Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?

Abstract Background While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology practice 2024-02, Vol.11 (1), p.69-81
Hauptverfasser: Baudou, Éloïse, Ryan, Jennifer L, Cox, Elizabeth, Nham, Lisa, Johnston, Krista, Bouffet, Éric, Bartels, Ute, Timmons, Brian, de Medeiros, Cynthia, Mabbott, Donald J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Neuro-oncology practice
container_volume 11
creator Baudou, Éloïse
Ryan, Jennifer L
Cox, Elizabeth
Nham, Lisa
Johnston, Krista
Bouffet, Éric
Bartels, Ute
Timmons, Brian
de Medeiros, Cynthia
Mabbott, Donald J
description Abstract Background While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy. Methods This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy:  5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes. Results Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/nop/npad055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10785595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/nop/npad055</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2914255327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-eaebbe03354caa84022758f3deda99564c3976ec29ecd8984990de8c525a094e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEURYMoKurKvWQlglQzyaSTuBHxGwrd6Dqkmdca6SQxyRTrr3eG1qIbVwm5J-c9uAgdF-SiIJJdOh8uXdA14XwL7VPCywHlgm9v7lW1h45SeieEFGxYMCF30R4TlHZ5tY8-xiHbxn5ZN8PaYfiEaGwCnKO2rn8M0c-ibrB1OEBtdY7W4Emf4tw2vo04tXFhFz6mK3znIeHe13_0qZPU1uc3iDoscaNzhnh9iHamep7gaH0eoNeH-5fbp8Fo_Ph8ezMaGFYVeQAaJhMgjPHSaC1KQmnFxZTVUGsp-bA0TFZDMFSCqYUUpZSkBmE45ZrIEtgBul55QztpoDbgunXmKkTb6LhUXlv1N3H2Tc38QhWkEpxL3hnO1oboP1pIWTU2GZjPtQPfJkVlUVLOGa069HyFmuhTijDdzCmI6otSXVFqXVRHn_xebcP-1NIBpyvAt-Ff0zcqxKD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2914255327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Baudou, Éloïse ; Ryan, Jennifer L ; Cox, Elizabeth ; Nham, Lisa ; Johnston, Krista ; Bouffet, Éric ; Bartels, Ute ; Timmons, Brian ; de Medeiros, Cynthia ; Mabbott, Donald J</creator><creatorcontrib>Baudou, Éloïse ; Ryan, Jennifer L ; Cox, Elizabeth ; Nham, Lisa ; Johnston, Krista ; Bouffet, Éric ; Bartels, Ute ; Timmons, Brian ; de Medeiros, Cynthia ; Mabbott, Donald J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy. Methods This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy: &lt;2 years (n = 9), 2–5 years (n = 10), and &gt; 5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes. Results Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the &lt; 2-year group (P = .008). Conclusion Participation in an ET program should be offered as part of routine postradiotherapy care in the first 1–2 years and strongly encouraged in the first 5 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-2577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-2585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38222057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Neuro-oncology practice, 2024-02, Vol.11 (1), p.69-81</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-eaebbe03354caa84022758f3deda99564c3976ec29ecd8984990de8c525a094e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3659-5766 ; 0000-0003-2112-5251</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38222057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baudou, Éloïse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nham, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Krista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffet, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmons, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabbott, Donald J</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</title><title>Neuro-oncology practice</title><addtitle>Neurooncol Pract</addtitle><description>Abstract Background While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy. Methods This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy: &lt;2 years (n = 9), 2–5 years (n = 10), and &gt; 5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes. Results Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the &lt; 2-year group (P = .008). Conclusion Participation in an ET program should be offered as part of routine postradiotherapy care in the first 1–2 years and strongly encouraged in the first 5 years.