294 Evaluation of Variation in Nursery Pig Growth Performance Utilizing Different Allotment Strategies

Abstract A total of 720 pigs (200×400, DNA) were used in two 42-day nursery trials (initial BW = 6.20 ± 0.12 kg and 5.63 ± 0.16 kg, respectively) to evaluate multiple strategies for allotting pigs to pens in research. At placement, the population was split into 3 cohorts with similar average BW and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2023-10, Vol.101 (Supplement_2), p.180-181
Hauptverfasser: Jenkins, Abigail K, Bromm, Jenna J, Gebhardt, Jordan T, Woodworth, Jason C, Tokach, Mike D, DeRouchey, Joel M, Goodband, Robert D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 180
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 101
creator Jenkins, Abigail K
Bromm, Jenna J
Gebhardt, Jordan T
Woodworth, Jason C
Tokach, Mike D
DeRouchey, Joel M
Goodband, Robert D
description Abstract A total of 720 pigs (200×400, DNA) were used in two 42-day nursery trials (initial BW = 6.20 ± 0.12 kg and 5.63 ± 0.16 kg, respectively) to evaluate multiple strategies for allotting pigs to pens in research. At placement, the population was split into 3 cohorts with similar average BW and standard deviation. Each cohort was randomly assigned 1 of 3 allotment strategies. Strategy 1 (random) utilized a simple randomization strategy with each pig randomized to pen independent of all other pigs. Strategy 2 [bodyweight (BW) distribution] sorted each pig within the cohort into 1 of 5 BW groups. One pig from each weight group was then randomly assigned to pen, such that distribution of BW within pen was uniform across pens. Strategy 3 (BW grouping) sorted pigs within the cohort into 3 BW categories: light, medium, and heavy. Within each BW category, pigs were randomized to pen to create pens of pigs from each BW category. Within each experiment, there were 72 pens with 5 pigs per pen and 24 pens per allotment strategy. For all strategies, once pigs were allotted to pens, pens were allotted to 1 of 2 treatments for a concurrent trial. In Exp. 1, environmental enrichment using ropes tied near the pan of the feeder was compared with a control with no enrichment. In Exp. 2, treatment diets consisted of basal levels of Zn and Cu from the trace mineral premix for the duration of the study (110 and 17 mg/kg, respectively; NC), or diets (PC) with carbadox (50 g/ton; Mecadox, Phibro Animal Health, Teaneck, NJ) fed in phase 1 and 2, pharmacological levels of Zn and Cu (2,414 mg/kg Zn from ZnO; 168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 1 and only Cu (168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 2. There were no meaningful allotment × treatment interactions (P > 0.10) for either study (Table). In Exp. 1, there were no effects of environmental enrichment on growth performance (P > 0.10). In Exp. 2, pigs fed the PC diet had greater (P < 0.001) ADG, ADFI, G:F, and final BW compared with pigs fed the NC diet. The coefficient of variation (CV) within pen between all pens on that allotment strategy and for the entire population of that allotment strategy were calculated for both trials. For between-pen CV, pigs allotted using BW distribution and BW grouping strategies had the least CV at allotment and final weigh day in both trials. Results were used to estimate the replication required with each allotment strategy to obtain significant differences with different percentage responses. Fewe
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skad341.199
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10612707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skad341.199</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3051761905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2009-c95f8a341d294639eaacc7695ab549dc099a3bc2945eb8464c66bb5c70e1e7ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUFLwzAUDqLgnJ69BrwJ3ZKmaZuTjDmnMHSg8xrSNO0y22Ym7WT-ejM6BE-e3nt83_ve9_gAuMZohBEj441wY_chchLhEWbsBAwwDWlAcExOwQChEAdpisNzcOHcBiEcUkYHoAhZBGc7UXWi1aaBpoDvwup-0A187qxTdg-XuoRza77aNVwqWxhbi0YquGp1pb91U8J7XRTKqqaFk6oybX3oXlsrWlVq5S7BWSEqp66OdQhWD7O36WOweJk_TSeLQIYIsUAyWqTCf5B7WzFhSggpk5hRkdGI5RIxJkgmPUhVlkZxJOM4y6hMkMIqUTkZgrted9tltcqld2FFxbdW18LuuRGa_0Uaveal2XGMYhwmKPEKN0cFaz475Vq-MZ1tvGlOEMVJjBminjXuWdIa56wqfk9gxA9xcB8HP8bBfRx-47bfMN32X_IPl72Pfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3051761905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>294 Evaluation of Variation in Nursery Pig Growth Performance Utilizing Different Allotment Strategies</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Jenkins, Abigail K ; Bromm, Jenna J ; Gebhardt, Jordan T ; Woodworth, Jason C ; Tokach, Mike D ; DeRouchey, Joel M ; Goodband, Robert