Bounding box-based 3D AI model for user-guided volumetric segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on standard-of-care CTs

To develop a bounding-box-based 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) for user-guided volumetric pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) segmentation. Reference segmentations were obtained on CTs (2006–2020) of treatment-naïve PDA. Images were algorithmically cropped using a tumor-centered bounding box...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] 2023-08, Vol.23 (5), p.522-529
Hauptverfasser: Mukherjee, Sovanlal, Korfiatis, Panagiotis, Khasawneh, Hala, Rajamohan, Naveen, Patra, Anurima, Suman, Garima, Singh, Aparna, Thakkar, Jay, Patnam, Nandakumar G., Trivedi, Kamaxi H., Karbhari, Aashna, Chari, Suresh T., Truty, Mark J., Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R., Bolan, Candice W., Sandrasegaran, Kumar, Majumder, Shounak, Goenka, Ajit H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To develop a bounding-box-based 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) for user-guided volumetric pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) segmentation. Reference segmentations were obtained on CTs (2006–2020) of treatment-naïve PDA. Images were algorithmically cropped using a tumor-centered bounding box for training a 3D nnUNet-based-CNN. Three radiologists independently segmented tumors on test subset, which were combined with reference segmentations using STAPLE to derive composite segmentations. Generalizability was evaluated on Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) (n = 41) and Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD) (n = 152) datasets. Total 1151 patients [667 males; age:65.3 ± 10.2 years; T1:34, T2:477, T3:237, T4:403; mean (range) tumor diameter:4.34 (1.1–12.6)-cm] were randomly divided between training/validation (n = 921) and test subsets (n = 230; 75% from other institutions). Model had a high DSC (mean ± SD) against reference segmentations (0.84 ± 0.06), which was comparable to its DSC against composite segmentations (0.84 ± 0.11, p = 0.52). Model-predicted versus reference tumor volumes were comparable (mean ± SD) (29.1 ± 42.2-cc versus 27.1 ± 32.9-cc, p = 0.69, CCC = 0.93). Inter-reader variability was high (mean DSC 0.69 ± 0.16), especially for smaller and isodense tumors. Conversely, model's high performance was comparable between tumor stages, volumes and densities (p > 0.05). Model was resilient to different tumor locations, status of pancreatic/biliary ducts, pancreatic atrophy, CT vendors and slice thicknesses, as well as to the epicenter and dimensions of the bounding-box (p > 0.05). Performance was generalizable on MSD (DSC:0.82 ± 0.06) and TCIA datasets (DSC:0.84 ± 0.08). A computationally efficient bounding box-based AI model developed on a large and diverse dataset shows high accuracy, generalizability, and robustness to clinically encountered variations for user-guided volumetric PDA segmentation including for small and isodense tumors. AI-driven bounding box-based user-guided PDA segmentation offers a discovery tool for image-based multi-omics models for applications such as risk-stratification, treatment response assessment, and prognostication, which are urgently needed to customize treatment strategies to the unique biological profile of each patient's tumor.
ISSN:1424-3903
1424-3911
1424-3911
DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2023.05.008