Comparison of 3 diagnostic methods for pulmonary tuberculosis in suspected patients with negative sputum smear or no sputum

To explore the diagnostic value of 3 methods for sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). This prospective study enrolled sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected TB admitted to Jiangxi Chest Hospital between January 2020 and Decem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2024-02, Vol.103 (6), p.e37039
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Xiaopeng, Chen, Lerong, Wan, Wenli, Peng, Jianping, Wu, Liangliang, Xin, Jing, Cai, Jianying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page e37039
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 103
creator Cheng, Xiaopeng
Chen, Lerong
Wan, Wenli
Peng, Jianping
Wu, Liangliang
Xin, Jing
Cai, Jianying
description To explore the diagnostic value of 3 methods for sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). This prospective study enrolled sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected TB admitted to Jiangxi Chest Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. The 3 methods were bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification. The diagnostic performance of the 3 tests was evaluated with BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard. A total of 456 samples were collected from 114 patients with suspected TB. Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with TB. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.953 and had sensitivity of 90.57%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.42%, accuracy of 95.61%. GeneXpert MTB/RIF achieved AUC of 0.906, sensitivity of 81.13%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 85.92%, accuracy of 91.23%. BALF-AFB smear had AUC of 0.519, sensitivity of 3.77%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 54.46%, and accuracy of 55.26%. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest κ of 0.911, while BALF-AFB smear had the lowest κ value of 0.040. For TB in sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients using BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard, BALF-AFB smear showed low diagnostic performance, while, though GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip had good diagnostic performance, combining GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip improved the diagnostic value to a great extent.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000037039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10860950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2924998938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c28b68b76323428357a1234b0f7cb598bab5674516f33e6e74a0fa4bc7974a9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUUtv1DAQthCILgu_AAn5yCXFycSvE0JboEituMDZsr3OrlFiB49TVPHnSdWlPOYy728eHyEvW3beMi3fXF-csz8CkoF-RDYtB9FwLfrHZMNYxxupZX9GniF-Y6wF2fVPyRkoAA5KbcjPXZ5mWyLmRPNAge6jPaSMNXo6hXrMe6RDLnRexiknW25pXVwofhkzRqQxUVxwDr6GPZ1tjSFVpD9iPdIUDqt_EyjOS10milOwha5QKZ9Cz8mTwY4YXpz0lnz98P7L7rK5-vzx0-7dVeOBi9r4TjmhnBTQQd8p4NK2q-XYIL3jWjnruJA9b8UAEESQvWWD7Z2_u9xqB1vy9h53XtwU9n7dsdjRzCVO60Em22j-zaR4NId8Y1qmBNOcrQivTwglf18CVjNF9GEcbQp5QdPprtda6fWvWwL3pb5kxBKGhzktM3e8mesL8z9va9erv1d86PlNFPwCpA-Wsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2924998938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of 3 diagnostic methods for pulmonary tuberculosis in suspected patients with negative sputum smear or no sputum</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cheng, Xiaopeng ; Chen, Lerong ; Wan, Wenli ; Peng, Jianping ; Wu, Liangliang ; Xin, Jing ; Cai, Jianying</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaopeng ; Chen, Lerong ; Wan, Wenli ; Peng, Jianping ; Wu, Liangliang ; Xin, Jing ; Cai, Jianying</creatorcontrib><description>To explore the diagnostic value of 3 methods for sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). This prospective study enrolled sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected TB admitted to Jiangxi Chest Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. The 3 methods were bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification. The diagnostic performance of the 3 tests was evaluated with BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard. A total of 456 samples were collected from 114 patients with suspected TB. Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with TB. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.953 and had sensitivity of 90.57%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.42%, accuracy of 95.61%. GeneXpert MTB/RIF achieved AUC of 0.906, sensitivity of 81.13%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 85.92%, accuracy of 91.23%. BALF-AFB smear had AUC of 0.519, sensitivity of 3.77%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 54.46%, and accuracy of 55.26%. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest κ of 0.911, while BALF-AFB smear had the lowest κ value of 0.040. For TB in sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients using BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard, BALF-AFB smear showed low diagnostic performance, while, though GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip had good diagnostic performance, combining GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip improved the diagnostic value to a great extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38335388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Diagnostic Accuracy Study ; Humans ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sputum - microbiology ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2024-02, Vol.103 (6), p.e37039</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c28b68b76323428357a1234b0f7cb598bab5674516f33e6e74a0fa4bc7974a9b3</cites><orcidid>0009-0004-2842-5382</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860950/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860950/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38335388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaopeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Lerong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Wenli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Liangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jianying</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of 3 diagnostic methods for pulmonary tuberculosis in suspected patients with negative sputum smear or no sputum</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>To explore the diagnostic value of 3 methods for sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). This prospective study enrolled sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected TB admitted to Jiangxi Chest Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. The 3 methods were bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification. The diagnostic performance of the 3 tests was evaluated with BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard. A total of 456 samples were collected from 114 patients with suspected TB. Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with TB. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.953 and had sensitivity of 90.57%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.42%, accuracy of 95.61%. GeneXpert MTB/RIF achieved AUC of 0.906, sensitivity of 81.13%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 85.92%, accuracy of 91.23%. BALF-AFB smear had AUC of 0.519, sensitivity of 3.77%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 54.46%, and accuracy of 55.26%. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest κ of 0.911, while BALF-AFB smear had the lowest κ value of 0.040. For TB in sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients using BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard, BALF-AFB smear showed low diagnostic performance, while, though GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip had good diagnostic performance, combining GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip improved the diagnostic value to a great extent.</description><subject>Diagnostic Accuracy Study</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sputum - microbiology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUUtv1DAQthCILgu_AAn5yCXFycSvE0JboEituMDZsr3OrlFiB49TVPHnSdWlPOYy728eHyEvW3beMi3fXF-csz8CkoF-RDYtB9FwLfrHZMNYxxupZX9GniF-Y6wF2fVPyRkoAA5KbcjPXZ5mWyLmRPNAge6jPaSMNXo6hXrMe6RDLnRexiknW25pXVwofhkzRqQxUVxwDr6GPZ1tjSFVpD9iPdIUDqt_EyjOS10milOwha5QKZ9Cz8mTwY4YXpz0lnz98P7L7rK5-vzx0-7dVeOBi9r4TjmhnBTQQd8p4NK2q-XYIL3jWjnruJA9b8UAEESQvWWD7Z2_u9xqB1vy9h53XtwU9n7dsdjRzCVO60Em22j-zaR4NId8Y1qmBNOcrQivTwglf18CVjNF9GEcbQp5QdPprtda6fWvWwL3pb5kxBKGhzktM3e8mesL8z9va9erv1d86PlNFPwCpA-Wsw</recordid><startdate>20240209</startdate><enddate>20240209</enddate><creator>Cheng, Xiaopeng</creator><creator>Chen, Lerong</creator><creator>Wan, Wenli</creator><creator>Peng, Jianping</creator><creator>Wu, Liangliang</creator><creator>Xin, Jing</creator><creator>Cai, Jianying</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2842-5382</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240209</creationdate><title>Comparison of 3 diagnostic methods for pulmonary tuberculosis in suspected patients with negative sputum smear or no sputum</title><author>Cheng, Xiaopeng ; Chen, Lerong ; Wan, Wenli ; Peng, Jianping ; Wu, Liangliang ; Xin, Jing ; Cai, Jianying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c28b68b76323428357a1234b0f7cb598bab5674516f33e6e74a0fa4bc7974a9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Diagnostic Accuracy Study</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sputum - microbiology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xiaopeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Lerong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Wenli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Liangliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jianying</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Xiaopeng</au><au>Chen, Lerong</au><au>Wan, Wenli</au><au>Peng, Jianping</au><au>Wu, Liangliang</au><au>Xin, Jing</au><au>Cai, Jianying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of 3 diagnostic methods for pulmonary tuberculosis in suspected patients with negative sputum smear or no sputum</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2024-02-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e37039</spage><pages>e37039-</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>To explore the diagnostic value of 3 methods for sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). This prospective study enrolled sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients with suspected TB admitted to Jiangxi Chest Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. The 3 methods were bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification. The diagnostic performance of the 3 tests was evaluated with BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard. A total of 456 samples were collected from 114 patients with suspected TB. Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with TB. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.953 and had sensitivity of 90.57%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.42%, accuracy of 95.61%. GeneXpert MTB/RIF achieved AUC of 0.906, sensitivity of 81.13%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 85.92%, accuracy of 91.23%. BALF-AFB smear had AUC of 0.519, sensitivity of 3.77%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 54.46%, and accuracy of 55.26%. The combination of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip for Mycobacterium strain identification yielded the highest κ of 0.911, while BALF-AFB smear had the lowest κ value of 0.040. For TB in sputum smear-negative and non-sputum patients using BALF Mycobacterium culture + BALF-AFB smear + GeneXpert MTB/RIF + Gene chip as the gold standard, BALF-AFB smear showed low diagnostic performance, while, though GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip had good diagnostic performance, combining GeneXpert MTB/RIF and gene chip improved the diagnostic value to a great extent.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>38335388</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000037039</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2842-5382</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2024-02, Vol.103 (6), p.e37039
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10860950
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Humans
Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sputum - microbiology
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology
title Comparison of 3 diagnostic methods for pulmonary tuberculosis in suspected patients with negative sputum smear or no sputum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A43%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%203%20diagnostic%20methods%20for%20pulmonary%20tuberculosis%20in%20suspected%20patients%20with%20negative%20sputum%20smear%20or%20no%20sputum&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Cheng,%20Xiaopeng&rft.date=2024-02-09&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e37039&rft.pages=e37039-&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000037039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2924998938%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2924998938&rft_id=info:pmid/38335388&rfr_iscdi=true