How the COVID-19 Pandemic Contributed to Diagnostic Bias
Diagnosis bias in the medical field is a recognized entity that can contribute to misdiagnoses and incorrect management. It remains a constant challenge that must be recognized and addressed. Several factors play a role in the formation of preconceptions which influence the physicians' decision...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e48282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Diagnosis bias in the medical field is a recognized entity that can contribute to misdiagnoses and incorrect management. It remains a constant challenge that must be recognized and addressed. Several factors play a role in the formation of preconceptions which influence the physicians' decision-making process. The aim of this paper is to present a case that was misdiagnosed and mistakenly managed due to diagnosis bias during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We also suggest two ways to reduce the risk of diagnosis bias. Multi-inflammatory syndrome of children (MIS-C) was described during the COVID-19 pandemic. The rise in the incidence of MIS-C masked the diagnosis of other diseases that present in a similar fashion. In this paper, we describe the case of a seven-year-old girl, who presented in 2020, with acute onset respiratory distress. Her chest images were suggestive of COVID-19 pneumonitis which prompted the physicians to complete the MIS-C workup by performing an echocardiogram. A large aneurysm of the left main artery was seen which led to a preliminary diagnosis of MIS-C. A repeat echocardiography, 48 hours after the initiation of MIS-C treatment, was suggestive of a large coronary fistula complicated by infective endocarditis and multiple septic pulmonary emboli. It can be inferred that the misdiagnosis occurred as a result of availability and premature-closure biases. Efforts to decrease such biases include group decision-making and using checklists during the assessment of a patient. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.48282 |