Do working length and proximal screw density influence the velocity of callus formation in distal tibia fractures treated with a medial bridge plate?

Introduction Aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of working length and screw density on callus formation in distal tibial fractures fixed with a medial bridge plate. Materials and methods 42 distal tibia fractures treated with a bridge plate were analyzed. Minimum follow-up was 12 months....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.523-528
Hauptverfasser: Gilli, Antonio, Ghirardelli, Stefano, Pozzi, Pierrenzo, Touloupakis, Georgios, Messori, Matteo, Theodorakis, Emmanouil, Antonini, Guido
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of working length and screw density on callus formation in distal tibial fractures fixed with a medial bridge plate. Materials and methods 42 distal tibia fractures treated with a bridge plate were analyzed. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. mRUST score (modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures) was used to assess callus formation. Working length and screw density were  measured from post-operative radiographs. Results 39 (92.9%) fractures healed uneventfully. 32 (76.19%) patients showed signs of early callus formation 3 months post-surgery. In these patients a lower screw density was used compared to patients who didn’t show early callus (33.4 vs. 26.6; p  = 0.04). No differences was noticed in working length. Conclusion Bridge plate osteosynthesis is a good treatment option in distal tibia fractures. In our series increasing the working length was not associated with a faster callus formation in distal tibia fractures. Conversely, a lower screw density proximally to the fracture site was associated to a faster callus growth.
ISSN:1432-1068
1633-8065
1432-1068
DOI:10.1007/s00590-023-03697-6