Eyespot variation and field temperature in the Meadow Brown butterfly

Since the classic work of E.B. Ford, explanations for eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly have focused on the role of genetic polymorphism. The potential role of thermal plasticity in this classic example of natural selection has therefore been overlooked. Here, we use large daily field...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology and Evolution 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e10842-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Mowbray, Sophie, Bennie, Jonathan, Rhodes, Marcus W., Smith, David A. S., ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e10842
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 14
creator Mowbray, Sophie
Bennie, Jonathan
Rhodes, Marcus W.
Smith, David A. S.
ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.
description Since the classic work of E.B. Ford, explanations for eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly have focused on the role of genetic polymorphism. The potential role of thermal plasticity in this classic example of natural selection has therefore been overlooked. Here, we use large daily field collections of butterflies from three sites, over multiple years, to examine whether field temperature is correlated with eyespot variation, using the same presence/absence scoring as Ford. We show that higher developmental temperature in the field leads to the disappearance of the spots visible while the butterfly is at rest, explaining the historical observation that hindwing spotting declines across the season. Strikingly, females developing at 11°C have a median of six spots and those developing at 15°C only have three. In contrast, the large forewing eyespot is always present and scales with forewing length. Furthermore, in contrast to the smaller spots, the size of the large forewing spot is best explained by calendar date (days since 1st March) rather than the temperature at pupation. As this large forewing spot is involved in startling predators and/or sexual selection, its constant presence is therefore likely required for defence, whereas the disappearance of the smaller spots over the season may help with female crypsis. We model annual total spot variation with phenological data from the UK and derive predictions as to how spot patterns will continue to change, predicting that female spotting will decrease year on year as our climate warms. Eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly has been held up as a classic example of a genetic polymorphism. Here we show that eyespot variation in the United Kingdom is correlated with field temperatures during larval/pupal development and predict that warmer summers will lead to less spotting. This suggests that thermal plasticity plays a strong role in this system.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.10842
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10794081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A792425596</galeid><sourcerecordid>A792425596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-25b770b4bf7e22b783154f51d9a283030ad259e403d528d1cb01529b55cf05403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EolXphR-AInFBSFv8GccnVFbhQyriAmfLicetq8RebKer_fd4SakKB-yDR_Yz78z4ReglwRcEY_oORmA16jh9gk4p5mIjpeiePopP0HnOt7iuFlOO5XN0wjrKRA1PUd8fIO9iae5M8qb4GBoTbOM8TLYpMO8gmbIkaHxoyg00X8HYuG8-pLgPzbCUAslNhxfomTNThvP78wz9-Nh_337eXH379GV7ebUZOZd0Q8UgJR744CRQOsiOEcGdIFYZ2jHMsLFUKOCYWUE7S8YBE0HVIMTocO2XnaH3q-5uGWawI4SSzKR3yc8mHXQ0Xv_9EvyNvo53mmCpOO5IVXhzr5DizwVy0bPPI0yTCRCXrKkibf0Y0oqKvv4HvY1LCnW-I6XaKtmqSl2s1LWZQPvgYi081m1h9mMM4Hy9v5SKciqEamvC2zVhTDHnBO6hfYL10VJ9tFT_trTCrx4P_ID-MbACZAX2tczhP1K63_ZsFf0FwFGpFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919607969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eyespot variation and field temperature in the Meadow Brown butterfly</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mowbray, Sophie ; Bennie, Jonathan ; Rhodes, Marcus W. ; Smith, David A. S. ; ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mowbray, Sophie ; Bennie, Jonathan ; Rhodes, Marcus W. ; Smith, David A. S. ; ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><description>Since the classic work of E.B. Ford, explanations for eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly have focused on the role of genetic polymorphism. The potential role of thermal plasticity in this classic example of natural selection has therefore been overlooked. Here, we use large daily field collections of butterflies from three sites, over multiple years, to examine whether field temperature is correlated with eyespot variation, using the same presence/absence scoring as Ford. We show that higher developmental temperature in the field leads to the disappearance of the spots visible while the butterfly is at rest, explaining the historical observation that hindwing spotting declines across the season. Strikingly, females developing at 11°C have a median of six spots and those developing at 15°C only have three. In contrast, the large forewing eyespot is always present and scales with forewing length. Furthermore, in contrast to the smaller spots, the size of