A Clinically Applicable Predictive Score in Lumbar Disc Disease for Formulating a Surgical Plan

Study Design Case control study Objective Micro-lumbar discectomy or Interbody fusion procedure are work-horse surgical procedures in management of lumbar disc disease. Spine surgeon in their early years of practice gets confused in choosing ideal surgical plan when dealing with a complex scenario....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global spine journal 2024-03, Vol.14 (2), p.676-686
Hauptverfasser: Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu, Moirangthem, Victor, Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam, Venkatesan, Muralidharan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 686
container_issue 2
container_start_page 676
container_title Global spine journal
container_volume 14
creator Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu
Moirangthem, Victor
Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam
Venkatesan, Muralidharan
description Study Design Case control study Objective Micro-lumbar discectomy or Interbody fusion procedure are work-horse surgical procedures in management of lumbar disc disease. Spine surgeon in their early years of practice gets confused in choosing ideal surgical plan when dealing with a complex scenario. A clinical score is needed to guide spine surgeons in choosing an optimal surgical plan. Materials and methods Study was done with research grant approval from AO Spine. A predictive score was formulated as per hypothesis following a pilot study. Two fellowship trained spine surgeons-one using the score (Group A) and other not using score (Group B-control) treated 40 patients included in their respective group. All patients were analysed preoperatively, post-surgery at 12 months follow-up with Visual analog scale score for back pain, leg pain, Oswestry disability index score, SF-36 score. Change in parameters at 12 months follow-up were analysed statistically. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Success rate of individual surgeon who managed respective group of patients and Difficulty index of surgeon who managed without using score was evaluated at 12 months follow-up. Results Success rate of Group A-surgeon was higher than Group B-surgeon .15% of Group B patients had poor surgical outcome at follow-up. Statistically significant improvement in Group A patients were seen in all 3 evaluated parameters when compared to Group B patients at 12 months of follow-up (P ≤ .05). Difficulty index of surgeon who didn’t use the score was 15%. Conclusion The proposed predictive score comprising all risk factors, can be used by spine surgeons when they are confronted with difficult scenario in decision-making. Accuracy, reliability and validity of the score needs to be evaluated in a larger scale. Level of evidence Ⅲ
doi_str_mv 10.1177/21925682221121093
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10802544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_21925682221121093</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2917184796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-abc087dd8e6637e27573a09ce5f5753d9d206f130af293e387957a45c8797e1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVFrHCEUhaW0NCHND-hLEfrSl029Our4VJZNkxQWGkjzLK5zZ2twZrY6E8i_r8Mm2zYlPuhBv3uuh0vIe2BnAFp_5mC4VDXnHIADM-IVOZ7vFlIZ9vqga35ETnO-Y2UprgXwt-RIKKhqacwxsUu6iqEP3sX4QJe7XSxyE5FeJ2yCH8M90hs_JKShp-up27hEz0P284YuI22HRC-G1E3RjaHfUkdvprSd_eh1dP078qZ1MePp43lCbi--_lhdLdbfL7-tluuFr8CMC7fxrNZNU6NSQiPXUgvHjEfZSi1FYxrOVAuCuZYbgaLWRmpXSV-ERmjECfmy991Nmw4bj_2YXLS7FDqXHuzggv33pQ8_7Xa4t8BqxmVVFYdPjw5p-DVhHm1XcmIsIXCYsuUatDIK9Ix-fIbeDVPqSz7LDWioK21UoWBP-TTknLA9_AaYnUdo_xthqfnwd4xDxdPACnC2B7Lb4p-2Lzv-BgY-ol0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2917184796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Clinically Applicable Predictive Score in Lumbar Disc Disease for Formulating a Surgical Plan</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu ; Moirangthem, Victor ; Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam ; Venkatesan, Muralidharan</creator><creatorcontrib>Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu ; Moirangthem, Victor ; Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam ; Venkatesan, Muralidharan</creatorcontrib><description>Study Design Case control study Objective Micro-lumbar discectomy or Interbody fusion procedure are work-horse surgical procedures in management of lumbar disc disease. Spine surgeon in their early years of practice gets confused in choosing ideal surgical plan when dealing with a complex scenario. A clinical score is needed to guide spine surgeons in choosing an optimal surgical plan. Materials and methods Study was done with research grant approval from AO Spine. A predictive score was formulated as per hypothesis following a pilot study. Two fellowship trained spine surgeons-one using the score (Group A) and other not using score (Group B-control) treated 40 patients included in their respective group. All patients were analysed preoperatively, post-surgery at 12 months follow-up with Visual analog scale score for back pain, leg pain, Oswestry disability index score, SF-36 score. Change in parameters at 12 months follow-up were analysed statistically. