Organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy

Purpose This study aimed to demonstrate the potential clinical applicability of an organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy. Methods This study included eleven consecutive patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy in 23 or 25 fractions. Daily and refer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2024-01, Vol.25 (1), p.e14220-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Kishigami, Yukako, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, Okamoto, Hiroyuki, Takahashi, Ayaka, Iramina, Hiraku, Sasaki, Makoto, Kawata, Kohei, Igaki, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e14220
container_title Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
container_volume 25
creator Kishigami, Yukako
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Okamoto, Hiroyuki
Takahashi, Ayaka
Iramina, Hiraku
Sasaki, Makoto
Kawata, Kohei
Igaki, Hiroshi
description Purpose This study aimed to demonstrate the potential clinical applicability of an organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy. Methods This study included eleven consecutive patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy in 23 or 25 fractions. Daily and reference magnetic resonance images were converted into mesh models. A weight‐based algorithm was implemented to optimize the distance between the mesh model vertices and surface of the reference model during the positioning process. Within the cost function, weight parameters were employed to prioritize specific organs for positioning. In this study, three scenarios with different weight parameters were prepared. The optimal translation and rotation values for the cervix and uterus were determined based on the calculated translations alone or in combination with rotations, with a rotation limit of ±3°. Subsequently, the coverage probabilities of the following two planning target volumes (PTV), an isotropic 5 mm and anisotropic margins derived from a previous study, were evaluated. Results The percentage of translations exceeding 10 mm varied from 9% to 18% depending on the scenario. For small PTV sizes, more than 80% of all fractions had a coverage of 80% or higher. In contrast, for large PTV sizes, more than 90% of all fractions had a coverage of 95% or higher. The difference between the median coverage with translational positioning alone and that with both translational and rotational positioning was 1% or less. Conclusion This algorithm facilitates quantitative positioning by utilizing a cost function that prioritizes organs for positioning. Consequently, consistent displacement values were algorithmically generated. This study also revealed that the impact of rotational corrections, limited to ±3°, on PTV coverage was minimal.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.14220
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10795436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A796715607</galeid><sourcerecordid>A796715607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4750-62ff4a7fce36be18ccea680d7eb8458f1fca5dd8439b4bf7be99940b4c670f7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQjRAVLYULH4AicUGVdrEdx45PaLWigFRUIcHZcuxx1lViL05StDc-gW_kS5iStiockA8ee968eTOvKF5QsqaEsDfGDmxNOWPkUXFCayZWSlH--EF8XDwdxytCKG2q5klxXEmluFD8pPh8mTsTf_34aVOc0pwxcjlcQyzNPCV8DWayuxC70vRdymHaDWWIZRhMB5jt5uDAldm4kKYdZLM_PCuOvOlHeH57nxZfz9992X5YXVy-_7jdXKwslzVZCeY9N9JbqEQLtLEWjGiIk9A2vG489dbUzjW8Ui1vvWxBoWbScisk8dJUp8XbhXc_twM4C3HKptf7jNryQScT9N-ZGHa6S9eaEqlqXglkeH3LkNO3GcZJD2G00PcmQppHzRrFFGrhFKGv_oFe4bIizqeZorXCvfIKUesF1ZkedIg-YWOLx8EQcMHgA_5vpBKS1oJILDhbCmxO45jB38unRN94q2-81X-8RfDLhwPfQ-_MRABdAN-xzeE_VHqz_cQW0t_bfrPq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2915918343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Wiley</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Kishigami, Yukako ; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ; Okamoto, Hiroyuki ; Takahashi, Ayaka ; Iramina, Hiraku ; Sasaki, Makoto ; Kawata, Kohei ; Igaki, Hiroshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kishigami, Yukako ; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ; Okamoto, Hiroyuki ; Takahashi, Ayaka ; Iramina, Hiraku ; Sasaki, Makoto ; Kawata, Kohei ; Igaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study aimed to demonstrate the potential clinical applicability of an organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy. Methods This study included eleven consecutive patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy in 23 or 25 fractions. Daily and reference magnetic resonance images were converted into mesh models. A weight‐based algorithm was implemented to optimize the distance between the mesh model vertices and surface of the reference model during the positioning process. Within the cost function, weight parameters were employed to prioritize specific organs for positioning. In this study, three scenarios with different weight parameters were prepared. The optimal translation and rotation values for the cervix and uterus were determined based on the calculated translations alone