Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women’s preferences in the LORD-trial
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of cancer (1990) 2023-10, Vol.192, p.113276-113276, Article 113276 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113276 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 113276 |
container_title | European journal of cancer (1990) |
container_volume | 192 |
creator | Schmitz, Renée S.J.M. Engelhardt, Ellen G. Gerritsma, Miranda A. Sondermeijer, Carine M.T. Verschuur, Ellen Houtzager, Julia Griffioen, Rosalie Retèl, Valesca Bijker, Nina Mann, Ritse M. van Duijnhoven, Frederieke Wesseling, Jelle Bleiker, Eveline M.A. |
description | Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether active surveillance (AS) for low-risk DCIS is safe, by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between AS and conventional treatment (CT). Here, we aim to describe how participants are distributed among both trial arms, identify their motives for their preference, and assess factors associated with their choice.
Data were extracted from baseline questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution and characteristics of participants; thematic analyses to extract self-reported reasons for the choice of trial arm, and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between patient characteristics and chosen trial arm.
Of 377 women included, 76% chose AS and 24% CT. Most frequently cited reasons for AS were “treatment is not (yet) necessary” (59%) and trust in the AS-plan (39%). Reasons for CT were cancer worry (51%) and perceived certainty (29%). Women opting for AS more often had lower educational levels (OR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.93) and more often reported experiencing shared decision making (OR 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37–5.37) than women choosing CT.
The LORD-trial is the first to offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between CT and AS. Most women opted for AS and reported high levels of trust in the safety of AS. Their preferences highlight the necessity to establish the safety of AS for low-risk DCIS.
•The LORD-trial investigates whether active surveillance is safe in low-risk DCIS.•Women strongly preferred active surveillance (76%) to conventional treatment (24%).•Most cited reason for active surveillance was “treatment is not (yet) necessary”.•Most cited reason for conventional treatment was "avoiding cancer worry". |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10632767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804923003787</els_id><sourcerecordid>2860407364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-b4fc2ffbc60174096fac90a55ddb512a6168ee1b5269221880fb67ebde40016b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUhS3UCqaUF2DlZTeZXjuJ7VSVKjT8FGkkJNqKHZbj3BQPmclgO6nY9TV4PZ6kjgYhsenKi3vOub7fIeSYwZwBE59Xc1xZM-fA8zljOZdij8yYklUGquTvyAyqssoUFNUB-RDCCgCkKmCfHORSlJJzNSO3Jza6EWkY_Iiu68zGIh3RhyHQ6NHENW4idRva9X8y78I9PV1c_vhCb_o0eP77FOjWY4seky9MuniHdHl1fZpF70z3kbxvTRfw6OU9JL_Oz34uvmfLq4vLxckys0Wex6wuWsvbtrYCmCygEq2xFZiybJq6ZNwIJhQiq0suKs6ZUtDWQmLdYAGJRJ0fkm-73O1Qr7Gx6dPedHrr3dr4R90bp99ONu5O_-5HzUBM4GRK-PSS4PuHAUPUaxcsTkSwH4LmSkABMhdFkvKd1Po-hHT-6x4GempGr_TUjJ6a0btmkunrzoQJw-jQ62DdRK1xHm3UTe_-Z_8HZRuXYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2860407364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women’s preferences in the LORD-trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Schmitz, Renée S.J.M. ; Engelhardt, Ellen G. ; Gerritsma, Miranda A. ; Sondermeijer, Carine M.T. ; Verschuur, Ellen ; Houtzager, Julia ; Griffioen, Rosalie ; Retèl, Valesca ; Bijker, Nina ; Mann, Ritse M. ; van Duijnhoven, Frederieke ; Wesseling, Jelle ; Bleiker, Eveline M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Renée S.J.M. ; Engelhardt, Ellen G. ; Gerritsma, Miranda A. ; Sondermeijer, Carine M.T. ; Verschuur, Ellen ; Houtzager, Julia ; Griffioen, Rosalie ; Retèl, Valesca ; Bijker, Nina ; Mann, Ritse M. ; van Duijnhoven, Frederieke ; Wesseling, Jelle ; Bleiker, Eveline M.A. ; Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether active surveillance (AS) for low-risk DCIS is safe, by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between AS and conventional treatment (CT). Here, we aim to describe how participants are distributed among both trial arms, identify their motives for their preference, and assess factors associated with their choice.
