Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?
Abstract Background While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuro-oncology practice 2024-02, Vol.11 (1), p.69-81 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 81 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Neuro-oncology practice |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Baudou, Éloïse Ryan, Jennifer L Cox, Elizabeth Nham, Lisa Johnston, Krista Bouffet, Éric Bartels, Ute Timmons, Brian de Medeiros, Cynthia Mabbott, Donald J |
description | Abstract
Background
While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy.
Methods
This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy: 5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes.
Results
Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/nop/npad055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10785595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/nop/npad055</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2914255327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-eaebbe03354caa84022758f3deda99564c3976ec29ecd8984990de8c525a094e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEURYMoKurKvWQlglQzyaSTuBHxGwrd6Dqkmdca6SQxyRTrr3eG1qIbVwm5J-c9uAgdF-SiIJJdOh8uXdA14XwL7VPCywHlgm9v7lW1h45SeieEFGxYMCF30R4TlHZ5tY8-xiHbxn5ZN8PaYfiEaGwCnKO2rn8M0c-ibrB1OEBtdY7W4Emf4tw2vo04tXFhFz6mK3znIeHe13_0qZPU1uc3iDoscaNzhnh9iHamep7gaH0eoNeH-5fbp8Fo_Ph8ezMaGFYVeQAaJhMgjPHSaC1KQmnFxZTVUGsp-bA0TFZDMFSCqYUUpZSkBmE45ZrIEtgBul55QztpoDbgunXmKkTb6LhUXlv1N3H2Tc38QhWkEpxL3hnO1oboP1pIWTU2GZjPtQPfJkVlUVLOGa069HyFmuhTijDdzCmI6otSXVFqXVRHn_xebcP-1NIBpyvAt-Ff0zcqxKD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2914255327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Baudou, Éloïse ; Ryan, Jennifer L ; Cox, Elizabeth ; Nham, Lisa ; Johnston, Krista ; Bouffet, Éric ; Bartels, Ute ; Timmons, Brian ; de Medeiros, Cynthia ; Mabbott, Donald J</creator><creatorcontrib>Baudou, Éloïse ; Ryan, Jennifer L ; Cox, Elizabeth ; Nham, Lisa ; Johnston, Krista ; Bouffet, Éric ; Bartels, Ute ; Timmons, Brian ; de Medeiros, Cynthia ; Mabbott, Donald J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy.
Methods
This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy: <2 years (n = 9), 2–5 years (n = 10), and > 5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes.
Results
Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the < 2-year group (P = .008).
Conclusion
Participation in an ET program should be offered as part of routine postradiotherapy care in the first 1–2 years and strongly encouraged in the first 5 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-2577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-2585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38222057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Neuro-oncology practice, 2024-02, Vol.11 (1), p.69-81</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-eaebbe03354caa84022758f3deda99564c3976ec29ecd8984990de8c525a094e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3659-5766 ; 0000-0003-2112-5251</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38222057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baudou, Éloïse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nham, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Krista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffet, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmons, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabbott, Donald J</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</title><title>Neuro-oncology practice</title><addtitle>Neurooncol Pract</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy.
Methods
This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy: <2 years (n = 9), 2–5 years (n = 10), and > 5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes.
Results
Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the < 2-year group (P = .008).
Conclusion
Participation in an ET program should be offered as part of routine postradiotherapy care in the first 1–2 years and strongly encouraged in the first 5 years.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2054-2577</issn><issn>2054-2585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEURYMoKurKvWQlglQzyaSTuBHxGwrd6Dqkmdca6SQxyRTrr3eG1qIbVwm5J-c9uAgdF-SiIJJdOh8uXdA14XwL7VPCywHlgm9v7lW1h45SeieEFGxYMCF30R4TlHZ5tY8-xiHbxn5ZN8PaYfiEaGwCnKO2rn8M0c-ibrB1OEBtdY7W4Emf4tw2vo04tXFhFz6mK3znIeHe13_0qZPU1uc3iDoscaNzhnh9iHamep7gaH0eoNeH-5fbp8Fo_Ph8ezMaGFYVeQAaJhMgjPHSaC1KQmnFxZTVUGsp-bA0TFZDMFSCqYUUpZSkBmE45ZrIEtgBul55QztpoDbgunXmKkTb6LhUXlv1N3H2Tc38QhWkEpxL3hnO1oboP1pIWTU2GZjPtQPfJkVlUVLOGa069HyFmuhTijDdzCmI6otSXVFqXVRHn_xebcP-1NIBpyvAt-Ff0zcqxKD8</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Baudou, Éloïse</creator><creator>Ryan, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Cox, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Nham, Lisa</creator><creator>Johnston, Krista</creator><creator>Bouffet, Éric</creator><creator>Bartels, Ute</creator><creator>Timmons, Brian</creator><creator>de Medeiros, Cynthia</creator><creator>Mabbott, Donald J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-5251</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</title><author>Baudou, Éloïse ; Ryan, Jennifer L ; Cox, Elizabeth ; Nham, Lisa ; Johnston, Krista ; Bouffet, Éric ; Bartels, Ute ; Timmons, Brian ; de Medeiros, Cynthia ; Mabbott, Donald J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-eaebbe03354caa84022758f3deda99564c3976ec29ecd8984990de8c525a094e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baudou, Éloïse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nham, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Krista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffet, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmons, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabbott, Donald J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baudou, Éloïse</au><au>Ryan, Jennifer L</au><au>Cox, Elizabeth</au><au>Nham, Lisa</au><au>Johnston, Krista</au><au>Bouffet, Éric</au><au>Bartels, Ute</au><au>Timmons, Brian</au><au>de Medeiros, Cynthia</au><au>Mabbott, Donald J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology practice</jtitle><addtitle>Neurooncol Pract</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>69-81</pages><issn>2054-2577</issn><eissn>2054-2585</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy.
Methods
This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy: <2 years (n = 9), 2–5 years (n = 10), and > 5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes.
Results
Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the < 2-year group (P = .008).
Conclusion
Participation in an ET program should be offered as part of routine postradiotherapy care in the first 1–2 years and strongly encouraged in the first 5 years.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38222057</pmid><doi>10.1093/nop/npad055</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-5251</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2054-2577 |
ispartof | Neuro-oncology practice, 2024-02, Vol.11 (1), p.69-81 |
issn | 2054-2577 2054-2585 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10785595 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Original |
title | Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20an%20exercise%20training%20program%20in%20pediatric%20brain%20tumour%20survivors:%20Does%20timing%20postradiotherapy%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20practice&rft.au=Baudou,%20%C3%89lo%C3%AFse&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=69-81&rft.issn=2054-2577&rft.eissn=2054-2585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/nop/npad055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2914255327%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2914255327&rft_id=info:pmid/38222057&rft_oup_id=10.1093/nop/npad055&rfr_iscdi=true |