Magnetic resonance imaging of pilonidal sinus disease: interobserver agreement and practical MRI reporting tips

Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement for the features of natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and propose a standardized checklist for reporting PSD on MRI. Materials and methods Forty MRI studies of 39 discrete patients with PSD were retrospecti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.115-125
Hauptverfasser: Abdelatty, Mohamed A., Elmansy, Noha, Saleh, Mahmoud M., Salem, Amany, Ahmed, Sara, Gadalla, Amr A., Osman, Mohamed F., Mohamed, Shady
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title European radiology
container_volume 34
creator Abdelatty, Mohamed A.
Elmansy, Noha
Saleh, Mahmoud M.
Salem, Amany
Ahmed, Sara
Gadalla, Amr A.
Osman, Mohamed F.
Mohamed, Shady
description Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement for the features of natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and propose a standardized checklist for reporting PSD on MRI. Materials and methods Forty MRI studies of 39 discrete patients with PSD were retrospectively evaluated by five independent radiologists using a standardized checklist. Fleiss’ Kappa ( k ) coefficients of agreement were used to test the agreement between categorical variables. The MRI features of the natal cleft sepsis associated with PSD were classified into four main categories: morphology, branching and extensions, external skin openings, and the relationship of the PSD to the coccyx. A survey was created and disseminated online among general surgeons who treat patients with PSD to assess the relevance of the MRI features proposed in the standardized checklist. Results The overall agreement regarding the identification of morphology of the natal cleft sepsis was moderate ( k  = 0.59). Lateral and caudal extensions interobserver agreement was substantial ( k  = 0.64 and 0.71, respectively). However, the overall agreement regarding the individual parts of anal sphincter involved was moderate ( k  = 0.47). Substantial interobserver agreement was found in assessing the proximity of the PSD to the coccyx ( k  = 0.62). Conclusion Preoperative MRI can delineate the extensions and branching of PSD with substantial agreement. MRI is superior in describing the deep extensions of PSD with better reliability than assessing the number and locations of the external openings. Expert consensus agreement is needed to establish the MRI features necessary for optimal reporting of PSD. Clinical relevance statement MRI can offer valuable information about the extent of sepsis associated with pilonidal sinus disease, particularly in cases with involvement of critical anatomical structures such as the coccyx and anal triangle. MRI can potentially contribute to more accurate patient stratification and surgical planning. Key Points • The interobserver agreement for assessing PSD’s lateral and caudal extension on MRI is substantial. • MRI can describe deep extensions and branching of PSD with superior reliability than assessing the number and site of external openings. • Reporting the relationship between natal cleft sepsis in PSD and the anal region may influence the surgical approach and postoperative healing.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-023-10018-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10791724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2850311322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-baf1a094158ec11e5bfeb9f9a151f895870c65071cec12fa1d091c5cb06a332d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERX_gBVggS2zYhM7Y8XXCBqEKSqVWSAjWluNMgqtcO9hJJd4eX24pbRes7NGc-WaODmMvEd4igD7NAFJCBUJWpcamEk_YEdZSlLKpn977H7LjnK8BoMVaP2OHUqvNRmh5xOKVHQMt3vFEOQYbHHG_taMPI48Dn_0Ug-_txLMPa-a9z2QzveM-LJRilyndUOJ2TERbCgu3oedzsq4Qy9DV14vCnWNadrzFz_k5OxjslOnF7XvCvn_6-O3sc3X55fzi7MNl5WqtlqqzA1poa1QNOURS3UBdO7QWFQ5NqxoNbqNAoyttMVjsizWnXAcbK6Xo5Ql7v-fOa7el3pXbkp3MnIq59MtE683DTvA_zBhvDIJuUYu6EN7cElL8uVJezNZnR9NkA8U1G9EokIhSiCJ9_Uh6HdcUij8jWlS1bAU0RSX2KpdizomGu2sQzC5Qsw_UlEDNn0DNDv3qvo-7kb8JFoHcC3JphZHSv93_wf4GfAWtrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2915439208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of pilonidal sinus disease: interobserver agreement and practical MRI reporting tips</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Abdelatty, Mohamed A. ; Elmansy, Noha ; Saleh, Mahmoud M. ; Salem, Amany ; Ahmed, Sara ; Gadalla, Amr A. ; Osman, Mohamed F. ; Mohamed, Shady</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdelatty, Mohamed A. ; Elmansy, Noha ; Saleh, Mahmoud M. ; Salem, Amany ; Ahmed, Sara ; Gadalla, Amr A. ; Osman, Mohamed F. ; Mohamed, Shady</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement for the features of natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and propose a standardized checklist for reporting PSD on MRI. Materials and methods Forty MRI studies of 39 discrete patients with PSD were retrospectively evaluated by five independent radiologists using a standardized checklist. Fleiss’ Kappa ( k ) coefficients of agreement were used to test the agreement between categorical variables. The MRI features of the natal cleft sepsis associated with PSD were classified into four main categories: morphology, branching and extensions, external skin openings, and the relationship of the PSD to the coccyx. A survey was created and disseminated online among general surgeons who treat patients with PSD to assess the relevance of the MRI features proposed in the standardized checklist. Results The overall agreement regarding the identification of morphology of the natal cleft sepsis was moderate ( k  = 0.59). Lateral and caudal extensions interobserver agreement was substantial ( k  = 0.64 and 0.71, respectively). However, the overall agreement regarding the individual parts of anal sphincter involved was moderate ( k  = 0.47). Substantial interobserver agreement