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2054-2577</issn><issn>2054-2585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEURYMoKurKvWQlglQzyaSTuBHxGwrd6Dqkmdca6SQxyRTrr3eG1qIbVwm5J-c9uAgdF-SiIJJdOh8uXdA14XwL7VPCywHlgm9v7lW1h45SeieEFGxYMCF30R4TlHZ5tY8-xiHbxn5ZN8PaYfiEaGwCnKO2rn8M0c-ibrB1OEBtdY7W4Emf4tw2vo04tXFhFz6mK3znIeHe13_0qZPU1uc3iDoscaNzhnh9iHamep7gaH0eoNeH-5fbp8Fo_Ph8ezMaGFYVeQAaJhMgjPHSaC1KQmnFxZTVUGsp-bA0TFZDMFSCqYUUpZSkBmE45ZrIEtgBul55QztpoDbgunXmKkTb6LhUXlv1N3H2Tc38QhWkEpxL3hnO1oboP1pIWTU2GZjPtQPfJkVlUVLOGa069HyFmuhTijDdzCmI6otSXVFqXVRHn_xebcP-1NIBpyvAt-Ff0zcqxKD8</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Baudou, Éloïse</creator><creator>Ryan, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Cox, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Nham, Lisa</creator><creator>Johnston, Krista</creator><creator>Bouffet, Éric</creator><creator>Bartels, Ute</creator><creator>Timmons, Brian</creator><creator>de Medeiros, Cynthia</creator><creator>Mabbott, Donald J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-5251</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</title><author>Baudou, Éloïse ; Ryan, Jennifer L ; Cox, Elizabeth ; Nham, Lisa ; Johnston, Krista ; Bouffet, Éric ; Bartels, Ute ; Timmons, Brian ; de Medeiros, Cynthia ; Mabbott, Donald J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-eaebbe03354caa84022758f3deda99564c3976ec29ecd8984990de8c525a094e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baudou, Éloïse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nham, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Krista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouffet, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmons, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabbott, Donald J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baudou, Éloïse</au><au>Ryan, Jennifer L</au><au>Cox, Elizabeth</au><au>Nham, Lisa</au><au>Johnston, Krista</au><au>Bouffet, Éric</au><au>Bartels, Ute</au><au>Timmons, Brian</au><au>de Medeiros, Cynthia</au><au>Mabbott, Donald J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology practice</jtitle><addtitle>Neurooncol Pract</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>69-81</pages><issn>2054-2577</issn><eissn>2054-2585</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background While exercise training (ET) programs show positive outcomes in cognition, motor function, and physical fitness in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) survivors, little is known about the optimal timing of intervention. The aim of this work was to explore the feasibility and benefits of ET based on its timing after radiotherapy. Methods This retrospective analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01944761) analyzed data based on the timing of PBT survivors' participation in an ET program relative to their completion of radiotherapy: &lt;2 years (n = 9), 2–5 years (n = 10), and &gt; 5 years (n = 13). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to compare feasibility and efficacy indicators among groups, as well as correlation analysis between ET program timing postradiotherapy and preliminary treatment effects on cognition, motor function and physical fitness outcomes. Results Two to five years postradiotherapy was the optimal time period in terms of adherence (88.5%), retention (100%), and satisfaction (more fun, more enjoyable and recommend it more to other children). However, the benefits of ET program on memory recognition (r = −0.379, P = .047) and accuracy (r = −0.430, P = .032) decreased with increased time postradiotherapy. Motor function improved in all groups, with greater improvements in bilateral coordination (P = .043) earlier postradiotherapy, and in running (P = .043) later postradiotherapy. The greatest improvement in pro-rated work rate occurred in the &lt; 2-year group (P = .008). Conclusion Participation in an ET program should be offered as part of routine postradiotherapy care in the first 1–2 years and strongly encouraged in the first 5 years.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38222057</pmid><doi>10.1093/nop/npad055</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-5251</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2054-2577
ispartof Neuro-oncology practice, 2024-02, Vol.11 (1), p.69-81
issn 2054-2577
2054-2585
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10785595
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Original
title Optimizing an exercise training program in pediatric brain tumour survivors: Does timing postradiotherapy matter?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20an%20exercise%20training%20program%20in%20pediatric%20brain%20tumour%20survivors:%20Does%20timing%20postradiotherapy%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20practice&rft.au=Baudou,%20%C3%89lo%C3%AFse&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=69-81&rft.issn=2054-2577&rft.eissn=2054-2585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/nop/npad055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2914255327%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2914255327&rft_id=info:pmid/38222057&rft_oup_id=10.1093/nop/npad055&rfr_iscdi=true