rectal spacer. Randomized trials are warranted for further validation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>38393414</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6226-0743</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1433-8726
ispartof World journal of urology, 2024-02, Vol.42 (1), p.97, Article 97
issn 1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10891188
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
Dosimetry
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Oncology
Patients
Prospective Studies
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Rectum
Terminology
Topic Paper
Urology
title One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One-year%20clinical%20outcomes%20of%20MR-guided%20stereotactic%20body%20radiation%20therapy%20with%20rectal%20spacer%20for%20patients%20with%20localized%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Poon,%20Darren%20M.%20C.&rft.date=2024-02-23&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.pages=97-&rft.artnum=97&rft.issn=1433-8726&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2930998610%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930998610&rft_id=info:pmid/38393414&rfr_iscdi=true