the large forewing spot is best explained by calendar date (days since 1st March) rather than the temperature at pupation. As this large forewing spot is involved in startling predators and/or sexual selection, its constant presence is therefore likely required for defence, whereas the disappearance of the smaller spots over the season may help with female crypsis. We model annual total spot variation with phenological data from the UK and derive predictions as to how spot patterns will continue to change, predicting that female spotting will decrease year on year as our climate warms. Eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly has been held up as a classic example of a genetic polymorphism. Here we show that eyespot variation in the United Kingdom is correlated with field temperatures during larval/pupal development and predict that warmer summers will lead to less spotting. This suggests that thermal plasticity plays a strong role in this system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10842</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38235407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Butterflies ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; butterfly ; Crypsis ; Ecological Genetics ; Eyespot ; Females ; Ford, E.B ; Gene polymorphism ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic polymorphisms ; Laboratories ; Meadows ; Natural selection ; phenotypic plasticity ; Polymorphism ; Predators ; Predictions ; Pupation ; Seasons ; Sexual selection ; Temperature ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Ecology and Evolution, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e10842-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-25b770b4bf7e22b783154f51d9a283030ad259e403d528d1cb01529b55cf05403</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5385-9888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10794081/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10794081/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,1412,11543,27905,27906,45555,45556,46033,46457,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38235407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mowbray, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennie, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Marcus W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><title>Eyespot variation and field temperature in the Meadow Brown butterfly</title><title>Ecology and Evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Since the classic work of E.B. Ford, explanations for eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly have focused on the role of genetic polymorphism. The potential role of thermal plasticity in this classic example of natural selection has therefore been overlooked. Here, we use large daily field collections of butterflies from three sites, over multiple years, to examine whether field temperature is correlated with eyespot variation, using the same presence/absence scoring as Ford. We show that higher developmental temperature in the field leads to the disappearance of the spots visible while the butterfly is at rest, explaining the historical observation that hindwing spotting declines across the season. Strikingly, females developing at 11°C have a median of six spots and those developing at 15°C only have three. In contrast, the large forewing eyespot is always present and scales with forewing length. Furthermore, in contrast to the smaller spots, the size of the large forewing spot is best explained by calendar date (days since 1st March) rather than the temperature at pupation. As this large forewing spot is involved in startling predators and/or sexual selection, its constant presence is therefore likely required for defence, whereas the disappearance of the smaller spots over the season may help with female crypsis. We model annual total spot variation with phenological data from the UK and derive predictions as to how spot patterns will continue to change, predicting that female spotting will decrease year on year as our climate warms. Eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly has been held up as a classic example of a genetic polymorphism. Here we show that eyespot variation in the United Kingdom is correlated with field temperatures during larval/pupal development and predict that warmer summers will lead to less spotting. This suggests that thermal plasticity plays a strong role in this system.</description><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>butterfly</subject><subject>Crypsis</subject><subject>Ecological Genetics</subject><subject>Eyespot</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Ford, E.B</subject><subject>Gene polymorphism</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic polymorphisms</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Pupation</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EolXphR-AInFBSFv8GccnVFbhQyriAmfLicetq8RebKer_fd4SakKB-yDR_Yz78z4ReglwRcEY_oORmA16jh9gk4p5mIjpeiePopP0HnOt7iuFlOO5XN0wjrKRA1PUd8fIO9iae5M8qb4GBoTbOM8TLYpMO8gmbIkaHxoyg00X8HYuG8-pLgPzbCUAslNhxfomTNThvP78wz9-Nh_337eXH379GV7ebUZOZd0Q8UgJR744CRQOsiOEcGdIFYZ2jHMsLFUKOCYWUE7S8YBE0HVIMTocO2XnaH3q-5uGWawI4SSzKR3yc8mHXQ0Xv_9EvyNvo53mmCpOO5IVXhzr5DizwVy0bPPI0yTCRCXrKkibf0Y0oqKvv4HvY1LCnW-I6XaKtmqSl2s1LWZQPvgYi081m1h9mMM4Hy9v5SKciqEamvC2zVhTDHnBO6hfYL10VJ9tFT_trTCrx4P_ID-MbACZAX2tczhP1K63_ZsFf0FwFGpFA</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Mowbray, Sophie</creator><creator>Bennie, Jonathan</creator><creator>Rhodes, Marcus W.