Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study

Introduction Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. Howev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes therapy 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.111-126
Hauptverfasser: Omachi, Takemasa, Ohara, Makoto, Fujikawa, Tomoki, Kohata, Yo, Sugita, Hiroe, Irie, Shunichiro, Terasaki, Michishige, Mori, Yusaku, Fukui, Tomoyasu, Yamagishi, Sho-ichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Diabetes therapy
container_volume 15
creator Omachi, Takemasa
Ohara, Makoto
Fujikawa, Tomoki
Kohata, Yo
Sugita, Hiroe
Irie, Shunichiro
Terasaki, Michishige
Mori, Yusaku
Fukui, Tomoyasu
Yamagishi, Sho-ichi
description Introduction Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM. Methods This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy ( n  = 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy ( n  = 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores. Results Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.” Conclusion Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10786762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A779271634</galeid><sourcerecordid>A779271634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7af6a6fea2f964e7c82db5ad29fd8f37b6c8c80f59a2fb5329c9fdcb63d5665d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAltiwSfHPxInZoNG0lEpFrURhaznO9dSjxB7spGVejOfjTqeMqIRIFrnO_c7xdXKK4jWjJ4zS-n1mQlBaUi5KymZKlOJZccgaqUqpJHu-rytxUBznvKJ4CaUUYy-LA1E3Da0oPyx-LeKwNsnnGEh05Mw5sGPelhdhhaVpeyBfYTDLfhp9B8SEjpxO_X6NuqufvjOjv0NwTJDzA3PeTzZmIN_R3LS-9-OG-ECuEYSAO9z78ZbcbNZAODlFAkbI5Av0CE75A5mT6xTzGifY-l4n6P3gg0kb3GPqNq-KF870GY4fn0fFt09nN4vP5eXV-cViflnamazGsjZOGunAcKfkDGrb8K6tTMeV6xon6lbaxjbUVQqJthJcWezYVoqukrLqxFHxcee7ntoBOoujJ9PrdfIDzqKj8fppJ_hbvYx3mtG6kbXk6PDu0SHFHxPkUQ8-WzynCRCnrHnTcMGFYBWib3fo0vSgfXARLe0W1_O6VrxmUsyQOvkHhXcHg7cxgPP4_omA7wQWv2hO4PbjM6q3WdK7LGnMkn7IkhYoevP3wfeSP8lBQOyAjK2whKRXcUoBf8b_bH8D6N3Ygg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2882323315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Omachi, Takemasa ; Ohara, Makoto ; Fujikawa, Tomoki ; Kohata, Yo ; Sugita, Hiroe ; Irie, Shunichiro ; Terasaki, Michishige ; Mori, Yusaku ; Fukui, Tomoyasu ; Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Omachi, Takemasa ; Ohara, Makoto ; Fujikawa, Tomoki ; Kohata, Yo ; Sugita, Hiroe ; Irie, Shunichiro ; Terasaki, Michishige ; Mori, Yusaku ; Fukui, Tomoyasu ; Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM. Methods This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy ( n  = 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy ( n  = 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores. Results Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.” Conclusion Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1869-6953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-6961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37880502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Diabetes ; Drug therapy ; Endocrinology ; Glucose metabolism ; Health aspects ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Research ; Oxidative stress ; Type 2 diabetes ; UMIN ; UMIN000042670</subject><ispartof>Diabetes therapy, 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.111-126</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7af6a6fea2f964e7c82db5ad29fd8f37b6c8c80f59a2fb5329c9fdcb63d5665d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6137-5493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786762/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786762/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,41119,42188,51575,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omachi, Takemasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujikawa, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohata, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugita, Hiroe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Shunichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terasaki, Michishige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Yusaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Tomoyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</title><title>Diabetes therapy</title><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM. Methods This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy ( n  = 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy ( n  = 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores. Results Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.” Conclusion Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Glucose metabolism</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Oxidative stress</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>UMIN</subject><subject>UMIN000042670</subject><issn>1869-6953</issn><issn>1869-6961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAltiwSfHPxInZoNG0lEpFrURhaznO9dSjxB7spGVejOfjTqeMqIRIFrnO_c7xdXKK4jWjJ4zS-n1mQlBaUi5KymZKlOJZccgaqUqpJHu-rytxUBznvKJ4CaUUYy-LA1E3Da0oPyx-LeKwNsnnGEh05Mw5sGPelhdhhaVpeyBfYTDLfhp9B8SEjpxO_X6NuqufvjOjv0NwTJDzA3PeTzZmIN_R3LS-9-OG-ECuEYSAO9z78ZbcbNZAODlFAkbI5Av0CE75A5mT6xTzGifY-l4n6P3gg0kb3GPqNq-KF870GY4fn0fFt09nN4vP5eXV-cViflnamazGsjZOGunAcKfkDGrb8K6tTMeV6xon6lbaxjbUVQqJthJcWezYVoqukrLqxFHxcee7ntoBOoujJ9PrdfIDzqKj8fppJ_hbvYx3mtG6kbXk6PDu0SHFHxPkUQ8-WzynCRCnrHnTcMGFYBWib3fo0vSgfXARLe0W1_O6VrxmUsyQOvkHhXcHg7cxgPP4_omA7wQWv2hO4PbjM6q3WdK7LGnMkn7IkhYoevP3wfeSP8lBQOyAjK2whKRXcUoBf8b_bH8D6N3Ygg</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Omachi, Takemasa</creator><creator>Ohara, Makoto</creator><creator>Fujikawa, Tomoki</creator><creator>Kohata, Yo</creator><creator>Sugita, Hiroe</creator><creator>Irie, Shunichiro</creator><creator>Terasaki, Michishige</creator><creator>Mori, Yusaku</creator><creator>Fukui, Tomoyasu</creator><creator>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-5493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</title><author>Omachi, Takemasa ; Ohara, Makoto ; Fujikawa, Tomoki ; Kohata, Yo ; Sugita, Hiroe ; Irie, Shunichiro ; Terasaki, Michishige ; Mori, Yusaku ; Fukui, Tomoyasu ; Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7af6a6fea2f964e7c82db5ad29fd8f37b6c8c80f59a2fb5329c9fdcb63d5665d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Glucose metabolism</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Oxidative stress</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>UMIN</topic><topic>UMIN000042670</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omachi, Takemasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujikawa, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohata, Yo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugita, Hiroe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Shunichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terasaki, Michishige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Yusaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Tomoyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omachi, Takemasa</au><au>Ohara, Makoto</au><au>Fujikawa, Tomoki</au><au>Kohata, Yo</au><au>Sugita, Hiroe</au><au>Irie, Shunichiro</au><au>Terasaki, Michishige</au><au>Mori, Yusaku</au><au>Fukui, Tomoyasu</au><au>Yamagishi, Sho-ichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes therapy</jtitle><stitle>Diabetes Ther</stitle><addtitle>Diabetes Ther</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>111-126</pages><issn>1869-6953</issn><eissn>1869-6961</eissn><abstract>Introduction Recent trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists considerably reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Oxidative stress, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk, is associated with glucose variability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This study aimed to analyze and compare the effects of semaglutide and dulaglutide therapies on oxidative stress and glucose variability as assessed through CGM. Methods This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel-group comparison study. Overall, 37 patients with T2DM treated with dulaglutide for at least 12 weeks were randomized into two groups: one receiving continuous dulaglutide therapy ( n  = 19) and one receiving injectable semaglutide therapy ( n  = 18) groups. The coprimary endpoints were changes in the results of the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites test, an oxidative stress marker, and CGM-evaluated glucose variability after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoint was changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) scores. Results Switching to semaglutide therapy was better than continuous dulaglutide therapy in reducing oxidative stress, glucose variability, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conversely, continuous dulaglutide therapy was better than semaglutide therapy in terms of DTSQ scores for “Convenience” and “Recommend.” Conclusion Injectable semaglutide therapy may be more effective than dulaglutide therapy in ameliorating oxidative stress and regulating glucose metabolism, including glucose variability, in patients with T2DM, while dulaglutide therapy may be more effective in terms of treatment satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN-CRT ID: UMIN000042670 (registered 7 December 2020).</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>37880502</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-5493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1869-6953
ispartof Diabetes therapy, 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.111-126
issn 1869-6953
1869-6961
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10786762
source Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Cardiology
Diabetes
Drug therapy
Endocrinology
Glucose metabolism
Health aspects
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Research
Oxidative stress
Type 2 diabetes
UMIN
UMIN000042670
title Comparison of Effects of Injectable Semaglutide and Dulaglutide on Oxidative Stress and Glucose Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Preliminary Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Effects%20of%20Injectable%20Semaglutide%20and%20Dulaglutide%20on%20Oxidative%20Stress%20and%20Glucose%20Variability%20in%20Patients%20with%20Type%202%20Diabetes%20Mellitus:%20A%20Prospective%20Preliminary%20Study&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20therapy&rft.au=Omachi,%20Takemasa&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=111-126&rft.issn=1869-6953&rft.eissn=1869-6961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13300-023-01493-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA779271634%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882323315&rft_id=info:pmid/37880502&rft_galeid=A779271634&rfr_iscdi=true