D</creator><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Abigail K ; Bromm, Jenna J ; Gebhardt, Jordan T ; Woodworth, Jason C ; Tokach, Mike D ; DeRouchey, Joel M ; Goodband, Robert D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract A total of 720 pigs (200×400, DNA) were used in two 42-day nursery trials (initial BW = 6.20 ± 0.12 kg and 5.63 ± 0.16 kg, respectively) to evaluate multiple strategies for allotting pigs to pens in research. At placement, the population was split into 3 cohorts with similar average BW and standard deviation. Each cohort was randomly assigned 1 of 3 allotment strategies. Strategy 1 (random) utilized a simple randomization strategy with each pig randomized to pen independent of all other pigs. Strategy 2 [bodyweight (BW) distribution] sorted each pig within the cohort into 1 of 5 BW groups. One pig from each weight group was then randomly assigned to pen, such that distribution of BW within pen was uniform across pens. Strategy 3 (BW grouping) sorted pigs within the cohort into 3 BW categories: light, medium, and heavy. Within each BW category, pigs were randomized to pen to create pens of pigs from each BW category. Within each experiment, there were 72 pens with 5 pigs per pen and 24 pens per allotment strategy. For all strategies, once pigs were allotted to pens, pens were allotted to 1 of 2 treatments for a concurrent trial. In Exp. 1, environmental enrichment using ropes tied near the pan of the feeder was compared with a control with no enrichment. In Exp. 2, treatment diets consisted of basal levels of Zn and Cu from the trace mineral premix for the duration of the study (110 and 17 mg/kg, respectively; NC), or diets (PC) with carbadox (50 g/ton; Mecadox, Phibro Animal Health, Teaneck, NJ) fed in phase 1 and 2, pharmacological levels of Zn and Cu (2,414 mg/kg Zn from ZnO; 168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 1 and only Cu (168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 2. There were no meaningful allotment × treatment interactions (P &gt; 0.10) for either study (Table). In Exp. 1, there were no effects of environmental enrichment on growth performance (P &gt; 0.10). In Exp. 2, pigs fed the PC diet had greater (P &lt; 0.001) ADG, ADFI, G:F, and final BW compared with pigs fed the NC diet. The coefficient of variation (CV) within pen between all pens on that allotment strategy and for the entire population of that allotment strategy were calculated for both trials. For between-pen CV, pigs allotted using BW distribution and BW grouping strategies had the least CV at allotment and final weigh day in both trials. Results were used to estimate the replication required with each allotment strategy to obtain significant differences with different percentage responses. Fewer replications are required to discern significant differences in ADG when allotting pigs utilizing BW grouping. However, there is no meaningful difference between allotment strategies in replications required to detect significant differences for G:F.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad341.199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal health ; Carbadox ; Coefficient of variation ; Copper ; Copper sulfate ; Day care centers ; Diet ; Enrichment ; Environmental effects ; Hogs ; Mathematical analysis ; Pens ; Randomization ; Swine ; Trace minerals ; Zinc ; Zinc oxide</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2023-10, Vol.101 (Supplement_2), p.180-181</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612707/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612707/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,1585,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Abigail K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bromm, Jenna J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebhardt, Jordan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodworth, Jason C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokach, Mike D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRouchey, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodband, Robert D</creatorcontrib><title>294 Evaluation of Variation in Nursery Pig Growth Performance Utilizing Different Allotment Strategies</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract A total of 720 pigs (200×400, DNA) were used in two 42-day nursery trials (initial BW = 6.20 ± 0.12 kg and 5.63 ± 0.16 kg, respectively) to evaluate multiple strategies for allotting pigs to pens in research. At placement, the population was split into 3 cohorts with similar average BW and standard deviation. Each cohort was randomly assigned 1 of 3 allotment strategies. Strategy 1 (random) utilized a simple randomization strategy with each pig randomized to pen independent