was found in assessing the proximity of the PSD to the coccyx ( k  = 0.62). Conclusion Preoperative MRI can delineate the extensions and branching of PSD with substantial agreement. MRI is superior in describing the deep extensions of PSD with better reliability than assessing the number and locations of the external openings. Expert consensus agreement is needed to establish the MRI features necessary for optimal reporting of PSD. Clinical relevance statement MRI can offer valuable information about the extent of sepsis associated with pilonidal sinus disease, particularly in cases with involvement of critical anatomical structures such as the coccyx and anal triangle. MRI can potentially contribute to more accurate patient stratification and surgical planning. Key Points • The interobserver agreement for assessing PSD’s lateral and caudal extension on MRI is substantial. • MRI can describe deep extensions and branching of PSD with superior reliability than assessing the number and site of external openings. • Reporting the relationship between natal cleft sepsis in PSD and the anal region may influence the surgical approach and postoperative healing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10018-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37566273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Check lists ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Magnetic Resonance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Morphology ; Neuroradiology ; Observer Variation ; Pilonidal Sinus - diagnostic imaging ; Pilonidal Sinus - surgery ; Radiology ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Sepsis ; Sinuses ; Sphincter ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.115-125</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-baf1a094158ec11e5bfeb9f9a151f895870c65071cec12fa1d091c5cb06a332d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-baf1a094158ec11e5bfeb9f9a151f895870c65071cec12fa1d091c5cb06a332d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2740-4657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-023-10018-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-023-10018-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37566273$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdelatty, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmansy, Noha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Mahmoud M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salem, Amany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadalla, Amr A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohamed F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Shady</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of pilonidal sinus disease: interobserver agreement and practical MRI reporting tips</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement for the features of natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and propose a standardized checklist for reporting PSD on MRI. Materials and methods Forty MRI studies of 39 discrete patients with PSD were retrospectively evaluated by five independent radiologists using a standardized checklist. Fleiss’ Kappa ( k ) coefficients of agreement were used to test the agreement between categorical variables. The MRI features of the natal cleft sepsis associated with PSD were classified into four main categories: morphology, branching and extensions, external skin openings, and the relationship of the PSD to the coccyx. A survey was created and disseminated online among general surgeons who treat patients with PSD to assess the relevance of the MRI features proposed in the standardized checklist. Results The overall agreement regarding the identification of morphology of the natal cleft sepsis was moderate ( k  = 0.59). Lateral and caudal extensions interobserver agreement was substantial ( k  = 0.64 and 0.71, respectively). However, the overall agreement regarding the individual parts of anal sphincter involved was moderate ( k  = 0.47). Substantial interobserver agreement was found in assessing the proximity of the PSD to the coccyx ( k  = 0.62). Conclusion Preoperative MRI can delineate the extensions and branching of PSD with substantial agreement. MRI is superior in describing the deep extensions of PSD with better reliability than assessing the number and locations of the external openings. Expert consensus agreement is needed to establish the MRI features necessary for optimal reporting of PSD. Clinical relevance statement MRI can offer valuable information about the extent of sepsis associated with pilonidal sinus disease, particularly in cases with involvement of critical anatomical structures such as the coccyx and anal triangle. MRI can potentially contribute to more accurate patient stratification and surgical planning. Key Points • The interobserver agreement for assessing PSD’s lateral and caudal extension on MRI is substantial. • MRI can describe deep extensions and branching of PSD with superior reliability than assessing the number and site of external openings. • Reporting the relationship between natal cleft sepsis in PSD and the anal region may influence the surgical approach and postoperative healing.</description><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Pilonidal Sinus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pilonidal Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Sphincter</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1432-1084</issn><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERX_gBVggS2zYhM7Y8XXCBqEKSqVWSAjWluNMgqtcO9hJJd4eX24pbRes7NGc-WaODmMvEd4igD7NAFJCBUJWpcamEk_YEdZSlLKpn977H7LjnK8BoMVaP2OHUqvNRmh5xOKVHQMt3vFEOQYbHHG_taMPI48Dn_0Ug-_txLMPa-a9z2QzveM-LJRilyndUOJ2TERbCgu3oedzsq4Qy9DV14vCnWNadrzFz_k5OxjslOnF7XvCvn_6-O3sc3X55fzi7MNl5WqtlqqzA1poa1QNOURS3UBdO7QWFQ5NqxoNbqNAoyttMVjsizWnXAcbK6Xo5Ql7v-fOa7el3pXbkp3MnIq59MtE683DTvA_zBhvDIJuUYu6EN7cElL8uVJezNZnR9NkA8U1G9EokIhSiCJ9_Uh6HdcUij8jWlS1bAU0RSX2KpdizomGu2sQzC5Qsw_UlEDNn0DNDv3qvo-7kb8JFoHcC3JphZHSv93_wf4GfAWtrg</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Abdelatty, Mohamed A.