Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is stro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic entomology 2024-02, Vol.117 (1), p.127-135 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Rinehart, Joshua D. Grula, Courtney C. Rinehart, Joseph P. Bowsher, Julia H. |
description | Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jee/toad207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10860157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/toad207</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2955230510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b433t-d2b23bbf1d92bbf1ac914d82046b66bb5a178be5a076ad2ad97742895545ea3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd2L1DAUxYMo7rj65LsEBNlF6uajbRpfRBZ1hVVfFHwLN-3tTIa26Sbpwvz3ZpxxUR8UAvchv5yccw8hTzl7xZmWF1vEi-ShE0zdIyuuZVMIzb_fJyvGhChYqeUJeRTjljFeC84ekhOptBJSsxUJnzEmN61pC7cu7WjnYMSEgW4gUjfOg2shOT9F2vtAR5hgjSNOifqepg1SGPr9oQNC3y7pp5RFpGdXu4z5OUvBa_oJ19Bu3OA6wPPH5EF-E_HJcZ6Sb-_ffb28Kq6_fPh4-fa6sKWUqeiEFdLannda7Ae0mpddI1hZ27q2tgKuGosVMFXn8NBppUrR6KoqKwSJ8pS8OejOix2xa7PrAIOZgxsh7IwHZ_68mdzGrP2t4aypGa9UVjg7KgR_s-RFmdHFFocBJvRLNPk3ripRl3VGn_-Fbv0SppzPiGxJSFZxlqmXB6oNPsaA_Z0bzsy-TJPLNMcyM_3s9wB37K_2MvDiAPhl_o_S-QG0zvsJ_8n-AJ0RuNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2955230510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Rinehart, Joshua D. ; Grula, Courtney C. ; Rinehart, Joseph P. ; Bowsher, Julia H.</creator><contributor>Liu, Tong-Xian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joshua D. ; Grula, Courtney C. ; Rinehart, Joseph P. ; Bowsher, Julia H. ; Liu, Tong-Xian</creatorcontrib><description>Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/toad207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37972390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Adults ; Alfalfa ; Animals ; Bats ; Bees ; behavior ; Body Size ; Cavities ; Cavity nesting ; conservation ; Diapause ; ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR ; Entomology ; Females ; Heritability ; Hymenoptera ; Influence ; insect rearing ; Larva ; Medicago sativa ; Megachilidae ; Nesting ; Nesting Behavior ; Offspring ; Overwintering ; Performance assessment ; physiology ; Pollen ; pollination ; Reproduction ; Wings</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2024-02, Vol.117 (1), p.127-135</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b433t-d2b23bbf1d92bbf1ac914d82046b66bb5a178be5a076ad2ad97742895545ea3e3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-3393-3186 ; 0000-0001-6347-9635</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1583,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37972390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Liu, Tong-Xian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grula, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowsher, Julia H.</creatorcontrib><title>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>behavior</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Cavity nesting</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>Diapause</subject><subject>ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Heritability</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>insect rearing</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>Medicago sativa</subject><subject>Megachilidae</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Overwintering</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>physiology</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>pollination</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Wings</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd2L1DAUxYMo7rj65LsEBNlF6uajbRpfRBZ1hVVfFHwLN-3tTIa26Sbpwvz3ZpxxUR8UAvchv5yccw8hTzl7xZmWF1vEi-ShE0zdIyuuZVMIzb_fJyvGhChYqeUJeRTjljFeC84ekhOptBJSsxUJnzEmN61pC7cu7WjnYMSEgW4gUjfOg2shOT9F2vtAR5hgjSNOifqepg1SGPr9oQNC3y7pp5RFpGdXu4z5OUvBa_oJ19Bu3OA6wPPH5EF-E_HJcZ6Sb-_ffb28Kq6_fPh4-fa6sKWUqeiEFdLannda7Ae0mpddI1hZ27q2tgKuGosVMFXn8NBppUrR6KoqKwSJ8pS8OejOix2xa7PrAIOZgxsh7IwHZ_68mdzGrP2t4aypGa9UVjg7KgR_s-RFmdHFFocBJvRLNPk3ripRl3VGn_-Fbv0SppzPiGxJSFZxlqmXB6oNPsaA_Z0bzsy-TJPLNMcyM_3s9wB37K_2MvDiAPhl_o_S-QG0zvsJ_8n-AJ0RuNw</recordid><startdate>20240212</startdate><enddate>20240212</enddate><creator>Rinehart, Joshua D.</creator><creator>Grula, Courtney C.</creator><creator>Rinehart, Joseph P.</creator><creator>Bowsher, Julia H.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3393-3186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-9635</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240212</creationdate><title>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</title><author>Rinehart, Joshua D. ; Grula, Courtney C. ; Rinehart, Joseph P. ; Bowsher, Julia H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b433t-d2b23bbf1d92bbf1ac914d82046b66bb5a178be5a076ad2ad97742895545ea3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>behavior</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Cavity nesting</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>Diapause</topic><topic>ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Heritability</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>insect rearing</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>Medicago sativa</topic><topic>Megachilidae</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Overwintering</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>physiology</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>pollination</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Wings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grula, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowsher, Julia H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rinehart, Joshua D.</au><au>Grula, Courtney C.</au><au>Rinehart, Joseph P.</au><au>Bowsher, Julia H.</au><au>Liu, Tong-Xian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2024-02-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>127-135</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>Body size influences performance in many bee species and may be influenced by nesting cavity diameter in cavity-nesting bees. Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) is a commercially-managed, solitary cavity-nesting bee. In M. rotundata body size has low heritability and is strongly influenced by the size of the larval provision and the diameter of the nesting cavity. Commercial nesting boxes have cavities that are 7 mm in diameter. Our goal was to examine the effects that nesting cavity diameter has on M. rotundata body size and performance by manipulating the size of cavities that are available for nesting. We provided bees with nesting cavities that ranged in size from 4 to 9 millimeters in 1 mm increments. To assess body size we measured mass and intertegular span. To assess performance we measured wing area, wing loading, sex, overwintering survival, pollen ball occurrence, and diapause status in the offspring. We also examined the reproductive output from the different nest cavity diameters. We found that the 8 mm cavities reared bees with the largest mass, and 4 mm cavities reared bees with the smallest mass. We determined that the 7 mm nesting cavity is optimal for offspring yield, the 8 mm nesting cavity is optimal for performance, and the 5 mm nesting cavity may be optimal for conservation efforts of other cavity-nesting bees. Based on the desired outcome of the bee managers, nest sizes differing from the standard may provide an advantage.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>37972390</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/toad207</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3393-3186</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-9635</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2024-02, Vol.117 (1), p.127-135 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X 1938-291X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10860157 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Adults Alfalfa Animals Bats Bees behavior Body Size Cavities Cavity nesting conservation Diapause ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR Entomology Females Heritability Hymenoptera Influence insect rearing Larva Medicago sativa Megachilidae Nesting Nesting Behavior Offspring Overwintering Performance assessment physiology Pollen pollination Reproduction Wings |
title | Nesting cavity diameter has implications for management of the alfalfa leafcutting bee (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nesting%20cavity%20diameter%20has%20implications%20for%20management%20of%20the%20alfalfa%20leafcutting%20bee%20(Hymenoptera:%20Megachilidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Rinehart,%20Joshua%20D.&rft.date=2024-02-12&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=127-135&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/toad207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2955230510%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2955230510&rft_id=info:pmid/37972390&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/toad207&rfr_iscdi=true |