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Success rate of individual surgeon who managed respective group of patients and Difficulty index of surgeon who managed without using score was evaluated at 12 months follow-up. Results Success rate of Group A-surgeon was higher than Group B-surgeon .15% of Group B patients had poor surgical outcome at follow-up. Statistically significant improvement in Group A patients were seen in all 3 evaluated parameters when compared to Group B patients at 12 months of follow-up (P ≤ .05). Difficulty index of surgeon who didn’t use the score was 15%. Conclusion The proposed predictive score comprising all risk factors, can be used by spine surgeons when they are confronted with difficult scenario in decision-making. Accuracy, reliability and validity of the score needs to be evaluated in a larger scale. Level of evidence Ⅲ</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-5682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-5690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/21925682221121093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36148599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Original ; Surgeons</subject><ispartof>Global spine journal, 2024-03, Vol.14 (2), p.676-686</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 AO Spine, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-abc087dd8e6637e27573a09ce5f5753d9d206f130af293e387957a45c8797e1d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6524-7659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10802544/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10802544/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,21945,27830,27901,27902,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moirangthem, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesan, Muralidharan</creatorcontrib><title>A Clinically Applicable Predictive Score in Lumbar Disc Disease for Formulating a Surgical Plan</title><title>Global spine journal</title><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><description>Study Design Case control study Objective Micro-lumbar discectomy or Interbody fusion procedure are work-horse surgical procedures in management of lumbar disc disease. Spine surgeon in their early years of practice gets confused in choosing ideal surgical plan when dealing with a complex scenario. A clinical score is needed to guide spine surgeons in choosing an optimal surgical plan. Materials and methods Study was done with research grant approval from AO Spine. A predictive score was formulated as per hypothesis following a pilot study. Two fellowship trained spine surgeons-one using the score (Group A) and other not using score (Group B-control) treated 40 patients included in their respective group. All patients were analysed preoperatively, post-surgery at 12 months follow-up with Visual analog scale score for back pain, leg pain, Oswestry disability index score, SF-36 score. Change in parameters at 12 months follow-up were analysed statistically. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Success rate of individual surgeon who managed respective group of patients and Difficulty index of surgeon who managed without using score was evaluated at 12 months follow-up. Results Success rate of Group A-surgeon was higher than Group B-surgeon .15% of Group B patients had poor surgical outcome at follow-up. Statistically significant improvement in Group A patients were seen in all 3 evaluated parameters when compared to Group B patients at 12 months of follow-up (P ≤ .05). Difficulty index of surgeon who didn’t use the score was 15%. Conclusion The proposed predictive score comprising all risk factors, can be used by spine surgeons when they are confronted with difficult scenario in decision-making. Accuracy, reliability and validity of the score needs to be evaluated in a larger scale. Level of evidence