Data were extracted from baseline questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution and characteristics of participants; thematic analyses to extract self-reported reasons for the choice of trial arm, and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between patient characteristics and chosen trial arm.
Of 377 women included, 76% chose AS and 24% CT. Most frequently cited reasons for AS were “treatment is not (yet) necessary” (59%) and trust in the AS-plan (39%). Reasons for CT were cancer worry (51%) and perceived certainty (29%). Women opting for AS more often had lower educational levels (OR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.93) and more often reported experiencing shared decision making (OR 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37–5.37) than women choosing CT.
The LORD-trial is the first to offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between CT and AS. Most women opted for AS and reported high levels of trust in the safety of AS. Their preferences highlight the necessity to establish the safety of AS for low-risk DCIS.
•The LORD-trial investigates whether active surveillance is safe in low-risk DCIS.•Women strongly preferred active surveillance (76%) to conventional treatment (24%).•Most cited reason for active surveillance was “treatment is not (yet) necessary”.•Most cited reason for conventional treatment was "avoiding cancer worry".</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37657228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>DCIS ; Original Research ; Patient preference ; Shared decision making</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2023-10, Vol.192, p.113276-113276, Article 113276</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>2023 The Authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-b4fc2ffbc60174096fac90a55ddb512a6168ee1b5269221880fb67ebde40016b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-b4fc2ffbc60174096fac90a55ddb512a6168ee1b5269221880fb67ebde40016b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804923003787$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Renée S.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Ellen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerritsma, Miranda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sondermeijer, Carine M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschuur, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houtzager, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffioen, Rosalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retèl, Valesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bijker, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Ritse M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijnhoven, Frederieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesseling, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleiker, Eveline M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women’s preferences in the LORD-trial</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><description>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether active surveillance (AS) for low-risk DCIS is safe, by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between AS and conventional treatment (CT). Here, we aim to describe how participants are distributed among both trial arms, identify their motives for their preference, and assess factors associated with their choice.
Data were extracted from baseline questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution and characteristics of participants; thematic analyses to extract self-reported reasons for the choice of trial arm, and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between patient characteristics and chosen trial arm.
Of 377 women included, 76% chose AS and 24% CT. Most frequently cited reasons for AS were “treatment is not (yet) necessary” (59%) and trust in the AS-plan (39%). Reasons for CT were cancer worry (51%) and perceived certainty (29%). Women opting for AS more often had lower educational levels (OR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.93) and more often reported experiencing shared decision making (OR 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37–5.37) than women choosing CT.
The LORD-trial is the first to offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between CT and AS. Most women opted for AS and reported high levels of trust in the safety of AS. Their preferences highlight the necessity to establish the safety of AS for low-risk DCIS.
•The LORD-trial investigates whether active surveillance is safe in low-risk DCIS.•Women strongly preferred active surveillance (76%) to conventional treatment (24%).•Most cited reason for active surveillance was “treatment is not (yet) necessary”.•Most cited reason for conventional treatment was "avoiding cancer worry".</description><subject>DCIS</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patient preference</subject><subject>Shared decision making</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUhS3UCqaUF2DlZTeZXjuJ7VSVKjT8FGkkJNqKHZbj3BQPmclgO6nY9TV4PZ6kjgYhsenKi3vOub7fIeSYwZwBE59Xc1xZM-fA8zljOZdij8yYklUGquTvyAyqssoUFNUB-RDCCgCkKmCfHORSlJJzNSO3Jza6EWkY_Iiu68zGIh3RhyHQ6NHENW4idRva9X8y78I9PV1c_vhCb_o0eP77FOjWY4seky9MuniHdHl1fZpF70z3kbxvTRfw6OU9JL_Oz34uvmfLq4vLxckys0Wex6wuWsvbtrYCmCygEq2xFZiybJq6ZNwIJhQiq0suKs6ZUtDWQmLdYAGJRJ0fkm-73O1Qr7Gx6dPedHrr3dr4R90bp99ONu5O_-5HzUBM4GRK-PSS4PuHAUPUaxcsTkSwH4LmSkABMhdFkvKd1Po-hHT-6x4GempGr_TUjJ6a0btmkunrzoQJw-jQ62DdRK1xHm3UTe_-Z_8HZRuXYw</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Schmitz, Renée S.J.M.