or in combination with rotations, with a rotation limit of ±3°. Subsequently, the coverage probabilities of the following two planning target volumes (PTV), an isotropic 5 mm and anisotropic margins derived from a previous study, were evaluated. Results The percentage of translations exceeding 10 mm varied from 9% to 18% depending on the scenario. For small PTV sizes, more than 80% of all fractions had a coverage of 80% or higher. In contrast, for large PTV sizes, more than 90% of all fractions had a coverage of 95% or higher. The difference between the median coverage with translational positioning alone and that with both translational and rotational positioning was 1% or less. Conclusion This algorithm facilitates quantitative positioning by utilizing a cost function that prioritizes organs for positioning. Consequently, consistent displacement values were algorithmically generated. This study also revealed that the impact of rotational corrections, limited to ±3°, on PTV coverage was minimal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14220</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37994694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Anisotropy ; Automation ; Cancer therapies ; Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Female ; Humans ; inter‐observer variability ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Optimization ; organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching ; Patients ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; soft‐tissue ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2024-01, Vol.25 (1), p.e14220-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4750-62ff4a7fce36be18ccea680d7eb8458f1fca5dd8439b4bf7be99940b4c670f7a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7825-2986 ; 0000-0001-9491-787X ; 0000-0003-4059-7932</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795436/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795436/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37994694$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kishigami, Yukako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iramina, Hiraku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawata, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><title>Organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy</title><title>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose This study aimed to demonstrate the potential clinical applicability of an organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy. Methods This study included eleven consecutive patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy in 23 or 25 fractions. Daily and reference magnetic resonance images were converted into mesh models. A weight‐based algorithm was implemented to optimize the distance between the mesh model vertices and surface of the reference model during the positioning process. Within the cost function, weight parameters were employed to prioritize specific organs for positioning. In this study, three scenarios with different weight parameters were prepared. The optimal translation and rotation values for the cervix and uterus were determined based on the calculated translations alone or in combination with rotations, with a rotation limit of ±3°. Subsequently, the coverage probabilities of the following two planning target volumes (PTV), an isotropic 5 mm and anisotropic margins derived from a previous study, were evaluated. Results The percentage of translations exceeding 10 mm varied from 9% to 18% depending on the scenario. For small PTV sizes, more than 80% of all fractions had a coverage of 80% or higher. In contrast, for large PTV sizes, more than 90% of all fractions had a coverage of 95% or higher. The difference between the median coverage with translational positioning alone and that with both translational and rotational positioning was 1% or less. Conclusion This algorithm facilitates quantitative positioning by utilizing a cost function that prioritizes organs for positioning. Consequently, consistent displacement values were algorithmically generated. This study also revealed that the impact of rotational corrections, limited to ±3°, on PTV coverage was minimal.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inter‐observer variability</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>soft‐tissue</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQjRAVLYULH4AicUGVdrEdx45PaLWigFRUIcHZcuxx1lViL05StDc-gW_kS5iStiockA8ee968eTOvKF5QsqaEsDfGDmxNOWPkUXFCayZWSlH--EF8XDwdxytCKG2q5klxXEmluFD8pPh8mTsTf_34aVOc0pwxcjlcQyzNPCV8DWayuxC70vRdymHaDWWIZRhMB5jt5uDAldm4kKYdZLM_PCuOvOlHeH57nxZfz9992X5YXVy-_7jdXKwslzVZCeY9N9JbqEQLtLEWjGiIk9A2vG489dbUzjW8Ui1vvWxBoWbScisk8dJUp8XbhXc_twM4C3HKptf7jNryQScT9N-ZGHa6S9eaEqlqXglkeH3LkNO3GcZJD2G00PcmQppHzRrFFGrhFKGv_oFe4bIizqeZorXCvfIKUesF1ZkedIg-YWOLx8EQcMHgA_5vpBKS1oJILDhbCmxO45jB38unRN94q2-81X-8RfDLhwPfQ-_MRABdAN-xzeE_VHqz_cQW0t_bfrPq</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Kishigami, Yukako</creator><creator>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</creator><creator>Okamoto, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Takahashi, Ayaka</creator><creator>Iramina, Hiraku</creator><creator>Sasaki, Makoto</creator><creator>Kawata, Kohei</creator><creator>Igaki, Hiroshi</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-2986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-787X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-7932</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy</title><author>Kishigami, Yukako ; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ; Okamoto, Hiroyuki ; Takahashi, Ayaka ; Iramina, Hiraku ; Sasaki, Makoto ; Kawata, Kohei ; Igaki, Hiroshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4750-62ff4a7fce36be18ccea680d7eb8458f1fca5dd8439b4bf7be99940b4c670f7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inter‐observer variability</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>soft‐tissue</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kishigami, Yukako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Ayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iramina, Hiraku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawata, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kishigami, Yukako</au><au>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</au><au>Okamoto, Hiroyuki</au><au>Takahashi, Ayaka</au><au>Iramina, Hiraku</au><au>Sasaki, Makoto</au><au>Kawata, Kohei</au><au>Igaki, Hiroshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e14220</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14220-n/a</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study aimed to demonstrate the potential clinical applicability of an organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy. Methods This study included eleven consecutive patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy in 23 or 25 fractions. Daily and reference magnetic resonance images were converted into mesh models. A weight‐based algorithm was implemented to optimize the distance between the mesh model vertices and surface of the reference model during the positioning process. Within the cost function, weight parameters were employed to prioritize specific organs for positioning. In this study, three scenarios with different weight parameters were prepared. The optimal translation and rotation values for the cervix and uterus were determined based on the calculated translations alone or in combination with rotations, with a rotation limit of ±3°. Subsequently, the coverage probabilities of the following two planning target volumes (PTV), an isotropic 5 mm and anisotropic margins derived from a previous study, were evaluated. Results The percentage of translations exceeding 10 mm varied from 9% to 18% depending on the scenario. For small PTV sizes, more than 80% of all fractions had a coverage of 80% or higher. In contrast, for large PTV sizes, more than 90% of all fractions had a coverage of 95% or higher. The difference between the median coverage with translational positioning alone and that with both translational and rotational positioning was 1% or less. Conclusion This algorithm facilitates quantitative positioning by utilizing a cost function that prioritizes organs for positioning. Consequently, consistent displacement values were algorithmically generated. This study also revealed that the impact of rotational corrections, limited to ±3°, on PTV coverage was minimal.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37994694</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.14220</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-2986</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-787X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-7932</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2024-01, Vol.25 (1), p.e14220-n/a
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10795436
source Electronic Journals Library; Open Access: PubMed Central; Wiley; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Open Access
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Anisotropy
Automation
Cancer therapies
Cervical cancer
Cervix
Female
Humans
inter‐observer variability
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Optimization
organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching
Patients
Radiation Oncology Physics
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
soft‐tissue
Uterus
title Organ‐contour‐driven auto‐matching algorithm in image‐guided radiotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T09%3A21%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organ%E2%80%90contour%E2%80%90driven%20auto%E2%80%90matching%20algorithm%20in%20image%E2%80%90guided%20radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Clinical%20Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Kishigami,%20Yukako&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e14220&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14220-n/a&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.14220&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA796715607%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2915918343&rft_id=info:pmid/37994694&rft_galeid=A796715607&rfr_iscdi=true