A feasibility study transplanting macrophages to a segmental nerve injury

Introduction/Aims Promoting regeneration after segmental nerve injury repair is a challenge, but improving angiogenesis could be beneficial. Macrophages facilitate regeneration after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effects of transplanting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 2023-11, Vol.68 (6), p.894-900
Hauptverfasser: Pan, Deng, Schofield, Jonathon Blake, Schellhardt, Lauren, Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K., Mackinnon, Susan E., Li, Xiaowei, Wood, Matthew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 900
container_issue 6
container_start_page 894
container_title Muscle & nerve
container_volume 68
creator Pan, Deng
Schofield, Jonathon Blake
Schellhardt, Lauren
Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K.
Mackinnon, Susan E.
Li, Xiaowei
Wood, Matthew D.
description Introduction/Aims Promoting regeneration after segmental nerve injury repair is a challenge, but improving angiogenesis could be beneficial. Macrophages facilitate regeneration after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effects of transplanting exogenous macrophages to a segmental nerve injury. Methods Bone marrow–derived cells were harvested from donor mice and differentiated to macrophages (BMDM), then suspended within fibrin hydrogels to facilitate BMDM transplantation. BMDM survival was characterized in vitro. The effect of this BMDM fibrin hydrogel construct at a nerve injury site was assessed using a mouse sciatic nerve gap injury. Mice were equally distributed to “fibrin+Mφ” (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium and BMDM) or “fibrin” hydrogel control (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium alone) groups. Flow cytometry (n = 3/group/endpoint) and immunohistochemical analysis (n = 5/group/endpoint) of the nerve gap region were performed at days 3, 5, and 7 after repair. Results Incorporating macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) improved BMDM survival and expansion. Transplanted BMDM survived for at least 7 days in a nerve gap (~40% retained at day 3 and ~15% retained at day 7). From transplantation, macrophage quantities within the nerve gap were elevated when comparing fibrin+Mφ with fibrin control (~25% vs. 3% at day 3 and ~14% vs. 6% at day 7). Endothelial cells increased by about fivefold within the nerve gap, and axonal extension into the nerve gap increased almost twofold for fibrin+Mφ compared with fibrin control. Discussion BMDM suspended within fibrin hydrogels at a nerve gap do not impair regeneration.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mus.27977
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10840956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2868123076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4447-c259d798080e57d25efe31754cddd9ea3b25ef776fe793b2127e4ca899c4e2583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaLZJD_0DRdBLe3AykmWPdCohJE0gpYc2kJvQ2uONFn9sJTvF_z4ym4Y20JOQ9PDwzryMvRdwIgDkaTfFE4kG8RVbCTCYqcLo12wFQumszM3dIXsb4xYAhC7xDTvMEXMEwBW7PuMNuejXvvXjzOM41TMfg-vjrnX96PsN71wVht2921Dk48Adj7TpqB9dy3sKD8R9v53CfMwOGtdGevd0HrHby4uf51fZzfev1-dnN1mllMKskoWp0WjQQAXWsqCGcoGFquq6NuTy9fKEWDaEJl2ERFKV08ZUimSh8yP2Ze_dTeuO6iolCa61u-A7F2Y7OG___en9vd0MD1aAVmCKMhk-PRnC8GuiONrOx4raNDANU7RSl1rIHHBBP75At8MU-jRfoowElUu1RPq8p9KiYgzUPKcRYJeGbLdol4YS--Hv-M_kn0oScLoHfvuW5v-b7LfbH3vlI6KZnAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892043248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A feasibility study transplanting macrophages to a segmental nerve injury</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Pan, Deng ; Schofield, Jonathon Blake ; Schellhardt, Lauren ; Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K. ; Mackinnon, Susan E. ; Li, Xiaowei ; Wood, Matthew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pan, Deng ; Schofield, Jonathon Blake ; Schellhardt, Lauren ; Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K. ; Mackinnon, Susan E. ; Li, Xiaowei ; Wood, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction/Aims Promoting regeneration after segmental nerve injury repair is a challenge, but improving angiogenesis could be beneficial. Macrophages facilitate regeneration after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effects of transplanting exogenous macrophages to a segmental nerve injury. Methods Bone marrow–derived cells were harvested from donor mice and differentiated to macrophages (BMDM), then suspended within fibrin hydrogels to facilitate BMDM transplantation. BMDM survival was characterized in vitro. The effect of this BMDM fibrin hydrogel construct at a nerve injury site was assessed using a mouse sciatic nerve gap injury. Mice were equally distributed to “fibrin+Mφ” (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium and BMDM) or “fibrin” hydrogel control (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium alone) groups. Flow cytometry (n = 3/group/endpoint) and immunohistochemical analysis (n = 5/group/endpoint) of the nerve gap region were performed at days 3, 5, and 7 after repair. Results Incorporating macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) improved BMDM survival and expansion. Transplanted BMDM survived for at least 7 days in a nerve gap (~40% retained at day 3 and ~15% retained at day 7). From transplantation, macrophage quantities within the nerve gap were elevated when comparing