Clinician educators’ conceptions of assessment in medical education
In pursuing assessment excellence, clinician-educators who design and implement assessment are pivotal. The influence of their assessment practice in university-run licensure exams on student learning has direct implications for future patient care. While teaching practice has been shown to parallel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2023-10, Vol.28 (4), p.1053-1077 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1077 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1053 |
container_title | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Sims, D. A. Cilliers, F. J. |
description | In pursuing assessment excellence, clinician-educators who design and implement assessment are pivotal. The influence of their assessment practice in university-run licensure exams on student learning has direct implications for future patient care. While teaching practice has been shown to parallel conceptions of teaching, we know too little about conceptions of assessment in medical education to know if this is the case for assessment practice and conceptions of assessment. To explore clinician-educators’ conceptions of assessment, a phenomenographic study was undertaken. Phenomenography explores conceptions, the qualitatively different ways of understanding a phenomenon. Data analysis identifies a range of hierarchically inclusive categories of understanding, from simple to more complex, and the dimensions that distinguish each category or conception. Thirty-one clerkship convenors in three diverse Southern settings were interviewed in three cycles of iterative data collection and analysis. Four conceptions of assessment were identified: passive operator, awakening enquirer, active owner and scholarly assessor. Six dimensions were elucidated to describe and distinguish each conception: purpose of assessment; temporal perspective; role and responsibility; accountability; reflexivity and emotional valence. Additionally, three characteristics that appeared to track the progressive nature of the conceptions were identified: professional identity, assessment literacy and self-efficacy. These conceptions encompass and extend previously described conceptions across different educational levels, disciplines and contexts, suggesting applicability to other settings. There is some evidence of a relationship between conceptions and practice, suggesting, together with the hierarchical nature of these conceptions, that targeting conceptions during faculty development may be an effective approach to enhance assessment practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10459-022-10197-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10624725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1399045</ericid><sourcerecordid>2768234672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-2cd98a98c6094971d77cfb8b55210f1352d9fccf0340e6ee73b53341ad6bfd133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuEzEYhS1URELgBZBAI7HpxuDL-LaqUJRyUSU2sLY8Hrs4mtipPVOJHa_R1-uT4DAhXBZd2fL5_uPz6wDwAqM3GCHxtmDUMgURIRAjrARkj8ASM0Eh5kKc1TuVBLZK8QV4WsoWIUSxlE_AgnLOCaXtEmzWQ4jBBhMb10_WjCmX-x93jU3Ruv0YUixN8o0pxZWyc3FsQmx2rg_WDMeJyjwDj70Zint-PFfg6-Xmy_oDvPr8_uP63RW0rRIjJLZX0ihpOVL1AfdCWN_JjjGCkceUkV55az2iLXLcOUE7VlNi0_PO95jSFbiYffdTV0PYmiebQe9z2Jn8XScT9L9KDN_0dbrVGHHSCsKqw_nRIaebyZVR70KxbhhMdGkqmgguCW25IBV9_R-6TVOOdT9NpGRccEoPFJkpm1Mp2flTGoz0oSY916RrTfpXTfqQ4tXfe5xGfvdSgZcz4HKwJ3nzCVOlqlvV6ayXqsVrl_9ke-Dbn8t5qHM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2885676332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinician educators’ conceptions of assessment in medical education</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sims, D. A. ; Cilliers, F. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sims, D. A. ; Cilliers, F. J.</creatorcontrib><description>In pursuing assessment excellence, clinician-educators who design and implement assessment are pivotal. The influence of their assessment practice in university-run licensure exams on student learning has direct implications for future patient care. While teaching practice has been shown to parallel conceptions of teaching, we know too little about conceptions of assessment in medical education to know if this is the case for assessment practice and conceptions of assessment. To explore clinician-educators’ conceptions of assessment, a phenomenographic study was undertaken. Phenomenography explores conceptions, the qualitatively different ways of understanding a phenomenon. Data analysis identifies a range of hierarchically inclusive categories of understanding, from simple to more complex, and the dimensions that distinguish each category or conception. Thirty-one clerkship convenors in three diverse Southern settings were interviewed in three cycles of iterative data collection and analysis. Four conceptions of assessment were identified: passive operator, awakening enquirer, active owner and scholarly assessor. Six dimensions were elucidated to describe and distinguish each conception: purpose of assessment; temporal perspective; role and responsibility; accountability; reflexivity and emotional valence. Additionally, three characteristics that appeared to track the progressive nature of the conceptions were identified: professional identity, assessment literacy and self-efficacy. These conceptions encompass and extend previously described conceptions across different educational levels, disciplines and contexts, suggesting applicability to other settings. There is some evidence of a relationship between conceptions and practice, suggesting, together with the hierarchical nature of these conceptions, that targeting conceptions during faculty development may be an effective approach to enhance assessment practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10459-022-10197-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36662334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Assessment Literacy ; Data Analysis ; Education ; Faculty Development ; Health sciences ; Learning ; Licenses ; Medical Education ; Medical School Faculty ; Medical Students ; Professional Identity ; Self Efficacy ; Student Evaluation ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2023-10, Vol.28 (4), p.1053-1077</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-2cd98a98c6094971d77cfb8b55210f1352d9fccf0340e6ee73b53341ad6bfd133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-2cd98a98c6094971d77cfb8b55210f1352d9fccf0340e6ee73b53341ad6bfd133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-022-10197-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10459-022-10197-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1399045$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36662334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sims, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilliers, F. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinician educators’ conceptions of assessment in medical education</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>In pursuing assessment excellence, clinician-educators who design and implement assessment are pivotal. The influence of their assessment practice in university-run licensure exams on student learning has direct implications for future patient care. While teaching practice has been shown to parallel conceptions of teaching, we know too little about conceptions of assessment in medical education to know if this is the case for assessment practice and conceptions of assessment. To explore clinician-educators’ conceptions of assessment, a phenomenographic study was undertaken. Phenomenography explores conceptions, the qualitatively different ways of understanding a phenomenon. Data analysis identifies a range of hierarchically inclusive categories of understanding, from simple to more complex, and the dimensions that distinguish each category or conception. Thirty-one clerkship convenors in three diverse Southern settings were interviewed in three cycles of iterative data collection and analysis. Four conceptions of assessment were identified: passive operator, awakening enquirer, active owner and scholarly assessor. Six dimensions were elucidated to describe and distinguish each conception: purpose of assessment; temporal perspective; role and responsibility; accountability; reflexivity and emotional valence. Additionally, three characteristics that appeared to track the progressive nature of the conceptions were identified: professional identity, assessment literacy and self-efficacy. These conceptions encompass and extend previously described conceptions across different educational levels, disciplines and contexts, suggesting applicability to other settings. There is some evidence of a relationship between conceptions and practice, suggesting, together with the hierarchical nature of these conceptions, that targeting conceptions during faculty development may be an effective approach to enhance assessment practice.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Assessment Literacy</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical School Faculty</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Professional Identity</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuEzEYhS1URELgBZBAI7HpxuDL-LaqUJRyUSU2sLY8Hrs4mtipPVOJHa_R1-uT4DAhXBZd2fL5_uPz6wDwAqM3GCHxtmDUMgURIRAjrARkj8ASM0Eh5kKc1TuVBLZK8QV4WsoWIUSxlE_AgnLOCaXtEmzWQ4jBBhMb10_WjCmX-x93jU3Ruv0YUixN8o0pxZWyc3FsQmx2rg_WDMeJyjwDj70Zint-PFfg6-Xmy_oDvPr8_uP63RW0rRIjJLZX0ihpOVL1AfdCWN_JjjGCkceUkV55az2iLXLcOUE7VlNi0_PO95jSFbiYffdTV0PYmiebQe9z2Jn8XScT9L9KDN_0dbrVGHHSCsKqw_nRIaebyZVR70KxbhhMdGkqmgguCW25IBV9_R-6TVOOdT9NpGRccEoPFJkpm1Mp2flTGoz0oSY916RrTfpXTfqQ4tXfe5xGfvdSgZcz4HKwJ3nzCVOlqlvV6ayXqsVrl_9ke-Dbn8t5qHM</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Sims, D. A.</creator><creator>Cilliers, F. J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Clinician educators’ conceptions of assessment in medical education</title><author>Sims, D. A. ; Cilliers, F. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-2cd98a98c6094971d77cfb8b55210f1352d9fccf0340e6ee73b53341ad6bfd133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Assessment Literacy</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical School Faculty</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Professional Identity</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sims, D. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilliers, F. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sims, D. A.</au><au>Cilliers, F. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1399045</ericid><atitle>Clinician educators’ conceptions of assessment in medical education</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><stitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</stitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1053</spage><epage>1077</epage><pages>1053-1077</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>In pursuing assessment excellence, clinician-educators who design and implement assessment are pivotal. The influence of their assessment practice in university-run licensure exams on student learning has direct implications for future patient care. While teaching practice has been shown to parallel conceptions of teaching, we know too little about conceptions of assessment in medical education to know if this is the case for assessment practice and conceptions of assessment. To explore clinician-educators’ conceptions of assessment, a phenomenographic study was undertaken. Phenomenography explores conceptions, the qualitatively different ways of understanding a phenomenon. Data analysis identifies a range of hierarchically inclusive categories of understanding, from simple to more complex, and the dimensions that distinguish each category or conception. Thirty-one clerkship convenors in three diverse Southern settings were interviewed in three cycles of iterative data collection and analysis. Four conceptions of assessment were identified: passive operator, awakening enquirer, active owner and scholarly assessor. Six dimensions were elucidated to describe and distinguish each conception: purpose of assessment; temporal perspective; role and responsibility; accountability; reflexivity and emotional valence. Additionally, three characteristics that appeared to track the progressive nature of the conceptions were identified: professional identity, assessment literacy and self-efficacy. These conceptions encompass and extend previously described conceptions across different educational levels, disciplines and contexts, suggesting applicability to other settings. There is some evidence of a relationship between conceptions and practice, suggesting, together with the hierarchical nature of these conceptions, that targeting conceptions during faculty development may be an effective approach to enhance assessment practice.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>36662334</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10459-022-10197-5</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1382-4996 |
ispartof | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2023-10, Vol.28 (4), p.1053-1077 |
issn | 1382-4996 1573-1677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10624725 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accountability Assessment Literacy Data Analysis Education Faculty Development Health sciences Learning Licenses Medical Education Medical School Faculty Medical Students Professional Identity Self Efficacy Student Evaluation Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods |
title | Clinician educators’ conceptions of assessment in medical education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A18%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinician%20educators%E2%80%99%20conceptions%20of%20assessment%20in%20medical%20education&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Sims,%20D.%20A.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1053&rft.epage=1077&rft.pages=1053-1077&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10459-022-10197-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2768234672%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2885676332&rft_id=info:pmid/36662334&rft_ericid=EJ1399045&rfr_iscdi=true |