Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY

Background: Cerebral edema is a secondary complication of acute ischemic stroke, but its time course and imaging markers are not fully understood. Recently, net water uptake (NWU) has been proposed as a novel marker of edema. Aims: Studying the RHAPSODY trial cohort, we sought to characterize the ti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of stroke 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.68-75
Hauptverfasser: Schleicher, Riana L, Vorasayan, Pongpat, McCabe, Megan E, Bevers, Matthew B, Davis, Thomas P, Griffin, John H, Hinduja, Archana, Jadhav, Ashutosh P, Lee, Jin-Moo, Sawyer, Robert N, Zlokovic, Berislav V, Sheth, Kevin N, Fedler, Janel K, Lyden, Patrick, Kimberly, W Taylor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 68
container_title International journal of stroke
container_volume 19
creator Schleicher, Riana L
Vorasayan, Pongpat
McCabe, Megan E
Bevers, Matthew B
Davis, Thomas P
Griffin, John H
Hinduja, Archana
Jadhav, Ashutosh P
Lee, Jin-Moo
Sawyer, Robert N
Zlokovic, Berislav V
Sheth, Kevin N
Fedler, Janel K
Lyden, Patrick
Kimberly, W Taylor
description Background: Cerebral edema is a secondary complication of acute ischemic stroke, but its time course and imaging markers are not fully understood. Recently, net water uptake (NWU) has been proposed as a novel marker of edema. Aims: Studying the RHAPSODY trial cohort, we sought to characterize the time course of edema and test the hypothesis that NWU provides distinct information when added to traditional markers of cerebral edema after stroke by examining its association with other markers. Methods: A total of 65 patients had measurable supratentorial ischemic lesions. Patients underwent head computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, or both at the baseline visit and after 2, 7, 30, and 90 days following enrollment. CT and MRI scans were used to measure four imaging markers of edema: midline shift (MLS), hemisphere volume ratio (HVR), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume, and NWU using semi-quantitative threshold analysis. Trajectories of the markers were summarized, as available. Correlations of the markers of edema were computed and the markers compared by clinical outcome. Regression models were used to examine the effect of 3K3A-activated protein C (APC) treatment. Results: Two measures of mass effect, MLS and HVR, could be measured on all imaging modalities, and had values available across all time points. Accordingly, mass effect reached a maximum level by day 7, normalized by day 30, and then reversed by day 90 for both measures. In the first 2 days after stroke, the change in CSF volume was associated with MLS (ρ = –0.57, p = 0.0001) and HVR (ρ = –0.66, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17474930231187268
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10789908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17474930231187268</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2831297700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27c19045487e3bc1c57ae5164c154c300d270b19f21024f92a9f574b46a700973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqLYWv0BXmTBi5etmSS7szlJqY8KBcXHwVPIptm6Zbtbk67Qf29Ka1EET_Mx8z2Gj5BToH0AxEtAgUJyyjhAhizN9kh3vYuFFHJ_hzntkCPvZ5SKBHl6SDocecYElV1yPqh1tfKlj5oiyp0u68hO7FxHATyNBo_PD9dvx-Sg0JW3J9vZI6-3Ny_DUTx-uLsfDsax4TJdxgwNyBAhMrQ8N2AS1DaBVBhIhOGUThjSHGTBgDJRSKZlkaDIRaqRUom8R642vos2n9uJsfXS6UotXDnXbqUaXarfl7p8V9PmUwHFTEqaBYeLrYNrPlrrl2peemOrSte2ab1iGQcmMcQFKmyoxjXeO1vscoCqdbvqT7tBc_bzwZ3iu85A6G8IXk-tmjWtC-36fxy_AN-dfs4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2831297700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Schleicher, Riana L ; Vorasayan, Pongpat ; McCabe, Megan E ; Bevers, Matthew B ; Davis, Thomas P ; Griffin, John H ; Hinduja, Archana ; Jadhav, Ashutosh P ; Lee, Jin-Moo ; Sawyer, Robert N ; Zlokovic, Berislav V ; Sheth, Kevin N ; Fedler, Janel K ; Lyden, Patrick ; Kimberly, W Taylor</creator><creatorcontrib>Schleicher, Riana L ; Vorasayan, Pongpat ; McCabe, Megan E ; Bevers, Matthew B ; Davis, Thomas P ; Griffin, John H ; Hinduja, Archana ; Jadhav, Ashutosh P ; Lee, Jin-Moo ; Sawyer, Robert N ; Zlokovic, Berislav V ; Sheth, Kevin N ; Fedler, Janel K ; Lyden, Patrick ; Kimberly, W Taylor ; NN104 Investigators ; on behalf of the NN104 Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Cerebral edema is a secondary complication of acute ischemic stroke, but its time course and imaging markers are not fully understood. Recently, net water uptake (NWU) has been proposed as a novel marker of edema. Aims: Studying the RHAPSODY trial cohort, we sought to characterize the time course of edema and test the hypothesis that NWU provides distinct information when added to traditional markers of cerebral edema after stroke by examining its association with other markers. Methods: A total of 65 patients had measurable supratentorial ischemic lesions. Patients