Ⅲ</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><issn>2192-5682</issn><issn>2192-5690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVFrHCEUhaW0NCHND-hLEfrSl029Our4VJZNkxQWGkjzLK5zZ2twZrY6E8i_r8Mm2zYlPuhBv3uuh0vIe2BnAFp_5mC4VDXnHIADM-IVOZ7vFlIZ9vqga35ETnO-Y2UprgXwt-RIKKhqacwxsUu6iqEP3sX4QJe7XSxyE5FeJ2yCH8M90hs_JKShp-up27hEz0P284YuI22HRC-G1E3RjaHfUkdvprSd_eh1dP078qZ1MePp43lCbi--_lhdLdbfL7-tluuFr8CMC7fxrNZNU6NSQiPXUgvHjEfZSi1FYxrOVAuCuZYbgaLWRmpXSV-ERmjECfmy991Nmw4bj_2YXLS7FDqXHuzggv33pQ8_7Xa4t8BqxmVVFYdPjw5p-DVhHm1XcmIsIXCYsuUatDIK9Ix-fIbeDVPqSz7LDWioK21UoWBP-TTknLA9_AaYnUdo_xthqfnwd4xDxdPACnC2B7Lb4p-2Lzv-BgY-ol0</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu</creator><creator>Moirangthem, Victor</creator><creator>Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam</creator><creator>Venkatesan, Muralidharan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-7659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>A Clinically Applicable Predictive Score in Lumbar Disc Disease for Formulating a Surgical Plan</title><author>Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu ; Moirangthem, Victor ; Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam ; Venkatesan, Muralidharan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-abc087dd8e6637e27573a09ce5f5753d9d206f130af293e387957a45c8797e1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moirangthem, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesan, Muralidharan</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Subramaniam, Macherla Haribabu</au><au>Moirangthem, Victor</au><au>Ramakrishnan, Bala subramaniam</au><au>Venkatesan, Muralidharan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Clinically Applicable Predictive Score in Lumbar Disc Disease for Formulating a Surgical Plan</atitle><jtitle>Global spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Global Spine J</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>676</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>676-686</pages><issn>2192-5682</issn><eissn>2192-5690</eissn><abstract>Study Design Case control study Objective Micro-lumbar discectomy or Interbody fusion procedure are work-horse surgical procedures in management of lumbar disc disease. Spine surgeon in their early years of practice gets confused in choosing ideal surgical plan when dealing with a complex scenario. A clinical score is needed to guide spine surgeons in choosing an optimal surgical plan. Materials and methods Study was done with research grant approval from AO Spine. A predictive score was formulated as per hypothesis following a pilot study. Two fellowship trained spine surgeons-one using the score (Group A) and other not using score (Group B-control) treated 40 patients included in their respective group. All patients were analysed preoperatively, post-surgery at 12 months follow-up with Visual analog scale score for back pain, leg pain, Oswestry disability index score, SF-36 score. Change in parameters at 12 months follow-up were analysed statistically. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Success rate of individual surgeon who managed respective group of patients and Difficulty index of surgeon who managed without using score was evaluated at 12 months follow-up. Results Success rate of Group A-surgeon was higher than Group B-surgeon .15% of Group B patients had poor surgical outcome at follow-up. Statistically significant improvement in Group A patients were seen in all 3 evaluated parameters when compared to Group B patients at 12 months of follow-up (P ≤ .05). Difficulty index of surgeon who didn’t use the score was 15%. Conclusion The proposed predictive score comprising all risk factors, can be used by spine surgeons when they are confronted with difficult scenario in decision-making. Accuracy, reliability and validity of the score needs to be evaluated in a larger scale. Level of evidence Ⅲ</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36148599</pmid><doi>10.1177/21925682221121093</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-7659</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2192-5682
ispartof Global spine journal, 2024-03, Vol.14 (2), p.676-686
issn 2192-5682
2192-5690
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10802544
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
Surgeons
title A Clinically Applicable Predictive Score in Lumbar Disc Disease for Formulating a Surgical Plan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T11%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Clinically%20Applicable%20Predictive%20Score%20in%20Lumbar%20Disc%20Disease%20for%20Formulating%20a%20Surgical%20Plan&rft.jtitle=Global%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Subramaniam,%20Macherla%20Haribabu&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=676&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=676-686&rft.issn=2192-5682&rft.eissn=2192-5690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/21925682221121093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2917184796%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2917184796&rft_id=info:pmid/36148599&rft_sage_id=10.1177_21925682221121093&rfr_iscdi=true