of all other pigs. Strategy 2 [bodyweight (BW) distribution] sorted each pig within the cohort into 1 of 5 BW groups. One pig from each weight group was then randomly assigned to pen, such that distribution of BW within pen was uniform across pens. Strategy 3 (BW grouping) sorted pigs within the cohort into 3 BW categories: light, medium, and heavy. Within each BW category, pigs were randomized to pen to create pens of pigs from each BW category. Within each experiment, there were 72 pens with 5 pigs per pen and 24 pens per allotment strategy. For all strategies, once pigs were allotted to pens, pens were allotted to 1 of 2 treatments for a concurrent trial. In Exp. 1, environmental enrichment using ropes tied near the pan of the feeder was compared with a control with no enrichment. In Exp. 2, treatment diets consisted of basal levels of Zn and Cu from the trace mineral premix for the duration of the study (110 and 17 mg/kg, respectively; NC), or diets (PC) with carbadox (50 g/ton; Mecadox, Phibro Animal Health, Teaneck, NJ) fed in phase 1 and 2, pharmacological levels of Zn and Cu (2,414 mg/kg Zn from ZnO; 168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 1 and only Cu (168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 2. There were no meaningful allotment × treatment interactions (P &gt; 0.10) for either study (Table). In Exp. 1, there were no effects of environmental enrichment on growth performance (P &gt; 0.10). In Exp. 2, pigs fed the PC diet had greater (P &lt; 0.001) ADG, ADFI, G:F, and final BW compared with pigs fed the NC diet. The coefficient of variation (CV) within pen between all pens on that allotment strategy and for the entire population of that allotment strategy were calculated for both trials. For between-pen CV, pigs allotted using BW distribution and BW grouping strategies had the least CV at allotment and final weigh day in both trials. Results were used to estimate the replication required with each allotment strategy to obtain significant differences with different percentage responses. Fewer replications are required to discern significant differences in ADG when allotting pigs utilizing BW grouping. However, there is no meaningful difference between allotment strategies in replications required to detect significant differences for G:F.</description><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Carbadox</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper sulfate</subject><subject>Day care centers</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Enrichment</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Pens</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Trace minerals</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><subject>Zinc oxide</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUUFLwzAUDqLgnJ69BrwJ3ZKmaZuTjDmnMHSg8xrSNO0y22Ym7WT-ejM6BE-e3nt83_ve9_gAuMZohBEj441wY_chchLhEWbsBAwwDWlAcExOwQChEAdpisNzcOHcBiEcUkYHoAhZBGc7UXWi1aaBpoDvwup-0A187qxTdg-XuoRza77aNVwqWxhbi0YquGp1pb91U8J7XRTKqqaFk6oybX3oXlsrWlVq5S7BWSEqp66OdQhWD7O36WOweJk_TSeLQIYIsUAyWqTCf5B7WzFhSggpk5hRkdGI5RIxJkgmPUhVlkZxJOM4y6hMkMIqUTkZgrted9tltcqld2FFxbdW18LuuRGa_0Uaveal2XGMYhwmKPEKN0cFaz475Vq-MZ1tvGlOEMVJjBminjXuWdIa56wqfk9gxA9xcB8HP8bBfRx-47bfMN32X_IPl72Pfw</recordid><startdate>20231028</startdate><enddate>20231028</enddate><creator>Jenkins, Abigail K</creator><creator>Bromm, Jenna J</creator><creator>Gebhardt, Jordan T</creator><creator>Woodworth, Jason C</creator><creator>Tokach, Mike D</creator><creator>DeRouchey, Joel M</creator><creator>Goodband, Robert D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231028</creationdate><title>294 Evaluation of Variation in Nursery Pig Growth Performance Utilizing Different Allotment Strategies</title><author>Jenkins, Abigail K ; Bromm, Jenna J ; Gebhardt, Jordan T ; Woodworth, Jason C ; Tokach, Mike D ; DeRouchey, Joel M ; Goodband, Robert D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2009-c95f8a341d294639eaacc7695ab549dc099a3bc2945eb8464c66bb5c70e1e7ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Carbadox</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper sulfate</topic><topic>Day care centers</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Enrichment</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Pens</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Trace minerals</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><topic>Zinc oxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Abigail K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bromm, Jenna J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebhardt, Jordan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodworth, Jason C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokach, Mike