underwent head computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, or both at the baseline visit and after 2, 7, 30, and 90 days following enrollment. CT and MRI scans were used to measure four imaging markers of edema: midline shift (MLS), hemisphere volume ratio (HVR), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume, and NWU using semi-quantitative threshold analysis. Trajectories of the markers were summarized, as available. Correlations of the markers of edema were computed and the markers compared by clinical outcome. Regression models were used to examine the effect of 3K3A-activated protein C (APC) treatment. Results: Two measures of mass effect, MLS and HVR, could be measured on all imaging modalities, and had values available across all time points. Accordingly, mass effect reached a maximum level by day 7, normalized by day 30, and then reversed by day 90 for both measures. In the first 2 days after stroke, the change in CSF volume was associated with MLS (ρ = –0.57, p = 0.0001) and HVR (ρ = –0.66, p &lt; 0.0001). In contrast, the change in NWU was not associated with the other imaging markers (all p ⩾ 0.49). While being directionally consistent, we did not observe a difference in the edema markers by clinical outcome. In addition, baseline stroke volume was associated with all markers (MLS (p &lt; 0.001), HVR (p &lt; 0.001), change in CSF volume (p = 0.003)) with the exception of NWU (p = 0.5). Exploratory analysis did not reveal a difference in cerebral edema markers by treatment arm. Conclusions: Existing cerebral edema imaging markers potentially describe two distinct processes, including lesional water concentration (i.e. NWU) and mass effect (MLS, HVR, and CSF volume). These two types of imaging markers may represent distinct aspects of cerebral edema, which could be useful for future trials targeting this process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-4930</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1747-4949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-4949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17474930231187268</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37382409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Brain Edema - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Edema - etiology ; Brain Ischemia - complications ; Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Ischemia - pathology ; Edema - complications ; Humans ; Ischemic Stroke - complications ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Stroke - drug therapy ; Water - metabolism</subject><ispartof>International journal of stroke, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.68-75</ispartof><rights>2023 World Stroke Organization</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27c19045487e3bc1c57ae5164c154c300d270b19f21024f92a9f574b46a700973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27c19045487e3bc1c57ae5164c154c300d270b19f21024f92a9f574b46a700973</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3743-7922 ; 0000-0002-4080-7584</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17474930231187268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17474930231187268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37382409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schleicher, Riana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorasayan, Pongpat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Megan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevers, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinduja, Archana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jadhav, Ashutosh P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin-Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Robert N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlokovic, Berislav V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedler, Janel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyden, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimberly, W Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NN104 Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the NN104 Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY</title><title>International journal of stroke</title><addtitle>Int J Stroke</addtitle><description>Background: Cerebral edema is a secondary complication of acute ischemic stroke, but its time course and imaging markers are not fully understood. Recently, net water uptake (NWU) has been proposed as a novel marker of edema. Aims: Studying the RHAPSODY trial cohort, we sought to characterize the time course of edema and test the hypothesis that NWU provides distinct information when added to traditional markers of cerebral edema after stroke by examining its association with other markers. Methods: A total of 65 patients had measurable supratentorial ischemic lesions. Patients underwent head computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, or both at the