An Approach to Assessing the Influence of Environmental and Occupational Cancer Hazard Identification on Policy Decision-Making
Cancer hazard identification is critical to informing decisions on preventive actions. However, the influence of cancer hazard assessments on the creation of health-protective regulations is poorly understood. Although prior studies have measured the health and economic benefits of regulatory action...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental health perspectives 2023-12, Vol.131 (12), p.125001-125001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 125001 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 125001 |
container_title | Environmental health perspectives |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Mehta, Suril S Morin, Isabelle Osborn, Kimberly Lemeris, Courtney R Conti, Michael Lunn, Ruth M |
description | Cancer hazard identification is critical to informing decisions on preventive actions. However, the influence of cancer hazard assessments on the creation of health-protective regulations is poorly understood. Although prior studies have measured the health and economic benefits of regulatory actions in general, we are not aware of efforts to explicitly study the influence of cancer hazard identification on policy decisions in the United States.
In this commentary, we present an approach to examine whether formal identification of a substance as a human carcinogen may prompt a regulatory action to reduce exposure to carcinogens and enhance public health. Further, we discuss the broader implications of cancer hazard identification on policy decision-making, including identifying gaps and providing recommendations.
Using the Report on Carcinogens (RoC) as a test case, we systematically searched U.S. federal and state databases for notices of regulations mentioning the RoC from 1995 to 2023. For each regulation, we extracted information on the carcinogen(s) regulated, the regulatory agency, the regulatory purpose, the economic sector exposure sources, and the analyzed public health benefits and costs. We created a publicly available, web-based interactive tool to visualize the data.
U.S. regulatory agencies have been using cancer hazard evaluations, such as the RoC, for decades to inform public health policy actions to prevent or mitigate cancer risks. Specifically, nonregulatory cancer hazard assessments have been used to prioritize chemical evaluations, support regulatory-based assessments, and trigger regulatory action. Our approach showed that assessing the influence of cancer hazard identification on science-based public health policies is feasible, informative, and needed, and our study is a first step in this direction. We recommend expanding this approach to other cancer and noncancer hazard assessments to ultimately inform our understanding of the influence of hazard classifications on policymaking. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12681. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1289/EHP12681 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10718082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A783296792</galeid><sourcerecordid>A783296792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e3ed4e90202f7716b070ab776d6d3bd346a49e168a9cf1085034e1d8c400a9703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4so3noK_gUSEEQfeib9kR9PR1lXd-FkD3-9hmw6baNtUpv28HzxXzfr7R1X2AfJQGDmM98ZZiaKnhN8RhIu3q7WlyShnDyIFiTPk1iIJHsYLTAWJKaM5ifRE--_Y4wJp_RxdJJyzHnOxCL6U1hU9P3glG7Q6FDhPXhvbI3GBtDGVu0EVgNyFVrZKzM424EdVYuULdFW66lXo3E2OJYqcANaq99qKNGmDJipjP4XRsEuXWv0NXoH2vjgij-qH6HM0-hRpVoPzw7_afT1_erLch1fbD9slsVFrPOUjzGkUGYgcIKTijFCd5hhtWOMlrRMd2WaUZUJIJQroSuCeY7TDEjJdYaxEgynp9H5jW4_7ToodehuUK3sB9Op4Vo6ZeQ8Yk0ja3clCWYkTCsJCq8PCoP7OYEfZWe8hrZVFtzkZRK6E1mCUxbQlzdorVqQxlYuSOo9LgvG00RQJvaC8RGqBguhvrNQmeCe8WdH-PBK6Iw-mvBmlhCYEX6NtZq8l5vPn_6f3X6bs6_usQ2odmy8a6f9pv0cPIxMD877Aaq7eRMs94crbw83oC_u7-cOvL3U9C8PlOWN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902942037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Approach to Assessing the Influence of Environmental and Occupational Cancer Hazard Identification on Policy Decision-Making</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mehta, Suril S ; Morin, Isabelle ; Osborn, Kimberly ; Lemeris, Courtney R ; Conti, Michael ; Lunn, Ruth M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Suril S ; Morin, Isabelle ; Osborn, Kimberly ; Lemeris, Courtney R ; Conti, Michael ; Lunn, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer hazard identification is critical to informing decisions on preventive actions. However, the influence of cancer hazard assessments on the creation of health-protective regulations is poorly understood. Although prior studies have measured the health and economic benefits of regulatory actions in general, we are not aware of efforts to explicitly study the influence of cancer hazard identification on policy decisions in the United States.
