Drug treatment service procurement: A systematic review of models, goals, and outcomes
Aim: To explore the goals and outcomes of public procurement of drug treatment services in OECD countries. The study explores how these complex services are procured and delivered. Methods and data: A systematic review of the literature (1990–2020) identified four partly overlapping models of drug t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2023-10, Vol.40 (5), p.424-442 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 442 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 424 |
| container_title | Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Schneider, Taina Kuussaari, Kristiina Virtanen, Petri |
| description | Aim: To explore the goals and outcomes of public procurement of drug treatment services in OECD countries. The study explores how these complex services are procured and delivered. Methods and data: A systematic review of the literature (1990–2020) identified four partly overlapping models of drug treatment service procurement that are here labelled traditional, value-based, outcome-based, and innovative. Results: Even though different forms of drug treatment services procurement are common, only 12 empirical studies that focused on procurement were found. The four models differ in their approaches to design and performance specifications and the role of competition and collaboration in the co-creation of value. Conclusions: Competition and incentives improve neither the efficiency nor the quality or the outcomes of complex drug treatment services. Whereas many studies focus on payment mechanisms, there are important research gaps that relate to the co-creation of value with and for the service-users and other stakeholders. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/14550725231157503 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10634391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14550725231157503</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2890756955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-3674a8122a6b9211d8e84a1c906c21cacc542e4459be82ce8260ef480515999b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVpaEKSH9BLEeTSQzfRaCWtlEswzicEeml7FVp57K7xrhxp18H_vnKcuE1CBWKG0TOvZngJ-QzsFKCqzkBIySoueQkgK8nKD-Qg13ShgKuPT7ksNsA-OU5pzvIRioMSn8h-WRlltKkOyK_LOMxoH9H1LXY9TRhXjUe6jMEPETe1czqiaZ16bF3feBpx1eAjDVPahgku0jc6C24TXDehYeh9aDEdkb1pLuLxczwkP6-vfoxvi_vvN3fj0X1RC236olSVcBo4d6o2HGCiUQsH3jDlOXjnvRQchZCmRs19vorhVGgmQRpj6vKQXGx1l0Pd4sTncaNb2GVsWhfXNrjGvn7pmt92FlYWmCpFaSArfH1WiOFhwNTbtkkeFwvXYRiS5dqwSiojZUZP3qDzMMQu75cpzbWUmolMwZbyMaQUcbqbBpjdOGffOZd7vvy7xq7jxacMnG6B5Gb499v_K_4BAOKf_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2882855804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drug treatment service procurement: A systematic review of models, goals, and outcomes</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Norart Open Access</source><creator>Schneider, Taina ; Kuussaari, Kristiina ; Virtanen, Petri</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Taina ; Kuussaari, Kristiina ; Virtanen, Petri</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To explore the goals and outcomes of public procurement of drug treatment services in OECD countries. The study explores how these complex services are procured and delivered. Methods and data: A systematic review of the literature (1990–2020) identified four partly overlapping models of drug treatment service procurement that are here labelled traditional, value-based, outcome-based, and innovative. Results: Even though different forms of drug treatment services procurement are common, only 12 empirical studies that focused on procurement were found. The four models differ in their approaches to design and performance specifications and the role of competition and collaboration in the co-creation of value. Conclusions: Competition and incentives improve neither the efficiency nor the quality or the outcomes of complex drug treatment services. Whereas many studies focus on payment mechanisms, there are important research gaps that relate to the co-creation of value with and for the service-users and other stakeholders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1455-0725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1458-6126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14550725231157503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37969897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Drug abuse ; Drugs ; Government purchasing ; Literature reviews ; Procurement ; Purchasing ; Reviews ; Services ; Systematic review ; Value</subject><ispartof>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2023-10, Vol.40 (5), p.424-442</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 SAGE Publications Ltd, or Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-3674a8122a6b9211d8e84a1c906c21cacc542e4459be82ce8260ef480515999b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-3674a8122a6b9211d8e84a1c906c21cacc542e4459be82ce8260ef480515999b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2635-5267</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634391/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634391/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,313,314,723,776,780,788,881,21945,27830,27843,27899,27901,27902,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Taina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Petri</creatorcontrib><title>Drug treatment service procurement: A systematic review of models, goals, and outcomes</title><title>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs</title><addtitle>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs</addtitle><description>Aim: To