Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study
Introduction Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. Howev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes therapy 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.111-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Diabetes therapy |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Omachi, Takemasa Ohara, Makoto Fujikawa, Tomoki Kohata, Yo Sugita, Hiroe Irie, Shunichiro Terasaki, Michishige Mori, Yusaku Fukui, Tomoyasu Yamagishi, Sho-ichi |
description | Introduction
Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM.
Methods
This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy (
n
= 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy (
n
= 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores.
Results
Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.”
Conclusion
Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction.
Clinical Trial Registration
UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10786762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A779271634</galeid><sourcerecordid>A779271634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7af6a6fea2f964e7c82db5ad29fd8f37b6c8c80f59a2fb5329c9fdcb63d5665d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAltiwSfHPxInZoNG0lEpFrURhaznO9dSjxB7spGVejOfjTqeMqIRIFrnO_c7xdXKK4jWjJ4zS-n1mQlBaUi5KymZKlOJZccgaqUqpJHu-rytxUBznvKJ4CaUUYy-LA1E3Da0oPyx-LeKwNsnnGEh05Mw5sGPelhdhhaVpeyBfYTDLfhp9B8SEjpxO_X6NuqufvjOjv0NwTJDzA3PeTzZmIN_R3LS-9-OG-ECuEYSAO9z78ZbcbNZAODlFAkbI5Av0CE75A5mT6xTzGifY-l4n6P3gg0kb3GPqNq-KF870GY4fn0fFt09nN4vP5eXV-cViflnamazGsjZOGunAcKfkDGrb8K6tTMeV6xon6lbaxjbUVQqJthJcWezYVoqukrLqxFHxcee7ntoBOoujJ9PrdfIDzqKj8fppJ_hbvYx3mtG6kbXk6PDu0SHFHxPkUQ8-WzynCRCnrHnTcMGFYBWib3fo0vSgfXARLe0W1_O6VrxmUsyQOvkHhXcHg7cxgPP4_omA7wQWv2hO4PbjM6q3WdK7LGnMkn7IkhYoevP3wfeSP8lBQOyAjK2whKRXcUoBf8b_bH8D6N3Ygg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2882323315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Omachi, Takemasa ; Ohara, Makoto ; Fujikawa, Tomoki ; Kohata, Yo ; Sugita, Hiroe ; Irie, Shunichiro ; Terasaki, Michishige ; Mori, Yusaku ; Fukui, Tomoyasu ; Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Omachi, Takemasa ; Ohara, Makoto ; Fujikawa, Tomoki ; Kohata, Yo ; Sugita, Hiroe ; Irie, Shunichiro ; Terasaki, Michishige ; Mori, Yusaku ; Fukui, Tomoyasu ; Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM.
Methods
This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy (
n
= 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy (
n
= 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores.
Results
Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.”
Conclusion
Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction.
Clinical Trial Registration
UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1869-6953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-6961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37880502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Diabetes ; Drug therapy ; Endocrinology ; Glucose metabolism ; Health aspects ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Research ; Oxidative stress ; Type 2 diabetes ; UMIN ; UMIN000042670</subject><ispartof>Diabetes therapy, 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.111-126</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7af6a6fea2f964e7c82db5ad29fd8f37b6c8c80f59a2fb5329c9fdcb63d5665d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6137-5493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786762/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786762/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,41119,42188,51575,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omachi, Takemasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujikawa, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohata, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugita, Hiroe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Shunichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terasaki, Michishige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Yusaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Tomoyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</title><title>Diabetes therapy</title><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction
Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM.
Methods
This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy (
n
= 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy (
n
= 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores.
Results
Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.”
Conclusion
Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction.