In this commentary, we present an approach to examine whether formal identification of a substance as a human carcinogen may prompt a regulatory action to reduce exposure to carcinogens and enhance public health. Further, we discuss the broader implications of cancer hazard identification on policy decision-making, including identifying gaps and providing recommendations.
Using the Report on Carcinogens (RoC) as a test case, we systematically searched U.S. federal and state databases for notices of regulations mentioning the RoC from 1995 to 2023. For each regulation, we extracted information on the carcinogen(s) regulated, the regulatory agency, the regulatory purpose, the economic sector exposure sources, and the analyzed public health benefits and costs. We created a publicly available, web-based interactive tool to visualize the data.
U.S. regulatory agencies have been using cancer hazard evaluations, such as the RoC, for decades to inform public health policy actions to prevent or mitigate cancer risks. Specifically, nonregulatory cancer hazard assessments have been used to prioritize chemical evaluations, support regulatory-based assessments, and trigger regulatory action. Our approach showed that assessing the influence of cancer hazard identification on science-based public health policies is feasible, informative, and needed, and our study is a first step in this direction. We recommend expanding this approach to other cancer and noncancer hazard assessments to ultimately inform our understanding of the influence of hazard classifications on policymaking. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12681.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/EHP12681</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38088579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cancer ; Carcinogens - toxicity ; Environmental aspects ; Hazardous substances ; Humans ; Identification and classification ; Independent regulatory commissions ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Medical care, Cost of ; Medical policy ; Neoplasms - chemically induced ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Occupational health and safety ; Oncology, Experimental ; Policy ; Prevention ; Public Health ; Risk factors ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2023-12, Vol.131 (12), p.125001-125001</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e3ed4e90202f7716b070ab776d6d3bd346a49e168a9cf1085034e1d8c400a9703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9605-7137</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10718082/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10718082/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38088579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Suril S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morin, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemeris, Courtney R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunn, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><title>An Approach to Assessing the Influence of Environmental and Occupational Cancer Hazard Identification on Policy Decision-Making</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>Cancer hazard identification is critical to informing decisions on preventive actions. However, the influence of cancer hazard assessments on the creation of health-protective regulations is poorly understood. Although prior studies have measured the health and economic benefits of regulatory actions in general, we are not aware of efforts to explicitly study the influence of cancer hazard identification on policy decisions in the United States.
In this commentary, we present an approach to examine whether formal identification of a substance as a human carcinogen may prompt a regulatory action to reduce exposure to carcinogens and enhance public health. Further, we discuss the broader implications of cancer hazard identification on policy decision-making, including identifying gaps and providing recommendations.
Using the Report on Carcinogens (RoC) as a test case, we systematically searched U.S. federal and state databases for notices of regulations mentioning the RoC from 1995 to 2023. For each regulation, we extracted information on the carcinogen(s) regulated, the regulatory agency, the regulatory purpose, the economic sector exposure sources, and the analyzed public health benefits and costs. We created a publicly available, web-based interactive tool to visualize the data.
U.S. regulatory agencies have been using cancer hazard evaluations, such as the RoC, for decades to inform public health policy actions to prevent or mitigate cancer risks. Specifically, nonregulatory cancer hazard assessments have been used to prioritize chemical evaluations, support regulatory-based assessments, and trigger regulatory action. Our approach showed that assessing the influence of cancer hazard identification on science-based public health policies is feasible, informative, and needed, and our study is a first step in this direction. We recommend expanding this approach to other cancer and noncancer hazard assessments to ultimately inform our understanding of the influence of hazard classifications on policymaking. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12681.