D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRouchey, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodband, Robert D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jenkins, Abigail K</au><au>Bromm, Jenna J</au><au>Gebhardt, Jordan T</au><au>Woodworth, Jason C</au><au>Tokach, Mike D</au><au>DeRouchey, Joel M</au><au>Goodband, Robert D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>294 Evaluation of Variation in Nursery Pig Growth Performance Utilizing Different Allotment Strategies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2023-10-28</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>180-181</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract A total of 720 pigs (200×400, DNA) were used in two 42-day nursery trials (initial BW = 6.20 ± 0.12 kg and 5.63 ± 0.16 kg, respectively) to evaluate multiple strategies for allotting pigs to pens in research. At placement, the population was split into 3 cohorts with similar average BW and standard deviation. Each cohort was randomly assigned 1 of 3 allotment strategies. Strategy 1 (random) utilized a simple randomization strategy with each pig randomized to pen independent of all other pigs. Strategy 2 [bodyweight (BW) distribution] sorted each pig within the cohort into 1 of 5 BW groups. One pig from each weight group was then randomly assigned to pen, such that distribution of BW within pen was uniform across pens. Strategy 3 (BW grouping) sorted pigs within the cohort into 3 BW categories: light, medium, and heavy. Within each BW category, pigs were randomized to pen to create pens of pigs from each BW category. Within each experiment, there were 72 pens with 5 pigs per pen and 24 pens per allotment strategy. For all strategies, once pigs were allotted to pens, pens were allotted to 1 of 2 treatments for a concurrent trial. In Exp. 1, environmental enrichment using ropes tied near the pan of the feeder was compared with a control with no enrichment. In Exp. 2, treatment diets consisted of basal levels of Zn and Cu from the trace mineral premix for the duration of the study (110 and 17 mg/kg, respectively; NC), or diets (PC) with carbadox (50 g/ton; Mecadox, Phibro Animal Health, Teaneck, NJ) fed in phase 1 and 2, pharmacological levels of Zn and Cu (2,414 mg/kg Zn from ZnO; 168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 1 and only Cu (168 mg/kg Cu from CuSO4) in phase 2. There were no meaningful allotment × treatment interactions (P &gt; 0.10) for either study (Table). In Exp. 1, there were no effects of environmental enrichment on growth performance (P &gt; 0.10). In Exp. 2, pigs fed the PC diet had greater (P &lt; 0.001) ADG, ADFI, G:F, and final BW compared with pigs fed the NC diet. The coefficient of variation (CV) within pen between all pens on that allotment strategy and for the entire population of that allotment strategy were calculated for both trials. For between-pen CV, pigs allotted using BW distribution and BW grouping strategies had the least CV at allotment and final weigh day in both trials. Results were used to estimate the replication required with each allotment strategy to obtain significant differences with different percentage responses. Fewer replications are required to discern significant differences in ADG when allotting pigs utilizing BW grouping. However, there is no meaningful difference between allotment strategies in replications required to detect significant differences for G:F.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skad341.199</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2023-10, Vol.101 (Supplement_2), p.180-181
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10612707
source Oxford University Press Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animal health
Carbadox
Coefficient of variation
Copper
Copper sulfate
Day care centers
Diet
Enrichment
Environmental effects
Hogs
Mathematical analysis
Pens
Randomization
Swine
Trace minerals
Zinc
Zinc oxide
title 294 Evaluation of Variation in Nursery Pig Growth Performance Utilizing Different Allotment Strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T18%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=294%20Evaluation%20of%20Variation%20in%20Nursery%20Pig%20Growth%20Performance%20Utilizing%20Different%20Allotment%20Strategies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Jenkins,%20Abigail%20K&rft.date=2023-10-28&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=180-181&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skad341.199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3051761905%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3051761905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skad341.199&rfr_iscdi=true