</creator><creator>Engelhardt, Ellen G.</creator><creator>Gerritsma, Miranda A.</creator><creator>Sondermeijer, Carine M.T.</creator><creator>Verschuur, Ellen</creator><creator>Houtzager, Julia</creator><creator>Griffioen, Rosalie</creator><creator>Retèl, Valesca</creator><creator>Bijker, Nina</creator><creator>Mann, Ritse M.</creator><creator>van Duijnhoven, Frederieke</creator><creator>Wesseling, Jelle</creator><creator>Bleiker, Eveline M.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women’s preferences in the LORD-trial</title><author>Schmitz, Renée S.J.M. ; Engelhardt, Ellen G. ; Gerritsma, Miranda A. ; Sondermeijer, Carine M.T. ; Verschuur, Ellen ; Houtzager, Julia ; Griffioen, Rosalie ; Retèl, Valesca ; Bijker, Nina ; Mann, Ritse M. ; van Duijnhoven, Frederieke ; Wesseling, Jelle ; Bleiker, Eveline M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-b4fc2ffbc60174096fac90a55ddb512a6168ee1b5269221880fb67ebde40016b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>DCIS</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patient preference</topic><topic>Shared decision making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Renée S.J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelhardt, Ellen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerritsma, Miranda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sondermeijer, Carine M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschuur, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houtzager, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffioen, Rosalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retèl, Valesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bijker, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Ritse M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duijnhoven, Frederieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesseling, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleiker, Eveline M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmitz, Renée S.J.M.</au><au>Engelhardt, Ellen G.</au><au>Gerritsma, Miranda A.</au><au>Sondermeijer, Carine M.T.</au><au>Verschuur, Ellen</au><au>Houtzager, Julia</au><au>Griffioen, Rosalie</au><au>Retèl, Valesca</au><au>Bijker, Nina</au><au>Mann, Ritse M.</au><au>van Duijnhoven, Frederieke</au><au>Wesseling, Jelle</au><au>Bleiker, Eveline M.A.</au><aucorp>Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women’s preferences in the LORD-trial</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>192</volume><spage>113276</spage><epage>113276</epage><pages>113276-113276</pages><artnum>113276</artnum><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether active surveillance (AS) for low-risk DCIS is safe, by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between AS and conventional treatment (CT). Here, we aim to describe how participants are distributed among both trial arms, identify their motives for their preference, and assess factors associated with their choice.
Data were extracted from baseline questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution and characteristics of participants; thematic analyses to extract self-reported reasons for the choice of trial arm, and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between patient characteristics and chosen trial arm.
Of 377 women included, 76% chose AS and 24% CT. Most frequently cited reasons for AS were “treatment is not (yet) necessary” (59%) and trust in the AS-plan (39%). Reasons for CT were cancer worry (51%) and perceived certainty (29%). Women opting for AS more often had lower educational levels (OR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.93) and more often reported experiencing shared decision making (OR 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37–5.37) than women choosing CT.
The LORD-trial is the first to offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between CT and AS. Most women opted for AS and reported high levels of trust in the safety of AS. Their preferences highlight the necessity to establish the safety of AS for low-risk DCIS.
•The LORD-trial investigates whether active surveillance is safe in low-risk DCIS.•Women strongly preferred active surveillance (76%) to conventional treatment (24%).•Most cited reason for active surveillance was “treatment is not (yet) necessary”.•Most cited reason for conventional treatment was "avoiding cancer worry".</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37657228</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8049 |
ispartof | European journal of cancer (1990), 2023-10, Vol.192, p.113276-113276, Article 113276 |
issn | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10632767 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | DCIS Original Research Patient preference Shared decision making |
title | Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women’s preferences in the LORD-trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A48%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Active%20surveillance%20versus%20treatment%20in%20low-risk%20DCIS:%20Women%E2%80%99s%20preferences%20in%20the%20LORD-trial&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Schmitz,%20Ren%C3%A9e%20S.J.M.&rft.aucorp=Grand%20Challenge%20PRECISION%20Consortium&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=192&rft.spage=113276&rft.epage=113276&rft.pages=113276-113276&rft.artnum=113276&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2860407364%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2860407364&rft_id=info:pmid/37657228&rft_els_id=S0959804923003787&rfr_iscdi=true |