Clinical Trial Registration
UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Glucose metabolism</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Oxidative stress</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>UMIN</subject><subject>UMIN000042670</subject><issn>1869-6953</issn><issn>1869-6961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAltiwSfHPxInZoNG0lEpFrURhaznO9dSjxB7spGVejOfjTqeMqIRIFrnO_c7xdXKK4jWjJ4zS-n1mQlBaUi5KymZKlOJZccgaqUqpJHu-rytxUBznvKJ4CaUUYy-LA1E3Da0oPyx-LeKwNsnnGEh05Mw5sGPelhdhhaVpeyBfYTDLfhp9B8SEjpxO_X6NuqufvjOjv0NwTJDzA3PeTzZmIN_R3LS-9-OG-ECuEYSAO9z78ZbcbNZAODlFAkbI5Av0CE75A5mT6xTzGifY-l4n6P3gg0kb3GPqNq-KF870GY4fn0fFt09nN4vP5eXV-cViflnamazGsjZOGunAcKfkDGrb8K6tTMeV6xon6lbaxjbUVQqJthJcWezYVoqukrLqxFHxcee7ntoBOoujJ9PrdfIDzqKj8fppJ_hbvYx3mtG6kbXk6PDu0SHFHxPkUQ8-WzynCRCnrHnTcMGFYBWib3fo0vSgfXARLe0W1_O6VrxmUsyQOvkHhXcHg7cxgPP4_omA7wQWv2hO4PbjM6q3WdK7LGnMkn7IkhYoevP3wfeSP8lBQOyAjK2whKRXcUoBf8b_bH8D6N3Ygg</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Omachi, Takemasa</creator><creator>Ohara, Makoto</creator><creator>Fujikawa, Tomoki</creator><creator>Kohata, Yo</creator><creator>Sugita, Hiroe</creator><creator>Irie, Shunichiro</creator><creator>Terasaki, Michishige</creator><creator>Mori, Yusaku</creator><creator>Fukui, Tomoyasu</creator><creator>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-5493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</title><author>Omachi, Takemasa ; Ohara, Makoto ; Fujikawa, Tomoki ; Kohata, Yo ; Sugita, Hiroe ; Irie, Shunichiro ; Terasaki, Michishige ; Mori, Yusaku ; Fukui, Tomoyasu ; Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7af6a6fea2f964e7c82db5ad29fd8f37b6c8c80f59a2fb5329c9fdcb63d5665d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Glucose metabolism</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Oxidative stress</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>UMIN</topic><topic>UMIN000042670</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omachi, Takemasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujikawa, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohata, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugita, Hiroe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Shunichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terasaki, Michishige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Yusaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Tomoyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omachi, Takemasa</au><au>Ohara, Makoto</au><au>Fujikawa, Tomoki</au><au>Kohata, Yo</au><au>Sugita, Hiroe</au><au>Irie, Shunichiro</au><au>Terasaki, Michishige</au><au>Mori, Yusaku</au><au>Fukui, Tomoyasu</au><au>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes therapy</jtitle><stitle>Diabetes Ther</stitle><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>111-126</pages><issn>1869-6953</issn><eissn>1869-6961</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM.
Methods
This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy (
n
= 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy (
n
= 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores.
Results
Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.”
Conclusion
Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction.
Clinical Trial Registration
UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>37880502</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-5493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1869-6953 |
ispartof | Diabetes therapy, 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.111-126 |
issn | 1869-6953 1869-6961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10786762 |
source | Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cardiology Diabetes Drug therapy Endocrinology Glucose metabolism Health aspects Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research Oxidative stress Type 2 diabetes UMIN UMIN000042670 |
title | Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Effects%20of%20Injectable%20Semaglutide%20and%20Dulaglutide%20on%20Oxidative%20Stress%20and%20Glucose%20Variability%20in%20Patients%20with%20Type%202%20Diabetes%20Mellitus:%20A%20Prospective%20Preliminary%20Study&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20therapy&rft.au=Omachi,%20Takemasa&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=111-126&rft.issn=1869-6953&rft.eissn=1869-6961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA779271634%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882323315&rft_id=info:pmid/37880502&rft_galeid=A779271634&rfr_iscdi=true |