fibrin+Mφ with fibrin control (~25% vs. 3% at day 3 and ~14% vs. 6% at day 7). Endothelial cells increased by about fivefold within the nerve gap, and axonal extension into the nerve gap increased almost twofold for fibrin+Mφ compared with fibrin control. Discussion BMDM suspended within fibrin hydrogels at a nerve gap do not impair regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-639X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-4598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mus.27977</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37737007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Angiogenesis ; Bone marrow ; Cell culture ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Culture media ; Endothelial Cells ; Feasibility Studies ; Fibrin ; Fibrin - chemistry ; Fibrin - pharmacology ; Flow cytometry ; Humans ; Hydrogels ; Hydrogels - chemistry ; Hydrogels - pharmacology ; Injuries ; macrophage ; Macrophages ; nerve gap ; Nerve Regeneration - physiology ; Nerves ; Peripheral Nerve Injuries ; Regeneration ; Sciatic nerve ; Sciatic Nerve - injuries ; Survival ; Transplantation</subject><ispartof>Muscle &amp; nerve, 2023-11, Vol.68 (6), p.894-900</ispartof><rights>2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4447-c259d798080e57d25efe31754cddd9ea3b25ef776fe793b2127e4ca899c4e2583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4447-c259d798080e57d25efe31754cddd9ea3b25ef776fe793b2127e4ca899c4e2583</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0714-1140</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmus.27977$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmus.27977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37737007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pan, Deng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Jonathon Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhardt, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackinnon, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><title>A feasibility study transplanting macrophages to a segmental nerve injury</title><title>Muscle &amp; nerve</title><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><description>Introduction/Aims Promoting regeneration after segmental nerve injury repair is a challenge, but improving angiogenesis could be beneficial. Macrophages facilitate regeneration after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effects of transplanting exogenous macrophages to a segmental nerve injury. Methods Bone marrow–derived cells were harvested from donor mice and differentiated to macrophages (BMDM), then suspended within fibrin hydrogels to facilitate BMDM transplantation. BMDM survival was characterized in vitro. The effect of this BMDM fibrin hydrogel construct at a nerve injury site was assessed using a mouse sciatic nerve gap injury. Mice were equally distributed to “fibrin+Mφ” (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium and BMDM) or “fibrin” hydrogel control (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium alone) groups. Flow cytometry (n = 3/group/endpoint) and immunohistochemical analysis (n = 5/group/endpoint) of the nerve gap region were performed at days 3, 5, and 7 after repair. Results Incorporating macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) improved BMDM survival and expansion. Transplanted BMDM survived for at least 7 days in a nerve gap (~40% retained at day 3 and ~15% retained at day 7). From transplantation, macrophage quantities within the nerve gap were elevated when comparing fibrin+Mφ with fibrin control (~25% vs. 3% at day 3 and ~14% vs. 6% at day 7). Endothelial cells increased by about fivefold within the nerve gap, and axonal extension into the nerve gap increased almost twofold for fibrin+Mφ compared with fibrin control. Discussion BMDM suspended within fibrin hydrogels at a nerve gap do not impair regeneration.</description><subject>Angiogenesis</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Culture media</subject><subject>Endothelial Cells</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Fibrin</subject><subject>Fibrin - chemistry</subject><subject>Fibrin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogels</subject><subject>Hydrogels - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrogels - pharmacology</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>macrophage</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>nerve gap</subject><subject>Nerve Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Nerves</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerve Injuries</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Sciatic nerve</subject><subject>Sciatic Nerve - injuries</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><issn>0148-639X</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaLZJD_0DRdBLe3AykmWPdCohJE0gpYc2kJvQ2uONFn9sJTvF_z4ym4Y20JOQ9PDwzryMvRdwIgDkaTfFE4kG8RVbCTCYqcLo12wFQumszM3dIXsb4xYAhC7xDTvMEXMEwBW7PuMNuejXvvXjzOM41TMfg-vjrnX96PsN71wVht2921Dk48Adj7TpqB9dy3sKD8R9v53CfMwOGtdGevd0HrHby4uf51fZzfev1-dnN1mllMKskoWp0WjQQAXWsqCGcoGFquq6NuTy9fKEWDaEJl2ERFKV08ZUimSh8yP2Ze_dTeuO6iolCa61u-A7F2Y7OG___en9vd0MD1aAVmCKMhk-PRnC8GuiONrOx4raNDANU7RSl1rIHHBBP75At8MU-jRfoowElUu1RPq8p9KiYgzUPKcRYJeGbLdol4YS--Hv-M_kn0oScLoHfvuW5v-b7LfbH3vlI6KZnAA</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Pan, Deng</creator><creator>Schofield, Jonathon Blake</creator><creator>Schellhardt, Lauren</creator><creator>Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K.