Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes

Introduction BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2024-02, Vol.41 (2), p.806-825
Hauptverfasser: Davison, Niall J., Guthrie, Nicole L., Medland, Sarah, Lupinacci, Paul, Nordyke, Robert J., Berman, Mark A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 825
container_issue 2
container_start_page 806
container_title Advances in therapy
container_volume 41
creator Davison, Niall J.
Guthrie, Nicole L.
Medland, Sarah
Lupinacci, Paul
Nordyke, Robert J.
Berman, Mark A.
description Introduction BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective. Methods We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature. Results From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications. Conclusions BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10838832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2910189330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-22185fe3579effb62aa494790d27ea2be97d62c7b5b9075119dcbc857a80de863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCC3BAOXJJscebtX1C1VJapEpw2ErcLMeZbF1l4-BxKu3b8Cw8GS5bKnrpYeTD_8_nkT7G3gl-KjhXH0mAhKbmIMuoBmp4wRZCr5q6DLxkC66WogapfxyxY6JbzoGrRr9mR1ILxZeyWbDrdaRcn_c9-hzucESi6mx0w54CVbGvXPU9IfkUphziWH0O25DdUG1uMLkJ5xx8FcZqs5_w9y8osWsxI71hr3o3EL59eE_Y9Zfzzfqyvvp28XV9dlV7aXSuAYRuepSNMtj37QqcW5qlMrwDhQ5aNKpbgVdt05pyuRCm863XjXKad6hX8oR9OnCnud1h53HMyQ12SmHn0t5GF-zTZAw3dhvvrOBaai2hED48EFL8OSNluwvkcRjciHEmC0ZwoY2UvFThUPUpEiXsH_8R3N4LsQchtgixf4XYe_77_y98XPlnoBTkoUAlGreY7G2cUzFAz2H_AI2fmEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2910189330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Davison, Niall J. ; Guthrie, Nicole L. ; Medland, Sarah ; Lupinacci, Paul ; Nordyke, Robert J. ; Berman, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davison, Niall J. ; Guthrie, Nicole L. ; Medland, Sarah ; Lupinacci, Paul ; Nordyke, Robert J. ; Berman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective. Methods We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature. Results From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications. Conclusions BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38170435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy ; Endocrinology ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Prescriptions ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Rheumatology</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2024-02, Vol.41 (2), p.806-825</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-22185fe3579effb62aa494790d27ea2be97d62c7b5b9075119dcbc857a80de863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9447-0825</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38170435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davison, Niall J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Nicole L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupinacci, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordyke, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective. Methods We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature. Results From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications. Conclusions BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCC3BAOXJJscebtX1C1VJapEpw2ErcLMeZbF1l4-BxKu3b8Cw8GS5bKnrpYeTD_8_nkT7G3gl-KjhXH0mAhKbmIMuoBmp4wRZCr5q6DLxkC66WogapfxyxY6JbzoGrRr9mR1ILxZeyWbDrdaRcn_c9-hzucESi6mx0w54CVbGvXPU9IfkUphziWH0O25DdUG1uMLkJ5xx8FcZqs5_w9y8osWsxI71hr3o3EL59eE_Y9Zfzzfqyvvp28XV9dlV7aXSuAYRuepSNMtj37QqcW5qlMrwDhQ5aNKpbgVdt05pyuRCm863XjXKad6hX8oR9OnCnud1h53HMyQ12SmHn0t5GF-zTZAw3dhvvrOBaai2hED48EFL8OSNluwvkcRjciHEmC0ZwoY2UvFThUPUpEiXsH_8R3N4LsQchtgixf4XYe_77_y98XPlnoBTkoUAlGreY7G2cUzFAz2H_AI2fmEQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Davison, Niall J.</creator><creator>Guthrie, Nicole L.</creator><creator>Medland, Sarah</creator><creator>Lupinacci, Paul</creator><creator>Nordyke, Robert J.</creator><creator>Berman, Mark A.</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-0825</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</title><author>Davison, Niall J. ; Guthrie, Nicole L. ; Medland, Sarah ; Lupinacci, Paul ; Nordyke, Robert J. ; Berman, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-22185fe3579effb62aa494790d27ea2be97d62c7b5b9075119dcbc857a80de863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davison, Niall J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Nicole L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupinacci, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordyke, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davison, Niall J.</au><au>Guthrie, Nicole L.</au><au>Medland, Sarah</au><au>Lupinacci, Paul</au><au>Nordyke, Robert J.</au><au>Berman, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><stitle>Adv Ther</stitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>806</spage><epage>825</epage><pages>806-825</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Introduction BT-001 (AspyreRx™) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective. Methods We modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature. Results From a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications. Conclusions BT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>38170435</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-0825</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-238X
ispartof Advances in therapy, 2024-02, Vol.41 (2), p.806-825
issn 0741-238X
1865-8652
1865-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10838832
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Cardiology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy
Endocrinology
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Original Research
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Prescriptions
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Rheumatology
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T12%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Prescription%20Digital%20Therapeutic%20in%20Type%C2%A02%20Diabetes&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Davison,%20Niall%20J.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=806&rft.epage=825&rft.pages=806-825&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2910189330%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2910189330&rft_id=info:pmid/38170435&rfr_iscdi=true