explore the goals and outcomes of public procurement of drug treatment services in OECD countries. The study explores how these complex services are procured and delivered. Methods and data: A systematic review of the literature (1990–2020) identified four partly overlapping models of drug treatment service procurement that are here labelled traditional, value-based, outcome-based, and innovative. Results: Even though different forms of drug treatment services procurement are common, only 12 empirical studies that focused on procurement were found. The four models differ in their approaches to design and performance specifications and the role of competition and collaboration in the co-creation of value. Conclusions: Competition and incentives improve neither the efficiency nor the quality or the outcomes of complex drug treatment services. Whereas many studies focus on payment mechanisms, there are important research gaps that relate to the co-creation of value with and for the service-users and other stakeholders.</description><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Government purchasing</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Procurement</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Value</subject><issn>1455-0725</issn><issn>1458-6126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVpaEKSH9BLEeTSQzfRaCWtlEswzicEeml7FVp57K7xrhxp18H_vnKcuE1CBWKG0TOvZngJ-QzsFKCqzkBIySoueQkgK8nKD-Qg13ShgKuPT7ksNsA-OU5pzvIRioMSn8h-WRlltKkOyK_LOMxoH9H1LXY9TRhXjUe6jMEPETe1czqiaZ16bF3feBpx1eAjDVPahgku0jc6C24TXDehYeh9aDEdkb1pLuLxczwkP6-vfoxvi_vvN3fj0X1RC236olSVcBo4d6o2HGCiUQsH3jDlOXjnvRQchZCmRs19vorhVGgmQRpj6vKQXGx1l0Pd4sTncaNb2GVsWhfXNrjGvn7pmt92FlYWmCpFaSArfH1WiOFhwNTbtkkeFwvXYRiS5dqwSiojZUZP3qDzMMQu75cpzbWUmolMwZbyMaQUcbqbBpjdOGffOZd7vvy7xq7jxacMnG6B5Gb499v_K_4BAOKf_Q</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Schneider, Taina</creator><creator>Kuussaari, Kristiina</creator><creator>Virtanen, Petri</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-5267</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Drug treatment service procurement: A systematic review of models, goals, and outcomes</title><author>Schneider, Taina ; Kuussaari, Kristiina ; Virtanen, Petri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b489t-3674a8122a6b9211d8e84a1c906c21cacc542e4459be82ce8260ef480515999b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Government purchasing</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Procurement</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Value</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Taina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Petri</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Taina</au><au>Kuussaari, Kristiina</au><au>Virtanen, Petri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drug treatment service procurement: A systematic review of models, goals, and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs</jtitle><addtitle>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>424</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>424-442</pages><issn>1455-0725</issn><eissn>1458-6126</eissn><abstract>Aim: To explore the goals and outcomes of public procurement of drug treatment services in OECD countries. The study explores how these complex services are procured and delivered. Methods and data: A systematic review of the literature (1990–2020) identified four partly overlapping models of drug treatment service procurement that are here labelled traditional, value-based, outcome-based, and innovative. Results: Even though different forms of drug treatment services procurement are common, only 12 empirical studies that focused on procurement were found. The four models differ in their approaches to design and performance specifications and the role of competition and collaboration in the co-creation of value. Conclusions: Competition and incentives improve neither the efficiency nor the quality or the outcomes of complex drug treatment services. Whereas many studies focus on payment mechanisms, there are important research gaps that relate to the co-creation of value with and for the service-users and other stakeholders.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37969897</pmid><doi>10.1177/14550725231157503</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-5267</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1455-0725 |
| ispartof | Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2023-10, Vol.40 (5), p.424-442 |
| issn | 1455-0725 1458-6126 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10634391 |
| source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; PAIS Index; PubMed Central; Norart Open Access |
| subjects | Drug abuse Drugs Government purchasing Literature reviews Procurement Purchasing Reviews Services Systematic review Value |
| title | Drug treatment service procurement: A systematic review of models, goals, and outcomes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A57%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drug%20treatment%20service%20procurement:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20models,%20goals,%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Nordic%20Studies%20on%20Alcohol%20and%20Drugs&rft.au=Schneider,%20Taina&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=424&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=424-442&rft.issn=1455-0725&rft.eissn=1458-6126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14550725231157503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2890756955%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882855804&rft_id=info:pmid/37969897&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14550725231157503&rfr_iscdi=true |