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinogens - toxicity</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Hazardous substances</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Independent regulatory commissions</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Medical care, Cost of</subject><subject>Medical policy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - chemically induced</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational health and safety</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4so3noK_gUSEEQfeib9kR9PR1lXd-FkD3-9hmw6baNtUpv28HzxXzfr7R1X2AfJQGDmM98ZZiaKnhN8RhIu3q7WlyShnDyIFiTPk1iIJHsYLTAWJKaM5ifRE--_Y4wJp_RxdJJyzHnOxCL6U1hU9P3glG7Q6FDhPXhvbI3GBtDGVu0EVgNyFVrZKzM424EdVYuULdFW66lXo3E2OJYqcANaq99qKNGmDJipjP4XRsEuXWv0NXoH2vjgij-qH6HM0-hRpVoPzw7_afT1_erLch1fbD9slsVFrPOUjzGkUGYgcIKTijFCd5hhtWOMlrRMd2WaUZUJIJQroSuCeY7TDEjJdYaxEgynp9H5jW4_7ToodehuUK3sB9Op4Vo6ZeQ8Yk0ja3clCWYkTCsJCq8PCoP7OYEfZWe8hrZVFtzkZRK6E1mCUxbQlzdorVqQxlYuSOo9LgvG00RQJvaC8RGqBguhvrNQmeCe8WdH-PBK6Iw-mvBmlhCYEX6NtZq8l5vPn_6f3X6bs6_usQ2odmy8a6f9pv0cPIxMD877Aaq7eRMs94crbw83oC_u7-cOvL3U9C8PlOWN</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Mehta, Suril S</creator><creator>Morin, Isabelle</creator><creator>Osborn, Kimberly</creator><creator>Lemeris, Courtney R</creator><creator>Conti, Michael</creator><creator>Lunn, Ruth M</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><general>Environmental Health Perspectives</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-7137</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>An Approach to Assessing the Influence of Environmental and Occupational Cancer Hazard Identification on Policy Decision-Making</title><author>Mehta, Suril S ; Morin, Isabelle ; Osborn, Kimberly ; Lemeris, Courtney R ; Conti, Michael ; Lunn, Ruth M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-e3ed4e90202f7716b070ab776d6d3bd346a49e168a9cf1085034e1d8c400a9703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinogens - toxicity</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Hazardous substances</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Independent regulatory commissions</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Medical care, Cost of</topic><topic>Medical policy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - chemically induced</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational health and safety</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Suril S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morin, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemeris, Courtney R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunn, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mehta, Suril S</au><au>Morin, Isabelle</au><au>Osborn, Kimberly</au><au>Lemeris, Courtney R</au><au>Conti, Michael</au><au>Lunn, Ruth M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Approach to Assessing the Influence of Environmental and Occupational Cancer Hazard Identification on Policy Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>125001</spage><epage>125001</epage><pages>125001-125001</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>Cancer hazard identification is critical to informing decisions on preventive actions. However, the influence of cancer hazard assessments on the creation of health-protective regulations is poorly understood. Although prior studies have measured the health and economic benefits of regulatory actions in general, we are not aware of efforts to explicitly study the influence of cancer hazard identification on policy decisions in the United States.
In this commentary, we present an approach to examine whether formal identification of a substance as a human carcinogen may prompt a regulatory action to reduce exposure to carcinogens and enhance public health. Further, we discuss the broader implications of cancer hazard identification on policy decision-making, including identifying gaps and providing recommendations.
Using the Report on Carcinogens (RoC) as a test case, we systematically searched U.S. federal and state databases for notices of regulations mentioning the RoC from 1995 to 2023. For each regulation, we extracted information on the carcinogen(s) regulated, the regulatory agency, the regulatory purpose, the economic sector exposure sources, and the analyzed public health benefits and costs. We created a publicly available, web-based interactive tool to visualize the data.
U.S. regulatory agencies have been using cancer hazard evaluations, such as the RoC, for decades to inform public health policy actions to prevent or mitigate cancer risks. Specifically, nonregulatory cancer hazard assessments have been used to prioritize chemical evaluations, support regulatory-based assessments, and trigger regulatory action. Our approach showed that assessing the influence of cancer hazard identification on science-based public health policies is feasible, informative, and needed, and our study is a first step in this direction. We recommend expanding this approach to other cancer and noncancer hazard assessments to ultimately inform our understanding of the influence of hazard classifications on policymaking. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12681.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</pub><pmid>38088579</pmid><doi>10.1289/EHP12681</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-7137</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-6765 |
ispartof | Environmental health perspectives, 2023-12, Vol.131 (12), p.125001-125001 |
issn | 0091-6765 1552-9924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10718082 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Cancer Carcinogens - toxicity Environmental aspects Hazardous substances Humans Identification and classification Independent regulatory commissions Laws, regulations and rules Medical care, Cost of Medical policy Neoplasms - chemically induced Neoplasms - epidemiology Occupational health and safety Oncology, Experimental Policy Prevention Public Health Risk factors United States - epidemiology |
title | An Approach to Assessing the Influence of Environmental and Occupational Cancer Hazard Identification on Policy Decision-Making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Approach%20to%20Assessing%20the%20Influence%20of%20Environmental%20and%20Occupational%20Cancer%20Hazard%20Identification%20on%20Policy%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Mehta,%20Suril%20S&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=125001&rft.epage=125001&rft.pages=125001-125001&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/EHP12681&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA783296792%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902942037&rft_id=info:pmid/38088579&rft_galeid=A783296792&rfr_iscdi=true |