Two Distinct Blue-Light Responses Regulate Epicotyl Elongation in Pea 1

Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light-grown pea ( Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses: a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant physiology (Bethesda) 1990-02, Vol.92 (2), p.495-499
Hauptverfasser: Warpeha, Katherine M. F., Kaufman, Lon S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 2
container_start_page 495
container_title Plant physiology (Bethesda)
container_volume 92
creator Warpeha, Katherine M. F.
Kaufman, Lon S.
description Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light-grown pea ( Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses: a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1062319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1062319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10623193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljL0OgjAYABujEfx5h74ASUsBYXFQUQcHY9ibihU-U1pCi4a318HF2ekuueRGyKcxC4MwjtIx8gn5OEnTzEMzax-EEMpoNEUeTZJkxQjz0aF4GbwD60CXDm9UL4MTVLXDF2lbo620H6t6JZzEeQulcYPCuTK6Eg6MxqDxWQpMF2hyF8rK5ZdztN7nxfYYtP21kbdSatcJxdsOGtEN3Ajgv0VDzSvz5JQkIaMZ-3vwBnTAVOs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Distinct Blue-Light Responses Regulate Epicotyl Elongation in Pea 1</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Warpeha, Katherine M. F. ; Kaufman, Lon S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Warpeha, Katherine M. F. ; Kaufman, Lon S.</creatorcontrib><description>Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light-grown pea ( Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses: a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2548</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16667303</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Development and Growth Regulation</subject><ispartof>Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1990-02, Vol.92 (2), p.495-499</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warpeha, Katherine M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Lon S.</creatorcontrib><title>Two Distinct Blue-Light Responses Regulate Epicotyl Elongation in Pea 1</title><title>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</title><description>Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light-grown pea ( Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses: a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light.</description><subject>Development and Growth Regulation</subject><issn>0032-0889</issn><issn>1532-2548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqljL0OgjAYABujEfx5h74ASUsBYXFQUQcHY9ibihU-U1pCi4a318HF2ekuueRGyKcxC4MwjtIx8gn5OEnTzEMzax-EEMpoNEUeTZJkxQjz0aF4GbwD60CXDm9UL4MTVLXDF2lbo620H6t6JZzEeQulcYPCuTK6Eg6MxqDxWQpMF2hyF8rK5ZdztN7nxfYYtP21kbdSatcJxdsOGtEN3Ajgv0VDzSvz5JQkIaMZ-3vwBnTAVOs</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>Warpeha, Katherine M. F.</creator><creator>Kaufman, Lon S.</creator><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>Two Distinct Blue-Light Responses Regulate Epicotyl Elongation in Pea 1</title><author>Warpeha, Katherine M. F. ; Kaufman, Lon S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10623193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Development and Growth Regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warpeha, Katherine M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Lon S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warpeha, Katherine M. F.</au><au>Kaufman, Lon S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two Distinct Blue-Light Responses Regulate Epicotyl Elongation in Pea 1</atitle><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>495-499</pages><issn>0032-0889</issn><eissn>1532-2548</eissn><abstract>Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light-grown pea ( Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses: a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light.</abstract><pmid>16667303</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0889
ispartof Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1990-02, Vol.92 (2), p.495-499
issn 0032-0889
1532-2548
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1062319
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Development and Growth Regulation
title Two Distinct Blue-Light Responses Regulate Epicotyl Elongation in Pea 1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A44%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Distinct%20Blue-Light%20Responses%20Regulate%20Epicotyl%20Elongation%20in%20Pea%201&rft.jtitle=Plant%20physiology%20(Bethesda)&rft.au=Warpeha,%20Katherine%20M.%20F.&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=495-499&rft.issn=0032-0889&rft.eissn=1532-2548&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1062319%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16667303&rfr_iscdi=true