baseline visit and after 2, 7, 30, and 90 days following enrollment. CT and MRI scans were used to measure four imaging markers of edema: midline shift (MLS), hemisphere volume ratio (HVR), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume, and NWU using semi-quantitative threshold analysis. Trajectories of the markers were summarized, as available. Correlations of the markers of edema were computed and the markers compared by clinical outcome. Regression models were used to examine the effect of 3K3A-activated protein C (APC) treatment. Results: Two measures of mass effect, MLS and HVR, could be measured on all imaging modalities, and had values available across all time points. Accordingly, mass effect reached a maximum level by day 7, normalized by day 30, and then reversed by day 90 for both measures. In the first 2 days after stroke, the change in CSF volume was associated with MLS (ρ = –0.57, p = 0.0001) and HVR (ρ = –0.66, p &lt; 0.0001). In contrast, the change in NWU was not associated with the other imaging markers (all p ⩾ 0.49). While being directionally consistent, we did not observe a difference in the edema markers by clinical outcome. In addition, baseline stroke volume was associated with all markers (MLS (p &lt; 0.001), HVR (p &lt; 0.001), change in CSF volume (p = 0.003)) with the exception of NWU (p = 0.5). Exploratory analysis did not reveal a difference in cerebral edema markers by treatment arm. Conclusions: Existing cerebral edema imaging markers potentially describe two distinct processes, including lesional water concentration (i.e. NWU) and mass effect (MLS, HVR, and CSF volume). These two types of imaging markers may represent distinct aspects of cerebral edema, which could be useful for future trials targeting this process.</description><subject>Brain Edema - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Edema - etiology</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - complications</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - pathology</subject><subject>Edema - complications</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Stroke - drug therapy</subject><subject>Water - metabolism</subject><issn>1747-4930</issn><issn>1747-4949</issn><issn>1747-4949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqLYWv0BXmTBi5etmSS7szlJqY8KBcXHwVPIptm6Zbtbk67Qf29Ka1EET_Mx8z2Gj5BToH0AxEtAgUJyyjhAhizN9kh3vYuFFHJ_hzntkCPvZ5SKBHl6SDocecYElV1yPqh1tfKlj5oiyp0u68hO7FxHATyNBo_PD9dvx-Sg0JW3J9vZI6-3Ny_DUTx-uLsfDsax4TJdxgwNyBAhMrQ8N2AS1DaBVBhIhOGUThjSHGTBgDJRSKZlkaDIRaqRUom8R642vos2n9uJsfXS6UotXDnXbqUaXarfl7p8V9PmUwHFTEqaBYeLrYNrPlrrl2peemOrSte2ab1iGQcmMcQFKmyoxjXeO1vscoCqdbvqT7tBc_bzwZ3iu85A6G8IXk-tmjWtC-36fxy_AN-dfs4</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Schleicher, Riana L</creator><creator>Vorasayan, Pongpat</creator><creator>McCabe, Megan E</creator><creator>Bevers, Matthew B</creator><creator>Davis, Thomas P</creator><creator>Griffin, John H</creator><creator>Hinduja, Archana</creator><creator>Jadhav, Ashutosh P</creator><creator>Lee, Jin-Moo</creator><creator>Sawyer, Robert N</creator><creator>Zlokovic, Berislav V</creator><creator>Sheth, Kevin N</creator><creator>Fedler, Janel K</creator><creator>Lyden, Patrick</creator><creator>Kimberly, W Taylor</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3743-7922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-7584</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY</title><author>Schleicher, Riana L ; Vorasayan, Pongpat ; McCabe, Megan E ; Bevers, Matthew B ; Davis, Thomas P ; Griffin, John H ; Hinduja, Archana ; Jadhav, Ashutosh P ; Lee, Jin-Moo ; Sawyer, Robert N ; Zlokovic, Berislav V ; Sheth, Kevin N ; Fedler, Janel K ; Lyden, Patrick ; Kimberly, W Taylor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27c19045487e3bc1c57ae5164c154c300d270b19f21024f92a9f574b46a700973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain Edema - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Edema - etiology</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - complications</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - pathology</topic><topic>Edema - complications</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Stroke - drug therapy</topic><topic>Water - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schleicher, Riana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorasayan, Pongpat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Megan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevers, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinduja, Archana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jadhav, Ashutosh P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jin-Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Robert N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlokovic, Berislav V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedler, Janel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyden, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimberly, W Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NN104 Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the NN104 Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of stroke</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schleicher, Riana L</au><au>Vorasayan, Pongpat</au><au>McCabe, Megan E</au><au>Bevers, Matthew B</au><au>Davis, Thomas P</au><au>Griffin, John H</au><au>Hinduja, Archana</au><au>Jadhav, Ashutosh P</au><au>Lee, Jin-Moo</au><au>Sawyer, Robert N</au><au>Zlokovic, Berislav V</au><au>Sheth, Kevin N</au><au>Fedler, Janel K</au><au>Lyden, Patrick</au><au>Kimberly, W Taylor</au><aucorp>NN104 Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the NN104 Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY</atitle><jtitle>International journal of stroke</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Stroke</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>68-75</pages><issn>1747-4930</issn><issn>1747-4949</issn><eissn>1747-4949</eissn><abstract>Background: Cerebral edema is a secondary complication of acute ischemic stroke, but its time course and imaging markers are not fully understood. Recently, net water uptake (NWU) has been proposed as a novel marker of edema. Aims: Studying the RHAPSODY trial cohort, we sought to characterize the time course of edema and test the hypothesis that NWU provides distinct information when added to traditional markers of cerebral edema after stroke by examining its association with other markers. Methods: A total of 65 patients had measurable supratentorial ischemic lesions. Patients underwent head computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, or both at the baseline visit and after 2, 7, 30, and 90 days following enrollment. CT and MRI scans were used to measure four imaging markers of edema: midline shift (MLS), hemisphere volume ratio (HVR), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume, and NWU using semi-quantitative threshold analysis. Trajectories of the markers were summarized, as available. Correlations of the markers of edema were computed and the markers compared by clinical outcome. Regression models were used to examine the effect of 3K3A-activated protein C (APC) treatment. Results: Two measures of mass effect, MLS and HVR, could be measured on all imaging modalities, and had values available across all time points. Accordingly, mass effect reached a maximum level by day 7, normalized by day 30, and then reversed by day 90 for both measures. In the first 2 days after stroke, the change in CSF volume was associated with MLS (ρ = –0.57, p = 0.0001) and HVR (ρ = –0.66, p &lt; 0.0001). In contrast, the change in NWU was not associated with the other imaging markers (all p ⩾ 0.49). While being directionally consistent, we did not observe a difference in the edema markers by clinical outcome. In addition, baseline stroke volume was associated with all markers (MLS (p &lt; 0.001), HVR (p &lt; 0.001), change in CSF volume (p = 0.003)) with the exception of NWU (p = 0.5). Exploratory analysis did not reveal a difference in cerebral edema markers by treatment arm. Conclusions: Existing cerebral edema imaging markers potentially describe two distinct processes, including lesional water concentration (i.e. NWU) and mass effect (MLS, HVR, and CSF volume). These two types of imaging markers may represent distinct aspects of cerebral edema, which could be useful for future trials targeting this process.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37382409</pmid><doi>10.1177/17474930231187268</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3743-7922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-7584</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-4930
ispartof International journal of stroke, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.68-75
issn 1747-4930
1747-4949
1747-4949
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10789908
source MEDLINE; SAGE Journals
subjects Brain Edema - diagnostic imaging
Brain Edema - etiology
Brain Ischemia - complications
Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging
Brain Ischemia - pathology
Edema - complications
Humans
Ischemic Stroke - complications
Stroke - complications
Stroke - diagnostic imaging
Stroke - drug therapy
Water - metabolism
title Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A21%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20brain%20edema%20in%20RHAPSODY&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20stroke&rft.au=Schleicher,%20Riana%20L&rft.aucorp=NN104%20Investigators&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=68-75&rft.issn=1747-4930&rft.eissn=1747-4949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17474930231187268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2831297700%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2831297700&rft_id=info:pmid/37382409&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17474930231187268&rfr_iscdi=true