Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is stro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2024-02, Vol.117 (1), p.127-135
Hauptverfasser: Rinehart, Joshua D., Grula, Courtney C., Rinehart, Joseph P., Bowsher, Julia H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 1
container_start_page 127
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 117
creator Rinehart, Joshua D.
Grula, Courtney C.
Rinehart, Joseph P.
Bowsher, Julia H.
description Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/toad207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10860157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/toad207</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2955230510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b433t-d2b23bbf1d92bbf1ac914d82046b66bb5a178be5a076ad2ad97742895545ea3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd2L1DAUxYMo7rj65LsEBNlF6uajbRpfRBZ1hVVfFHwLN-3tTIa26Sbpwvz3ZpxxUR8UAvchv5yccw8hTzl7xZmWF1vEi-ShE0zdIyuuZVMIzb_fJyvGhChYqeUJeRTjljFeC84ekhOptBJSsxUJnzEmN61pC7cu7WjnYMSEgW4gUjfOg2shOT9F2vtAR5hgjSNOifqepg1SGPr9oQNC3y7pp5RFpGdXu4z5OUvBa_oJ19Bu3OA6wPPH5EF-E_HJcZ6Sb-_ffb28Kq6_fPh4-fa6sKWUqeiEFdLannda7Ae0mpddI1hZ27q2tgKuGosVMFXn8NBppUrR6KoqKwSJ8pS8OejOix2xa7PrAIOZgxsh7IwHZ_68mdzGrP2t4aypGa9UVjg7KgR_s-RFmdHFFocBJvRLNPk3ripRl3VGn_-Fbv0SppzPiGxJSFZxlqmXB6oNPsaA_Z0bzsy-TJPLNMcyM_3s9wB37K_2MvDiAPhl_o_S-QG0zvsJ_8n-AJ0RuNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2955230510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Rinehart, Joshua D. ; Grula, Courtney C. ; Rinehart, Joseph P. ; Bowsher, Julia H.</creator><contributor>Liu, Tong-Xian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joshua D. ; Grula, Courtney C. ; Rinehart, Joseph P. ; Bowsher, Julia H. ; Liu, Tong-Xian</creatorcontrib><description>Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/toad207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37972390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Adults ; Alfalfa ; Animals ; Bats ; Bees ; behavior ; Body Size ; Cavities ; Cavity nesting ; conservation ; Diapause ; ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR ; Entomology ; Females ; Heritability ; Hymenoptera ; Influence ; insect rearing ; Larva ; Medicago sativa ; Megachilidae ; Nesting ; Nesting Behavior ; Offspring ; Overwintering ; Performance assessment ; physiology ; Pollen ; pollination ; Reproduction ; Wings</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2024-02, Vol.117 (1), p.127-135</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b433t-d2b23bbf1d92bbf1ac914d82046b66bb5a178be5a076ad2ad97742895545ea3e3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-3393-3186 ; 0000-0001-6347-9635</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1583,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37972390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Liu, Tong-Xian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grula, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowsher, Julia H.</creatorcontrib><title>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>behavior</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Cavity nesting</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>Diapause</subject><subject>ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Heritability</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>insect rearing</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>Medicago sativa</subject><subject>Megachilidae</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Overwintering</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>physiology</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>pollination</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Wings</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd2L1DAUxYMo7rj65LsEBNlF6uajbRpfRBZ1hVVfFHwLN-3tTIa26Sbpwvz3ZpxxUR8UAvchv5yccw8hTzl7xZmWF1vEi-ShE0zdIyuuZVMIzb_fJyvGhChYqeUJeRTjljFeC84ekhOptBJSsxUJnzEmN61pC7cu7WjnYMSEgW4gUjfOg2shOT9F2vtAR5hgjSNOifqepg1SGPr9oQNC3y7pp5RFpGdXu4z5OUvBa_oJ19Bu3OA6wPPH5EF-E_HJcZ6Sb-_ffb28Kq6_fPh4-fa6sKWUqeiEFdLannda7Ae0mpddI1hZ27q2tgKuGosVMFXn8NBppUrR6KoqKwSJ8pS8OejOix2xa7PrAIOZgxsh7IwHZ_68mdzGrP2t4aypGa9UVjg7KgR_s-RFmdHFFocBJvRLNPk3ripRl3VGn_-Fbv0SppzPiGxJSFZxlqmXB6oNPsaA_Z0bzsy-TJPLNMcyM_3s9wB37K_2MvDiAPhl_o_S-QG0zvsJ_8n-AJ0RuNw</recordid><startdate>20240212</startdate><enddate>20240212</enddate><creator>Rinehart, Joshua D.</creator><creator>Grula, Courtney C.</creator><creator>Rinehart, Joseph P.</creator><creator>Bowsher, Julia H.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3393-3186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-9635</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240212</creationdate><title>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</title><author>Rinehart, Joshua D. ; Grula, Courtney C. ; Rinehart, Joseph P. ; Bowsher, Julia H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b433t-d2b23bbf1d92bbf1ac914d82046b66bb5a178be5a076ad2ad97742895545ea3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>behavior</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Cavity nesting</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>Diapause</topic><topic>ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Heritability</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>insect rearing</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>Medicago sativa</topic><topic>Megachilidae</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Overwintering</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>physiology</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>pollination</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Wings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grula, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowsher, Julia H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rinehart, Joshua D.</au><au>Grula, Courtney C.</au><au>Rinehart, Joseph P.</au><au>Bowsher, Julia H.</au><au>Liu, Tong-Xian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2024-02-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>127-135</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>37972390</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/toad207</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3393-3186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-9635</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2024-02, Vol.117 (1), p.127-135
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10860157
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Adults
Alfalfa
Animals
Bats
Bees
behavior
Body Size
Cavities
Cavity nesting
conservation
Diapause
ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR
Entomology
Females
Heritability
Hymenoptera
Influence
insect rearing
Larva
Medicago sativa
Megachilidae
Nesting
Nesting Behavior
Offspring
Overwintering
Performance assessment
physiology
Pollen
pollination
Reproduction
Wings
title Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nesting%20cavity%20diameter%20has%20implications%20for%20management%20of%20the%20alfalfa%20leafcutting%20bee%20(Hymenoptera:%20Megachilidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Rinehart,%20Joshua%20D.&rft.date=2024-02-12&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=127-135&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/toad207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2955230510%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2955230510&rft_id=info:pmid/37972390&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/toad207&rfr_iscdi=true