</creator><creator>Elmansy, Noha</creator><creator>Saleh, Mahmoud M.</creator><creator>Salem, Amany</creator><creator>Ahmed, Sara</creator><creator>Gadalla, Amr A.</creator><creator>Osman, Mohamed F.</creator><creator>Mohamed, Shady</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-4657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of pilonidal sinus disease: interobserver agreement and practical MRI reporting tips</title><author>Abdelatty, Mohamed A. ; Elmansy, Noha ; Saleh, Mahmoud M. ; Salem, Amany ; Ahmed, Sara ; Gadalla, Amr A. ; Osman, Mohamed F. ; Mohamed, Shady</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-baf1a094158ec11e5bfeb9f9a151f895870c65071cec12fa1d091c5cb06a332d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Pilonidal Sinus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pilonidal Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Sphincter</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdelatty, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmansy, Noha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Mahmoud M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salem, Amany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadalla, Amr A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohamed F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Shady</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdelatty, Mohamed A.</au><au>Elmansy, Noha</au><au>Saleh, Mahmoud M.</au><au>Salem, Amany</au><au>Ahmed, Sara</au><au>Gadalla, Amr A.</au><au>Osman, Mohamed F.</au><au>Mohamed, Shady</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging of pilonidal sinus disease: interobserver agreement and practical MRI reporting tips</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>115-125</pages><issn>1432-1084</issn><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement for the features of natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and propose a standardized checklist for reporting PSD on MRI. Materials and methods Forty MRI studies of 39 discrete patients with PSD were retrospectively evaluated by five independent radiologists using a standardized checklist. Fleiss’ Kappa ( k ) coefficients of agreement were used to test the agreement between categorical variables. The MRI features of the natal cleft sepsis associated with PSD were classified into four main categories: morphology, branching and extensions, external skin openings, and the relationship of the PSD to the coccyx. A survey was created and disseminated online among general surgeons who treat patients with PSD to assess the relevance of the MRI features proposed in the standardized checklist. Results The overall agreement regarding the identification of morphology of the natal cleft sepsis was moderate ( k  = 0.59). Lateral and caudal extensions interobserver agreement was substantial ( k  = 0.64 and 0.71, respectively). However, the overall agreement regarding the individual parts of anal sphincter involved was moderate ( k  = 0.47). Substantial interobserver agreement was found in assessing the proximity of the PSD to the coccyx ( k  = 0.62). Conclusion Preoperative MRI can delineate the extensions and branching of PSD with substantial agreement. MRI is superior in describing the deep extensions of PSD with better reliability than assessing the number and locations of the external openings. Expert consensus agreement is needed to establish the MRI features necessary for optimal reporting of PSD. Clinical relevance statement MRI can offer valuable information about the extent of sepsis associated with pilonidal sinus disease, particularly in cases with involvement of critical anatomical structures such as the coccyx and anal triangle. MRI can potentially contribute to more accurate patient stratification and surgical planning. Key Points • The interobserver agreement for assessing PSD’s lateral and caudal extension on MRI is substantial. • MRI can describe deep extensions and branching of PSD with superior reliability than assessing the number and site of external openings. • Reporting the relationship between natal cleft sepsis in PSD and the anal region may influence the surgical approach and postoperative healing.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37566273</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-023-10018-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-4657</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-1084
ispartof European radiology, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.115-125
issn 1432-1084
0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10791724
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Check lists
Diagnostic Radiology
Evaluation
Humans
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Magnetic Resonance
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morphology
Neuroradiology
Observer Variation
Pilonidal Sinus - diagnostic imaging
Pilonidal Sinus - surgery
Radiology
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sepsis
Sinuses
Sphincter
Ultrasound
title Magnetic resonance imaging of pilonidal sinus disease: interobserver agreement and practical MRI reporting tips
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A56%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20of%20pilonidal%20sinus%20disease:%20interobserver%20agreement%20and%20practical%20MRI%20reporting%20tips&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Abdelatty,%20Mohamed%20A.&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=115-125&rft.issn=1432-1084&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-023-10018-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2850311322%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2915439208&rft_id=info:pmid/37566273&rfr_iscdi=true