</creator><creator>Mackinnon, Susan E.</creator><creator>Li, Xiaowei</creator><creator>Wood, Matthew D.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-1140</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>A feasibility study transplanting macrophages to a segmental nerve injury</title><author>Pan, Deng ; Schofield, Jonathon Blake ; Schellhardt, Lauren ; Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K. ; Mackinnon, Susan E. ; Li, Xiaowei ; Wood, Matthew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4447-c259d798080e57d25efe31754cddd9ea3b25ef776fe793b2127e4ca899c4e2583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Angiogenesis</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Culture media</topic><topic>Endothelial Cells</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Fibrin</topic><topic>Fibrin - chemistry</topic><topic>Fibrin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogels</topic><topic>Hydrogels - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrogels - pharmacology</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>macrophage</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>nerve gap</topic><topic>Nerve Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Nerves</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerve Injuries</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Sciatic nerve</topic><topic>Sciatic Nerve - injuries</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Deng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Jonathon Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhardt, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackinnon, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Deng</au><au>Schofield, Jonathon Blake</au><au>Schellhardt, Lauren</au><au>Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K.</au><au>Mackinnon, Susan E.</au><au>Li, Xiaowei</au><au>Wood, Matthew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A feasibility study transplanting macrophages to a segmental nerve injury</atitle><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>894</spage><epage>900</epage><pages>894-900</pages><issn>0148-639X</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><eissn>1097-4598</eissn><abstract>Introduction/Aims Promoting regeneration after segmental nerve injury repair is a challenge, but improving angiogenesis could be beneficial. Macrophages facilitate regeneration after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effects of transplanting exogenous macrophages to a segmental nerve injury. Methods Bone marrow–derived cells were harvested from donor mice and differentiated to macrophages (BMDM), then suspended within fibrin hydrogels to facilitate BMDM transplantation. BMDM survival was characterized in vitro. The effect of this BMDM fibrin hydrogel construct at a nerve injury site was assessed using a mouse sciatic nerve gap injury. Mice were equally distributed to “fibrin+Mφ” (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium and BMDM) or “fibrin” hydrogel control (fibrin hydrogels containing culture medium alone) groups. Flow cytometry (n = 3/group/endpoint) and immunohistochemical analysis (n = 5/group/endpoint) of the nerve gap region were performed at days 3, 5, and 7 after repair. Results Incorporating macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) improved BMDM survival and expansion. Transplanted BMDM survived for at least 7 days in a nerve gap (~40% retained at day 3 and ~15% retained at day 7). From transplantation, macrophage quantities within the nerve gap were elevated when comparing fibrin+Mφ with fibrin control (~25% vs. 3% at day 3 and ~14% vs. 6% at day 7). Endothelial cells increased by about fivefold within the nerve gap, and axonal extension into the nerve gap increased almost twofold for fibrin+Mφ compared with fibrin control. Discussion BMDM suspended within fibrin hydrogels at a nerve gap do not impair regeneration.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37737007</pmid><doi>10.1002/mus.27977</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-1140</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-639X
ispartof Muscle & nerve, 2023-11, Vol.68 (6), p.894-900
issn 0148-639X
1097-4598
1097-4598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10840956
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Angiogenesis
Bone marrow
Cell culture
Cerebrospinal fluid
Culture media
Endothelial Cells
Feasibility Studies
Fibrin
Fibrin - chemistry
Fibrin - pharmacology
Flow cytometry
Humans
Hydrogels
Hydrogels - chemistry
Hydrogels - pharmacology
Injuries
macrophage
Macrophages
nerve gap
Nerve Regeneration - physiology
Nerves
Peripheral Nerve Injuries
Regeneration
Sciatic nerve
Sciatic Nerve - injuries
Survival
Transplantation
title A feasibility study transplanting macrophages to a segmental nerve injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T20%3A00%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20feasibility%20study%20transplanting%20macrophages%20to%20a%20segmental%20nerve%20injury&rft.jtitle=Muscle%20&%20nerve&rft.au=Pan,%20Deng&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=894&rft.epage=900&rft.pages=894-900&rft.issn=0148-639X&rft.eissn=1097-4598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mus.27977&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2868123076%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892043248&rft_id=info:pmid/37737007&rfr_iscdi=true