Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes
Introduction BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus sta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in therapy 2024-02, Vol.41 (2), p.806-825 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 825 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 806 |
container_title | Advances in therapy |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Davison, Niall J. Guthrie, Nicole L. Medland, Sarah Lupinacci, Paul Nordyke, Robert J. Berman, Mark A. |
description | Introduction
BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective.
Methods
We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature.
Results
From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications.
Conclusions
BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10838832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2910189330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-22185fe3579effb62aa494790d27ea2be97d62c7b5b9075119dcbc857a80de863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCC3BAOXJJscebtX1C1VJapEpw2ErcLMeZbF1l4-BxKu3b8Cw8GS5bKnrpYeTD_8_nkT7G3gl-KjhXH0mAhKbmIMuoBmp4wRZCr5q6DLxkC66WogapfxyxY6JbzoGrRr9mR1ILxZeyWbDrdaRcn_c9-hzucESi6mx0w54CVbGvXPU9IfkUphziWH0O25DdUG1uMLkJ5xx8FcZqs5_w9y8osWsxI71hr3o3EL59eE_Y9Zfzzfqyvvp28XV9dlV7aXSuAYRuepSNMtj37QqcW5qlMrwDhQ5aNKpbgVdt05pyuRCm863XjXKad6hX8oR9OnCnud1h53HMyQ12SmHn0t5GF-zTZAw3dhvvrOBaai2hED48EFL8OSNluwvkcRjciHEmC0ZwoY2UvFThUPUpEiXsH_8R3N4LsQchtgixf4XYe_77_y98XPlnoBTkoUAlGreY7G2cUzFAz2H_AI2fmEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2910189330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Davison, Niall J. ; Guthrie, Nicole L. ; Medland, Sarah ; Lupinacci, Paul ; Nordyke, Robert J. ; Berman, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davison, Niall J. ; Guthrie, Nicole L. ; Medland, Sarah ; Lupinacci, Paul ; Nordyke, Robert J. ; Berman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective.
Methods
We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature.
Results
From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications.
Conclusions
BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38170435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy ; Endocrinology ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Prescriptions ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Rheumatology</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2024-02, Vol.41 (2), p.806-825</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-22185fe3579effb62aa494790d27ea2be97d62c7b5b9075119dcbc857a80de863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9447-0825</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38170435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davison, Niall J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Nicole L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupinacci, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordyke, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction
BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective.
Methods
We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature.
Results
From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications.
Conclusions
BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCC3BAOXJJscebtX1C1VJapEpw2ErcLMeZbF1l4-BxKu3b8Cw8GS5bKnrpYeTD_8_nkT7G3gl-KjhXH0mAhKbmIMuoBmp4wRZCr5q6DLxkC66WogapfxyxY6JbzoGrRr9mR1ILxZeyWbDrdaRcn_c9-hzucESi6mx0w54CVbGvXPU9IfkUphziWH0O25DdUG1uMLkJ5xx8FcZqs5_w9y8osWsxI71hr3o3EL59eE_Y9Zfzzfqyvvp28XV9dlV7aXSuAYRuepSNMtj37QqcW5qlMrwDhQ5aNKpbgVdt05pyuRCm863XjXKad6hX8oR9OnCnud1h53HMyQ12SmHn0t5GF-zTZAw3dhvvrOBaai2hED48EFL8OSNluwvkcRjciHEmC0ZwoY2UvFThUPUpEiXsH_8R3N4LsQchtgixf4XYe_77_y98XPlnoBTkoUAlGreY7G2cUzFAz2H_AI2fmEQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Davison, Niall J.</creator><creator>Guthrie, Nicole L.</creator><creator>Medland, Sarah</creator><creator>Lupinacci, Paul</creator><creator>Nordyke, Robert J.</creator><creator>Berman, Mark A.</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-0825</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</title><author>Davison, Niall J. ; Guthrie, Nicole L. ; Medland, Sarah ; Lupinacci, Paul ; Nordyke, Robert J. ; Berman, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-22185fe3579effb62aa494790d27ea2be97d62c7b5b9075119dcbc857a80de863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davison, Niall J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Nicole L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupinacci, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordyke, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davison, Niall J.</au><au>Guthrie, Nicole L.</au><au>Medland, Sarah</au><au>Lupinacci, Paul</au><au>Nordyke, Robert J.</au><au>Berman, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><stitle>Adv Ther</stitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>806</spage><epage>825</epage><pages>806-825</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Introduction
BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective.
Methods
We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature.
Results
From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications.
Conclusions
BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>38170435</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-0825</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-238X |
ispartof | Advances in therapy, 2024-02, Vol.41 (2), p.806-825 |
issn | 0741-238X 1865-8652 1865-8652 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10838832 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Cardiology Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy Endocrinology Glycated Hemoglobin Humans Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oncology Original Research Pharmacology/Toxicology Prescriptions Quality-Adjusted Life Years Rheumatology |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T12%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Prescription%20Digital%20Therapeutic%20in%20Type%C2%A02%20Diabetes&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Davison,%20Niall%20J.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=806&rft.epage=825&rft.pages=806-825&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2910189330%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2910189330&rft_id=info:pmid/38170435&rfr_iscdi=true |