</creator><creator>Smith, David A. S.</creator><creator>ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-9888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Eyespot variation and field temperature in the Meadow Brown butterfly</title><author>Mowbray, Sophie ; Bennie, Jonathan ; Rhodes, Marcus W. ; Smith, David A. S. ; ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-25b770b4bf7e22b783154f51d9a283030ad259e403d528d1cb01529b55cf05403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>butterfly</topic><topic>Crypsis</topic><topic>Ecological Genetics</topic><topic>Eyespot</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Ford, E.B</topic><topic>Gene polymorphism</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic polymorphisms</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Pupation</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mowbray, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennie, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Marcus W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mowbray, Sophie</au><au>Bennie, Jonathan</au><au>Rhodes, Marcus W.</au><au>Smith, David A. S.</au><au>ffrench‐Constant, Richard H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eyespot variation and field temperature in the Meadow Brown butterfly</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e10842</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10842-n/a</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Since the classic work of E.B. Ford, explanations for eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly have focused on the role of genetic polymorphism. The potential role of thermal plasticity in this classic example of natural selection has therefore been overlooked. Here, we use large daily field collections of butterflies from three sites, over multiple years, to examine whether field temperature is correlated with eyespot variation, using the same presence/absence scoring as Ford. We show that higher developmental temperature in the field leads to the disappearance of the spots visible while the butterfly is at rest, explaining the historical observation that hindwing spotting declines across the season. Strikingly, females developing at 11°C have a median of six spots and those developing at 15°C only have three. In contrast, the large forewing eyespot is always present and scales with forewing length. Furthermore, in contrast to the smaller spots, the size of the large forewing spot is best explained by calendar date (days since 1st March) rather than the temperature at pupation. As this large forewing spot is involved in startling predators and/or sexual selection, its constant presence is therefore likely required for defence, whereas the disappearance of the smaller spots over the season may help with female crypsis. We model annual total spot variation with phenological data from the UK and derive predictions as to how spot patterns will continue to change, predicting that female spotting will decrease year on year as our climate warms. Eyespot variation in the Meadow Brown butterfly has been held up as a classic example of a genetic polymorphism. Here we show that eyespot variation in the United Kingdom is correlated with field temperatures during larval/pupal development and predict that warmer summers will lead to less spotting. This suggests that thermal plasticity plays a strong role in this system.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38235407</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.10842</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-9888</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and Evolution, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e10842-n/a
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10794081
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Butterflies
Butterflies & moths
butterfly
Crypsis
Ecological Genetics
Eyespot
Females
Ford, E.B
Gene polymorphism
Genetic aspects
Genetic polymorphisms
Laboratories
Meadows
Natural selection
phenotypic plasticity
Polymorphism
Predators
Predictions
Pupation
Seasons
Sexual selection
Temperature
Variation
title Eyespot variation and field temperature in the Meadow Brown butterfly
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A16%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eyespot%20variation%20and%20field%20temperature%20in%20the%20Meadow%20Brown%20butterfly&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20Evolution&rft.au=Mowbray,%20Sophie&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e10842&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10842-n/a&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.10842&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA792425596%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919607969&rft_id=info:pmid/38235407&rft_galeid=A792425596&rfr_iscdi=true